Battles Rage Over Biden’s Clean Energy Projects as the Size and Cost Jump

Backlash Builds Against $3 Trillion Clean-Energy Push

The Wall Street Journal notes the Ballooning Size of Wind and Solar Projects Draws Local Ire

County-by-county battles are raging as wind and solar projects balloon in size, edge closer to cities and encounter mounting pushback in communities from Niagara Falls to the Great Plains and beyond. Projects have slowed. Even in states with a long history of building renewables, developers don’t know if they can get local permits or how long it might take. 

In Kansas, wind power grew rapidly for two decades and supplies around 45% of the electricity generated in-state, ranking it third in the nation. But at least five counties in more-populous eastern Kansas have recently placed moratoriums or bans on new wind or solar projects, joining 18 others that already restricted wind development to preserve the tallgrass prairie ecosystem.

The U.S., though, is a patchwork of state and local governments with different rules on development, and opposition to projects has mounted for myriad reasons. Increasingly, many communities are concerned that the rapidly expanding size of wind and solar farms will irreparably alter the complexion of where they live.

In Michigan, a typical solar project once covered 60 acres but now would take up 1,200, said Sarah Mills, a senior project manager at the University of Michigan’s Graham Sustainability Institute. Ms. Mills said they may need to get smaller—and more expensive—to be more socially acceptable. A refrain emerging at community meetings she attends is, “What you’re asking our rural community to host is way more than our fair share.”

Not Over My Dead Body

There’s much more in the article about increasing opposition. That’s a free link for interested parties.

One woman was offered $10,000 to have electric lines cross her property. She turned it down. Another said “not over my dead body”. 

The Line it is Drawn, the Curse it is Cast

“The line it is drawn. The curse it is cast. The slow one now will later be fast as the present now will later be past. The new order is rapidly fadin’. And the first one now will later be last, for the times they are a-changin’.”

More wind farms and solar are inevitable. But without battery storage, neither is reliable.

Natural gas, coal, and nuclear plants are not meant to be turned on and off at the whim of clouds, wind, cold fronts, and heat waves. 

But here we are pushing technologies without any infrastructure remotely in place. 

The Inflation Reduction Act Price Jumps From $385 Billion to Over $1 Trillion

Penn Wharton revised its estimate of the cost of the inflation reduction act significantly higher based on Biden’s actual implementation of the deal.

And when these allegedly clean energy solutions fail in the mandated time frame, a demand to do something to fix the problems is guaranteed.

This will inevitably mean the ridiculously named “Inflation Reduction Act” will lead to an even bigger boondoggle “Son of the Inflation Reduction Act.”

For discussion, please see The Inflation Reduction Act Price Jumps From $385 Billion to Over $1 Trillion

