AOC Agrees With Trump’s Request to Send $2,000 Free Money to Everyone

Trump Morphed Into a Mini Andrew Yang 

The political bedfellows have never been stranger.

Yesterday, Trump threatened to to Veto the bipartisan package. One of his reasons was the myriad of unrelated attachments. 

The other was Trump wanted to send out blanket checks, not of $600 but $2,000. 

AOC Hops on the Bandwagon

Free Money!

Free money for everyone. 

That’s a populist idea that comes up several times every year. It was even a campaign issue.

Andrew Yang Chimes In

Please recall the presidential debates and Andrew Yang: This 43-year-old running for president in 2020 wants to give everyone $1,000 a month in free cash.

Freedom Dividend

Yang calls it a “Freedom Dividend”. 

Damn, that’s a name Trump would have used if only he thought of it first.

Yang wants $1,000 a month. Trump wants a one-time $2,000 payout.

Other Trump Ideas

Yep, it’s very disappointing we do not have a balanced budget amendment to stop this nonsense.

Well, we can always use tariffs to balance the budget.

How’d that idea work out?

What a Disgrace

Finally, please note: Trump Calls Covid Bill a Disgrace, Refuses to Sign It

When do Yang, AOC, and Trump get together to hash out the bipartisan details of the “Freedom Dividend”?

Surely there is a compromise here somewhere. The way Washington works, expect $2,000 a month for everyone.

But with AOC openly on board, Trump likely to sign the disgrace then lash out at everyone again.

Addendum: Who Agreed With Whom?

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

30 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
numike
numike
3 years ago

when do I get the check??

PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago

Trump feels the more chaos he creates the better position he is in. Unfortunately the country pays for it in the end, in lives and dollars.

Carl_R
Carl_R
3 years ago
Reply to  PreCambrian

There is a particular need for chaos at the moment. If there are massive riots after January 6th, he can declare martial law.

amigator
amigator
3 years ago

Let’s do it the sooner we really break the country the sooner we can start putting it back together. Just make it 5k and 10k per couple nice round numbers.

GeorgeWP
GeorgeWP
3 years ago

The bill had plenty of hand outs to business and the inflation of money supply is supporting the wealth of asset holders, so why not throw some money at the poor end. They will spend it which will boost the economy while the wealthy just trade it for more assets.

mrutkaus
mrutkaus
3 years ago
Reply to  GeorgeWP

Yes, where are the lobbyists for the poor?

plashadpobedy
plashadpobedy
3 years ago

If the bill passes, it’s just another opportunity for the American people to take it in the a$$ again. What a disgrace, to pass a 5K+page bill that no one has read. For me, the silver lining (in my case, gold) is that gold will shine once again. Bring it on, fools.

Johnson1
Johnson1
3 years ago

what a business model Amazon has:

For its smaller competitors, it has made business untenable. How can anyone compete against Amazon? A company so big, so omnipotent and so convenient that it has generated wealth for its owner and his (ex-)wives on a scale never before seen on this planet.

Here’s a small example of how Amazon operates, courtesy of a recent Wall Street Journal article. A small business began selling camera tripods on the site, and reached $3.5 million in sales, 0.001% of Amazon’s revenue. Amazon then copied the tripods and sold them more cheaply and subsequently banned the tripod company from the site.

Anda
Anda
3 years ago

So AOC ditches positive discrimination for a couple of thousand bucks ?

JoeJohnson
JoeJohnson
3 years ago

GOP Senate opposition to this coule cost them the Georgia Senate seats.

amigator
amigator
3 years ago
Reply to  JoeJohnson

Yes very good point. That will add an interesting twist…..great chess match… It’s McConnell’s move.

Augustthegreat
Augustthegreat
3 years ago

American democracy nowadays is like a circus. plenty of laughable stunts now and then then.

BDR45
BDR45
3 years ago

Why stop at $2000? Make a real difference in people’s lives. Give a $100,000. Really it’s only a digital keystroke away. Deduct a few billion from the defense dept.
Default is coming anyway through inflation, and more importantly, the bond vigilantes don’t seem to be interested.

Michael M
Michael M
3 years ago

From “The Hill”: Does anyone know if these are true?

The $900 billion stimulus package COVID-19 “relief” bill is exactly what one would expect from a dysfunctional, tone-deaf Congress: a pork-filled cluster filled with anything and everything that has nothing to do with the coronavirus pandemic or relief.

And in the swampiest thing ever, the bill, which is combined with a $1.4 trillion omnibus spending bill, is 5,593 pages long, or 5,583 pages too many, was given to lawmakers six hours before a vote to review what exactly is in it (hint: more pork than a Tyson Foods plant).

