Free Health Care is a Right
The Assembly Constitutional Amendment ACA 11 proposal declares “Comprehensive health care coverage for every resident of California is a right” and seeks major tax hike to pay for it.
The Tax Foundation does a Tax Analysis of the proposal.
A proposed constitutional amendment (ACA 11) in California would increase taxes by $12,250 per household, roughly doubling the state’s already high tax collections, to fund a first-in-the-nation single-payer health-care system. The top marginal rate on wage income would soar to 18.05 percent—nationally, the median top marginal rate is 5.3 percent—and the state would adopt a new 2.3 percent gross receipts tax (GRT), at a rate more than three times that of the country’s highest current pure GRT.
All told, the new tax package is intended to raise an additional $163 billion per year, which is more than California raised in total tax revenue any year prior to the pandemic.
These taxes, moreover, could be increased by simple majorities in the legislature, as the bill exempts the three new taxes from the constitution’s supermajority requirements for tax increases. If a future legislature decides that doubling the state’s tax collections was insufficient, the constitution’s supermajority requirement would not stand in its way. And while the new surtaxes are inflation-indexed (the payroll tax’s second bracket is not), the legislature is authorized to suspend inflation indexing at any time, which would lead to the particularly curious case of inflation-indexing the standard income tax brackets but not the surtax brackets.
New Tax Hikes
- Surtaxes atop the current individual income tax structure beginning at $149,509 in income;
- A graduated-rate payroll tax system with the top rate kicking in for employees with more than $49,990 in annual income; and
- A gross receipts tax of 2.3 percent, excluding the first $2 million of business income.
And while 16 states either implemented or enacted individual or corporate income tax cuts in 2021, and more are looking to join them in 2022, California policymakers want voters to approve five new surtaxes, with a top rate of 2.5 percent atop the current 13.3 percent top marginal income tax rate and the proposed new 2.25 percent payroll tax, for a combined top marginal rate of 18.05 percent. This is more than 7 percentage points higher than the next-highest rates in Hawaii (11 percent), New York (10.9 percent), and New Jersey and the District of Columbia (both at 10.75 percent).
Issues with the proposal abound.
For instance, the payroll tax exempts employers with fewer than 50 resident employees, punishing small businesses for expanding and creating a meaningful tax cliff. Imagine, for instance, the overly simplified hypothetical of a company with 49 employees making $80,000 each. At 49 employees, the company has no payroll tax burden. Hiring one additional employee generates a tax bill of $90,000—more than that employee’s salary!
Grand Experiment
I highly doubt that even California residents are silly enough to vote for this, but who knows.
Since it only impacts those who live and work in California, perhaps every outsider should root for this knowing full well it will backfire instantly causing a mad scramble to undo the Constitutional Amendment.
Passage is what the Progressive lunatics deserve, but the amendment affects innocent parties, not just the lunatics.
Thanks for Tuning In!
Like these reports?
If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.
Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.
If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.
Mish


If they
limit it to those who have resided in California for the last five years it
could work but the avowed reason for implementing it is to include illegal immigrants
then I doubt if that requirement would have been put in. I think this is used
to show how progressive they are and expect it not to pass. In that case it
would be a Democrat marketing ploy and nothing more. We will see if it passes.
If I switched plans to a lower deductible I’d pay 5k a year max for anything I can come down with and only pay 340 a month, or half the price, however my coverage would be capped at 300k per event, meaning if I get a 2 million dollar cancer problem, I’d be on the hook for 1.7 million of it. Obviously, I chose the 680 a month plan just in case.
However, California’s proposition is interesting. If they pass it I could go to the lower plan and if I get an expensive cancer I simply up and move to CA and sign up for their health system. Viola! I’m covered by the state! Woohoo!
Of course, I’d be greatly burdening their system, along with all the other sick people who’d do the same. There are still cheap places to move to there as well, just not on the coast or Tahoe.
Oooooh. That is {{{{{scary}}}}} bad…… when compared to the $20,761.56 that we are paying for health insurance right now! LOL
And I no longer even have a 6-figure salary…
Why not join a sharing group? You’ll get excellent coverage for at most, 680 a month. You’ll never pay more than 500 a year with the plan I’m on. Every person I know who was paying 20-30k for health insurance and switched has been more than estatic at switching, and most are saving 15k or more a year over what they were paying and even getting better coverage.If you don’t want a religious sharing group (which I am a part of) I believe there are a few non-religious ones out there, but the pickings are slimmer.
yes, that one is a sham. Sadly, there are con artists in every profession, including health care.Others are not scams and are well funded with over a million members. There are abotu 10 million members of health sharing networks and it’s not an unusual thing anymore.
Besides, I’m all for getting rid of ponzi scheme type health care. That’s what this is.
The one I’m a member of has over a million and a half members. That’s a totally different thing that this sham you found.
Twice as many people on the planet now. There is no escape from them.
total to 39,466,855 people as of January 1, 2021, according to new population estimates and
housing data released today by the California Department of Finance.
California’s negative growth rate of -0.46 percent represents the first 12-month decline since state
population estimates have been recorded. Three principal factors contributed in this year-over-year population decrease
Her home was purchased 7 years ago for 300k. It’s now worth probably 700k. Crazy price appreciation there.