Brexit Talks Might Fail: There’s Not Enough Cake

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn gave a speech in the UK laying out what he wants Brexit to look like. It is in contrast to what UK prime minister Theresa May wants.

However, neither May’s proposal nor Corbyn’s proposal is acceptable to the EU. Corbyn is playing politics, and it may well lead to the collapse of the UK government, but it won’t stop Brexit.

Talks May Fail

That’s the short version. Eurointelligence provides the long version.

Jeremy Corbyn’s speech was a bit of a downer in our view. He gave us Labour’s version of having your cake and eating it: a bespoke customs union of the kind the EU is unlikely to agree to. He accepts partial regulatory alignment, but not membership of the single market. He insists on the UK having a say on future EU trade deals, which will be completely unacceptable to the EU. He reaffirmed yesterday that Labour will not be seeking a second referendum, or challenging Brexit in other ways. In fact, this should be the main headline. By coming out in favour of the customs union – however flawed it may be – Labour has closed the door on Brexit revocation. We very much liked Laura Kuenssberg’s philosophical observation:

>”…if the EU says we can’t have a say in a customs union, and Mr Corbyn says he wouldn’t join a union if the UK wasn’t given a say, what happens then? Nothing about what outwardly seems a softer Brexit is guaranteed. If the promise is an impossible one, is it really a promise at all?”

>We have heard a troubling comment on Sky News last night, which suggested that Corbyn’s shift in position was due mostly to the local elections in May. Labour is hoping to win a number of outer London boroughs which had strong Remain majorities at the referendum.

Corbyn’s problem is essentially the same as Theresa May’s: intermediate options work in British politics only, but not for the EU. This is why we have argued that the UK’s choice is rather stark: it is a choice between a trading relationship based on WTO rules (either with or without an Article 50 agreement), or a customs union with full regulatory alignment in respect of the products that are traded and a complete abdication of external trade policy.

The Irish border issue is critical. The EU has aligned itself fully with Ireland on it. The Guardian reports that the European Commission’s draft Article 50 agreement, to be published tomorrow will stipulate that Northern Ireland stay in a de facto customs union with full regulatory alignment. This will put massive strain on the UK government. The EU’s document will have 200 pages and contain 160 legal articles. The Commission will sign off the draft on Wednesday before handing it to the EU ambassadors.

Not Enough Cake

Both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn promised to tackle the Northern Ireland border problem. But neither has a proposal that is acceptable to the EU.

In different ways, Corbyn and May want to have their cake and eat it too. Of course, that pertains to to the EU as well.

Unless someone is willing to eat less cake, there will not be any cake to share at all.

This setup suits me just fine. A hard Brexit with WTO rules will prove to the world that leaving the EU is not such a big deal. Moreover, and contrary to what most think, it will be the EU, not the UK that suffers the most.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ahengshp58
ahengshp58
6 years ago
stillCJ
stillCJ
6 years ago

Everyone at the table wants the biggest piece of the cake. Even those who are willing to have equal amounts will not get along with those who want the most. England would likely be best off to just tell the EU to stuff it.

Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
6 years ago

The union of European countries from Atlantic to Urals existed before the wars and the cold war tore them apart. It would be nice to return to that old time. However, some things have changed: government paid health care, social and unemployment insurance, expanded trade, more product regulations. There is some need for bureaucracy, but not the mandarins of Brussels kind. I don’t think anybody will kick the British expats from anywhere as long as they don’t look for a job abroad.

ahengshp58
ahengshp58
6 years ago
Yancey_Ward
Yancey_Ward
6 years ago

There will be no Brexit is still my position. All of this is a prelude to a second referendum in which Remain will win by hook or by crook.

frozeninthenorth
frozeninthenorth
6 years ago

Oh and lets not forget Northern Ireland…

AndrewUK
AndrewUK
6 years ago

Out of the EU that becomes an immigration matter and bilateral. The EU might think it is a Sovereign State, but it isn’t yet, so the UK can set a quota of Polish citizens it will give residence visas to. I would certainly, as of 29/3/2019 abolish the right to export benefits etc for all EU migrants. The EU has a lot to lose in all of this, but judging by how they have destroyed Greece it seems they really don’t give a f***.

Sebmurray
Sebmurray
6 years ago

I would imagine that the last thing the likes of Spain and Portugal want or need is for all the British expats or retirees currently living there being forced to sell up and go back home, taking with them billions of Euros

frozeninthenorth
frozeninthenorth
6 years ago

Mish, you got Trump right, he did win! On this, to say that the UK will be better of under WTO rules, maybe, I am less than certain. However, the WTO rules say nothing of the hundreds of thousands of European who live in the UK, nor does it say anything about the hoards of British who live in Europe…Not everything here is commerce, some of it has to do with people. Then again, maybe North America will be better of without NAFTA…what say you!

SweetKenny
SweetKenny
6 years ago

I feel like the world is on a financial merry go round – I keep waiting for someone to get off and initiate a change but everyone would rather stay on and get sick.

philbq
philbq
6 years ago

Error: my comments are intended for the yuan discussion. Oops!…Sorry.

philbq
philbq
6 years ago

To add to the fear in China , Xi clearly is trying to become a dictator for life. I wonder when the Chinese people will revolt. Are they mice?

philbq
philbq
6 years ago

There is a longing for national sovereignty that cannot be ignored. International trade deals suppress sovereignty. The EU is run by an unelected bureaucracy and follows the trade policies that benefit large transnational corporations. Many nations would rather go it alone than be controlled by unelected ministers in the EU. As in the U.S., the polarization of wealth has left millions unemployed and in poverty. And many European nations are overwhelmed by the flood of immigrants, taxing the social safety net. Brexit is a natural response to all of this.

Hooligan
Hooligan
6 years ago

The UK should trigger exit now, with no transition agreement. Let the cards fall where they may (sic). The problem is insoluble when instread of the expression – in the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king – in the land of the EU, sight is regulated, with an eyepatch and the blind are taxed for collisions.

Hooligan
Hooligan
6 years ago

Quite right Mish. A Brexit deal is impossible. Corbyn is a total waste of (marxist) space and because of this, he will only ever lead the UK to (more) ruin.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.