A Huge Disconnect Between Climate Rhetoric and Doing Anything About It

Conference of Parties 

COP26 is the 26th annual Conference of Parties on climate change. The goal of these meetings is to agree to methods of limiting global warming to 1.5ºC above pre-industrial levels by 2100. 

COP15 in Paris set lofty goals, but goals are one thing and actions are another. The rest of the 25 previous conferences failed totally.

Unless China, India, and developing nations are on board, don’t expect COP to do anything. And here’s a hint: China, India, and the developing nations are not on board,

Goals of COP26

  • Secure global net zero by mid-century and keep 1.5C within reach
  • Adapt to protect communities and natural habitats
  • Mobilize finance
  • Work together to deliver

Except for the first bullet point the goals are mush, but I can translate. 

Mobilize finance means payments to developing nations to meet their goals. Developing nations want more money than will be agreed on.

China is not committed net zero by mid-century. Countries are not working together.

COP26 Agenda

  • October 30-31: G20 leaders gather in Rome. Key moment: look for climate pledges from China, India, and Saudi Arabia. More climate cash from France and Italy. A G20 communiqué reaffirming 1.5C goal.
  • November 1-2 : World Leaders Summit opens COP26. Speeches will call for more climate action as talks begin. Key moment: an appearance from Xi Jinping will signal China means business.
  • November 4: Energy Day – Alok Sharma will be fighting to “make coal history”. Key moment: look out for new signatories to the UN’s No New Coal pact.
  • November 5: Youth and public empowerment day. Key moment: expect noisy protests from Greta Thunberg for more action.
  • November 10: Transport day, with focus on cutting carbon from cars. Key moment: Boris Johnson will hope for new national bans on petrol and diesel car sales.
  • November 12: Negotiations are due to end, so expect last minute scuffles to delay proceedings. Key moment: release of the negotiated text. No climate target, but nations are likely to reaffirm support for 1.5C goal. The text may agree to present more ambitious carbon-cutting targets by 2023. Nations should also have agreed common time frames for their climate targets, and the format for progress reports against those targets.

The above from COP26 meaning: What the name of Glasgow climate summit stands for and its aims explained

What to Expect

  • October 30-31: Another useless communiqué reaffirming 1.5C goal.
  • 1-2 November: Lots of speeches including another world will end in 15 years keynote address. Xi Jinping will not signal China means business or if he does, it will be a lie.
  • 4 November: Energy Day – Alok Sharma will fight to “make coal history”. There will be new signatories to the UN’s No New Coal pact but China and the US won’t be among them.
  • 5 November: Expect noisy protests from Greta Thunberg. This goal will certainly be met but it will not accomplish a damn thing.
  • 10 November: Transport day, with focus on cutting carbon from cars. Key moment: Boris Johnson will hope for new national bans on petrol and diesel car sales. If there is anything to cheer it will come in this sector. But there will not be meaningful bans on petrol other than perhaps diesel cars. Most of the success will happen anyway from car makers. 
  • 12 November: Negotiations are due to end, so expect last minute scuffles to delay proceedings. Key moment: release of the negotiated text. No climate target, but nations are likely to reaffirm support for 1.5C goal. The text is sure to disappoint climate change activists.

Climate Summit to Nowhere

The Wall Street Journal has the right idea in its outlook The Climate Summit to Nowhere.

It’s incongruous bordering on the bizarre to organize a summit like this while Europe is battening down for a winter fuel crisis, President Biden is begging OPEC to produce more oil, China is firing up its coal-fueled power plants amid an electricity shortage, and climate-change plans wilt as soon as they’re exposed to the sunlight of democratic politics.

No matter. This summit is called COP26 because there have already been 25. No less than the United Nations admitted this week that nations have made little progress on their previous climate pledges. But rather than adjust to this political reality, the delegates will make even more unrealistic promises.

The commitments of developing countries are even flimsier and depend on bribes from the rich. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) this week called for more international aid to finance emissions reductions: A “floor” of $100 billion annually should do it, with $367 billion over the next five years going to Asean, thank you. Out of the 75% reduction in carbon emissions the Philippines plans to achieve by 2030, 72% is contingent on foreign aid, Nikkei reported this week.

