Biden Removes Some of Trump’s Tariffs on Solar Panels, Good Idea?

Solar tariffs imposed by Trump, image Reuters via Wall Street Journal.

Wishy-Washy Compromise

In a wishy-washy compromise likely to please no one, Biden Extends Trump’s Solar Tariffs, but Allows More Solar Cells to Enter Duty-Free

The Biden administration said Friday it would extend a set of tariffs on solar-energy imports for four years, but significantly reduce their scope by doubling the amount of solar cells that can enter the U.S. without facing any levies.

The tariffs apply to imports of solar cells and modules globally. About two-thirds of the familiar solar modules that go on rooftops and utility installations are made in China, and about 15% are manufactured by countries in Southeast Asia, often at Chinese-owned companies, according to the data from IHS Markit. U.S. producers make about 2%.

Pro-Tariff Position

“Gutting the safeguard this way makes it almost impossible to believe that we will ever produce solar cells, solar wafers, or polysilicon for solar production in this country ever again,” said Mamun Rashid, the president of San Jose, Calif.-based Auxin Solar Inc., one of the companies that had sought an extension of the tariffs. “This decision undermines our energy independence and our national security.”

In December, the International Trade Commission (ITC), a U.S. government body that advises Congress and the White House on tariff policy, recommended maintaining both the tariffs and the existing quota level of 2.5 gigawatts of solar cells. 

Anti-Tariff Position

The Solar Energy Industries Association, which represents companies that install and use solar panels, welcomed the administration’s actions even though it said it would have preferred to have the tariffs lifted entirely.

What Biden Did 

Biden administration officials say the U.S. would continue to allow bifacial solar panels—those that collect solar energy from both sides of the panel—to enter the U.S. without paying duties.

Ignoring the ITC, the Biden administration instead doubled the quota level to 5 gigawatts, allowing a significant chunk of imports to avoid the levies.

What Biden Should Have Done

This one is easy. Biden should have removed all of the tariffs.

Despite the tariffs imposed by Trump, no U.S. factory makes the solar cells which are the key input to most solar panels.

Trump’s tariffs raised costs, hindered doing anything about the environment, and cost a significant number of US jobs. 

You either want to do something about the environment or not. And the Tariffs cost the US jobs. Trump caused a loss in three ways. 

Fair Trade Clowns

The fair trade clowns want the floor. But Trump gave them a chance with huge tariffs and that still did not help, and it never will. Raise tariffs enough and the entire industry stalls over the price.

The fair trade idea is crazy for another reason. It implies China is giving the US too good a deal. In other words, China is subsidizing US consumers at it own expense. And we complain: No! I insist we pay more. 

The fair trade clowns would rather pay more for something to save or create a few hundred manufacturing jobs at the expense of thousands of installation jobs, trucking jobs, assembly jobs, etc. And in this case, the environment suffers over it as well, assuming you believe solar panels would make a difference. 

Regardless, Trump’s tariffs were a total failure. Biden should remove all of them, not just the ones on solar panels.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com

Please Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
UCT
UCT
2 years ago
Mish is a China bootlicker and shortsighted.  Chinese companies use forced labor and receive government incentives to produce solar panels at a cheap price.  They also dump the toxic byproducts of production into local rivers and landfills.  Do you think the pollution doesn’t eventually make its way into the food chain????  The tariffs (duties) imposed on Chinese goods should be higher than they are. End user cheaper prices aren’t okay if we sanction slavery and pollution to save a few bucks.  If we made the panels here there wouldn’t be slave labor, nor would there be pollution.  If they are too expensive to sell here, who cares?  We can not control the climate or stop its change so we need to just adapt.
dmartin
dmartin
2 years ago
Reply to  UCT
They don’t use forced labor….that’s a bunch of boloney that you fell for.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Like so many things we’ve seen, once the damage is done (bankrupting good, profitable US companies), trying to undo the damage is impossible. This horse left the barn so long ago the famers all bought row crop tractors with GPS.
But genius level thinking compared to lifting Iran sanctions just to drive down high gas prices in a year when Democrats have an approval rating in line with real interest rates. Now that was the Warren politburo’s finest achievement to date. Not because of aha they did, but because of why they did it. Short term thinking is becoming their hallmark. 
Because…they stacked the bureaucracy with women and persons of color, many of whom have no clue what they’re doing. Bring back the old white men. We’re gonna need them. Apparently only racists get energy.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Thought for food.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
Yes, stupidity at its finest. The government talks out of both sides of its mouth when it comes to supporting Green policies.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
Reply to  JeffD
The net effect of this will be big suppliers buying all panels up to the quota limit the first second of each new year, then passing on a 15% price gouge to resellers. 10% for the Big Guy I guess, to pass this corrupt legislation.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago

You can’t
complain about the deficit in trade goods being too high and complain about tariffs
being too high at the same time. They are two sides of the same coin. Trade is
not and, has never been and never will be a level field nor has high tariffs
ever been a barrier to high economic growth. Free trade is a philosophy just
like Monetarism and Marxism are and blind obedience to the idea instead
of reality has always lead to disaster. No I do not think that all tariffs are
bad and they should be used when merited.

