Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

AOC’s Tax the Rich Hypocrisy Stinks to High Heavens

AOC is busy basking in the glow of a $35,000 a Plate Event allegedly promoting her Tax the Rich campaign.

Tax the Rich

A.O.C.’s Met Gala Dress Triggered Strong Reactions

The New York Times reports A.O.C.’s Met Gala Dress Triggered Strong Reactions.

While some championed the provocation, the congresswoman’s “Tax the Rich” gown drew sharp statements from across the political spectrum.

Representative Ocasio-Cortez’s attendance — and dress — provided easy fodder for her most reliably triggered critics. On Twitter, Donald Trump Jr., the former president’s eldest son, tagged her as a fraud for sending a message about taxing the rich “while she’s hanging out with a bunch of wealthy leftwing elites.”

But more surprising than the rote judgments from her political opponents was the criticism Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat, generated from the left — a chorus of dissatisfaction from progressives and self-described socialists disappointed by a gesture they said caricatured a progressive cause and underscored their sense that she is not maximizing her ability to fight for working people from Congress.

“The Met Gala is an event best shunned by sincere socialists,” wrote John Ganz, a columnist for Gawker.com who described himself as a supporter who at other times has viewed Ms. Ocasio-Cortez as a “beacon of hope.”

Danny Haiphong, a socialist activist and writer, said what offended him was not the dissonance of a self-described democratic socialist hobnobbing with the elite, but that “A.O.C. and the Squad are not leveraging their enormous base of support to demand the very thing she put on her dress.”

Met Gala 2021

What About Rules?

Please consider this Q&A at Ethics.House.Gov FAQ on Free Gifts.

Q. I have been invited to attend a lunch briefing, and the sponsor will serve a box lunch. Can I accept the lunch?

A. If the sponsor is not a registered lobbyist or foreign agent and does not employ or retain such a person, then House Members and employees may generally accept a gift, including a meal, valued at less than $50. Gifts from a single donor valued at $100 or more in a single calendar year are prohibited. If the sponsor does employ or retain a lobbyist, free attendance may still be acceptable if the event qualifies as a “widely attended event.”

In addition to getting a free $35,000 ticket, nowhere do the rules suggest it is acceptable for the boyfriend of the House member to get a free $35,000 ticket.

The hypocrisy of AOC’s appearance at this event, with her boyfriend, dolled up in an expensive donated dress stinks to high heavens.

Even the Left was generally appalled. That’s quite a statement.  

Addendum – Comments From a Friend

A person who is the working class “revolutionary” she claims to be would never attend such a diner and so obviously enjoying it. 

The other leading working class advocate in Congress, Bernie Sanders, would never attend such a thing and certainly not in designer clothes doing to red carpet poses (think of Bernie in his only winter coat and mittens). 

Recall that In the 2019-20 Democratic debates she denounced Pete Buttigieg over attending “wine caves”.

She tuned a policy objective and made it a trite joke across her derriere. Literally she made a progressive tax policy into a “butt” of jokes.

Almost everyone at that event opposes her policies she espouses, but she showed she was no real threat. I am sure they all wanted to get photos with AOC as they were cute and they could show them to their kids to look cool.

Every politician gets co-opted, but in her case the transition was very rapid, like the Obamas. I think she sees public service as becoming a big celeb.

I do not think she was a fraud when she started out but 3-4 years into this she sure is one now.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? 

