Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

The Fed’s Balance Sheet Shows Intent to Support Housing Forever

Mortgage-Backed Securities Duration Synopsis

  • Total mortgage assets have risen from $1.422 trillion in December of 2019 to $2.628 trillion in December of 2021.
  • Currently, 97.6% of the mortgages the Fed holds are 10 years or longer duration all the way up to 30 years. 

Let’s compare that balance sheet expansion with that of US treasuries. 

Duration of Fed’s Balance Sheet US Treasuries

Treasuries Duration Synopsis

  • Total treasury assets have risen from $2.301 trillion in December of 2019 to $5.638 trillion in December of 2021.
  • Currently, 23.9% of the treasuries the Fed holds are 10 years or longer duration.

What if the Fed let its balance sheet unwind for a full 10 years?

10-Year Natural Unwind

  • After 10 years, 97.6% of the mortgages would still be on the Fed’s book. And if the duration of the existing mortgages was 30-year mortgages, then they would still be in the 10-year and older bucket.
  • For comparison purposes, after 10 years, only 23.9% of the treasuries would still be on the Fed’s book. 

Chart Source

A reader asked where the data is from. The answer is straight from the Fed Archives.

I took data from the current report, a year ago, and two years ago.

Don’t Worry, the Fed has Belts and Suspenders

Does anyone recall Bernanke’s alleged plan to shrink the Fed’s balance sheet?

If not, I can help. 

Please recall my 2020 post regarding statements Bernanke made when he was still Fed Chair: Don’t Worry, the Fed has Belts and Suspenders

On February 27, 2013, Ben Bernanke spoke to US Congress about how the Fed would unwind its balance sheet.

Bernanke said, We Have “Belts, Suspenders” to Unwind Balance Sheet .

Bernanke’s vague answer to Sen. Richard Shelby, R-AL, when asked how the Fed will deleverage the balance sheet, was this: “In terms of exiting from our balance sheet… a couple of years ago we put out a plan; we have a set of tools. I think we have belts, suspenders – two pairs of suspenders. I think we have the technical means to unwind at the appropriate time; of course picking the exact moment to do, of course, is always difficult.”

What About the Current Divergence?

The Fed does not intend to ever do what Bernanke said he would do. It never did, and I said so in 2013 as well.

But what about the divergence between mortgages and treasuries?

I brought this up in a Tweet the other day in which I stated the Fed may try hard to prevent the yield curve from inverting. 

Take a peak at that Treasury balance sheet again. Even without adding to it its sheet, the Fed has plenty of room to micromanage things.

I suspect the Fed will make a statement about maintaining its balance sheet for “a while” if and when they actually finish tapering, 

Then the Fed will have lots of room to do things like buy more 3-year notes and sell 5-year notes (or vice versa, whatever the Fed seeks to accomplish) right from its balance sheet without having to resort to new operations.

The Fed might be able to pull off an Operation Twist move without even announcing it. In this kind of setup, the yield curve may go flat without strongly inverting. 

Mortgages vs Treasuries

While it’s true mortgages are long-term commitments, the Fed has no intention of winding them down or any portion of its balance sheet down.

Mortgage-backed securities will wind down when people refinance, but the bulk of that has been done. Only if rates hit new record lows will there be much of a mortgage wind down and not even then if the Fed maintains the size of its balance sheet.

Meanwhile, mortgage rates are are also heavily influenced by 10-year treasuries and there is ample room for the Fed while holding its balance sheet constant to manipulate 10-year treasuries.  

We will learn the Fed’s true intent if and when it makes a statement about maintaining the size of its balance sheet for “a while” which I propose will be permanent.

What About Recession?

I believe one is coming much faster than anyone at the Fed believes. Heck another set of lockdowns could do it, anything actually. 

All it will take is an investor attitude shift on the stock market. The stock market adds buoyancy to all kinds of spending. 

