Trump Threatens to Leave NATO, Chastises European Allies

Trump threatens to leave NATO if allies don’t help reopen the strait. But it’s not his decision.

Threat to Leave NATO

The Wall Street Journal reports Trump Raises NATO Withdrawal as Allies Push Back on Iran War

President Trump has raised with his advisers the possibility of withdrawing from NATO if allies don’t help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, U.S. officials said, as growing tensions with Europeans threaten the alliance that has been the foundation of the post-World War II order.

He hasn’t explicitly given an order to pull the U.S. out of the alliance that has stood for more than three-quarters of a century, the officials said. But they added that Trump has discussed leaving NATO or potentially finding ways to weaken the U.S. commitment to the organization. Trump has made no final decision about the future of the U.S. role in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the officials said.

Trump’s comments, made recently to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and others in private conversations, come as he urges Europeans to pry open the Strait of Hormuz so the U.S. can end its military campaign against Iran. He has railed against NATO for not joining U.S.-Israeli military efforts against Iran.

When asked about Trump’s private comments, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said “President Trump has made his disappointment with NATO and other allies clear, and as the president emphasized, ‘the United States will remember.’”

Trump’s conversations about the U.S. role in NATO come as European leaders have hardened their stances toward Trump. Polls show the Iran war is deeply unpopular among European voters. Even leaders who were once considered among the U.S. president’s closest allies have expressed growing frustration with him over the Iran conflict and his demands.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who once boasted about his close relationship with Trump, said last week that he had firmly rejected the president’s demand to help open the Strait of Hormuz in a phone call between the two leaders. He said the way the U.S. president was speaking about Germany and Europe was unacceptable.

“I told him, if you wanted our help, you should have asked earlier instead of going to the newspapers now,” Merz said.

Trump and others in his administration have been publicly airing their frustrations with NATO allies. Trump told a British newspaper, the Telegraph, in an interview that he was strongly considering pulling the U.S. out of NATO.

On Fox News Tuesday, Rubio signaled that after the war Trump would rethink whether the U.S. should remain in NATO.

“Unfortunately, after this conflict has concluded, we are going to have to re-examine that relationship, we are going to have to re-examine the value of NATO and that alliance for our country,” he told host Sean Hannity. “Ultimately, that’s a decision for the president to make, and he’ll have to make it.”

Nations Rebuking Trump

The UK, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Germany Greece, Australia, and Japan all have said no to Trump’s request for aid. Some refused air space.

Spain Refuses Air Space

Italy Blocks Air Space

France Blocks Air Space

United Kingdom

I applaud the decision of every country above. NATO is a defense treaty.

Trump unilaterally started this war. It is a mess of Trump’s making.

Returning to NATO. Trump is bluffing again.

Meaningless Threat

The discussion of leaving NATO is expected, but also ridiculous.

The ridiculousness of the threat has nothing to do with the merits of leaving NATO. Rather, the political reality is Trump cannot unilaterally leave NATO.

A law passed by Congress in 2023 prohibits a president from unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from NATO.

Leaving NATO would take a two-thirds vote in the Senate or a joint act of Congress. Rubio championed the legislation when he was in the Senate.

Rubio Irony

The measure was Spearheaded by Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), in the annual National Defense Authorization Act

The bipartisan attempt to add checks and balances highlights the lengths Congress is willing to go to protect the U.S.-NATO relationship amid ongoing Russian aggression and after years of criticism of the military alliance during Trump’s presidential tenure.

Rubio said in a statement: “The Senate should maintain oversight on whether or not our nation withdraws from NATO. We must ensure we are protecting our national interests and protecting the security of our democratic allies.”

A Question of Standing

The pertinent question is who would have standing to file a lawsuit.

Here’s an article that discusses Separation of Powers and NATO Withdrawal and the question of standing.

I propose any number of weapons manufacturers would easily have standing.

There are insufficient votes in Congress to leave NATO. So Trump’s threat to leave NATO is dead already, regardless of the merits of the idea.

