Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Biden Imposes Strict Climate Change Mandates on the Pentagon

Thanks to president Biden, The Pentagon Marches Off to Climate War.

https://twitter.com/TrixieIvy4/status/1600655272929787905

A little-noticed rule-making proposed by the Department of Defense, NASA and the General Services Administration last month would require federal contractors to disclose and reduce their CO2 emissions as well as climate financial risks. The rule would cover 5,766 contractors that have received at least $7.5 million from the feds in the prior year.

For example, weapons manufacturers would have to quantify and disclose the amount of CO2 generated from their own facilities; manufacturers that produce steel, computer chips and motors used in their weapons; propellants and fuel; and even munition storage areas. It’s unclear if CO2 emissions will influence procurement decisions.

Large contractors would also have to publish an annual climate disclosure and develop “science-based targets” to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in alignment with the goals of the 2015 Paris agreement. That means contractors will have to aim to zero out emissions and possibly require their contractors to do so.

Will Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Technologies have to redesign weapons systems and aircraft to be powered by lithium-ion batteries? China mines and processes the critical minerals used in batteries and other green technologies that will be required to meet these “science-based targets.”

The proposed rule would also apply to non-defense contractors, including pharmaceutical, shipping and tech companies, though it curiously exempts universities, nonprofit research institutions and state and local governments. 

No, that isn’t the Onion, I am quoting. It’s the Wall Street Journal. 

Well, that’s OK. 

It will add to inflation and bigger budgets. Who doesn’t want that? 

Besides, I expect an announcement soon that President Biden got Russia, China, and North Korea, to agree to the same rules so they are fair across the board. 

Hoot of the Day

Lead Question Answered

Hello Pentagon, what do you think of Biden’s new and costly green mandates for weapons?

Yes, the Pentagon loves it. Astute observation.

Q: Why?
A: They will get much bigger budgets but will either ignore the climate targets or lie about meeting them.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