Rich countries first made the $100 billion pledge in 2009, but the money still hasn’t appeared. Taxpayers in rich economies will be even less willing to sacrifice their own cash for the climate when they realize who isn’t coming to COP26: Vladimir Putin of Russia and China’s Xi Jinping.

Leaders of other big CO2 emitters, such as world number-three India, will be in Glasgow but might as well not be. Delhi’s environment minister suggested this week that his government won’t sign up for net zero. With several hundred million Indians still living in poverty, India needs more energy from fossil fuels, as does all of Africa.

Mr. Xi promised in 2020 to reduce climate emissions—but only after 2030. In the here and now, China is building more coal-powered plants because growing the economy is a far higher priority. The Kremlin’s budget floats on oil and gas production, and Mr. Putin won’t mind if Western Europe goes to net zero. He’ll then have more energy leverage.

More Money Please 

Please consider the ASEAN Joint Statement on Climate Change COP 26.

Hooray! 

“The Kingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, the Republic of the Union of Myanmar, the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Singapore, the Kingdom of Thailand and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, reaffirmed our commitments ….”

Based On ….”a new collective quantified goal from a floor of USD 100 billion per year, which takes into account the needs and priorities of developing countries.”

NIKKEI Asia reports ASEAN urges developed world to lift climate financing over $100bn

Developed countries should “continue and further scale up the mobilization of climate finance ahead of initiating deliberations on the setting up of a new collective quantified goal from a floor of $100 billion per year,” the bloc said in a joint statement issued Tuesday at its annual summit, ahead of the COP26 climate conference opening next week in Scotland.

Yet a study by the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, a Singaporean think tank, found that Southeast Asians have little awareness of their countries’ climate policies. Nearly 60% of respondents were unsure whether their country had submitted its Nationally Determined Contribution to the Paris climate agreement.

ASEAN would need at least $367 billion through the next five years for its energy plans, bloc Secretary-General Lim Jock Hoi said this week.

Synopsis 

  • China will continue to build coal-fired plants through 2030
  • China has a net neutral target of 2060 not 2050
  • Russia will not do a thing
  • India will not agree to goals 
  • Developing countries will demand but not receive more money
  • Gretta, will give a rousing speech on the end of the world as we know it within 15 years. 

How much carbon will be released by all those jetting around the world to attend this useless summit? 

COP26 will be the biggest failure yet. 

But hey, Gretta will get her picture on countless newspapers and magazines. That counts for something, doesn’t it? 