Rubio and Trump look like idiots.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

91 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave Smith
Dave Smith
5 days ago

Trump threatening to leave Iran? What a joke. Nato members will more likely null trump’s authorization to use their land quite possibly at Iran’s insistence to open the straights for shipping. It is an art of the deal kind of thing.

ivokar
ivokar
6 days ago

There are large muslim populations in France and Spain. They have no need to stir up the pot by openly supporting a war that these people see is against muslims.

Ron
Ron
6 days ago

Maybe, but he can order the military to redeploy assets ANYWHERE else and that effectively creates issues for NATO.

Naphtali
Naphtali
6 days ago

Rubio and Trump look like idiots.” Succinct and sums up things quite nicely.

Flavia
Flavia
6 days ago

Isn’t Meloni a Trump fan?
And she won’t let Siggy help with the Iran war effort.

You name it
You name it
6 days ago
Reply to  Flavia

That was the previous Trump clone. The one that swore he wouldn’t start new wars.

Frosty
Frosty
6 days ago

This war is for Israel and its theocracy.

He did not include NATO in the plan.
He did not invite their participation.
He did not allow them time to prepare for the economic aftershocks.
He chastised our allies publicly before giving time for diplomacy.
He lied that there were nuclear weapons.
He attacked Iran during negotiations when they were ascent to his demands.
Hormuz is only closed by the insurance companies because of the US/Israel/Iran war.

Trump is responsible for the entire mess…

Augustine
Augustine
6 days ago
Reply to  Frosty

For the record, Zionism, Christian or Jewish, approves of pedophilia, child sacrifice and satanism. This cult even deserves its own name, Epsteinism.

Peace
Peace
6 days ago
Reply to  Augustine

This is job of rich and famous.
Nobody will go to jail.
Even Bill Clinton is innocent

You name it
You name it
6 days ago
Reply to  Frosty

> Trump is responsible for the entire mess…

Beg to disagree. Zion Don only front man. Others are responsible, that much should be abundantly clear by now.

As for leaving NATO – good riddance. The sooner the better. Close all the bases and relocate your staff to wherever you want. The vassals will heave a sigh of relief. And cancel all their orders for useless overpriced last centuries’ outdated military equipment.

Not too likely this will happen, unfortunately. Another brainless rant to fill the time and distract from the digital enslavement program. Of the survivors, that is.

Stu
Stu
6 days ago

So let’s start from the beginning on this one shall we. NATO was formed in 1949. Its primary purpose, was to protect one another against the Soviet Union during tho Cold War. It was mostly, sort of a pact of European Countries and the U.S. which I believe instigated the thought. The NATO members committed to protect one another from all threats as well.

Fast forward to today, and some things have changed. Firstly and most importantly, is America is much more massive militarily than back in 1949. We no longer need protection from threats, but we still stand by our Ally’s when necessary from threats from other Nations with the goal to harm. Iran is a perfect example, and why many Countries are so happy with the U.S. for ridding the World of a continual death threat from them! Iran has not been nice to surrounding Countries and the people in there own Country for that matter…

Now let’s look at the NATO compensation packages, as they stood in 2024 (last data?). The U.S. Pays 16% of the NATO Budget. All other Countries ONLY pay 2% of there GDP. If it’s truly for protection, then we shouldn’t be paying anything to anyone. Which brings up another question. Why are we then paying NATO 16% when they are not needed, and have at times not helped us I do believe, or threatened not to.

We have helped many Countries on our side of things and will continue to do so. Why wouldn’t we?
NATO uses the money for Military Operations, some programs that I am not quite sure exactly what they do, and readiness, that should be the Countries job, and have very little to do with NATO.

NATO should be a simple PACT to assist one another (Countries in NATO) if needed during times of turmoil, stress, products, technology etc. Every Member should pay equal amounts, as we are all equal. We may have more money, but we have the Military to pay for, that’s helping protect those in NATO currently. That small amount is merely for Administrative Cost.