52 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Another signal of deep systematic decline: All of NATO cannot match the military industrial output of Russia, but what is their concern?
Explosions that don’t produce soot and carbon dioxide, which forms an extra threshold for their ‘more usable, tactical’ nukes.
Perhaps I should cheer when the US start decommissioning nukes because they form a threat to the environment!
amigator
amigator
3 years ago
I can see it now only allowed to fire 3 missiles every 12 hours so as not to overload the environment with carbon. An no attacks on fuel dumps/Refineries or ammunition stocks!
Bbbbbbb
Bbbbbbb
3 years ago
So you found a scam to pump up military budgets using “climate change” as cover? And the problem is “green mandates”? Not, you know, militarism as a profit center in a deepening economic crisis, and a drive toward new wars and maybe eventually another world war?
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“A little-noticed rule-making proposed by the Department of Defense, NASA
and the General Services Administration last month would require
federal contractors to disclose and reduce their CO2 emissions as well
as climate financial risks.”
This is a danger to our democracy. These agencies do not legislate the law, which is a democratic legislative process.
Rbm
Rbm
3 years ago
Well dont think the can cut carbon from machines etc. but i recall the military is worried about warming. Think ports/ ship yards/ airstrips sitting on permafrost.
More concerned about social unrest from people moving due to sea level rise/ hunger from failed crops and such.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“Hello Pentagon, what do you think of Biden’s new and costly green mandates for weapons?”
General Milley is too busy trying to figure out how to meet DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) quotas, to be available for comment on converting the new B-21 bomber program to solar powered flight, to meet climate mandates.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“The proposed rule would also apply to non-defense contractors, including pharmaceutical…”
How much CO2 production would be reduced by terminating production of the Covid shots, which are ineffective at preventing Covid infection? Also, requirement of vaccine passports by the G20, for international travel, will increase CO2 output, as well as Rochelle Walensky’s planned adult vaccination program, to get more needles in more American arms, more often.
FlyNavy1
FlyNavy1
3 years ago
As long as we use the correct pronouns for our enemies trying to kill us, it will all be worth it. Rome is burning. This country has been deliberately destroyed by radical leftists.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  FlyNavy1
I have reduced the number of pronouns I am willing to accommodate.
Henceforth the idiots are simply “it.”
KidHorn
KidHorn
3 years ago
The bad news is my house was destroyed because the tanks that were supposed to protect it took 24 hours to recharge, but the good news is the temperature is 0.1F cooler than it would be if they used diesel.
GruesomeHarvest
GruesomeHarvest
3 years ago
If the Pentagon and President Poopie Pants cared about the environment, they wouldn’t be starting wars and they wouldn’t be blowing up Nord Stream pipelines full of methane gas.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
They don’t really care about the environment. They care more about saying the things that will end up winning them more votes than they lose.
And it was most likely Russia that blew up the pipeline. A threat by Putin that he could do the same to other energy infrastructure throughout the world in retaliation for the sanctions placed on Russia. Though Russia continues to try to blame it on the British.
In addition, Russia is determined to keep destroying as much Ukrainian energy infrastructure as possible in order to make Ukrainians suffer this winter. Though you probably want to blame that on Biden as well, because its suits your politics.
In the end, the pipeline was no longer being used, and probably won’t be used again for quite some time, since Europe is determined to get off their dependence on Russian gas.
If for some reason the pipeline was needed again, repairs would not take very long.
grazzt
grazzt
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
I knew the Russians were behind the recent Keystone Pipeline leak! I mean if they are willing to blow up their own pipeline that they have complete control over the flow of gas, to show the world they can do that anywhere – it’s obvious they are again showing prowess in infrastructure sabotage.
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Putin’s drivers license was just found at the pipeline leak in Kansas today.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Avery
Hello comrades Avery and grazzt. Please tell Putin that many of us Americans will not be duped by his trolls. Enjoy your Russian winter! I will now add you to my list of trolls to block on this site. Bye.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
hear hear , the oil pundit who did not know that Shell quoted 25 Euro in 2019 vs today’s 26 Euro something …. and is now delusive enough to think that Russia blew up its own pipelines….. Fed up with you I prefer your alter ego potatoe vendor Zardoz…..
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Riddle me this?
  • Why did the Russians blow up their own pipeline, in a heavily monitored tiny region of the sea, instead of a Norwegian pipeline to pusillanimous Poland?
  • Why not a pipeline feeding arch villain UK?
  • Why not a pipeline from a competitor in the North Sea?
  • Why not a pipeline carrying gas through Ukraine to Europe?
    (There is still considerable gas transit for which the Russians are paying Ukraine in dollars!)
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Answer to:
1. To show that they can strike anywhere if they want to.
2. Too risky. Putin can’t afford to bring NATO into this.
3. See 2
4. Putin still needs the money from those sales. Nordstream was shut down already (and may never reopen) and wasn’t earning him anything anymore. That made it a better target.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
The US military is the largest user of fuel in the world and a major contributor to global warming and climate change. Biden’s proposals are insignificant and will change very little. This particular story is more public relations than anything of substance.
Meanwhile, the cost of Climate change is going to grow more and more as time goes by. In particular, the military.
There is very little appetite on either side of the political divide to cut back on military spending. So the military will continue to consume a lot of fossil fuels for a long time to come.
Demand for oil and gas is going to keep increasing.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave

By Vijay Jayaraj

I live in Bengaluru in southern India. This month, the city recorded
the coldest temperature in 10 years for the month of November.

