The US Has 63 Consecutive Years of Sanction Failure Against Cuba!

The WSJ notes Protests Grow Against the Communist Regime

Cuban citizens have taken to the streets across the country for the first time in more than six decades to protest against deteriorating living conditions and the lack of basic goods and services, including medical attention amid increasing numbers of coronavirus infections.

The protests, with thousands of people calling for an end to the 62-year-old communist regime, began Sunday in the western city of San Antonio de los Baños, later spreading to more than 40 cities and towns including the capital Havana. President Miguel Díaz-Canel responded by calling on supporters to take back the streets from the protesters and deploying security forces across the country.

The latest wave of hardship for the Cuban people comes after the economy contracted more than 11% last year amid the pandemic, which led tourism to dry up and brought about a drop in remittances from Cubans living abroad—both vital sources of income for families.

Cubans stand for hours in line to buy basic goods such as chicken or bread, or even to take a bus. The island is increasingly hit by hours-long electricity outages, and, in recent days, coronavirus infections have surged, according to authorities, putting a strain on the country’s health system.

History of US Sanction Failure

I have repeatedly made that statement “Sanctions don’t work”. Cuba is the perfect example.

The US has had Continual Sanctions Against Cuba since 1958.

  • It is the most enduring trade embargo in modern history. The United States first imposed an embargo on the sale of arms to Cuba on March 14, 1958, during the Fulgencio Batista regime. 
  • On October 19, 1960 (almost two years after the Cuban Revolution had led to the deposition of the Batista regime) the U.S. placed an embargo on exports to Cuba except for food and medicine after Cuba nationalized American-owned Cuban oil refineries without compensation. 
  • On February 7, 1962 the embargo was extended to include almost all exports. 
  •  In 1999 President Bill Clinton expanded the trade embargo by also disallowing foreign subsidiaries of U.S. companies to trade with Cuba.
  • Since the year 2000, the embargo no longer prohibits the trade of food and humanitarian supplies.
  • On January 12, 2017, President Barack Obama announced the immediate cessation of the wet feet, dry feet policy, eight days before his term ended.
  • On November 8, 2017, US President Donald Trump’s Administration had enacted new rules which would re-enforce the business and travel restrictions which were loosened by the Obama Administration and would go into effect on November 9.
  • As of 2018, the embargo is enforced mainly through six statutes: the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the Cuban Assets Control Regulations of 1963, the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992, the Helms–Burton Act of 1996, and the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000.

63 Consecutive Years of Sanction Failure!

The US, via sanction policy has been attempting to take down the Cuban government continually since 1958. 

That is a proven history of 63 consecutive years of sanction failure!

Historic Opportunity and Notable Successes

https://twitter.com/kleinev0s/status/1414669449140051977

Credit Where Credit is Due

If the Cuban government does fall, credit Covid-19, Not Biden, Not Trump, Not Obama, Not Bush, Not Reagan, Not Kennedy, etc. 

More accurately, should the government collapse, credit the people of Cuba with Covid-19 as the final “too much to take” straw. 

Biden is Finally Doing What Trump and Obama Promised, Yet Few Cheer

On July 10, I wrote Biden is Finally Doing What Trump and Obama Promised, Yet Few Cheer

The US has continually been in Afghanistan for 20 years. We could stay  another 60 and we would fail at nation building. 

The US failed in Vietnam, in Iraq, in Syria, in Libya, and in Afghanistan.

Governments, especially foreign governments, don’t build nations, people do. How many times do we need to prove this?

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

25 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Blurtman
Blurtman
2 years ago
Sorry, Mish, but you are again posting fake news.  According to the State Deparment, the Cubans were protesting about COVID cases and deaths.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
The missionary zeal of the American people has proved irrepressible.
For more than 200 years they have been showing up in foreign countries in one way or another, always in anticipation of being hailed as liberating heroes, good guys spreading their virtues globally. Completely oblivious, 200 years of being punched in the nose has made no dent in their self-image of beneficent altruistic do-gooders.
Even George Washington fretted that if the slaves in Haïti were successful in overthrowing their colonial captors, it would serve as a rallying example to the slaves back home.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
If you find out who’s driving the protests, you’ll find out why they’re occurring. First thought is CIA, but why would our government want an uprising in a communist country when our current administration is trying to move us towards socialism? Biden blames the protests on covid. Not the government. When all else fails, blame covid, racism or climate change.
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
2 years ago
The United States has always looked like a bully when it comes to these very small countries. Clearly our policy isn’t freedom–in allowing these countries to govern themselves. It is we are going to bully you to act the way that is in accordance to the way the United States government wants you to act. That’s part of the problem at our southern border. Decades of the US bullying central American countries has led to worse conditions and often puppet dictators that don’t have the people’s best interest at hand. Therefore these people leave and head north. 
amigator
amigator
2 years ago
This could also be said about our policies in the Middle East.  You would think after so many years of failures we might try something else…..Unless the policies are working for someone?   Hmmmmm Big Banks?  Wall Street? Da Government?  Someone somewhere is winning. Could be just the appearance we are doing something is good enough for the politicians the big money to be made is here in the US.
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Has the US been hurt by the embargo? Has Cuba been hurt?
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
I think you can make the case that both have been hurt.
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I think both have been hurt, but the damage to the US wasn’t enough to be noticeable. Cuba is in a bad way economically, but is it because of the sanctions, or because of their Communist dictatorship, o both?
To be clear, I have no strong opinion as to whether the economic sanctions were “successful” nor “a failure”, nor even as to what the goals were that you would measure success or failure against. If the goal was to force a regime change, it clearly failed. If the goal was to make Cuba economically irrelevant, they probably succeeded.
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
2 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Think of all the American cars that could have been delivered to the shores of Cuba… 

