The Stunning [But Inaccurate] Profile of SVB’s Chief Administration Officer – a Correction

The above Fox News Caption Is Wrong. Please skip to the correction at the end.

Gentile’s Profile 

  • Prior to joining the firm in 2007, Mr. Gentile served as the CFO for Lehman Brothers’ Global Investment Bank where he directed the accounting and financial needs within the Fixed Income division.
  • Mish Note: Lehman went bankrupt on September 15, 2008.
  • Prior to that, he served as CFO of the Global Corporate and Investment Bank at Bank of America,
  • Wikipedia Note: Merrill Lynch & Co. agreed to be acquired by Bank of America on September 14, 2008, at the height of the financial crisis of 2007–2008, the same weekend that Lehman Brothers was allowed to fail. 
  • Previously, Mr. Gentile spent more than 10 years with J.P. Morgan in various financial management positions, including Global Head of Financial Risk Management. 
  • Mish Comment: Global head of Financial Risk management, what a hoot!
  • He started his career at Arthur Andersen.
  • Wikipedia Note: Arthur Andersen was an American accounting firm based in Chicago that provided auditing, tax advising, consulting and other professional services to large corporations. By 2001, it had become one of the world’s largest multinational corporations and was one of the “Big Five” accounting firms (along with Deloitte & Touche, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers). The firm collapsed by mid-2002, as details of its questionable accounting practices for energy company Enron and telecommunications company Worldcom were revealed amid the two high-profile bankruptcies. The scandals were a factor in the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The above excerpts from SVB’s Profile except as noted. 

Need a 12 Hour Snooze?

Apparently that’s how long it takes Bill Ackman to explain why a bailout is needed.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act: What It Does to Protect Investors

Please consider Sarbanes-Oxley Act: What It Does to Protect Investors

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is a law the U.S. Congress passed on July 30 of that year to help protect investors from fraudulent financial reporting by corporations.

 Also known as the SOX Act of 2002, it mandated strict reforms to existing securities regulations and imposed tough new penalties on lawbreakers.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 came in response to financial scandals in the early 2000s involving publicly traded companies such as Enron Corporation, Tyco International plc, and WorldCom.

The high-profile frauds shook investor confidence in the trustworthiness of corporate financial statements and led many to demand an overhaul of decades-old regulatory standards.

Expect Criminal Indictments of SVB Top Executives

Yesterday I commented Expect Criminal Indictments of SVB Top Executives, Here’s Why

The CEO, CFO, and CMO all have some serious explaining to do on insider sales.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Correction

Joseph Gentile is the Chief Administrative Officer at SVB Securities, an investment firm. SVB Securities is a subsidiary of the former parent company of Silicon Valley Bank, which is financially independent from the collapsed bank.

I picked up this story from Fox News. It was repeated many times by people I respect. 

I wish I had the editorial staff of a major news outlet, but I don’t. I did verify additional details on Wikipedia. 

Fox News issued this correction: “Editor’s Note: The article that previously appeared here was factually inaccurate. We apologize for our errors“.

I believe that is insufficient as it did not even mention Gentile’s name. Instead, Fox removed the entire article with only that headline remaining. 

That’s neither an apology nor a correction in my book. 

We can do better. Apologies to Joseph Gentile. 

