Banks are So Stuffed With Cash They Tell Companies: No More Deposits

No More Cash Please 

Some banks, awash in deposits, are encouraging corporate clients to spend the cash on their businesses or move it elsewhere. It’s a strange case of “No More Cash Please“.

U.S. companies are holding on to billions of dollars in cash. Their banks aren’t sure what to do with it. Some banks are encouraging corporate customers to consider alternatives. 

Top of mind for many big banks is a rule requiring them to hold capital equivalent to at least 3% of all assets. Worried about the rule’s impact during the pandemic, the Fed changed the calculation in 2020 to ignore deposits the banks held at the central bank, but ended that break this March. Since then, some banks have warned the growing deposits could force them to raise more capital, or say no to deposits.

“Raising capital against deposits and/or turning away deposits are unnatural actions for banks and cannot be good for the system in the long run,” Jennifer Piepszak, then-CFO of JPMorgan Chase & Co., said on a call with analysts in April.

One strategy is reverse tiering, giving clients lower yields for additional deposits. Asking customers to move some funds to another, smaller bank also is an option, said Pete Gilchrist, an executive vice president at Novantas Inc., which advises banks.

In recent months, banks including BNY Mellon have focused on moving clients from deposits into money-market funds. The money-market funds, in turn, need new places to park all that new cash and earn some interest. But rock-bottom interest rates have pushed them into storing it back at the Federal Reserve overnight, in a facility that pays them zero return and had been largely ignored for the past three years. 

Nonsensical QE

Bear in mind that the Fed, via QE has been stuffing banks with cash for a year at a  rate of about $120 billion a month.

Not only do the banks have no use for it, it’s starting to cost them money.

The Fed’s solution, using the word loosely, is to do reverse Repos draining banks of cash.

Reverse repos topped $500 billion this week, effectively undoing over four months of QE.

The Fed Says This Was Expected 

Wolf Richter also notes Fed’s Reverse Repos Hit $503 Billion. Liquidity Drain Undoing over 4 Months of QE

What really caught my eye was Fed statements as noted by Richter.

New York Fed President John Williams emphasized repeatedly that the reverse repo system “was working really well,” and that there were “really, no concerns about that. We expected that to happen. It’s working exactly as designed.”

Amazingly, 

  1. The Fed crams half a trillion dollars down banks’ throats.
  2. Banks tell corporations no more deposits because they are losing money on them. Alternatively banks have to raise capital.
  3. So corporations turn to money market funds.
  4. The money market funds do not know what to do with the cash either.
  5. So the Fed is forced to take a half trillion dollars back.
  6. This was expected and is working exactly as designed.

Thank You Fed!

Meanwhile, please note The Fed Says Inflation Is Transitory, It Has a Vested Interest to Lie

Also note How the Fed’s Inflation Policies Benefitted the Top 1% In Pictures Part 1

I will tackle part 2 later today.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago

“Bear in mind that the Fed, via QE has been stuffing banks with cash for a year at a  rate of about $120 billion a month.

Not only do the banks have no use for it, it’s starting to cost them money.”

Newton wins again. For each action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Money has gotten so cheap, they can’t afford it.
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Businesses could, of course, either do a one-time dividend or a stock repurchases (which are mathematically identical), but that would just push the cash somewhere else. Those who received the dividend, or those who sold the shares would then have the cash, and some would end up in banks. In the end, if money supply increases dramatically, you either are going to get inflation, or the velocity is going to have to fall (i.e. money parked in banks, or somewhere else).
Too much BS
Too much BS
2 years ago
Lumber Yard monthly news letter: Framing package that was $50,000 last year is now @ $250,000 and you have a long wait to get your pasckage.  Lots  have excavated holes that are waiting and waiting for Framers and lumber.  and the boom party goes on.  link to youtu.be 
There are bubbles everywhere and not a pin to spare..
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Too much BS
I wonder if we will see this kind of shortage end….I might want to build one more house.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Banks are flush with cash. Deadbeat companies can survive issuing junk bonds. How long can the dysfunctional system go on?
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
Until a sudden, total Soviet-style collapse.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
The Fed has completely succeeded in destabilizing the financial markets, the economy and soon society itself.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
Reply to  Bam_Man
Just buy the s&p500 and go along for the ride.  No use trying to fight this.  I sat on ~100% cash from 2008 till early this year.  Now I’m in the market.  The fundamentals never made sense and now I’m literally in the poor house compared to my “ignorant” friends and peers who were in the market all along.
Cocoa
Cocoa
2 years ago
Well does anyone want to borrow a trillion bucks, with all asset classes going crazy and at their highs. Is there a decent “investment” anywhere out there with value?
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  Cocoa
gold
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Islands.  Buy an island, preferably with a nice beach. All the best billionaires have one.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
The Chinese are very good at building new islands out of underwater reefs and they can do it at a low cost.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Cocoa
A self sustaining space station, one big enough for you and your immediate family (say up to half dozen more).
Not subject to taxes, confiscation, break-ins, wars, pandemic’s etc.
For reference, Wikipedia says the international space station cost 150 billion so you could buy quite a bit more and still have some $ left over to get shuttle service to/from earth when needed.
If you need to generate some $, rent some space on yours to scientists / science projects.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
“Companies” is a too general term. I would be interested in which companies have too much cash and why do they have it. Is it due to a few companies being cash rich or is it widespread across sectors? I suspect it is concentrated. If banks have no use for the funds shows that there is a lack of decent investments in productive projects. It could also explain why real estate is going up everywhere because it’s the only place to put your money. 
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
They have too much cash because their tax payments aren’t high enough!
ThaomasH
ThaomasH
2 years ago
And what is wrong with any of this?  The TIPS breakeven rate is pretty near the Fed’s target for the price level trajectory.  Seem to be working OK so far.
dbannist
dbannist
2 years ago
I will happily take that half trillion dollars off the hands of the banks.  I’ll even pay them a half percent interest rate.

