Bigger is Better: Trump Says a “Small Cut” Won’t Do

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
abend237-04
abend237-04
4 years ago

Every national politician has two options when it comes to economic policy: Educate the electorate on the dangers of government prolificacy and the need for sound fiscal policy OR badger the Central Bank for lower interest rates and a resulting weaker currency.
Fed Chairman Powell is on record as opposing QE3 under Bernanke, “It’ll never be enough for Wall Street; even $4.3 trillion won’t be enough…” but he can’t stand alone against a currency race to the bottom, which is what’s underway.

I believe the root cause of Europe’s economic malaise lies in ECB efforts aimed at protecting the German export engine via low interest rates and a weaker Euro.

13 Trillion dollars of societal capital parked idle in sovereign junk is a damning indictment of every Central Banker and national politician on the planet.

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago

@Advancingtime – When Trump Organization went bankrupt, a lot of people blamed Trump for buying the Trump Shuttle (now Delta Shuttle I think?). Others said he had too many properties levered in debt. The stock market had been on a tear, but Trump doesn’t buy stocks (according to Trump, I have no idea).

But when creditors dug into Trump Organization, they realized the bankruptcy was caused by a helicopter crash that killed several senior executives who ran day to day operations while Trump “made deals”. Art of the Deal and all that. Trump tweets and draws the crowds, he knows how to deal with crooked city officials who demand bribes and union bosses who demand kickbacks when building supplies are brought to a job site.

Trump relied (and probably still relies) on a group of trusted advisors to handle lots of the details, to actually execute Trump Organization strategy.

Plenty of corporations and armies have been stymied because the leader had vision but didn’t have lieutenants who could execute.

President Trump (as opposed to CEO Trump) has had a lot of trouble finding lieutenants who can execute his ideas, people who can get things done. There has been a LOT of personnel turnover.

Obama had the same problem. Bush II had Colin Powell and Condolesa Rice and Rumsfeld to execute, but Bush II had no vision. Bill Clinton mostly had vision for coed interns, but he also lacked lieutenants who could get things done.

Presidents and CEOs need solid people who can execute the leader’s vision. HR departments spend a lot of time making sure they can attract good employees; companies that don’t have trouble.

Washington DC has so much corruption, and confirmation hearings are such partisan witch hunts, that Presidents of both parties are unable to get good lieutenants to get things done

FromBrussels
FromBrussels
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

you just drew a clear picture of the global corrupt, criminal, political, corporate environment in general…..

Advancingtime
Advancingtime
4 years ago

As we have come to know more about President Trump it is clear he is very comfortable with economic manipulation. This is not written as an attack on Trump but to point out the President has a distinct view of the world which spills into the financial system. Trump appears to embrace MMT and often seems more worried about today than the future. His “damn tomorrow” attitude is reflected in deficit spending and calling for lower interest rates.

Trump’s delusion that his stock market can go straight up forever is not based on years of stock trading but rather his years in real estate where inflation treated him well as prices rose ever higher. The article below argues this has skewed his views on the economy in ways that might damage us in the future.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago
Reply to  Advancingtime

Now that we are back to 2% GDP he knows he needs lower rates. But his fate will depend on the economy come 2020. Bankruptcy is no issue.

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago

I wish Trump and the cabal of criminals in Washington (Congress, lobbyists, and the academics in the Eccles building) would factor in the loss of interest income people get hit for while we subsidize a city full of parasites (DC) and their bank CEO friends.

A rate cut (if it happens) will hurt people who need interest income. It will not fix the economy anymore than it fixed Japan.

A rate cut is a lot of loss, with absolutely no gain.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago

More winning. Proving lobbying Trump doesnt matter when it comes to Qatar, Dubai or UAE – all who have Kushner in their back pocket .

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago

For an allegedly casual observer, you have a raging case of Trump derangement syndrome.

Trump has you worked into a total frenzy

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago

I voted for him. Thus what you purport is impossible.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago

It seems like you are in a frenzy here since you opened your account today. I’ve been here for over a decade on this blog and going back to before 2004 on the old blog. Trump was a good idea in theory. In practice it has been a disaster. I guess its impossible for you to think there is truth on all sides. That requires thinking.