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

54 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
Here is the problem in a nutshell: If a bank chooses to invest long, while it’s debts (i.e. customer deposits) are short term, the bank is knowingly placing themselves in a risky position. If interest rates don’t change, or go down, they reap extra profits from that risk. If rates rise, they lose money. If their bet is too big, they go bankrupt. This is a well known, and well established risk of failing to match maturities. It broke banks in the 30’s. After that, banks learned to match maturities of investments and debt, and left mortgages to S&L’s. It then broke the S&Ls in the late 70’s and early 80’s, after which, S&L’s ceased to exist, and mortgages were bundled and sold as securities. Those long term investments are a logical choice for purchase by pensions and insurance companies, who have long term, predictable obligations, which they can match to their investments. They are appropriate for purchase by banks only in small quantities. Even an entry level risk manager knows the above. If Mr. Gentile allowed this to go on, he could not have been unaware of the risk. If he was over-ridden by the CEO, he should have left the company. Since he remained, he is completely responsible, and should be accountable.
As another point, this is not a problem that creeps up. Once inflation started rising, it was clear that the Fed would raise rates. By a year ago, it was clear that their long term bond position was going to cause problems. They had adequate warning, and could have avoided this by hedging, by liquidating part of their portfolio, or by raising additional capital while their stock was over $500. They apparently didn’t, or didn’t do enough. Any insider sales within the last year should be reversed, and the money used to repay depositors, because insiders who knew the bond position knew it was deeply underwater, and that the bank was in trouble.
Business Man
Business Man
2 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Awesome post, thank you.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Fed Welfare Monkeys like these are, by now, all that the term “Silicon Valley” refers to.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
2 years ago
‘a left leaning bank far more interested in appeasing gays, lesbians and transgenders than in actually running a bank that wouldn t collapse’ …..I read somewhere ….must be fake news, right ?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Paging Dr. Gotee-Charleton. He has a PhD in this stuff. And let me put a trillin dollar bet on the solution: more printing.
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
Wall street most successful short seller is Jim Chanos and his Cabal. SVB and their cabal
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
2 years ago
Let s attack Russia and resolve all Ponzi scheme related issues for once an f all …..in the name of DEMOCKCRAZY and freedom, of course ….LOL…..btw , Deep State is already working on it ….
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2

No eat black potato comrade! It make hallucinations!

Fred C Dobbs
Fred C Dobbs
2 years ago
I am afraid people are coming down hard on this man unfairly. His experience tutored him more than most – he learned all that a bank should not do. We must assume he passed on the benefit of his experience to his boss, the CEO and the Board too. The policy-makers (the Board) and the administrative head (CEO) may be presumed to have far better advised than they would be by an ordinary man of less experience. It was a willful, intentional, long-discussed decision by the CEO and Board to position the bank’s Assets they way they were. The CFO has no authority to defy delegated authority, anymore than any military officer in charge of the US in Afghanistan could overrule his superior.
So far as bailing out SVB, Ackerman is talking about something he knows little. The point people like Ackerman won’t make is this is not the first time that the honest hard-working people in the financial business have paid the price of FED mismanagement. The FED, before 1978. accommodated inflation for almost 15 years, raising rates behind inflation. In 1978, Volker came in and no longer accommodated inflation. He put FED rates above inflation, not just a teeny bit, but more and more and more until he broke the prevailing expectations that FED anti-inflation efforts were transitory, the FED would quickly cave in, pivot, and lower rates etc etc etc. The FED caused the depressions of 1980 – 1983 intentionally. Thousands of banks, s&ls, credit unions, closed, and none were bailed.
The interesting theme that has yet to unravel is this: SVB is not a one of a kind situation. Every person, firm or corporation that bought a fixed-rate note, bill or bond since 2008 that has not matured and its principal repaid in full, holds an ‘underwater’ debt instrument. Insurance companies, Pension funds, Securities Industry firms, Banks, S&Ls, Credit Unions, you and me etc. etc. etc. own something worth less than we paid for it. How many have enough capital to survive this indefinite period of financial hardship and instability?
JackWebb
JackWebb
2 years ago
Reply to  Fred C Dobbs
You’re a very informed person. Could you expound a bit on the “shadow banking sector?” Thanks in advance.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Gentile. What a strange name for a bankster?!
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago

Contagion or no?

Jack
Jack
2 years ago
Would not be surprised with a bail out, Fed going with 0.25%, and equity markets running up.
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  Jack
Thought the same, CNN reports that this SVB treasury problem may not be an isolated case, wondering if the Fed factors this is a symptom of overshooting.
Jack
Jack
2 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Another scenario is no bail out, view this as the “tightening until something breaks” threshold, do a 0.25%, and equity markets runs up.
People are still itching for another market run up. Assets still priced high which makes everyone feel flush.
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Observation, another site that I’ve mentioned (uses a “fight club” meme) that tends to promote pro-Putin agenda is currently invoking fearful statements about bank runs and economic fallout over SVB.
I also mentioned how ridiculously short sighted buying long treasuries at the lowest rates in 100 years is, makes no sense that industry professionals would do this…I speculated as to whether Gentile et al might not have done it to the benefit of counter parties or hidden counter-positions.
I’ll stop there, lest I’m a conspiracy theorist, but food for thought.
.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
2 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
re: “makes no sense that industry professionals”
Powell is considered a professional, and he has no idea what he’s doing. QE by design, promotes speculation, a byproduct was cypto currencies, (like the unregulated E-$ market with no reserve requirements). QE stokes asset prices, as was intended by Bankrupt-u-Bernanke.

