Mercy Me! Inflation Expectations Are No Longer Well Anchored

The New York Fed’s latest Survey of Consumer Expectations shows another huge leap in inflation expectations.

The June 2021 Survey of Consumer Expectations shows that median inflation expectations at the short-term horizon climbed 0.8 percentage point to 4.8 percent, while inflation expectations at the medium-term horizon remained unchanged. 

Inflation Data Description

  • Median one-year ahead expected inflation rate: Respondents are asked for the percent chance that, over the next 12 months, the rate of inflation (deflation) will be 12% or higher; between 8% and 12%; between 4% and 8%; between 2% and 4%; between 0 and 2%. A generalized beta distribution is fitted to the responses of each survey participant and the mean of this distribution is calculated. This is the respondent’s “expected inflation rate”.
  • Median point prediction: Respondents are asked what they think the rate of inflation will be over the next 12 months. This is a point prediction (a single-value forecast).
  • The three-year forecasts are for three years instead of one.

Parroting the News?

One has to wonder how much of this is real opinion vs constant news recently of higher prices.

I suspect a bit of both as prices have gone up, but either way it’s irrelevant, because:

Inflation Expectations Are Meaningless

Contrary to widespread belief that inflation expectations matter, they are actually meaningless and the above charts show just that.

For most of eight years reported inflation was under 2% and often under 1%, and briefly negative. Yet, the look ahead median point prediction was never below 2.9%.

If expectations mattered, why did the CPI and PCE stay below 2% so long? 

A look at CPI components shows how silly it is to believe in inflation expectations.

CPI Percentage Weights

I highlighted inelastic items.

Perhaps a portion of education is elastic. But a portion of other housing is inelastic as is a portion of communication and other goods.

Recreation is elastic and so is apparel (assuming one does not ruin one’s only coat or shoes).

Somewhere between 80% and 90% of household purchases are inelastic.

Inelastic Item Questions

Q: If consumers think the price of food will drop, will they stop eating? Will they eat twice as much if they expect prices will rise?

Q: If consumers think the price of gas will drop, will they stop driving?

Q: If consumers think the price of rent will drop, will they hold off renting until that happens? Will they rent two apartments if they expect the price to rise?

Q: Will consumers delay medical services if they think prices will drop? Will they have two operations if they think prices will rise?​

Elastic Item Questions

Q. Better deals on TVs and computers are always around the corner. Does that stop TV and computer purchases?

Q. If someone wants a new refrigerator, toaster, or stove will they wait two months if they think prices will decline?

Asset prices are a different matter, however.

Asset Price Expectations

  • People do buy stocks it they believe prices will rise. They avoid stocks or sell them if they expect prices will drop.
  • People will stretch to buy a home if they expect prices to rise. They wait if they expect prices will drop.

Note that every member of the Fed talks about expectations that don’t matter ignoring those that do matter.

And not only does the Fed ignore asset price expectations, they ignore asset prices totally. That’s how you get three enormous bubbles in 20 years.

Inflation Expectations vs Year-Over-Year Inflation Measures Since 2013

Expectations Fantasy

  • For most of 8 consecutive years, year-over-year CPI and PCE was under 2%.  
  • In that same time frame, the Median 3-year estimate and the median point projections was seldom below 3%.
  • If inflation expectations mattered, that chart would be impossible.
  • Alternatively, one might say people believe low inflation is transitory.
  • Yet, we constantly hear the Fed yapping “Inflation expectations are well anchored”.

It’s a good thing for the Fed that expectations don’t matter because 5+% expectations can no longer be considered well anchored. 

The only thing that’s clearly well anchored is Fed groupthink silliness. 