If the U.S. leaves NATO, as a matter of law, the treaty should remain in force for the other 31 members, despite a US departure profoundly affecting the alliance. The U.S. would stand by NATO Countries that wish to work with them, and be Ally’s of course. I don’t think it will come to this though.

Note: No member has ever left NATO. In Article 13 within the Treaty are the rules for such action. It takes 1 Year before you are officially able to be removed from the Treaty.

Frosty
Frosty
6 days ago
Reply to  Stu

Israel is and aggressive theocracy, it is not part of NATO and has never contributed anything to the US or NATO.

Let’s see Israel start to pay the cost of its aggression since 1913!

Frosty
Frosty
6 days ago
Reply to  Frosty

I am all for disarming Iran as long as Israel is disarmed as well.

Both have been pains in all of our asses since Israel was arbitrarily created by the British through the Balfour Declaration in 1913.

Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  Frosty

They are disarming the chance for Nuclear War to occur if we don’t. Iran promised to do so, said they can’t wait to do so, in fact, it’s there biggest wish in all of there existence, to do so. They scream it each and every day as they scream “Death to America” and ALL its supporters as well. They have proved this time and time again.

Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  Frosty

Israel is arguably one of the best Ally’s we have, and definitely is our largest and most favored Middle East Ally.

Jon
Jon
6 days ago
Reply to  Stu

Since the fall of the USSR in 1991, neither Europe nor the USA have had an enemy.

Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  Jon

Hmm… Odd because Iran has been a crystal clear enemy, since 1953 and still are today.

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
6 days ago
Reply to  Stu

Maybe we should leave geopolitical strategy to the folks who can count beyond 36.

Last edited 6 days ago by Phil in CT
Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

We should probably go with 66, as that’s the number of American hostages that were taken by Iran in 1953…

ivokar
ivokar
6 days ago
Reply to  Stu

The only time in history when one of the NATO countries asked for help of other NATO members was after 9/11 when the US asked other NATO countries to join it in the war against terror (Iraq, Afganistan etc). I repeat: this was the ONLY time in history. So all this talk about no-one helping when in need is a complete BS.

Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  ivokar

So I guess this is not NATO helping. Well it’s a good thing when we don’t ask for help they provide it anyway I guess… there are more examples but no time to keep going with this silliness…

Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  Stu

NATO did roll Anchor Guard into action in response to the invasion of Kuwait. Anchor Guard consisted of a large influx of NATO aircraft moved into Turkey with the purpose of protecting NATO and Turkish airspace during the conflict. This was mostly considered to be a monitoring mission.

Ace Guard was another mission that was centered around the defense of Turkey during the First Gulf War. The Turkish government at the time was paranoid about an aggressive Iraq and requested that NATO send new military hardware to discourage any potential attack.

NATO deployed the ACE Mobile Force in response. This consisted of various NATO nations committing large numbers of aircraft to the Iraq-Turkey border. New weapons systems were also installed in Turkish military bases along with new more modern equipment.

Between 1992 and 1995, NATO airforces carried out strategic bombings against targets that were threatening UN peacekeepers and were vital in breaking the now infamous siege of Sarajevo.

NATO forces were crucial in limiting the violence that was being committed against civilian populations and played a pivotal role in leading to ceasefires, which eventually blossomed into long-lasting peace agreements.

TEF
TEF
6 days ago

Hear ye … Hear ye … peasantry … now substituting TITO for NATO (the Trump-Israeli Treaty Organization).

LM2020
LM2020
6 days ago

Trump is just a pissy little man baby, having a toddler tantrum because European leaders (and the rest of the world) are sick of his BS. Only his lackeys and lickspittles in the government, and his window-licking supporters still take him seriously.

Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  LM2020

I think you have that backwards. Trump is simply frustrated when we are always helping out our Ally’s, and when some are asked for help, they are not helping us out!

Triple B
Triple B
6 days ago

The only way to dial down all this chaos is for people to stop amplifying Trump’s behaviour and attention‑seeking posts.

