Have central banks gone too far in with rate cuts? I think so, and a BIS study No 804 (Un)conventional Policy and the Effective Lower Bound concludes the same thing.

The 47-page study is for geeks and it is mostly unintelligible gibberish that I will mock. A few small sections of the report are mostly understandable. Here are a couple such snips.

In response to the Financial and economic crisis of 2008-09, central banks have aggressively cut monetary policy rates, in many cases all the way to the effective lower bound (henceforth ELB), namely the rate below which it becomes profitable for Financial institutions to exchange central bank reserves for cash.

Our main result is that in reaction to a Financial shock which reduces banks' monitoring efficiency, credit policy may be a more efficient tool than policy interest rates.

Cutting policy rates to zero may be unnecessary after non-standard measures have been implemented.

The report was mostly 47 pages of nonsense that looked like the following:

BIS Study 804 Snip 1

Image placeholder title

BIS Study 804 Snip 2

Image placeholder title

BIS Study 804 Snip 3

Image placeholder title

The study had 20 references to the word "assume".

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

Note the preceding snip to "simply" the solution via a simple "approximation".

The study is rife with gibberish about things like "output gaps" that cannot be accurately calculated even if they exist at all.

In the first snip above, the study mentions "entrepreneurs would postpone consumption until the time of death."

This is another way of saying time preference cannot logically be negative.

Conclusion

Despite all the gibberish and mathematical nonsense, the final conclusion is at least somewhat understandable "Cutting policy rates to zero may be unnecessary after non-standard measures have been implemented".

I would revise and expand the sentence as follows.

Cutting rates to zero can never be correct. It is against laws of finance and time preference, which can never be negative. But there should not be a Fed in the first place either to cut rates or to implement "non-standard" measures.

Brick Wall

Central banks are the problem, not the solution.

They have hit a brick wall and cannot cram any more debt into the system.

There is no tolerance for paying interest.

The evidence is overwhelming.

  1. More Currency Wars: Swiss Central Bank Poised to Cut Interest Rate to -1.0%
  2. Inverted Negative Yields in Germany and Negative Rate Mortgages.
  3. Fed Trapped in a Rate-Cutting Box: It's the Debt Stupid

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Reader Asks “Why are Zero Interest Rates Bad? What Should the Interest Rate Be?”

Reader Henrique from Brazil asks “Can you please explain in simple layman terms why zero or negative interest rates are bad? What should the interest rate be?”

BIS warns of Diminishing Returns of Monetary Policy, Zombies, Junk, Complacency

The BIS annual report fired off a plethora of warnings to central bankers yet missed the best warning of all: bubbles.

Huge Interest Rate Dislocations: Did the Fed Cut Too Much?

A series of charts shows new fed-sponsored interest rate dislocations. Let's dive into the charts.

BIS Blasts Cryptos in Special Report: "Beyond the Hype"

The BIS blasts cryptos over scaling issues, energy, and trust. The BIS is correct. Cryptos are fatally flawed as money.

BIS Points Finger at Yellen, Draghi: Warns About “Unthinkably” Low Interest Rates.

In it latest quarterly report, the BIS (Bank of International Settlements), pointed a direct finger at Fed chair Janet Yellen with an even bigger point at ECB president Mario Draghi.

Fed Cuts Interest Rate 3rd Time in 2019 With Hints of a Pause

The FOMC committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate to 1-1/2 to 1-3/4 percent.

Negative Interest Rates: Have They Backfired Already?

Anyone with an ounce of common sense knows that negative interest rates cannot occur naturally, can only occur with government or central bank intervention, have nothing to do with free markets, and must fail eventually.

Lagarde Praises Negative Rates, Study Shows They Reduce Lending

Incoming IMF chief Christine Lagarde says negative rates have helped Europe more than they’ve hurt. I disagree.

Yet Another Fed Study Concludes Phillips Curve is Nonsense

Proponents of the Phillips Curve keep looking for ways in which it works. Yet, another study concludes it doesn't.