I’ll invest it in rental property, including farmland.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
OT….I read this and thought it was interesting. Rich people are bailing out of China, India, Russia, Hong Kong, and Turkey. Looks like Australia is claiming a lot of them……which is interesting, because I don’t think of Oz as a tax haven. I suppose that depends on their loopholes, which I know nothing about.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Flight to safety. Bodes  well for the Dollar. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Damn. I’m betting against the dollar right now.  🙂
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
It’s more a long-term thing in my mind. Short term I hope you are right.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
I got your meaning.  Just joking there!
I don’t really worry about the dollar unless is goes above 120 or below 75. At either extreme it means something bad for me. The usual ups and downs are just something to trade on.
 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Since when is this news? And ZeroHedge has lost credibility long ago.
In truth, ZeroHedge smarly figured out that with central banking cartel’s print-forever, there is barely any space for market analysis, and went tabloid.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Sorry, I thought it might be of interest. Demographic trends are ongoing, and worth paying attention to, imho. It’s just a blog article, not something the Tyler Durden’s wrote.
I know all about the rise and fall of ZH.  I’ve been reading it for as long as I’ve been reading Mish, which is way more than a decade. In general…….I think your point is well made, but they do still occasionally put up things that are of interest to me. And they have a habit of exposing things that are being swept under the rug, just like the lab leak hypothesis. 
You have to use your critical thinking skills when you read ZH….but I try not to throw out the baby with the bath water. I can make my own judgments about their bias, which is huge….and I look for confirmation elsewhere on all their reporting before I take it too seriously.
dbannist
dbannist
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I’ve also been reading ZH for about a decade.  

I’ve learned to avoid anything written by Michael Snyder (the doom king) as every article the guy writes is full of doom porn and hyperbole.
ZH does have quite a bit of valuable stuff on it though, once you know how to weed through it.

And they are much faster at getting urgent news out than the major networks.  

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
There used to be a lot of Michael Snyder types on the internet, but civilization has managed to hang on until most of them aged out.
My own bias is fairly negative toward fiat money, globalization, the coming end to  cheap energy, and all the rest of it. But I believe in living the life you’ve been given, and not hiding in a cave somewhere, and writing doom-and-gloom articles.  Whatever happens, my intention is to survive, thrive, and get whatever lessons I need to learn out of this incarnation. We are all here for some reason…there is always a purpose in life if you look for it.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Agree. It’s the same with other finance/economics sites. Everybody has capitulated and waits for the end game. The end game which has not been articulated by the banking and political overlords because they don’t have a clue, either.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
So, what do you consider a reliable source of information?
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
ZH is a great aggregation site for articles.  Such a site CAN’T lose credibility because very little is actually written by the principles there.  I think perhaps the market analysis posts might be but 95% of what you’ll find there is sourced from other sites.  If you look closely at the articles, you will usually find a linkout somewhere to the original article that they copied from.  I think doing this helps them stay on the legal side of things.
Just use ZH as an RSS feed and stay away from the comment section on each article.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Agree that the same laws protect ZH as Google, and Yahoo.
And I am not disparaging  ZH; they are the only mass site that allows comments when almost every mainstream site shut them down. In the gone  comment sections, you learned things the great controllers deemed too close to the real thinking of the population, and in stark contrast to the propaganda piece that was the article . 
My main problem with ZH is the elimination of news categories, and many great commenters left the site over time.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Glad somebody has plenty of cash. Not Main Street mom & pops. They’e going out of business because the price of wages and their other costs are rising way faster now than they can raise the prices of their goods and services. The continued  Fed policies are going to wipe the rest of the little guys out, for the most part. 

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.