The November 18 snow event at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport is
the earliest snowfall in recorded history since 1898. Just an isolated
event due to a regional storm? Well, think again. The past few months witnessed unusual cold spells in the U.S. and
Canada. Buffalo registered one of its highest snowfalls for November
while Vancouver saw unusual early winter snowfall. Greenland has been registering a consistent growth in ice sheet SMB since 2016.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
We usually start seeing freezing temps in late Oct early Nov, it’s Dec 8th and not a single day below freezing yet.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
It is below average in Los Angeles this week.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
You are wasting your time. You might as well be trying to convince me that the entire world is flat because you live in a flat area. I certainly do not care about your silly examples that supposedly mean something to you.
All I care about is the facts, and how I can make money from them. Anthropogenic Global warming is a scientific fact. The resulting climate change is a scientific fact.
And the way that those in power in the world respond to these facts is what I pay attention to. You are not in power. Your irrelevant opinions therefore mean nothing to me.
Humanity is going to continue to use fossil fuels for many more decades and I intend to profit from that use. The fact that this will make global warming and climate change even worse is just another fact that I cannot change. I simply accept those facts.
Your desire to live in some alternate reality where you personally decide to ignore the facts is your choice. But no matter what fantasy you choose to believe in, it will not change the facts. Humanity keeps adding more greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere every year. This causes global average temperatures to go up every year. Which is causing the climate change we are seeing.
I cannot change the facts. But I can profit from them.
MarkraD
MarkraD
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“All I care about is the facts, and how I can make money from them.”
Agriculture for you.
For Ron, I suggest investing in Coal, diesel auto manufacturers and the Truth Social IPO.
.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Lol! People like Ron are simply cult morons who will believe almost anything, provided its not true. They are not interested in investing. All they want to do is promote their ridiculous cult beliefs.
I do have some agriculture investments, including some fertilizer companies, but they are only a small portion of a heavily weighted oil and gas portfolio.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“You are wasting your time. You might as well be trying to convince me
that the entire world is flat because you live in a flat area. I
certainly do not care about your silly examples that supposedly mean
something to you.”
Except they aren’t silly examples.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Lol! Still not interested in your alternate reality cult beliefs. You are a waste of my time.
Webej
Webej
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Actually, warmer ocean water melts the edges/bottom of the ice sheet, but warmer temperatures bring more precipitation to essentially desert areas, adding snow to the top of the ice sheet (which is very cold due to altitude). It is not completely understood how these two dynamics amplify or cancel each other, and there has always been some controversy about whether growing ice sheets signal a warming period or a cooling period. It could well be that ice sheets break up from lubrication and structural damage at the bottom instead of overall melting.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Not much controversy at all. The ice is melting because the earth is warming.
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
The VLCC and container ships bringing Bezo and Walton merchandise are up there, too. Greta should be monitoring the top of the smokestacks.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Just the Democrat leadership pandering to it’s far-left branch as usual. Years ago the military was ordered to prepare for climate change but that didn’t keep them from using it as a justification to get money to improve cold weather combat capabilities of the three services. The zero carbon push fits nicely into the pentagon’s plans to power expeditionary bases using small modular nuclear reactors instead of having to ship in tons of fuel by trucks of air. It eliminates a supply line worry, one that the Russians discovered in their push to Kyiv, and would generate enough power for lasers to shoot down anything thrown at the base. That’s just one example. I am sure that the Military will get a bunch of money to develop “air to fuels” (or A2F) as well.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago

Yes, the Pentagon loves it. Astute observation.

Q: Why?
A: They will get much bigger budgets but will either ignore the climate targets or lie about meeting them.
Touche!!!
And there, we have the sole and only reason for the entire “climate crisis” nonsense…..
None of which has any bearing whatsoever, on whether gajascientists turn out to be correct or not when feeding ever more papers into the mill; deeming, holding and screetching that the planet will average out warmer in 2068 than 1968; in ever vainer hopes of getting themselves some once impressive, to the easily so, sounding degree.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
“No, that isn’t the Onion, I am quoting. It’s the Wall Street Journal.

Well, that’s OK.”