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“Gretta, will give a rousing speech on the end of the world as we know it within 15 years.”
Is this another repositioning of the goal post? A few years ago we were supposed to have only 12 years. How many times has the goal post been moved, now? Any one see a pattern, yet?
“Transport day, with focus on cutting carbon from cars.”
Remove all the oil derivative plastic/rubber parts from all cars. What materials will they be replaced with?
“Youth and public empowerment day.”
Used to get mailings from the local utility comparing my electrical usage to other similar households. I was in the bottom 6-8% of usage.
What was preventing everyone else from empowering themselves to use less electricity? Nothing, that i can think of. So what do they need an empowerment day for, virtue signalling?
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
At least Greta puts a proper child in childbrained….
If the rest of the rabble were her age; the lot of them would at least appear a bit cute, sitting there screeching about all the things other people should be forced to do on account of whatever teen fashion is the rage du jour.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
“Mobilize finance means payments to developing nations to meet their goals.”
Payments made with money stolen from productive people by debasement, of course. Under one childbrained scheme or another. Since an “industry” filled with nothing but rank idiots living off of debasement theft and nothing whatsoever but, is obviously such a necessary ingredient in solving real problems and all…..
QTPie
QTPie
2 years ago
I don’t see much improvement on the climate front unfortunately until all the following happens:
  • Viable, cost-effective, multi-day, wide-scale energy storage technology is developed and commercialized.
  • China stops building coal power plants at a furious pace.
  • Africa figures out how to slow down the rate of their population growth, which far, far out-paces the rate of the rest of the world.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
2 years ago
Be careful what you ask for. China can solve the carbon emissions problem by ceasing all manufacturing for exporting.
Call_Me
Call_Me
2 years ago
At these conferences do attendees trade pins (a la the olympics)?  Are there s.w.a.g. bags?  Do they all get neat t-shirts? 
It’s more about those 25k people feeling good about themselves while enjoying a trip to a foreign land on someone else’s dime.  Throw in some sound bites from political candidates (after all, any office-holder is perpetually campaigning) and some digital ‘ink’ spilled here and there while people publicize their own opinions and we’ll see you all back here for COP27!
tbergerson
tbergerson
2 years ago
Having read the comments, it is amazing how rational people accept the nonsense that is ESG and Warmism (yes it is a religious cult, with economic self-interest baked in). 
If you want to understand at least a little of what is at stake read this: link to blog.evergreengavekal.com
And then read part 2:
The current crop of warmist claptrap is tantamount to murder.  Raising the price of energy will cost people their lives.  Millions of people.  If forced on the larger non-compliers like China and India and the rest of Africa and Asia (and hey these fascists are all about FORCING things on people against their will these days), it will cost BILLIONS of lives.  COP26 and ESG and pretty much all of the solutions to climate change are in effect murder.  Mass murder.  And if you believe the nonsense that it is an existential crisis for mankind, you are deluded.  Or that there is a coming climate catastrophe.  There IS a coming catastrophe but it has nothing to do with a warming planet.
tbergerson
tbergerson
2 years ago
The amount we should send to tinpot island dictators and ASEAN so their leaders can spend it on hookers, blow and mercedes?  Zero.  Net zero dollars sent to anyone to “help” them meet these farcical climate goals.   That should be the real Net Zero goal. 
You want to do something?  Plant trees.  Trillions of trees.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
Xi Jinping will not signal China means business or if he does, it will be a lie.
  • In 2019, China made 80 percent of the world’s supply of solar panels. 
  • China has the biggest increase in wind turbine generation
  • China has embarked on an ambitious nuclear power strategy in which many new technologies are being trialed
  • A Chinese person emits less than half as much CO² as does an American
Europe is battening down for a winter fuel crisis
  • There is enough gas in storage to get through the winter.
  • Only a winter colder by far than anything in recent memory and drop in import levels will change this.
    People exposed to the spot price of the EU Council’s preferred energy market will hit in the pocket book.
QTPie
QTPie
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
All well and good, but at the same time China is the only nation which is still furiously expanding electricity production from coal, by far the most CO2-intensive way to make electrical power, while virtually all other nations have slowed down or reversed investment in new coal plants.
Greenmountain
Greenmountain
2 years ago
Complcated. But why are the Feds in the flood insurance business.  May be time for the private insurance market to take over. How many times do we repair flooded roads and houses before we realize – maybe this is no longer inhabitable.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
Reply to  Greenmountain
You think there is some coast that can escape floods ? Come back here in 2030 or so and let’s see what’s remaining of coastal cities around the world compared to 2020. 
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
2 years ago
Do we all agree that ESG will be a bust, and there is money to be made in the short-term by owning fossil fuels?
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
I view ESG as a part of investing reality, and one that has to be considered. The way ESG affects access to capital is a game changer. But ESG has to do with a social phenomenon, and it’s not driven by math.
The thing that is missed is……that in a rush to signal virtue, large endowments are throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Energy makes the modern world run. Renewables are woefully insufficient and likely to remain so for my lifetime and beyond, and FF energy assets are still extremely valuable and the largest part of the energy mix.