Rather than bottling up
existing savings, the authorities should pursue every possible means for
promoting the orderly and continuous flow of monetary savings into real
investment (which increases the real rate of interest). I.e., the FED should gradually drive the banks out of the savings business (which contrary to the FED, doesn’t
reduce the size of the payment’s system).

Keynes defined saving and investment in such a way that in his theory, saving always equals investment. Monetary savings are an unrealized leakage in National Income Accounting procedures. The economic system is being run in reverse.
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Monetary theory notwithstanding, I was just pondering the notion that SVB was intentionally mishandled for the benefit of unseen entities or transactions.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Gentile? Soros and the Jewish globalist cabal took them down.
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
LOL
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
The most successful short seller is Jim Chanos and his cabal.
Matt3
Matt3
2 years ago
Hey Mish
How can businesses access the banks that they have deposits with?
I know the Fed Regulators assign ratings to each the area of a bank and then an overall bank rating but these are confidential and can not be reported by the the banks to the public or by the regulators to the public.
It’s virtually impossible to run a business and maintain balances under 250K. Public disclosures like 10Q and 10K are likely too stale to see problems like SVB.
Is this answer to only utilize big money center banks that are too big to fail? If so, we will end up with even more concertation in financial sector and greater political influence. It will destroy community banking and communities. Probably also kill the regional banks. Is this what we want?
I don’t have an answer. This is a real question.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
If you have millions to deposit, perhaps you should check out the balance sheets of banks you are depositing with. Perhaps you should be in a money market fund.
I will do a post on the real solution.
Matt3
Matt3
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Thanks. I appreciate that. I’m reading 10Q and 10K reports for banks I utilize but it’s stale information and I’m not sure I know how to evaluate them. I haven’t gone back to read the 10K or 10Q for SVB to see what would have stood out and how I could have seen this.
As a business, we run through a lot of cash and accumulate cash in advance of capital expenditures. Minimum cash we try to have to cover payrolls, payables and unexpected expenses is $1 million. Some weeks, customer payments get delayed so we utilize this cash. We also have unexpected repairs or capital expenditures that need to happen. We don’t utilize a line of credit for these things as we try to be more conservative, retain capital and keep our debt levels low.
Avery
Avery
2 years ago
Tomorrow morning the Regional Banks will have yellow tape around then with hazardous waste signs:
‘Closed – EPA sampling for Dioxins!’
The COVID theater and lockdowns were in fact back door bailouts to the fall 2019 Repo crisis and gateway to CBDC control.
“Never let a good crisis go to waste”
– some former Chicago mayor with more murders than Lightfoot
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
As far as the talk of insider selling, I’m of the impression that the only requirement is public disclose of insider transactions.
Hopefully there’s exceptions for a situation like this, where maybe they knew things the public did not.
I distinctly remember all the speculation & debate in 2008 about nationalizing banks, this fail is food for thought, it’s not just wealthy clients getting hurt but a lot of small business and startups, their employees.
I also know for a fact that if SVB is bailed there will be many more who will take unreasonable risks.
Maybe the FDIC needs to create an optional plan for large depositors, maybe banks portfolio’s need more transparency & scrutiny.
.
Matt3
Matt3
2 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
I believe the sales were preplanned and disclosed. I think the disclosure occurred in December. I’m not sure how that would be criminal but I’m not very familiar with this type of issue.
Jmurr
Jmurr
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt3

I’m sure they could have seen what would happen many weeks ago.

MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
So am I. I also suspect as long as they disclosed the sales, they knew they’d be fine.
I also recall someone taking out a recent large short position in SVB, would like to know who.
.
Jack
Jack
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
They would have seen this months ago
Jack
Jack
2 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Would not like to be someone who bought SVIP shares on Feb 27.
No bragging rights there – might have bought the CEOs shares.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
2 years ago
Reply to  Jack
Yes Papadave , you are clever ….buying oil , we know ….I know anyway
Jack
Jack
2 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels2
Not PapaDave but my oil and tobacco is doing well.
Some are curious to know. Did FromBrussels1 fall out of a window?
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  Jack
He is good citizen for mother land, no window for him.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
2 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
give each other a like , at least
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
2 years ago
Reply to  Jack
did Realist fall out of a window ?
mattdunn
mattdunn
2 years ago
As a senior advisor to many banks and financial firms on liquidity risk, none of this surprises me and just another chapter in poorly managed banks. Some observations:
– Where’s the Board and the Risk Cmte of the Board? Getting tired of seeing Board diversity trump folks on the Board who actually understand risk. Been asked too many times to “dumb down” Board materials on liquidity risk because they don’t understand it!
– Where’s the CRO? Kim Olson just joined the bank but too many highly paid CRO’s out there who don’t understand liquidity risk. I don’t want to hear from the CEO, I want to hear from the CRO who is required to be independent and report directly to the risk cmte of the Board. Clearly that is/was not the case at SVB.
– The Fed has a problem (and not the obvious one). SVB is required to file a FR2052a report monthly – the largest banks are required to file daily. What is the FR 2052a? It is the detailed liquidity position of the bank for which banks are required to build stress models of the data and calculate and publicly disclose and attest to liquidity metrics – LCR/NSFR (which Trump administration rolled back and SVB was not required to do). SVBs balance sheet is fairly simple and the Fed had the data and would have easily been able to calculate an LCR (which is what they usually do). So does the Fed have some liability because they had the data? They are the only central bank that collects liquidity data.
– AFS/HTM accounting rules need to change.
– Capital and VAR: regulators need to impose market VAR limits on capital (regardless of accounting treatment). VAR should never exceed a specific % of tier 1 capital. That’s why there is hedging policies, or in SVBs case, lack thereof.
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  mattdunn
“LCR/NSFR (which Trump administration rolled back and SVB was not required to do)”
I’d wager this was to appease a lender, it represents the real problem of deregulation/self regulation and tax favorism in exchange for campaign funds or back door deals.
Thank you, great post.
.
grepper
grepper
2 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
“LCR/NSFR (which Trump administration rolled back and SVB was not required to do)”
its my understand is that SVB (the CEO) lobbied hard to have banks with assets less that 250Billion opt out of those stress tests.
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  grepper
While Mish makes a strong argument over Gentile’s horrible track record, I can’t help but wonder if this wasn’t intentional, maybe to cash out of counter-positions, or to the benefit of an outside party willing to reciprocate.
Buying treasuries en masse at the generational high is crazy stupid, even I shorted treasuries in 2020, I’m just a simple retail trader.
.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
2 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
you, Zardoz , Papadave , Jack ….all so f clever, ‘liking ‘ each other …I forget realist , where is he ? Did the fraudulent vaxxine knock him out, like it did with Ed the dentist ?
Matt3
Matt3
2 years ago
Reply to  mattdunn
Matt,
How can a depositor know and understand the liquidity risk of a bank? I keep seeing that the depositors should have known. How would I find this information? Can I then use this to see which banks in the system are most at risk or is their a rating group that does this effectively that I can use?
grepper
grepper
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
“How can a depositor know and understand the liquidity risk of a bank?”
they can’t and they really shouldn’t. it really is about trust. trust the banks and the people at the banks…and that the regulators are doing their jobs.
“I keep seeing that the depositors should have known.”
should have known what? it isn’t reasonable for depositors to understand the minutia of bank inner workings. What depositors should have known are the FDIC rules and the risks of having over 250k in an account. sad part of this is that some of the startups that had SVB deposists were required to only bank for SVB. When these startups raised that money the VCs required that they only bank with SVB..and you know what else? The VCs that required this got special benefits(personal/business loans/etc) from SVB