It harkens back to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) once explaining that a bill needed to be passed in order to find out what was in it. In a related story, our government is broken.

The top-line from the bill says a mere $600 per adult and $600 per child goes to those eligible, which is half of what adults received in another relief package passed earlier this year (the per-child payment was $500). Not hard to see that this amount is hardly enough to keep those struggling from staying out of poverty.

So where is the rest of the $1.4 trillion going?

Glad you asked.

Exhibit A: “Of the funds appropriated under title III of the Act that are made available for assistance for Pakistan, not less than $15,000,000 shall be made available for democracy programs and not less than $10,000,000 shall be made available for gender programs.” Yep. $10 million. For gender programs. In Pakistan.

Exhibit B: Funds for “Resource Study of Springfield (Illinois) Race Riot.” That riot occurred in (checks notes) 1908.

Exhibit C: “Statement Of Policy Regarding The Succession Or Reincarnation Of The Dalai Lama.” We’ll just leave that one there.

Exhibit D: There’s actually a commission tasked with educating “consumers about the dangers associated with using or storing portable fuel containers for flammable liquids near an open flame.”

Exhibit E: Another $40 million will be allocated “for the necessary expenses for the operation, maintenance and security” of The Kennedy Center, which received $25 million in another COVID-19 relief bill earlier this year. Also in a related story, the Kennedy Center has been closed.

Exhibits F, G, H, I, J: $86 million for assistance to Cambodia; $130 million to Nepal, $135 million to Burma, $453 million to Ukraine, $700 million to Sudan.

Exhibit K: The bill creates a Women’s History Museum and an American Latino Museum as part of the Smithsonian. Overall, the Smithsonian gets (checks notes again) $1 billion.

inonothing
inonothing
3 years ago

I prefer $2k to half-k. I think the country is united on this issue.

Sechel
Sechel
3 years ago

Junior member if Congress. No influential committee posts

jivefive98
jivefive98
3 years ago

At some point 51% of workers will have no work as their jobs will be replaced by a computer. This is guaranteed. If we were smart, we would take the time to find a way to “tax the computers” and skim off some of their productivity and return it to … American citizens a la Andrew Yang. Dont do that and we’ll eventually have food riots beyond belief. $2000 per person is doable even in a rational world. While we’re waiting for one, cash to Americans in whatever form is very necessary at the moment.

Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
Reply to  jivefive98

If you were “smart” you would tax the dead more and the living less.

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago

Now we have two “populists” or whatever you want to call them agreeing on something fundamental which is not seen by the “rational” legislators or whatever you want to call them. Both of these “populists” represent significant parts of the population that are very unhappy.

Zardoz
Zardoz
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

I know I used to get pretty grumpy when grocery money ran out. The “3 Days Till Payday” fast worked great to keep me trim though.

The “X Days Till Payday” fast would make me downright stabby if it wore on too long. If you don’t have food and shelter, you die. People get grabby when they can’t get what they need to stay alive.

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago

If you create a lot of money from nothing and give it to some and not others then you have to expect that those left out would demand their due especially when the criteria for receiving said funds are unnecessarily complicated and frankly suspect. Adding riders to the bill is worse than being wrong, it is a mistake because it gives the impression or more likely the certitude that no legislator has actually read the bill in its entirety and therefor have no fucking idea what they voted.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago

“Everyone” does not include everyone……just the deserving semi-poor, of course.

In the name of greater equity.

Rich people must be more heavily taxed. Like everyone with 100K earned income……you know, those RICH people….they don’t deserve to make that kinda money. They must be oppressing somebody.

DeyoJH
DeyoJH
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

Try working hard and then reread your statement.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
Reply to  DeyoJH

I do work hard, my judgmental friend. And I saved about ten other people from losing their jobs. Where is my Christmas present from the government?

Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago

President Trump is trying to buy votes in the GA senator run-offs. Many voters from both parties have had their incomes blocked through COVID quarantine. Trump’s base would rather have no money go to foreign countries. Taking money budgeted to foreign countries and redistributing it to those in America is a better compromise in voters’ eyes.

DanielHolzer
DanielHolzer
3 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear

Except you cannot buy votes for Republican incumbents when it is the GOP establishment had been what was blocking an earlier round of larger stimulus checks.

njbr
njbr
3 years ago

I’m sure AOC also was in favor of the veto of the dense bill, too.

Trump/AOC 2024

Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  njbr

Good point – I was going to write about that but picked this one instead.

May get to that later today.

njbr
njbr
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish

Busy, busy…

PreCambrian
PreCambrian
3 years ago
Reply to  njbr

That combination would be some kind of Frankenstein’s monster.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.