FF companies, meanwhile, are not run by dummies. They are pivoting to deal with a changing future. Temporarily, at least, they are becoming real cash cows. In the longer term, the line between FF companies and renewables is going to become more and more blurred. Energy will just be energy. If you make it, you can still sell it.
TheWindowCleaner
TheWindowCleaner
2 years ago
Cost is why climate chaange goals will not be met. That is precisely why we require a policy of a 50% discount/rebate at retail sale and an additional 50% discount/debt jubilee policy at the point of loan signing for all big ticket green consumer items like EVs and solar powered homes. Lets implement the wet dream of all libertarians and integrate beneficial price and asset DEFLATION into profit making economic systems. Think about it instead of reacting in an orthodox way.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Sounds good for oil and gas.
It was mostly a red week for oil and gas stock and MLP prices as crude took a breather. But it should be pretty much done now, with higher prices still coming imho. I’m long 22 oil and gas companies and 2 renewables. Also holding 2 covered call income ETF’s and one carbon credit ETF. All but two pay some dividends or ROC distribution. Current dividend outlook is 5.85%. 
I did the right thing to bail on my miner trades, but gold is in a triangle consolidation and apt to make a big move soon. It could be up or down….but I keep thinking that gold will find a bottom soon and that metals and miners will have their day. From a cycles trading perspective, we appear to have  more than five years of likely upside in commodities just ahead.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“Triangle consolidation”? Is that a ‘golden triangle’, like a Fibonacci thing, like golden rectangle (1:1.618) ?  I guess the ‘up or down’ thing has to do with whether the triangle points up or down.
My political, social, and economic fundamentals point to higher gold. Meanwhile, gold will continue to drift sideways/down until the next big crisis.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Every trader knows what a triangle consolidation is, and what it means.
thimk
thimk
2 years ago
Go for the low hanging fruit . Shutting down the worst 5 percent in USA  would immediately wipe
out about 75 percent of the carbon emissions produced by electricity
generation.  Number  one polluter Poland . Only one china plant made top 10 list.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  thimk
You must mean the biggest time wasters, like Facebook/Meta
QTPie
QTPie
2 years ago
Reply to  thimk
That statistic seems distorted/misleading because they refer to 5% of the number of plants but (as far as I can tell), it doesn’t seem they adjusted for the capacity of those plants. So it might be that it’s 5% of the total number of plants but that those plants generate say 20% of the total electricity (I don’t know what the actual number is).
Curious-Cat
Curious-Cat
2 years ago
More than half of taxis in Shanghai are electric vehicles. What cities in the US can make that claim,do you think?
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
China is well ahead of the US on that score. Mentioned it the other day.
But what good is it if most of the electricity comes from coal!?
It’s likely worse.
Curious-Cat
Curious-Cat
2 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
Nothing will be done until the 0.1% feel their wealth threatened, or the 99.9% decide they will no longer tolerate the threat to the planet and their lives. The French, Russian and Chinese revolutions come to mind.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
The 0.1% are in control. They run the green show.  They start and own the companies making green. It used to be that long-leap innovation fired up the world economy. Green is NOT long-leap. It is government-imposed, conveyed by propaganda directed to people who do not think critically.  Which is not to say the climate is changing–there are short term solar cycles (11 years) and intermediate term cycles (400 years)– and a cleaner planet with less waste it better than a dirty planet with waste.
QTPie
QTPie
2 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
What good is that if so much of the electricity in China is coming from coal power plants (including many new ones under or planned for construction).
ed_retired_actuary
ed_retired_actuary
2 years ago
Actual action will be far less than the goal, but substantially more than if there was no global consensus among leaders to at least go through the motions.  Let’s be skeptical realists, but avoid the temptation of cheap cynicism.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Is any nation going to do anything different because of COP26?
Name some. 
US – No
China – No
Russia – No
India – No
Germany – No
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Recall Macron’s attempt and the resultant Yellow-vest movement
Biden asks for OPEC to pump more oil. 
Joe Manchin would not agree to phasing out oil and gas subsidies.
Will any nation change any action?
Hell, the COP15 agreed to pay developing nations and did not even deliver an agreed dollar promise.
The summit is useless.
ed_retired_actuary
ed_retired_actuary
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
I would say a little to moderate amount for most of these countries as leaders strive to look responsible and broad minded to their many citizens concerned about global warming, although as a result of continued attention, and perhaps a trivial amount from any individual summit.  Certainly the $500B intended for clean energy that might get though congress could be a bit of yes for the US.   Of course there could be more meaningful progress when/if technology makes the cost of renewables nearly competitive with fossil fuels across broad uses.
TheWindowCleaner
TheWindowCleaner
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Right, because they don’t have 50% discount/rebate and 50% discount/debt jubilee policies. With them you can cut all manner of taxes and other costs and still have a profit making economic system.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
No one is really going to do much of anything to suppress global warming on any kind of scale that actually matters because it would cost too much, whether is real $$ or economic impact.
Just tongue wang until you get voted out of office.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.