SleemoG
SleemoG
6 days ago
Reply to  Triple B

Sadly more than a decade too late. The MSM got what it wanted and we’re all stuck with the consequences.

Stu
Stu
6 days ago
Reply to  Triple B

I thought he would curtail his rhetoric, but unfortunately he doesn’t seem to have that ability just yet, and may never. It’s not helpful that’s for sure!

Nate
Nate
6 days ago

In other news ….

https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/01/politics/live-news/supreme-court-birthright-trump

I hear Trump stormed out when the justices appeared skeptical

Phil in CT
Phil in CT
6 days ago
Reply to  Nate

It’s just proof that he’s not getting (or listening to) good advice from anyone around him. We know more here from Mish’s blog than the president does.

Last edited 6 days ago by Phil in CT
Daniel Holzer
Daniel Holzer
6 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

Yes, this is very common for autocrats, they surround themselves with people who say what they want to hear and do not have the courage to contradict the boss.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
6 days ago
Reply to  Phil in CT

You cannot teach someone who is determined not to learn anything.

Nate
Nate
6 days ago
Reply to  Nate
todde
todde
6 days ago

Sounds like a good plan.

With the loss of bases in the middle east and Europe, we will have more difficulty projecting power accross the Globe.

We should be able to replace 80 year old treaties. Granted not on Trump’s whim, but this isnt anywhere near the worse thing to be done.

PreCambrian
PreCambrian
6 days ago
Reply to  todde

but this isnt anywhere near the worse thing to be done.”

That is NOT a very high bar.

Peace
Peace
6 days ago
Reply to  todde

Nothing is permanent.
Friends and foes are not permanent.
Sooner or later whatever formed will disappear one day
NATO, EU are illusion. Everybody wants to join while they are powerful and rich.
Even now Europe is noncompetitive, stagnant and getting poorer.

Last edited 6 days ago by Peace
Limey
Limey
6 days ago
Reply to  Peace

Surely your last sentence refers to the USA !!!!

SleemoG
SleemoG
6 days ago
Reply to  todde

Underrated comment.

john
john
6 days ago

Trump says this and then Trump says that? As of now if you still take It —-as a trustworthy rule— than you fell for another of Donalds– 365 Day–April Fools.

Last edited 6 days ago by john
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
6 days ago

All these EU countries (also the UK) are now chock full of potentially hostile male Muslim immigrants.
Might just make their governments think twice about supporting an unprovoked war against a Muslim country – don’t ya think?

Last edited 6 days ago by Bam_Man
Tom
Tom
6 days ago
Reply to  Bam_Man

Racist much?

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
6 days ago
Reply to  Bam_Man

Europe has so many Muslim refugees because they were fleeing the United States’ wars.

MMchenry
MMchenry
6 days ago

War Amnesia by Trump. 970 lbs of enriched uranium (enough for 10-12 nuclear bombs) WAS enough to start a war. Incredulously now it somehow isn’t.

” it was no longer a worry” my ass. Either it was and is, or it never was – all in about a month.

“970 pounds of near-bomb-grade enriched uranium that international inspectors say is likely buried at two sites in Iran — enough to make 10 to a dozen bombs — Mr. Trump said “it was no longer a worry”.

Will see his latest weasaling at his “April Fools Speech” tonight.

Last edited 6 days ago by MMchenry
El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
6 days ago
Reply to  MMchenry

Neither are the Epstein files. Mission Accomplished!

Sentient
Sentient
6 days ago
Reply to  MMchenry

Hopefully Iran will assemble those ten atomic weapons asap so that Israel thinks twice about using their nuclear weapons. Because Iran WOULD be able to retaliate even after an Israeli nuclear attack.

Flavia
Flavia
6 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

They’re being assembled right now, as we write.

Dave Smith
Dave Smith
6 days ago

I am so proud of Trump’s negotiation skills, NOT! By telling the world he will be pulling out in 2 to 3 weeks, he just told the Iranians how long they need to hold out. This fool giving his address to the nation should be titled April fool’s day address by the nation’s top fool.