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

34 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
StephanLarose
StephanLarose
2 years ago
Perhaps what these people would prefer are oil spills and air pollution in their backyards? Talk to anyone who lives by an oil pipeline or a coal/gas power plant how much they like it. Solar is the cheapest energy source already, and it’ll only get cheaper. The panels and batteries are all going down in price and getting more efficient. You can keep trying to spin this yarn that we need to keep polluting the planet while dumping barrel-loads of taxpayer money into the pockets of oil majors through the trillions in subsidies we give these corrupt, evil corporations, but the market will inevitably choose cheaper, cleaner energy and there’s no stopping that, thank goodness. Talk to anyone with solar on their roofs who get to live off-grid and they’ll tell you how much they love it. That’s called independence and self-sufficiency baby, and there’s nothing better.
DolyG
DolyG
2 years ago
“But without battery storage, neither is reliable.”
That’s what hydro and other gravity systems can do. Molten salts may also be used. And gas can be used for the purposes of compensating for the low times, and eventually, the gas power stations could be running on biogas.
In short, the technologies exist. What does not exist is technologies that give you cheap energy at a pretty profit. When you stop asking for the impossible, you may get something done. For as long as you insist that the impossible is possible, you’ll keep hitting a wall and getting hurt, and heading for a future where war, freezing and even hunger are all quite likely.
PapaDave
PapaDave
2 years ago
Pretty standard. Nimbyism. Environmental concerns. Regulatory concerns. Etc etc. All of which slows the pace of development of many energy projects, whether its windmills, solar farms, refineries, pipelines, dams, mines, power plants etc etc.
All of which puts constraints on energy supplies going forward, and puts upward pressure on energy prices.
We will be using oil and gas for a long time. And it is going to get more expensive (for the reasons above and many more). Which is why I remain heavily invested in oil and gas companies.
In addition; The economy won’t grow very well if it is starved of energy. So anything that constrains energy supply helps contribute to sluggish growth .
Avery
Avery
2 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Any insights on Alberta wildfires effects on O & G industries up there?
Thanks
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Seems like the environmentalists are eating each other. On the one side all energy production must be renewable and clean, on the other you can’t build solar farms or hydro electric dams due to the environmental damage.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Somehow in our form of government, the kooks always end up with the leverage.
vboring
vboring
2 years ago
Gas plants are designed to be turned on and off quickly.
The new Natrium nuclear reactors are also designed to provide flexible power output.
All that said, if your goal is to reduce power sector emissions, the only proven model is nuclear energy built in a rational regulatory environment. A la France.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
I understand why people don’t want windmills. They’re ugly. But solar panels can be fenced int.
Battery storage isn’t going to be a big deal. Lots of companies building batteries and the price keeps going down. Tesla even has a new business where they charge their batteries at night, when the cost is low, and then resell it back to the power company in the afternoon, when prices are a lot higher. Seems like easy money to me.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
The article said they don’t mind smaller projects. 60 acres is a small farm.
1200 acres is 2 square miles (664 acres per sq mile). That’s an enormous amount of space you have to plow under (ie can’t grow food, no trees, can’t live there, soil erosion in wind storms etc) that’s never coming back into use. Compared to Windmills it’s a way bigger eye sore.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Seems like they could keep growing under the windmills. It’d be pretty cool to have a field that powers its own tilling and harvest equipment… maybe even cooks its own fertilizer.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
They are talking about solar fields, not windmills. They definitely still farm around Windmills or at least they do in Texas.
Solar pretty much covers everything up so that nothing can live under it or just crab grass type thing. So no animals, lots of soil erosion etc. Plus I suspect 2 square miles covered in mirrors would tend to heat up that area in a manner similar to the way paved cities heat up more than countryside.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
The Solar cells actually cool things down. They absorb the solar energy and convert it into electricity. The ground just heats up.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
There are a lot of big solar facilities in the desert areas of California. I don’t think it’s nearly as ugly as a windmill on top of a mountain.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Unfortunately the wind also blows at night.
ThinkEconomically
ThinkEconomically
2 years ago
Biden would still be passing off Bobby Kennedy’s speeches if he could. The guy is a grifter plain and simple. Can’t believe 1/2 the country believes this guy. The left has gone full on Marxist and they control the media. Sorry everyone. We are sort of screwed. Speak up and you will be labeled.
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
2 years ago
Mandates are the first resort of idiots.
Fish1
Fish1
2 years ago
Everyone knows this green energy thing is a bunch of crap. Oh wait, The state of Kansas gets 45% of their energy from wind…Let me try another one, those Tesla vehicles don’t work. Writing this from a Jiffy Lube, doing maintenance on my Suburban… “We can’t possibly make green energy and low carbon work.” Mr. Bigut, CEO Standard Oil.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
2 years ago
Reply to  Fish1
Kansas is 54% according to the table in this chart. I am actually surprised to see so many states above 40% from clean (wind/solar) on the list.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Clean energy is something like 1/3 of the grid now. It’s slowly and steadily increased over the past 20 years. The really dirty stuff like coal is almost gone or will be gone in another decade or so.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
It’s windy out there in the middle. I suspect Wyoming could power the country with windmills on just the area that has been strip mined.
Topferment
Topferment
2 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Kansas uses nuclear power, natural gas and coal for our reliable electricity. We sale the unreliable wind power to other states.
prumbly
prumbly
2 years ago
Reply to  Fish1
“he state of Kansas gets 45% of their energy from wind”
I call BS. According to the EIA, less than 20% of Kansas’ energy comes from wind (2020). Most of their energy comes from natural gas and coal. 80% of homes are heated by natural gas and propane.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
2 years ago
“What you’re asking our rural community to host is way more than our fair share.”
And how exactly is their “fair share” being calculated? What contributions has the rural community made to GDP or city/county/state tax revenue? probably next to nothing and they get money for roads, schools and other infrastructure that they couldn’t afford to build on their own from their large tax base city centers.
But that’s not the real problem anyway. When Exxon and other oil/gas companies have diminishing production do these rural people think Exxon is going to send a tanker all the way out to the middle of nowhere so these people can get fuel? Or is Exxon going to concentrate their distribution where most of their sales are at such as large city centers?
If I lived in a rural area I’d be taking as much free energy production as possible because it’ll be a lot more expensive in the future. If they don’t like solar panels in their backyard where are they going to get gas for their truck or electricity for their EV?
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Exxon and other oil companies are going to be a fraction of their current size in a decade.
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Exactly. Agree 100% which means gasoline production will become much more limited and available. It won’t make sense to send 1000 tankers to 1000 rural areas where there is a single gas station in a 50 mile radius. It would be cost prohibitive to do so. Exxon and other oil & gas companies subsidize delivery to these regions, I doubt they are profitable at all.
There is a similar parallel to what is happening with airlines right now. The same will happen with fuels.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
Those rural areas will make Bio-diesel from plants.
That means less food shipped to the cities. Not sure what city people are going to eat then 🙂
MPO45v2
MPO45v2
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
All those empty commercial real estate buildings will be turned into vertical farms.
You would think Iowa would be driving around with corn fuel with all the corn they grow but even Iowa now gets 72% of their electricity from wind.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I think it’s generally recognized that the biofuel thing didn’t pan out, but the subsidies remain. It’s just goopy solar, in the end.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Oh, it’s clearly a failure (though I guy I play hockey with did convert his diesel Mercedes to bio-fuel to run on the grease from his 2 restaurants. Car always smelt like fries. LOL).
But if we ever did run out of real diesel or it became prohibitively expensive you can bet people would go back to it.
msspec
msspec
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
”That means less food shipped to the cities. Not sure what city people are going to eat then :)”
Insects of various kinds will be ‘normalized’ and touted as delicacies by the PTB.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
The farm equipment will be EV like everything else. The big harvesters will likely have solar panels on them, helping charge the batteries.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
In 10 years Exxon and other oil companies are going to be much more profitable.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
2 years ago
Reply to  MPO45v2
The rural areas supply your food, the materials you use to build and maintain the cities, and the energy. Cities used to ship manufactured goods back to the countryside, but now it seems all the cities do is financial swindling and software. The manufacturing was exported as part of the financial swindling.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.