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago

I got here first… Mommy! Tell Tater-Man to stop making me cry

Trump got into your head, you are completely obsessed by everything he does

Matt3
Matt3
4 years ago

We are in a crazy world. When the Greek 10 year is under 2%, maybe the US rates are too high. US rates look high in relation to other countries.
Most of EU has negative rates. I would have said this was impossible and will lead to disaster. I would guess everyone here thought that
QE would create inflation, gold would sky rocket and we would enter a depression. It hasn’t – so far. Now I believe we are headed to MMT either with Trump or with any of the Democrats.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt3

Yep. Ray Dalio states this openly as is preparing for it. He has even convinced nonbelievers in the financial world that MMT 2.0 is coming.

Blurtman
Blurtman
4 years ago

Moar cowbell!

kilroy
kilroy
4 years ago
Reply to  Blurtman

Agree, it was great on SNL!

bradw2k
bradw2k
4 years ago
Reply to  Blurtman

I got a debt fever! And the only prescription is lower rates!

Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago

CONfidence in the government, Fed and other equally corrupt institutions is steadily evaporating. Eventually, this will lead to loss of $USD reserve currency status and a shocking decline in US living standards. For now, the $USD remains the “purest gal in the whorehouse”, but for how much longer – it’s anyone’s guess.

Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago

He wants the Fed to go all the way to “Minus 11”.

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago

@Tengen Too much corruption in Washington DC for any president to really fix things. Comey and Brennan should not have been able to use government resources to attempt a coup, and corrupt members of Congress (who knew from the beginning there was nothing there, because Obama told them in deed if not in word) used a fraudulent coup to drag their own country through the mud.

Trump getting elected is a symptom of the underlying disease that is effecting the all G7 countries. Its why we are seeing similar persons winning elections all over the G7.

If you want to get rid of Trump, you have to fix the underlying problem: Washington DC is corrupt to its very core. Hilary is corrupt to her very core. That’s why DC loved her and the rest of the country did not.

Tengen
Tengen
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

I don’t want to “get rid of Trump”, I want the Fed to stop blowing this bubble so we can have the big reset we desperately need. It will be very painful but also inevitable and absolutely necessary.

When Trump makes statements like this, he proves he’s part of the swamp like nearly every other politician.

Carlos_
Carlos_
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

Gee I seem to remember him saying something about draining the swamp. Give me a break now you want to have it both ways with your hero. Honestly, the derange Orange guy kind of insinuated that he could use nukes to end the war in Afghanistan. The he wonders why other countries want their own nukes. The guy is a bully and everyone knows it by now

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

Clearly you are a faux news watcher and repeater. Literally every post is about Comey and Brennan. At some point tan-man has a problem. Tsunami of problems coming for him.

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago

For an allegedly casual observer, you have a raging case of Trump derangement syndrome.

You and Rachel Maddow have been predicting “this is the week Trump gets caught” for two years.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

Lol. I voted for him so what you purport is impossible.

AshH
AshH
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

Please disclaimer your messages with the statement “This message was approved by the Russian IRA”. Thanks.

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago
Reply to  AshH

Please disclaimer your poor writing skills.

Not sure if you meant to poke fun at Obama telling Medelev, when he [Obama] thought the mics were off, to tell Putin that he [Obama] would have more flexibility after the election (which is a clear and blatant act of collusion between Obama and the Russian government.

Or perhaps you are referring to the Clinton Foundation receiving a $140 million bribe from Russatom? That’s either a blatant act of collusion or else its Hilary accepting bribes.

Or maybe you are talking about Bill Clinton getting $500K for a 45 minute speech in Russia?

Because Comey and Brennan (and later “Mueller”, aka Hilary’s campaign lawyers) chose to overlook all those cases and evidence.

People who are tasked with gathering evidence would have investigated those acts and included them in any professionally written report about Russian election interference.

Tengen
Tengen
4 years ago

Some of us still remember the “big fat, ugly bubble” that a certain candidate talked about last election. My, how times changed after 2016.

Fortunately he did manage to lock her up, end the wars, build the wall, and drain the swamp, so at least he’s not a total blowhard.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago
Reply to  Tengen

Oh the irony of being the incumbent vs the insurgent. This is going to be hilarious and end badly.

Tater-Man
Tater-Man
4 years ago

30 years of central bank planning in Japan accomplished absolutely nothing — except for a lot of debt.

The Fed is doing the same thing, and will get the same results.

Period. Amen. No buts. Same input, same output.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

Clamoring for growth at any cost only gets more debt.

TheLege
TheLege
4 years ago
Reply to  Tater-Man

The US will be lucky to get the same results as Japan. I suspect they’ll get a whole lot more.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.