Nate
Nate
6 days ago
Reply to  Dave Smith

That is only if you can believe things that are said.

Tom
Tom
6 days ago
Reply to  Nate

I believe they will accurately reflect the day being April Fools Day

Augustine
Augustine
6 days ago
Reply to  Dave Smith

Every POTUS has resorted to bombing some poor country before mid terms to rally his base around a war time POTUS. It’s as Usonian as apple pie. The difference is that the 🍊 is not as cunning as his predecessors and surrounded himself not with better informed and educated people than him, but the worse ones and picked Iran, ignoring that it can and does shoot back.

Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar
6 days ago

While President Trump needs US Congresses approval to withdraw from NATO.

He does have the ability to render NATO mute if he chooses to withdraw US Service personnel based in Europe. Or chooses to end the 5 Eyes programme and stop Intelligence sharing.

Tom
Tom
6 days ago
Reply to  Raj Kumar

5 eyes was already impacted when the NATO members stopped sharing information in the Gulf of Mexico. They all said they won’t participate in sinking fishing boats as that constitutes a crime.

Sentient
Sentient
6 days ago
Reply to  Tom

And you believe that? Wow

Sentient
Sentient
6 days ago
Reply to  Raj Kumar

If Trump tried to exit Five Eyes (which he has no interest in doing) he’d be shot dead by a supposed transgender before morning. With a 30-0-06.

Brutus Admirer
Brutus Admirer
6 days ago

~1941, Charles Lindbergh presciently said something along the lines of ‘If the US allows itself to be drawn into this war, they will be tightly tied to and embroiled with Europe forever.’

(FDR and US media–controlled by non-Canadians–did the drawing.)

Lawrence Bird
Lawrence Bird
6 days ago

Mish Trump does not have to “leave” NATO in an official treaty sense. All he has to do is to say he will not honor the treaty commitments.

J_Schneider
J_Schneider
6 days ago

I haven’t heard any one demanding Freedom Fries in March 2026 🙂 Maybe that Iran war is a bit unpopular.

Leaving NATO comes with pros and cons.

Pros – 1/ It enables full and fast pivot to Asia 2/ No risk of getting involved in a war with Russia due to stupid antiques of Baltic states or Poland 3/ No need to be a judge&sheriff keeping order in Europe 4/ Throwing Ukraine under the bus means possibility of making some common sense deals with Russia 5/ It makes invasion of Greenland easier

Cons – A/ No military basis in Europe (and Greenland) and more difficult logistics to get to Israel and to Middle East B/ Europe may get closer to China and may normalize its relations with Russia. C/ Letting Europe alone means losing control over its energy policy and partially losing an important oil&gas customer D/ Europe may again resurface as a competitor of US in financial sphere as euro is important reserve currency E/ Stronger Europe means a potential trade war with the US

It seems to be a good option from military point of view and a problematic option from geopolitical, economic and financial points of view.

Tom
Tom
6 days ago
Reply to  J_Schneider

Con-no one trusts anything we say.

Augustine
Augustine
6 days ago
Reply to  J_Schneider

You say pros and cons, but I read pros and pros. Let us focus and invest on the welfare and prosperity and security our nation, not of others.

Bill
Bill
6 days ago

Well our (ahem) allies in Europe, whose security has been big-brother-backed for decades, have soured as allies ..as have we. Might as well get on with the breakup and let them spend themselves into having standing armies, navies, missile defenses. Let them decide if their security is truly in hand and if their own version of ethnic / refugee invasion is manageable. I’m okay with that. But I don’t have a say and it’ll never happen. This blog comment section will all bash the US and be for more globalism but the world, with the financial imbalances all around, is likely turning inward/isolationism once again. Maybe in 2 years we’ll go back to globalism but methinks that even a domestic political change won’t resume that tired tripe.

Jon
Jon
6 days ago
Reply to  Bill

The Soviet Union fell in 1991, and the Europeans have had no enemies or potential threats since then. The “refugee invasion” was caused by the US attack on Iraq. The US pulling out of NATO would be the best thing that could ever happen to Europe.

