Bad But Expected News – Progressives Cave In and Pass Infrastructure Bill

Bad But Expected News

Under intense pressure, the Progressive Caucus finally ditched their demand that Build Back Better had to pass before they would pass the infrastructure bill.

House Passes Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill

CNN reports House Passes Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill

GOP Reps. John Katko, Don Bacon, Jeff Van Drew, Don Young, Fred Upton, Adam Kinzinger, Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Reed, Andrew Garbarino, Nicole Malliotakis, David McKinley, and Chris Smith of New Jersey, voted with Democrats to pass the bill.

Democratic Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Cori Bush, Jamaal Bowman, Ayanna Pressley, and Rashida Tlaib voted against their party in opposition to the bill.

\When Democrats hit the number of 218 votes, which was enough to pass the bill, many Democrats stood up and clapped. A large group of Democrats huddled around House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, giving her fist bumps and high fives.

The legislation passed the Senate in August, but stalled in the House as Democrats tried to negotiate a deal on a separate $1.9 trillion economic package, another key component of Biden’s agenda that many Democrats had tied to the fate of the infrastructure bill. 

How We Got Here

Going into Friday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi said it was her intention to vote on final passage of the infrastructure bill and the social spending bill known as Build Back Better. But, Friday morning it was clear that a group of House moderates were not ready to support the final passage of Build Back Better for a variety of reasons.

To accommodate that group, after hours of inaction, Pelosi decided to schedule a final vote on the infrastructure bill, and stop short of final passage of the Build Back Better bill, by only voting on the rule governing debate, hoping that would be enough to unify Democrats.

That plan however immediately collided with a significant number of progressives, who have consistently called for both the infrastructure and Build Back Better bills to move together.

Progressives stalled floor action for hours as they deliberated how to move forward.

Then, moments before the final vote, a group of key moderate holdouts released a statement vowing to vote for the social spending package “in its current form other than technical changes, as expeditiously as we receive fiscal information from the Congressional Budget Office-but in no event later than the week of November 15.”

In Its Current Form

The current form includes several additions that Senator Joe Manchin has repeatedly stated he will not vote for.

The current form also includes immigration reform that cannot possibly get past Senate reconciliation rules.

Pelosi Pushes for a Vote That’s Doomed in the Senate, What’s Going On?

Earlier today I asked Pelosi Pushes for a Vote That’s Doomed in the Senate, What’s Going On?

What’s Going On?

Are these actions supposed to change Manchin’s mind? What?

The only thing I can come up with is Pelosi is now willing to pass the infrastructure bill and Build Back Better separately but cannot come out and say it that way because Progressives will not go along.

Divide and Conquer?

  • If she cannot goad the Progressives to give up their BBB First demand, there will be nothing at all because Manchin has the opposite demand.
  • If infrastructure passes (allegedly on a track where BBB is presented at the same time but cannot pass the Senate), she will say “Do you want something or nothing?”

Is take what you can get by “divide and conquer” the unannounced game?

Divide and Conquer It Is

Pelosi and Biden pressured Progressives into passing the infrastructure bill stand alone. 

Next, assuming Manchin hold firms, Pelosi will ask the Progressives “Do you want something or nothing?”

Rest assured it will be something unless Manchin is willing to kill the whole damn thing.

I hoped Progressives would not cave in, but they did as expected. 

Unfortunately We Get Something

No loaf was better than part of a loaf. Unfortunately, we get at least part of the loaf. 

How much more of the loaf we get is up to Senator Manchin.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports?

If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ajc1970
ajc1970
2 years ago
Anybody have a link to a good summary of what’s in the new law?
I’m assuming it’s hundreds of pages and I don’t want to read through it.
Certainly at least one reporter has done that work.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
progressives have so little brain cells, collies herd them daily…..
anyone voting for these dumb sheep is a dumb sheep
oee
oee
2 years ago
It was the Dems that passed The Biden/Harris admin passed infrastructure! Not Trump (the so-called dealmaker, he cannot even manage a house of ill repute, even if his life depends on it).  He had four years and could not do it. Biden/Harris did it within a year,. 
Also, since you do not like infrastructure, please get off the internet since it was ceated by the evil US govt! 
You are the first person I know who does not want to drive on good roads or good trains. 
or have people have access to the internet,. 
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  oee
Remember during the March 2020 crisis, how smoothly they transferred 5 TRILLION dollars upward to the richest 1000 people in the country?

These libertarians pretended to oppose it.  Why do I say “pretended”?  Because when a suggestion was made this year that we should claw back a SMALL fraction of that money by taxing the billionaires, they roundly opposed it.  The amount of howling and chest-beating they did was quite a sight.  

honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
Reply to  oee
they passed a bill to taxpayers, wow, great work dementia joe and kamala ho, why are folks still concerned with Trump…he’s gone….sheep chew grass for a long time…..go apply somewhere, get a job
QTPie
QTPie
2 years ago
The title of the article is a bit misleading given that technically the ultra-woke Democrat progressives didn’t “cave in”. They voted against it but the bill was nevertheless passed thanks to a number of Republicans voting for the bill.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  QTPie
They did cave.  Their leader Jayapal voted for it.  The 6 who voted against it did so after they were *allowed* by the queen mother Pelosi to do so.
ajc1970
ajc1970
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Yup.
Members also “vote trade” too. I’m sure some of that was going on.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
So the progressives caved, huh?   What a shock!  LOL
I have always told the progressives who think they can change this party from within – no, you can’t change the DONORcrat Party; the DONORcrat Party changes you!

That said, the way forward from this ignominious defeat, is what I have been proposing all along.   If push comes to shove (as it indeed has now), drop ALL the BBB items behind and take up just one.   The child tax credit.  Pass it for just one year.   Make it universal or as near-universal  as you can.   Cover at least 99 percent of the people, not 80 percent or 90 percent or 95 percent or 98 percent.   Be the Oprah of child tax credit.   Then run the 2022 elections with a simple proposition – keep us in power in the House and the Senate if you want the tax cuts to continue.   

TechLover1
TechLover1
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I would add full Medicare expansion with dental, hearing etc for one year as well. Let Republicans and centrist Dems campaign on repealing the benefits in Nov 22.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  TechLover1
That would be good too, but since the progressives have been caving again and again and again, the suggestion I made was what should the bare minimum be.   In fact, I would be very surprised if they even get that.   At best, they might manage to get one with severe income caps, like 40,000 or 50,000.    Which then makes it a sort of a welfare program.  And the Republicans do know how to run against those.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
time to go all in on the s&p500?  if this passes, i think i will.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  anoop
It’s a done deal.  Only needs Joey’s signature now.
QTPie
QTPie
2 years ago
Reply to  anoop
Not sure how much this will matter in the long run as far as market returns given that this bill isn’t as big as it sounds. It only amounts to about $50 billion in new/additional spending per year over the next decade.
Business Man
Business Man
2 years ago
I see $463.5 billion here.  Wasn’t this supposed to be something like $1.2T?  I remember Mish talking about a missing huge chunk of money.  Is this that bill?
So any guesses on what the other $600 billion is?
TechLover1
TechLover1
2 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
500B was new spending. Rest was already scheduled to be spent on infrastructure for the next ten years. So $46.5 Billion is “missing”.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.