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Bungalow Bill
There were US businesses gearing up to operate in Cuba until we reversed the easing of relations that had been going on, and went full sanctions again under Trump. Those were American entrepreneurs, and they got cut off at the knees. There was one very interesting company that was going to build tractors there. Not sure what became of that idea. Down the tubes, I suppose. Or maybe they took their plan elsewhere.
Cuba was propped up by the Soviets, and after the Soviet Union fell, then Venezuela was giving them almost free oil….until Chavez died. Since then, things have gotten worse….and  the loss of tourism dollars has been a big deal.
Cuba was never entirely self-sufficient under communism, although they gave it a pretty good shot. The Castros were despots, but the US has supported plenty of despots…..they just weren’t OUR despots. 
I always thought the Cubans who got out early, the ones with real money who went into the sugar business in Florida and made even more money, were too much of a driving force in US foreign policy towards Cuba. That group (all big Republicans, and donors)  has had an outsize effect on Florida  and US Cuba policy over my lifetime.
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Peru is on the brink of nationalizing the copper mines, what will we do then?  What would work?
amigator
amigator
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Well buy stock in copper mines that are not in Peru.  The production in those mines in Peru will most likely drop about 70%.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  amigator
It’s also got the lions share of the world’s silver reserves.  I do expect Peru to do stupid things…..like maybe try to nationalize the mining industry.
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
2 years ago
Just one more year.
We need to stay strong against Communism in Cuba for just one more year.
If we don’t, the Socialists will take over the USA.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  davebarnes2
You believe Communists in Cuba are causing Socialist to take over the USA? I don’t think you actually believe that.
Even if the current regime fails / topples, I don’t think the Cuban people are going to suddenly embrace democracy, at least not how the USA imagines it. It will look a lot more like how Russia has democracy where there is essentially just 1 party but you can vote on some issues / leaders.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
“It will look a lot more like how Russia has democracy where there is essentially just 1 party but you can vote on some issues / leaders.”

You mean it will look a lot like how US has democracy where there is essentially just one right-wing party but you can vote for one faction or the other?

Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  davebarnes2
One year?!? No way. What we need is a Five Year Plan.
Ah. And, sigh, to take this thread down in apparent altitude:                🙂
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
2 years ago
Reply to  Felix_Mish
I see what you did there, Comrade.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago

The Worlds Greatest Bastion of Capitalism… thwarted by a bunch of raggedy commies.

threeblindmice
threeblindmice
2 years ago
If the embargo was imposed to overturn the government, it failed.  If the embargo was imposed as a punishment for the expropriation of the oil refineries (it was), then it delivered punishment.  The libertarian in me opposes embargos in general.  But I do have a problem with expropriation and dictatorships.  What to do?
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  threeblindmice
Would you deny people a dictator, if that’s what they want?
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
A thoughtful question.  My answer is that while democracy is a crucial value, it is not the highest value.  Protection of civil liberties is more valuable and should be the highest value.  That was our founders’ intent in establishing a republic rather than a pure democracy.  
And what if a dictator plays bait and switch?  Your question assumes Castro was popular.  What was popular in 1959 was the overthrow of Batista by a man who promised elections within six months.  His support was based on that.  Cubans are still waiting.  Truly popular regimes don’t need to execute and aren’t afraid of dissidents.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  threeblindmice
It wasn’t just the oil refineries. It was also all the private property once the communists took over.
What to do about the expropriation is the whole reason relations haven’t been restored in the past 63 years because sons/daughters of former land owners continue to demand that they get their property back even though someone else has owned/lived on it for 63 years. Not gonna happen and hence the embargo continues even though no other country has one with Cuba (as a Canadian I visited Cuba for vacation just fine).
threeblindmice
threeblindmice
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I don’t know if “sons’daughters” is “the whole reason” or even a small reason.  I get the push to ‘just move on’.  And I’ll hear that it’s not the US’ business to enforce property rights for Cubans who’ve had property expropriated (the sons and daughters you refer to), but should the US have anything to say about US refiners, agricultural and mining assets taken from US citizens?  Should the US respond at all, especially if the regime in place is the same one that expropriated?  There is an argument that justice would require some compensation, no?  Maybe practical considerations say ‘give the regime a mulligan’.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  threeblindmice
A lot of old school money families in America lost property in Cuba. That kind of old school money has a lot of political influence in Washington. That’s the primary reason the embargo has lasted so long. Since other countries (Canada, Europe) didn’t lose much at all they’ve continued to do business/vacation there.
No one likes expropriation without compensation. But a revolution is technically a war / war zone. Most insurance and other claims get voided when wars happen. Cuba is now dirt poor for the most part and there is no way to pay back claims from 60 years ago (many are looking for $ for cars/jewelry seized etc) and figuring out land claims would be even worse.
Unfortunately it’s past time to move on after 60 years. Otherwise, why don’t the Indians here get to make land and other claims for stuff expropriated from them in the 1800s when the US was expanding across the continent.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.