You name it
You name it
6 days ago
Reply to  Jon

> the “refugee invasion” was caused by the US attack on Iraq

That’s just one of the modules. The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan dates back to the 1930s. Took them a while. Right wing conspiracy YOU BET

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalergi_Plan

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
6 days ago
Reply to  Bill

Europe would have no security concerns worth talking about, but for American adventurism.

Tom
Tom
6 days ago
Reply to  Feral Finster

Except Putin

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
6 days ago
Reply to  Tom

The idea that Russia is itching to play “Risk!” is absurd.

Sentient
Sentient
6 days ago
Reply to  Tom

Tom and his buddies: “Russia is struggling against Ukraine.” Also Tom: “Russia wants to take over Western Europe”.

If Europe really worried about Russia, they would have built up their militaries years ago. They’re only focused on Russia because they’re unwilling to handle their own internal problems. They’re like white American high school girls getting worked up about Joseph Kony in 2012.

dtj
dtj
6 days ago

So, the U.S. starts a war without consulting anyone but Israel, then expects NATO allies to pitch in because the war resulted in disruption of petroleum supplies to them.

Trump says Iran asked for a ceasefire. Iran denied it. Who are you going to believe, Trump or Iran?

Trump’s recent remarks about the war ending soon are nauseating. They are made purely for market manipulation.

alx
alx
6 days ago
Reply to  dtj

kushner jr and bibi started war!

Peppe
Peppe
6 days ago
Reply to  dtj

and the markets swallow every fart coming from Trumps mouth. This is not investing, markets are a high stakes casino that don’t follow reality markets they follow BS.

randocalrissian
randocalrissian
6 days ago
Reply to  dtj

Only a Trump Cultist will believe Trump before Iran. This is how far the USA has fallen in 14-15 months under Trump.

KSU82
KSU82
6 days ago

Anyone notice last week the EU parliament has voted on ICE-ificaiton of Europe. They have not been able to stop the flow so the word is that they are modeling this after the ICE program in the US.

———————————————————
https://rebelnews.ie/2026/03/20/the-eu-is-paving-the-way-for-ice-style-deportations/

In many parts of the EU, national police officers, border guard and coast guard authorities are already engaged in mass expulsions, arbitrary detention and violence against migrants and operate with impunity.

Alongside plans for “return hubs”, there are also plans to try to expand states’ powers to detain and remove people domestically, extending the length of immigration detention, widening the grounds on which people can be incarcerated, and expanding enforcement measures intended to secure deportations.

Among these is a new provision allowing authorities to conduct investigations and home raids, with searches extending beyond the homes of those facing removal to other “relevant premises”, which could potentially include the homes of citizens suspected of sheltering undocumented people, as well as spaces used by humanitarian organisations.

The Mega Warehouse detentions centers now being opened up by ICE across the United States might seem a world away from Europe on the face of it – but the EU has created the conditions for this to become the reality here too.

Last edited 6 days ago by KSU82
Tom
Tom
6 days ago
Reply to  KSU82

Europe isn’t as brazenly uncivilized as America. I doubt they will hire white supremist groups, kill civilians, and ignore the abuse like America can.
No one has an issue with deportation of illegal aliens. Its the cruelty and lies. Deported because of a 20 year old traffic ticket is hardly reasonable. More so when you look at our adminstrations impressive criminal record.

Augustine
Augustine
6 days ago
Reply to  Tom

There’s a reason why my grandparents left Europe: it’s brazenly uncivilized when the going gets tough. They’ll start eating and killing each other in no time. It’s their history: a century doesn’t go by without a couple of major European wars.

Last edited 6 days ago by Augustine
Flavia
Flavia
6 days ago
Reply to  Augustine

Not enough land.

Feral Finster
Feral Finster
6 days ago
Reply to  Tom

Trust me, they’re plenty uncivilized.