Webej
Webej
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
So, do you disagree with Mish and think that higher tariffs will create a solar panel industry in the USA?
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
I disagree with Mish and may the Lord have pity on my soul. I believe some tariffs are necessary and I am not a free trader at all. There should have been tariffs on Chinese solar panels. Now we have solar panel manufacturing and spend billions buying what we used to make from China.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
 In other words, China is subsidizing US consumers at it own expense. And we complain: No! I insist we pay more.
AMEN
BowserB46
BowserB46
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
No, the U.S. is helping with China’s child labor and slave labor unemployment problems.  Full employment of children and slaves in China makes the world a safer place.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
Are you saying China is cheaper because it is giving it away to the American consumer, despite what Mish says?
Or are you stating it is only cheaper due to child/slave labor?
Children in China go to school. They work hard. Compared to American schools it is child labor, but then they are not illiterate at the end.
Hi-tech industry rarely works on slave labor. I do not think you can prove that most industry in China works with slaves and that people don’t earn wages. In fact, they have the highest rate of home ownership in the world (slaves?) and they overwhelmingly have faith in their leaders, at a far higher rate than have Americans in Joe Biden.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
“Hi-tech industry rarely works on slave labor. …”
Googles “iphone slave labor”
“About 2,800,000 results”
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
They are not slaves, and are free to go back to their village.
Perhaps the conditions leave a lot to be desired, but that is not slavery.
Your Nikes have more advertising than labor in them. The young women in Indonesia who put them together are getting a pittance and are working hard, but they are not slaves. If they were fired they would be worse off.
Not justifying differential conditions in various parts of the globe, but slavery only works with physical “energy” label.
Better treated slaves are more productive, and more autonomy leads to more creative results.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Nazi Germany use slave labor to make V-1 and V-2 missiles. Many of their airplanes were also made by slave labor. China has a very high home ownership level because in 1998  the government announced the end of Welfare Housing Provision. Before that all housing was owned by the government and the people paid rent. The end of the welfare housing provision transfered ownership from the state to the renter thus in one stoke making China go from no private ownership to he highest.
lamlawindy
lamlawindy
2 years ago
I had supported the tariffs when originally imposed because I thought that US manufacturers would jump into the solar panel game.  The manufacturing of panels isn’t as capital intensive as car-making, and the push to move to solar seemed like a prime opportunity.  Seeing that manufacturers didn’t jump at the chance, it’s clear that the Trump-era tariffs failed in this particular industry.
BowserB46
BowserB46
2 years ago
Reply to  lamlawindy
I don’t know what the effect of the tariffs were at the consumer level, but once a year for the last four years, I’ve gotten quotes for solar installation (southeast Texas outside Houston), and I’ve yet to get a price that breaks even in less than 13 years at current electric rates and assuming -0- maintenance and repair expenses.  Maybe it’s the cost of panels, but from the kinds and complexity of quotes I’ve gotten, it seems like solar is as much a racket as a business.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
That’s a long time. Do you have a small house or is electric really that cheap where you live (when I lived in Dallas and Austin I don’t recall thinking electric was ‘cheap’, it seemed average compared to other places I’ve lived)?
My electric bill in Florida averages about 250 a month (4200 sq ft house, salt pool pump, lawn sprinklers etc) and I don’t run keep it especially cool (average 77 AC temp) or 3K a year. In 13 years that would be 39K for me and I’m sure I could get solar for a lot less than that.
I’ve looked into solar and the best way forward seems to be the new solar tiles that Musk and some other companies (better than his) are promoting. The catch is that it only gets done when you replace your roof since the solar is built into the tile itself. But if you are already spending 30-40K for a roof, upgrading those tiles to solar for a bit more money makes sense.
lamlawindy
lamlawindy
2 years ago
Reply to  BowserB46
It CAN be a racket, depending on how one does the installation.  I did my own ground-level installation, so my panels are not on my roof.  My system is not large; my goal was to defray the cost of part of my electrical bill and not to make money via net metering. 
The panels, inverters, and wire totaled about $3000.  The 26% tax credit brought my out-of-pocket costs down to about $2200.  My electricity production varies, of course, but was about 6000 kWh in 2021.  Our metered electrical service is about 10 cents a kWh, so I save about $600 a year.  In 4 years, the panels & inverters will have paid for themselves, assuming my production and electricity costs remain the same.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.