Man, aren’t we getting old…….
By now, it must have been 50 years since those two differed from one another.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
3 years ago
Guess those $435 hammers are going to be going up to $500+ now – LOL.
Dr Funkenstein
Dr Funkenstein
3 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Those hammers were never $435. What happened was when itemizing a particular project, rather than list each item by its price, someone took the total cost and divided it by the number items to save time . So each item was assigned a book value of $435. Naturally some media type who couldn’t be bothered to explain things, saw it and said “a hammer cost $435! Look at the money the Reagan administration wastes!”. Which isn’t to say DoD doesn’t waste money at times.
Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
“He who has a mind to beat a Dog will easily find a Stick” the saying goes.
bowwow
bowwow
3 years ago
Exempting universities, non-profit research institutions and governments must mean anything that is government or full fat milk-fed by government subsidization is excluded.
grazzt
grazzt
3 years ago
Reply to  bowwow
Umm, remind me again who funds the military?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Why do they call it the department of defense? They seem a bit offensive to me. Even the few times they appeared to be defensive, they totally sucked at it. Not to mention how questionable those moments appeared to anyone with half a brain. Just saying.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
“Why do they call it the department of defense? They seem a bit offensive to me.”
Dude, you need to pay more attention in Newspeak class!
Where you’re heading, next thing you know you won’t even “understand” that “the economy” is in some sort of “crises” whenever it becomes more affordable for productive people to obtain space to produce things in, and stuff!!!
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
I just love it when I get schooled like that! Thank you so much for illuminating me on such things that are way over my little slave head. And you’re right on the economics. I thought it had something to do with my household budget or something like that. Had no idea how it helped to drive policy! The more you know……
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
In that “Constitution’ which Mish referenced the other day, it was originally called the Department of War from 1789 to 1947.
When the Orwellian name change came about the Dulles Brothers were stealing the country for MIC while Truman was proud of paying personal postage stamps out of his pocket and Ike was everybody’s favorite Grandpa Golfer. Proxmire talking about the $500 hammers and $2000 toilet seats in the ’70s seems quite quaint.
I’d like to see Mish in the Nicholas Cage part if there is another National Treasure movie to locate this Constitution thing. Clue – parts of it were seen breaking off a skull in Dallas on 11/22/1963 by The Magic Bullet.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
3 years ago
Reply to  Avery
That was a pretty impressive bullet that day. I used to live in Dallas, and I’ve been by that library. You absolutely need a magic bullet to make that shot from that spot. Those pesky Russians are so diabolical! We really are the dumbest species on this planet.
LostNOregon
LostNOregon
3 years ago
It’s not that big of a deal. Tech has been doing it for years (GRI reporting). After a year or two, we had set up fairly inexpensive, automatic systems that generated the data for these reports pretty easily. The goals were pretty innocuous and easily gamed. There are MUCH more intrusive requirements out there.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
Just give the money to the rail workers. There will be serious problem if they start quitting in large numbers.
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Just give the rail workers same time off benefits as Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg.
Avery
Avery
3 years ago
Raytheon to design $1,000,000,000 slingshots.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  Avery
That is a lie, the slingshots are only $100,000.
It is the proprietary ammunition and quarterly maintenance where Raytheon profits for many decades.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
They were gonna waste that money somehow. This just makes it efficient
.
Roy
Roy
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Isn’t that an oxymoron? Efficiently wasting money? Should I be laughing or crying right now?
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Gun guys, including gunmakers, tend to trend Republican.
Totalitarian juntas, regardless of nominal party affiliation, are becoming more and more dependent on those gun makers every day. Hence have little alternative but handing them huge shares wealth.
This is just Biden’s way to channel some of that wealth away from reliable GOP supporter gunmakers; and towards Pippi Thunberg groupies more likely to trend Democrat.
NO different from the D guys favouring handing more loot to teachers and ambulance chasers; while the R guys favors handing it to jackboots and midnight cowboys.
Doesn’t go any deeper than that. Nothing in Idiotopia really does. Wouldn’t be such a predictably reliable, freefalling idiotopia if any did.
Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Another conspiracy!

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.