MPO45v2
MPO45v2
6 days ago

Strange days….Remember Brexit? Remember all those discussions about how the UK would be better off without the EU…well…well…well. The UK didn’t count on Trump I guess.

https://www.politico.eu/article/volatile-world-requires-britain-uk-get-close-eu-keir-starmer/

LONDON — The “volatile” international situation requires Britain to build a closer relationship with the European Union, Keir Starmer has said.
Addressing reporters at Downing Street on Wednesday the U.K. prime minister said London and Brussels will flesh out plans for “closer economic cooperation” and tighter security ties at an upcoming summit.
“It is increasingly clear that as the world continues down this volatile path, our long-term national interest requires closer partnership with our allies in Europe and with the European Union,” Starmer said.

The UK rejoin the EU? Lol. I frequently bring up demographics and populations here for a reason: safety in numbers. The UK isn’t as dumb as I thought.

Sentient
Sentient
6 days ago
Reply to  MPO45v2

The Europeon version of “more cowbell” is “more Europe”. Their imbecilic leaders’ answer to everything is to tether themselves together even tighter to the unelected bureaucrats in Brussels. It’s no coincidence that both the Europeon Union and NATO are based in Brussels. At least Spain and Italy are saying “no” to the US using bases in those countries to attack Iran. Meanwhile, Starmer (who always looks like he just saw a ghost) buckled and allowed use of Diego Garcia and is promising to send 2,500 Special Boat Service personnel. Hey Keir – I thought this wasn’t your war. Did your wife correct you on that?

Last edited 6 days ago by Sentient
Stoic
Stoic
6 days ago

Putin’s certainly getting his money’s worth out of Trump, don’t you think?

alx
alx
6 days ago
Reply to  Stoic

usa gov runs 2.9 trln deficit!
taxes are about 5 – 5.5 trln
debt is 39 trln

putin;s fault too?

Sentient
Sentient
6 days ago
Reply to  Stoic

derp

SleemoG
SleemoG
6 days ago
Reply to  Stoic

Agent Krasnov is a faithful little bitch.

SavyinDallas
SavyinDallas
6 days ago

Most of the world will likely survive and recover, but I’m not sure the United States will survive without long term and irreparable damage. Trump and his Zionist owners/”allies” have done horrific harm to our nation. Our short term pain looks like it will be long-term and devastating pain. I suspect the billionaire Oligarchs cannot manipulate and prop up the markets for much longer. Get ready for change– very painful and long term pain. The Empire may be on it’s last legs.

alx
alx
6 days ago
Reply to  SavyinDallas

dont be fool!

usa is still rich, and pretty powerful!

usa can cut 500 bil from defense budget and still spend twice more than china w/ 1.5 bil people

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
6 days ago
Reply to  alx

You forgot to subtract the grift.

JohnF
JohnF
6 days ago
Reply to  SavyinDallas

“Our short term pain looks like it will be long-term and devastating pain”

MAGA = Microsoft – Amazon – Google – Apple.!

The Only Growth In The Economy Right Now Is The Building Of The ‘Digital Prison’ – ‘Epstein’ PDF Billionaire’s Dragging Everyone Into:

‘AI Skynet’ – Total Surveillance – Digital ID.

Last edited 6 days ago by JohnF
randocalrissian
randocalrissian
6 days ago
Reply to  SavyinDallas

All the while Trump’s unrepentant voters are self-assuring this is how we dominate the world and make the USA better.

Sentient
Sentient
6 days ago

Leave NATO? Promises, promises.

randocalrissian
randocalrissian
6 days ago
Reply to  Sentient

Promises, promises
You knew you’d never keep

I’m back robbyrob
I’m back robbyrob
6 days ago

Rubio Downplays Damage To US From Closure Of Strait Of HormuzMarco made an appearance on Sean Hannity’s show on Fox this Tuesday
Secretary of State Marco Rubio thinks we’re all idiots.

alx
alx
6 days ago

he is mo11ron , doesn’t have clue about real life

he is blubber mouth

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
6 days ago
Reply to  alx

… in oversized shoes.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.