Given the increased ability of the Fed to micromanage the yield curve without starting new programs, don’t think we will necessarily have huge inversions across the curve as has happened in previous recessions.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish                          

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
TCW
TCW
4 years ago
“…don’t think we will necessarily have huge
inversions across the curve as has happened in previous recessions.”  So it is different this time.  Makes me wonder what else is different from historical norms and if we should even be looking at history to try to predict the future any longer… 
JeffD
JeffD
4 years ago
The FHFA raises the conforming loan limit by 18%, and suddenly, the Fed spends 18% more on the motgages it buys. See how that works? It’s the fastest way possible to create inflation without looking like a “bad guy” in the eyes of the public. Expect more of this every year until something breaks.
numike
numike
4 years ago
“The Fed’s Balance Sheet Shows Intent to Support Housing Forever” Nooooo?? Really?? Im shocked!! **   rolls eyes **
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“The Fed’s Balance Sheet Shows Intent to Support Housing Forever”
Not typical, but i received a realtor mailer last week promoting a house that sold for $1.2 million, had 25 bidders and sold for $328,000 above listing.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Speaking of the economy, this trucker warns about a reduction in goods delivered across the Canadian border due to vaccine mandate for truckers.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Martin Armstrong: “California Governor Gavin Newsom is deliberately worsening the supply
chain crisis by implementing additional power-grab COVID restrictions.
Workers in California now must stay home and quarantine for two weeks if
they are exposed to COVID. It does not matter if they are vaccinated.
It does not matter if they are vaccinated AND test negative. Some
workplaces will allow “exposed” employees to return to work earlier, but
they must wear a mask and remain six feet away from their coworkers and
customers to let the public know they are potentially one of the
diseased.”
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
It’s pretty clear they will not back down until the people rise up and take them down.  We are just going to have to get used to the idea that the tree of liberty has gone too long unattended to.
Call_Me
Call_Me
4 years ago
They have to continue to support it if the U.S. is ever going to get to 50-year (or lifetime) mortgages.
@Mish-
I recently tried to log in and the platform had me enter a user name even though I was signing in to an existing account.  Unfortunately these old fingers hit ‘enter’ instead of ‘shift’ and my handle got truncated.  Is there a fix or do I need to make a new account?
Call_Me_Al
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Could it be that the Fed supports the housing market primarily because since banks aren’t lending anymore (in comparison to the days before reverse repos)….it is the primary source of new money going into M2? It’s got to be the main way money gets created in this country, no?
I keep reading about a crisis around there not being enough dollars in circulation to support the function of the so-called Eurodollar market of foreign dollar-denominated debt. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Given a high enough interest rate, banks would lend. I don’t think QE is done to increase the money supply. Rather, it’s done to keep interest rates low and to fund the government. If the FED could accomplish that with fewer purchases, they would. QE is the only way money gets created.
Mish
Mish
4 years ago
I addressed the comments on refis and reiterate my position the Fed will hold its balance sheet intact – manipulating rates and supporting housing.
If the Fed issues a statement that it will let its balance sheet shrink naturally without manipulation then it will still take decades.
TheCaptain
TheCaptain
4 years ago
Reply to  Mish
You can’t end a debt Ponzi gracefully.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
That’s how you support homelessness, and the desperation which goes with it.
As well as the inability of American companies and workers to compete, in any other fields than the ones, FIRE primarily, whose every “competitive” advantage simply boils down directly to how much loot The Fed hands them, in exchange for doing either nothing or simple, zero-talent-required makework suitable for illiterate dilettantes.
It’s how The Fed ensures it is completely indispensable, to everyone with command over enough resources to otherwise challenge it.
urtau
urtau
4 years ago
As Tony Bennett said, this is pretty poor / disingenuous analysis.  This doesn’t have much (anything?) to do with Fed choosing longer duration mortgage portfolio, it’s simply the nature of how they work given the history of interest rates (which the Fed does manipulate).  Almost all mortgages are 15+ years at the start, and since we’ve had historic, all-time low rates in past 2 years, most mortgages have been refinanced during that time.   The Fed didn’t get rid of all the shorter remaining maturity mortgages, the mortgage holders did that by their own choice.
Steve_R
Steve_R
4 years ago
todays target looks like 450 on the spy
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
It would be AWESOME if Cramer rang the bell at the top.
Not 2 weeks ago uttering nonsense that economy a “juggernaut” and the best he’s ever seen.
Bookend nicely with his Bear Stearns call.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“After 10 years, 97.6% of the mortgages would still be on the Fed’s book.”
Doubtful.  I think the typical mortgage holder either sells or refinances a lot sooner.  IIRC, 7 years is average before original mortgage ditched.
“Given the increased ability of the Fed to micromanage the yield curve without starting new programs, don’t think we will necessarily have huge inversions across the curve as has happened in previous recessions.”
Agree.  Also, Treasury Department doing its part by lengthening maturity.  September 2020 56 months.  September 2021 66 months.  Will be harder to invert with these machinations.  Have to settle for flattening.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Oh great feds, destroy duration/interest rate  risk ? long term = short term . I give up .  I guess I should be grateful I don’t live in Turkey  

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.