If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
“Almost everyone at that event opposes her policies she espouses”
They don’t.
All of them owe their wealth to money printing and largely nothing but. Outside of silly Ayn Rand fantasies, that’s been the case among the leeching classes since before Ayn Rand herself.
Your tax accountant charging you another few pennies to minimize the impact of some 2% increase in a tax which 99% of your effective “earnings” bypass anyway, is a complete pittance, compared to the millions to billions in funds The Fed steals from productive people on your behalf every year.
AOC being 100% illiterate and stupid, like most of the halfwits in orbit around The Met, can be relied on to keep cheering for The Fed stealing more and more of the earnings of the people she claims to represent. She simply doesn’t have the brains to comprehend anything else. Basic, fundamental economics, and even arithmetic, is simply too diffimicult for the crowd The Fed favors. “Not one man in a million,” as Keynes quipped. And AOC, and any of the other mediocrities and worse at that Bimbo Ball, sure ain’t no one in a million.
Cocoa
Cocoa
4 years ago
AOC is called brilliant by some, and idiotic by others. I think the latter is becoming more apparent
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
The guy in the picture with the money is Ben Bronfman, one of the many great grandchildren of Samuel Bronfman, the founder of a large liquor business in Canada. Ben’s paternal grandfather was Samuel’s eldest son, Edgar Sr. (a naturalized American) who was on the Forbes 400 list before he died. I suspect that Edgar Sr. provided a nest egg for all of his grandchildren but he was not wealthy enough to leave them each $1 billion. My guess is that Ben is a 1%er, who AOC loves to rail against. If AOC’s constituents happen to see the picture above, they probably won’t care about who paid for the tickers. Three of the four people in the picture are people of color. The white guy is in the minority.
yooj
yooj
4 years ago
Much nicer couture than Mao’s. 
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“What About Rules?”
What rules? Rules are for the servant class.
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Ben  probably paid for AOC’s ticket and for the ticket for her boyfriend. Total $70,000. Will the House Ethics Committee launch an investigation into this serious breech of House Rules related to the accepting of gifts by House members?
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
the designer is a credit debt junkie who doesn’t pay taxes and bills and has warrants in multiple counties for failing to pay
typical sheep of the left….
Esclaro
Esclaro
4 years ago
Again what hypocrisy. The ethics rules mean absolutely nothing to the cabal of Republican criminals in Congress. They are beyond corrupt. They are vile traitors selling themselves to Russia and Saudi Arabia. 
Jmurr
Jmurr
4 years ago
Reply to  Esclaro
They are all criminals. Take a look at Pelosi’s stock trading gains. 
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Jmurr
They steal as much as they can, of course. Why wouldn’t they.
The important part is therefore, as anyone even remotely literate immediately understands, to limit what they can steal. Which resolves to take away all mechanisms which can possibly be used to steal. Which, in practice, resolves to ending central banking: Money printing is THE simplest and most pervasive means by which the leeches steal. Then, remove the ability to “mandate” people spend money on some stuff (insurance..), and banning them from buying, and supplying, other things (houses). Then remove the ability to spy on people, which automatically removes the ability to tax activity. Then remove the ability to steal via the so called “courts:” Jail people, but never rob them. When someone leaves jail at the end of his sentence, he gets his money and guns back.
Those simple steps, would remove 95+% of all officially sanctioned theft. It’s not that darned hard. It only appears hard to an electorate so imbecile and indoctrinated, that they are simply incapable of comprehending anything at all more complicated than regurgitating utterly childish and mindless drivel.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
I’m wondering if mother Nancy approves. AOC might be grounded for a while . /s
GaryL
GaryL
4 years ago
It was an honest display of why Socialism never works. Principles and ethics fly out the window and are trumped by Human Nature. That’s why anyone can look at Socialist countries and see that somehow there is still a ruling elite who, despite it all, still manage to have their own rules and possess exponentially more than the other piggies who are equal in name only. Even Bernie, with his one coat and mittens, still has his 4 houses and God knows what else. Thanks, AOC, for hitting us in the face with your hypocrisy.
SAKMAN1
SAKMAN1
4 years ago
Reply to  GaryL
This! An honest display of why socialism, or really ANY new political structure doesnt achieve its philosophical goal. Competition is NECESSARY for life, it is literally why we do what we do, and it ultimately results in heirarchy. All you ever achieve, even with successful revolution is to rotate in a new group of elite.
MATHGAME
MATHGAME
4 years ago
Reply to  GaryL
Pete Townsend once wrote “Meet the new boss ….. Same as the old boss ……”
The bosses will always be the same … because all are afflicted with the same corrupt human nature. 
Won’t Get Fooled Again … ? … Really?  Too many people have been fooled forever because too many people have been fools forever.
goldguy
goldguy
4 years ago
Like most of that ilk, they ALL want to BE someone.  Massive ego’s and small minds. 
Freebees2me
Freebees2me
4 years ago
People don’t realize that AOC was actually on a Congressional “fact finding” junket.  
She wanted to better understand “rich people” in order to properly regulate them.
She even said as much.   She said that the Met is an important constituent….  She needed to properly assess their needs…
Nothing to see here – move along!
conservativeprof
conservativeprof
4 years ago
Democrats have proposed free lunch, vote buying schemes to achieve permanent political advantage.  Free money to the masses stolen from the most productive. What could go wrong?
Roto1711
Roto1711
4 years ago
Taxing the Rick will result in a pass through to the other 99 percent who can ill afford to pay even more taxes. The Government just needs to stop spending more money than they take in.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.