64% of Firms Doing Business in China Consider Relocation, Only 1% to N. America

Reuters reports Many U.S. Firms in China Eyeing Relocation as Trade War Bites.

> U.S. companies operating in China believe they are suffering more from the trade dispute than firms from other countries, according to the poll by the American Chamber of Commerce in South China, which surveyed 219 companies, one-third from the manufacturing sector.

  • More than 70 percent of U.S. firms operating in southern China are considering delaying further investment there and moving some or all of their manufacturing to other countries as the trade war bites into profits.
  • Sixty-four percent of the companies said they were considering relocating production lines to outside of China, but only 1 percent said they had any plans to establish manufacturing bases in North America.
  • Nearly 80 percent of the survey respondents said the tariffs have knocked their businesses, with U.S. tariffs having slightly more impact than the Chinese ones.
  • One-third of companies estimated the trade dispute had reduced business volumes ranging from $1 million to $50 million, while nearly one in 10 manufacturers reported high-volume business losses of $250 million or more.
  • Nearly half the companies surveyed also said there had been an increase in non-tariff barriers, including increased bureaucratic oversight and slower customs clearance.

Two-Way Pain

It’s clear that Trump has managed to inflict some pain on China.

It’s equally clear that US companies doing business in China are also suffering.

Winning

This we call “winning” even though almost none of that business is headed for the US, or even North America.

Rather, Vietnam, India, and other emerging markets will benefit.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Refuztosay
Refuztosay
5 years ago

Mish – I get the focused David Recardo / Adam Smith view on economics but you have to consider strategic factors. China is a nation governed by thieves, liars, and cheats. They are not our friends – they are corrupt competitors at best and a long-term enemy in all likelihood. So, yes – in your world of perfect competition and free and frictionless trade – we could theoretically benefit from no tariffs. But that is not the world we live in – and – if you consider yourself an American – you have to do something to reign in China. If some companies move to Vietnam from China – and we don’t see the jobs that’s fine – because we have reduced our dependency on a bad actor and reduced the industrial might and technology advantage that China will (already is using) use against the USA. The USA is not perfect – but following your advice we’ll end up with China on top and we’ve all seen how that works out (like 100m dead people in Russia’s question for Marxist utopia.) As always – keep up the great work – and my request is for you to at least try and see the broader picture of risk.

JL1
JL1
5 years ago

US companies profits will be lower for companies which have gotten larger profit margins by outsourcing and moving production to China.

US workers will benefit over the long term.

blacklisted
blacklisted
5 years ago

The trend of low cost labor moving from China to cheaper areas like Vietnam has been underway long before Trump. So has the trend of increasing corruption and govt largess that will eventually drive the financial capital of the world to China after 2032. Trump is a symptom of the root problem – career politicians, but you choose to focus on symptoms.

Kinuachdrach
Kinuachdrach
5 years ago

This is early days in the fight-back against China’s long-running trade war against the US. For an objective viewer, this report does not sound bad.

First, businesses are considering moving jobs & tax revenues out of China. After the usual chorus has died down, that is likely to make the Chinese authorities more interested in finding a mutually satisfactory solution to the trade imbalance with the US. Remember — the reason for tariffs is to bring the Chinese to the negotiating table.

Second, US (and global) supply chains will be diversified away from over-reliance on China. Everybody is likely to benefit from the resulting increased competition.

Third, the benefits of manufacturing industry will be spread to countries which sit today where China did 20 or 30 years ago. More human beings in more places will be lifted out of poverty.

Mish
Mish
5 years ago
Reply to  Kinuachdrach

Brilliant – Let’s penalize US companies for the benefit of Vietnam, then Cambodia, India etc etc. – How idiotic

Kinuachdrach
Kinuachdrach
5 years ago
Reply to  Mish

Let’s be serious — those “US” companies are already manufacturing overseas. If they shift production from one overseas country to another, it has no effect on production in the US, which is the real basis of the US economy.

The report basically says that US tariffs are penalizing China without benefitting US workers — and without costing US consumers anything, since production gets shifted to another low cost (lower cost?) country. It is hardly idiotic to suggest that a penalized China may become more willing to negotiate a good solution to the trade imbalance.

El_Ted0
El_Ted0
5 years ago
Reply to  Kinuachdrach

Correct, Kinuachrach. The tactical intent of the tariffs is not to return every US manufacturing job in China to the US. It is to pressure China into behaving like a 1st world nation, open their markets and respect patents. The Trump-Haters have nothing but straw-man arguments. Retaliation AGAINST protectionism is not protectionism.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.