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

11 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
The Moore Inflation predictor called this bump inflation pretty closely, until the last couple months, when they were well under the actual number. Note that when I first posted it last fall, Mish said “I’ll take the under. Way under.”  In fairness to Mish, he later did the calculations, and realized that the big jump in reported inflation was indeed baked in.
Their current forecast if for reported inflation to drop to 5% next month, and stabilize there until February of next year, before trending back down. The do see a possibility that the Fed is wrong, in which case inflation could stay in the mid 5-6% range, then go up to 6.5% by fall.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
I buy laptops and TVs that are 80% as good as a new one for 50% of the price and spend the other 50% a couple of years later on models that are 150% better than currently state of the art.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“The New York Fed’s latest shows another huge leap in inflation expectations.”
When does it get to bounds, as in jumping over tall buildings in a single bound? Will that call the top in inflation expectations?
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Housing is a bit different since 64% of American households own their homes so an increase in housing prices increases their wealth. For the rest of the index price increases take away from the wealth of everybody so it makes no sense to just replace rent equivalent with real estate prices. I don’t have a magic formula but perhaps an overall country-wide inflation number is not useful anymore since price increases are highly specific to regions.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Even among homeowners, there is a lot of turnover in housing. So it isn’t like people just buy a house and it’s done for their lifetime. So I don’t see runaway rising housing prices to be good for society on the whole. Maybe you’re somewhat protected once you own something, But young people need homes, and their ability to afford them isn’t going up commensurate with housing prices.
For some of us who might have seen this coming to some degree and prepared for inflation in housing, It’s been a sweet deal. My net worth has gone up 25% in a year.
OER seems flawed from the get-go. You’re basically surveying people who don’t even rent, to figure out if rent is going up or not. Dumb, if you ask me.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
My view is strictly the view of a homeowner and as such my wealth increases but the cost of living in the house (taxes, maintenance and such) keeps moving up but certainly less than that of the equivalent rent. It is hard for young people to buy houses now but only in the hot markets. If you have a reasonable job in Kentucky you have no problem buying a house. If you live in the Bay area it’s a different story. The movement out of the cities will likely continue because of that fact and it is a good thing since it enables the young to get into the market and it also spreads the jobs around the country instead of being highly concentrated into just a few mega-metro areas. The Second Law of Thermodynamics also applies to social systems and prices.
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
2 years ago
“Turns out it’s a heck of a lot easier to create demand than it is to bring supply up to snuff.” Jay Powell – last press conference.
In keeping with the same perspective of not thinking about thinking of chair Powell, I can also state with confidence : Its better to be rich and in good health than poor and sick.
Good times ahead.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“Turns out it’s a heck of a lot easier to create demand than it is to bring supply up to snuff.” Jay Powell
Especially true when governments crash supply.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
OER is obviously a huge part of what’s wrong with CPI-U. I don’t see how they can keep using the same method of estimating housing. It’s very problematic, and I expect they must be able to see that.
On risk assets like stocks and bonds….those are bought with  discretionary income. I can understand why they might not belong in CPI. But housing is the elephant in the room, imho. 
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
The elephant missing form the picture is rent prices.
With eviction moratoriums till end of September, right now we are going through a shortage of rentals everywhere (at least here in California).
Everything that comes up for rent, is listed at least 20 to 30% higher than last year, check zillow price history and you are in for a shock.
I read that in NY some rentals are overbid frenetically similar to what is going on with houses.
As soon as the moratorium is out, the rent prices will explode as a lot of rentals will be withdrawn from the market while dead beats are evicted and places renovated and those that will rent will be at much higher prices as landlords try to recover losses. 
But I suspect the moratorium to be extended for another year in September as the delta variant in combination with media hysteria give a new casus belli to our politicians to protect us from ourselves. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
I’m raising rents, but I have to….to meet rising costs. Rental RE is a cash flow business…no cash flow equals out of business in short order.
The rents on the houses I own, which are in great demand, are not going up as much as what you just stated they re in Cali. It’s impossible to raise rents to keep up with rising nominal values here right now. Most of my properties have been increasing in nominal value by 4 to 9%…per MONTH. 
None of this crazy recent RE change is sustainable over the long run. As an investor, I recommend reducing leverage and doing refi’s to increase cash flow if the numbers work. We might have to ride out some rough times ahead, if risk assets like stocks really tank at some point. 
I’ve been lucky as far as tenants go, although I did have one die without letting anyone know….and it was a few days before anybody checked on him. Messy deal there. That one is still vacant since May.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.