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  grepper
“it really is about trust. trust the banks and the people at the banks”
This sickens me, in the aftermath of 2008 we still can’t view banks holdings, I’m sure you know Kyle Bass’s story, how difficult it was to get info on CDO’s.
,
MarkraD
MarkraD
2 years ago
Reply to  Matt3
“…Can I then use this to see which banks in the system are most at risk or is their a rating group that does this effectively that I can use?”
I suggest googling the story of how Kyle Bass decided to short sub-primes, I was shocked at how secretive banks are allowed to be with assets that are sold to the public – as I recall, it took him over a year to finally find an insider willing to tell him what CDO’s were comprised of.
The big banks were intentionally pushing mortgages onto unqualified buyers, knowing they’d default, solely to create more CDO’s to sell, they also pressured S&P, Moody’s and other ratings co’s to fraudulently rate them “AAA”.
Repealing Glass-Steagall was profoundly dangerous.
.
JackWebb
JackWebb
2 years ago
Reply to  mattdunn
Very informative! Please feel free to add anything you want. THANK YOU for your post.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
2 years ago
A nation of ruthless con-men and the child-like victims they prey upon.
This is America in 2023.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
2 years ago
So Gentile specializes in these sorts of scandals. How shocking. He’ll walk.
Sunriver
Sunriver
2 years ago
Ro Khanna says all depositors in SVB should be guaranteed full amounts. Payrolls must be met. Stockholders to take haircuts and possible criminal indictment of SVB executive staff. Danger, according to Khanna, is a run on smaller banks and depositors only dealing withe the big four banks.
Fully expect a bailout of SVB depositors and SVB being recapitalized.
Anyone want to buy 30 year treasuries? SVB apparently was far to exposed to them so the assets are there. Well unless 30 year treasuries stay north of 5% for many years which could happen. Assets may not be there. What else did SVB invest in?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
Stockholders are already wiped out as the stock has essentially gone to zero.
Only those with 250K and less get 100% of their money. All other depositors are essentially creditors of the banks assets. The assets will be sold and they will get what comes of the proceeds. It will likely be a haircut of 10-20%. That kind of haircut will not stop payrolls from being met in the short term (it may lead to some layoffs though).
All the above is normal when a business of any kind fails. Why should this be any different (bailouts). EVERYONE knows there is a non-zero risk on depositing money at banks if you exceed 250K just as there is non-zero risk if as a business you are awaiting payment from another business and they go bankrupt before you get paid (you get a haircut there too).
JackWebb
JackWebb
2 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
I haven’t looked into the asset portfolio because, like Ross Perot, I have been focused like a laser beam on the basic duration mismatch. Elsewhere, I’m informed that SVB held a bunch of mortgage backs. I don’t know what their duration is, or the credit quality.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  JackWebb
It’s not even that much of a duration mismatch as it is of value of the assets they hold.
Whether its an MBS or treasuries, if they are paying 1-2% in a world where currently issued MBS and treasuries are paying 4-5% then those 1-2% securities are worth less. The reason is no one wants to own them or buy them when there are better options available. So they have to be sold at a loss in order to get someone to take them off your hands.
Others have posted they could hold to duration and be whole but that’s not quite true. You get your original investment back but if it pays 2% in a world of 3-5% inflation then you lose money because what you got isn’t worth as much (time value of money).
SVB isn’t the only bank with this problem but they are the only one that’s having massive drawdowns because startups are burning through their cash like crazy and thus drawing down their deposits.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Duration mis-match is a crime perpetrated by the FED. Every recession since WWII was the FED’s fault. Economic projections within a year are infallible. What’s obvious is that the FED’s Ph.Ds. don’t know a debit from a credit. They don’t understand Money and Central banking.

The complete deregulation of interest rates
for the commercial banks, indeed sponsored by the most dominant economic
predator, the oligarch: the American Bankers Association, is vitiated on
largely false premises on which deregulation is based, viz., that deposits in
commercial banks constitute the “savings’ of the depositors, that these are “lent”
to the banks, and that the commercial banks are only a “medium” through which
this end is affected.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.