Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

California Decriminalized Shoplifting for Amounts Under $950, Guess What Happened

Shoplifter’s Paradise

Please note San Francisco Has Become a Shoplifter’s Paradise

“Theft in Walgreens’ San Francisco stores is four times the average for stores elsewhere in the country, and the chain spends 35 times more on security guards in the city than elsewhere,” reported the San Francisco Chronicle. 

Earlier this year, a spokesman for CVS, which has closed at least two stores, told CNN that of its 155 locations in the Bay Area, the 12 in San Francisco account for 26% of all shoplifting incidents in the region.

Much of this lawlessness can be linked to Proposition 47, a California ballot initiative passed in 2014, under which theft of less than $950 in goods is treated as a nonviolent misdemeanor and rarely prosecuted.

Meanwhile, politically progressive local prosecutors from Los Angeles to Philadelphia and New York compete to see who can prosecute the fewest people.

Just Plain Crazy

This is just plain crazy. And it’s another reason for the big backlash I expect in the 2022 midterm elections.

School boards, crime, racist college admissions that favor blacks who cannot read, and critical race theory crammed down kids throats are all part of the extreme Left madness sweeping the country.

In February, I noted Coca Cola Confirms Training Employees ‘Try To Be Less White’

In July, I commented Critical Race Theory Should Be Banned, and a Black Parent Explains Why

“Educators use CRT as their own agenda, to indoctrinate the kids to hate each other,” said one black parent to a rousing round of applause at a school board meeting.

In May I noted College Entrance Exam SAT Score Racial Profiling: 964=1223

Welcome to new math that says an SAT score of 964 equals a score of 1223.

We can’t sit on our hands and ignore the disparities of wealth reflected in the SAT,” claim college administrators.

To compensate for the fact that Blacks score lower on average than Asians and Whites, SAT to Give Students ‘Adversity Score’.

And so here we are. Shoplifting is the fault of Walgreens, not the shoplifters. 

This makes about as much sense as everything else sweeping the country.

 Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports?

If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. 

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

54 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
astroboy
astroboy
4 years ago
Is it possible to shoplift more than $950 worth of stuff from a Walgreens?
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
What is interesting in America is the things that start on the coasts usually trickle their way into the heartland in time. I can see a time where middle states start realizing how much it is costing the states, counties, and cities to try some of these shoplifters as debt problems continue to spring up in our society. They will throw it back on the stores for not taking more precautions. 
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
The logical end result is to have stores that look like the old Service Merchandise stores. In those, there was a showroom filled with non-working demo samples. You browsed the samples, made your choices, placed your order, and paid. By the time you paid, the real, working merchandise came down a conveyor, and you picked it up on your way out the door. What is old is new again.
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
I remember Service Merchandise!  Great post!
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
Of just go to an internet based model…
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Bungalow Bill
The Service Merchandise model was much like an internet model, but with a showroom where you could look at and touch non-working samples. You didn’t have to go to the showroom, though. You could order from a catalog and have it shipped to you. It would be conducive to pre-ordering with curbside pickup, too. Replace the catalog with a web page, and you have internet ordering for shipment or curbside pickup, plus the ability to see and touch actual samples of the merchandise, but with no possibility of shoplifting.
I’m certainly not saying that Service Merchandise will rise from the grave, but rather that, in a world with endemic shoplifting, we may see some aspects of their service implemented in other retailers, particularly we may see expensive merchandise sold with non-working displays, where you have to pay first before you get the actual, working item.  In fact, I’ve seen that very thing at other retailers, where you pay for the item while someone fetches it from locked storage.
bowwow
bowwow
4 years ago
Law enforcement and the criminal justice system shouldn’t be removed from handling instances of theft based on a cutoff dollar value of stolen goods.    Often enough thieves take whatever they can whenever they feel compelled to steal.  Government agencies should have a role in discouraging theft.  In California they’re just plopping the problem on the business location.  
Location personnel are supposed to catch their own thieves.  This includes repeat offenders.  They’re supposed to be insured, etc..  Technology and locked displays are common.  Customers and location personnel aren’t supposed to mind any of this.   
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago

If stealing
below the amount of $950 is not a crime, then buying what has been stolen is
not a crime either. If I could centralize by an app the buying of those goods
giving the entrepreneurs/thieves a place for them to quickly and easily
exchange the fruit of their work for money, then I could corner the market. It’s
not fencing because the goods were not stolen and because of the fast
turnaround the entrepreneur/thieves could increase their volume allowing them
to steal more and more and I could take a nice slice. I make money on the
spread and everyone is happy. I could expand to different cities and states and
use my new-found wealth to pay politicians to change the laws in their states.
An IPO would follow and I could rake in billions.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Doug78, master criminal. 
Professor Moriarty don’t got nuthin’ on you.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
As we say, if it moves shoot it.
Jackula
Jackula
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
They already have offerup, craigslist, ebay etc…friggin crazy
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Jackula
It would take too much time for them to find buyers. I on the other hand will guarantee a price as soon as they send pictures of the loot. The whole process from steal to fence (my truck would be close by for the drop off of goods) to payment would take a half hour tops. They could be back to another store very quickly maybe doing ten stores a day. By the way if you are in the Chicago area I can get you some Louis Vitton handbags real cheap.
Dutoit
Dutoit
4 years ago
This really very strange, because USA has the highest incarceration rate par 100000 hab.
And in the same time it seems that more and more infractions are not punished….
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
The whole country is built on nothing but theft. Anyone in any position of influence, is receiving a combined trillions worth annually of loot stolen by The Fed. It’s how the CEO of Walgreens makes his money. Why should he care? Keeping on the progressive Fed’s good side, and out of ambulance chasing shakedown racketeers’ sights, is infinitely more important to his bottom line than whether a few franchises or locations have to close. People who shop at Walgreens have been robbed sufficiently by The Fed that their spending is rather irrelevant anyway.
Incarceration has nothing to do with whether crimes have been committed or not. Rather, it’s just another racket in and of itself. This time to pay off connected PE monkeys who have “invested” in “correctional facilities” and the like. And to “secure support” of flatfooted fatsos who think they appear more “tough” by cheering for Dear Leader to tweet something mean about someone.
Etc., etc. It’s nothing but rot and manure all the way in all directions. Random jailings and arbitrary abuse of incompetent-at-everything kangaroo courts, complete lack of any rule of law.
For twenty years or more now, the cops in San Francisco have not only not bothered one iota about bicycle theft. They actively protect the thieves! Same story at Walgreens: Should a shopkeeper, despite being taxed of all he earns so that the state will supposedly protect his business, still be in a position to have to do the protection himself… Then, suddenly: Here come the cops… Who “don’t have the resources” to come after shoplifters. But coming after shopkeepers, and bicycle owners, now that’s no problem at all…..
While the Taliban may be a bit on the rough side of 100% optimal: At least cutting off of hands do work. And all things which do work; do, at a minimum, trump all things which don’t.
Bungalow Bill
Bungalow Bill
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
“The whole country is built on nothing but theft.”

Funny, I just had a conversation similar to this with my sister. She decided to bring up, since I didn’t vote for Trump (didn’t vote for Biden either) some strange conspiracy theory that in 2030, the government is going to steal our houses from us. I was amused. I had to remind her they will take your house and assets if you don’t pay your federal, state, and county masters. The flag that flies above the IRS will come get your stuff if you don’t pay all that money in to be free.

I then had to remind her after she ranted about the Keystone Pipeline and Trump’s border fence earlier at dinner that for those projects to even start requires government taking land from private property owners. Apparently she isn’t offended by government stealing as she claimed she was.

You are right, and it’s not just San Francisco. I have had my car stolen in Illinois and broken into in Missouri. The cops filled out some paperwork and that was it. When my car was actually found, I had to pay the impound and towing fees. More theft added to the intitial crime. 

whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit

Why would that be a surprise?  Income and wealth inequality lead to all sorts of problems – including petty crime, violent crime, homicides and so on.   

This is just one example – the US is almost off the charts when it comes to charting how crime rates are impacted by inequality:

Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Stop.  “Wealth inequality” does not diminish anyone’s right to go out and make a living any which way they want.  But you have to want it, you have to make sacrifices, and you have to work crazy hard.  If you are unwilling to do those things, you will be “unequal” to those with wealth.
That is life.  There are so many job opportunities out there that recruiters have never seen anything like it.
Me making a living, and a good one, does not preclude anyone else from starting up a business or working hard to make a good salary for themselves.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
Two points.   One, the inequality levels are higher in the US than in any other developed country.   And two, the inequality is growing.    If you want to say that you are smart and hardworking, and the other Americans who are poor are lazy, then I would tell you to go screw yourself!
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Nice response!  You really are a Progressive.  You can’t control your emotions and start shouting at me with words I didn’t even use.
Now to your other point:  When the richest people in the world are entrepreneurs based in the U.S., then yes there is going to be wealth inequality.  Not everyone can make it big.  But you don’t need to.  You fall into the trap that most progressives fall into, which is that you believe wealth is transferred, not created.  You think that when people order on Amazon and Jeff Bezos makes a profit, that he “took” it from them and now wealth is “unequal.”  You have a lot to learn.
Remember this phrase and think about it:  “Poverty is a mindset.”  Anyone can start from zero and get somewhere.  But you have to work hard, and you have to make sacrifices.  It will not come to you, and no one will lay it out for you.
By the way, I started out from zero.  My mom and I were alone and we literally had nothing.  All I had was my body, my mind and then eventually my education.
I note that it’s always the comfortable and privileged who are Progressives.  It is the people who had nothing and worked hard within the system to achieve something and attain some level of financial comfort that are usually conservatives.
Why is that?
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
There is nothing surprising. As the US has become increasingly an atheist country, crime rates have risen dramatically. Perhaps religion instills a sense of morality, or perhaps it is no more than the opiate of the masses. Either way, the decrease in religion that the teaching of humanism has wrought has led to unintended consequences, though perhaps not unexpected ones. Look at the replies here. Do you see replies of “theft is wrong”, or do you hear replies that it’s all relative, and some theft is ok, and understandable?
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
catch and release shoplifting .  Hmmm, ” merica”  land of the free , home of the brave.
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
Prop 47 is an admission by the State of California that there are no resources to pay to combat such petty crime.  Violent crime is the priority.
The citizens of California would pay either way — for the infinite number of LEOs necessary to blunt shoplifting or higher prices to compensate retailers for “shrinkage.”
Perhaps it’s time for retailers to come up with more advanced ways to protect their inventories.  I’m sure I could give them a dozen or so ideas.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple
“Prop 47 is an admission by the State of California that there are no resources to pay to combat such petty crime. “
Yet plenty of resources available to combat those who do nothing more than protect their own property, now than noone else does it for them…..
Nothing wrong with cops, nor any other taxfeeder, having no resources. Just make sure the have NO resources. People will sort it out better without the taxfeeders, than with them. At least at anything remotely resembling the current state of taxfeeding and dutyshirking.
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
I agree.  It all went downhill when the people delegated self-defense of life and property to the State.
Since2008
Since2008
4 years ago
I will take a guess at the answer to Mish’s question about what happened. I would guess that the state saved so much money by not prosecuting small theft that they made public employee pensions solvent and gave the corporations who were being stolen from a tax cut to make up for the lost property.
Law enforcement used the saved time to figure out who used a fire extinguisher to bludgeon to death the capital police officer a while back and put that person in prison for life.
Then the people who think not prosecuting $900 theft is a good idea were so happy that they decided to let people take $900 from them every day and they never pressed charges.
And everyone lived happily ever after.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Since2008
I think Shedlock was so consumed by confirmation bias that he failed to stop and think about 2 key questions:

1. Why only San Francisco?  Why not other places (cities or towns) in California?
2. Why only Walgreens?  Why not other stores?   

Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Funny that death by fire extinguisher didn’t make it into the FBI report. It did make it into CNN but it’s a bit different.
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
It’s happening in Chicago, too (where I’m from).  The thing about Chicago is that many thefts are not even reported.  The police have decided that they won’t even do the paperwork.  Or, they will put you last in the queue, and unless you are willing to wait around for 6 hours, they just won’t show up.  Too few police and reporting is “not a priority.”
When I had something stolen and I called 911, I was actually scolded by the operator that this wasn’t an emergency, and should be reported via 311, which is the City’s reporting line.  Police do not show and the city does not care.
In the meantime, many high profile businesses are leaving the Mag Mile, and many storefronts are going vacant.
It’s happening in other places, but just because the media doesn’t tell you, doesn’t mean it isn’t true.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
Reread what I wrote.  I asked why not other places in California.   The premise of the poster was that it was because of the $950 threshold in California.
njbr
njbr
4 years ago
Straight from shoplifting to CRT.  My goodness, you people are easily triggered.  Almost like Mr. Baldwin, with about as good an aim….
But some facts for the rant,  Califonia is one of the lower felony thresholds at $950–there are only 12 states with thresholds under $1000.  Texas’ is tied at the highest with at  $ 2500–what a bastion of liberal nonsense they are!! 
The change in CA happened in 2010, TX in 2015—oooh the ourage from over a decade ago bubbles to the surface…..
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  njbr
CRT is the latest shiny object for the right-wingers, just like Russiagate is (and has been for 4+ years) for the latte/limousine/learjet liberals. 

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2021/06/critical-race-theory-republicans-frankfurt-school

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
This POV, that CRT is being overblown by the right, who get it all wrong and see communists under every bush, might be reassuring to you,, but it is not the reality of what’s going on here. I’ve been observing how the new Black Woke intelligentsia is attacking Condoleezza Rice for not carrying water for CRT. Fwiw, Rice, who is the kind of example  Black kids should be looking up to, gets it right, and the attacks are very revealing.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Well, Rice (and Powell) are the kind of example Black kids should not be looking up to.   Both were involved in telling lies to sell the illegal war on Iraq that resulted in the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis, displaced millions more, got thousands of US troops killed and spent trillions of dollars over 2 decades.   
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
CRT is not a shiny object, CRT is racist and teaches people to hate.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  njbr
The difference is that in Texas store owners have guns. Not wise to try to steal from someone with a gun.
njbr
njbr
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Try again–virtually the same property crime rates….TX  2245/100,000, CA 2139/100,000
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  njbr
Depends on what type of crime. Those are overall property crimes it seems. Are they in stores or in people’s homes? Also show your data source. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
It certainly adds an element of excitement to the average convenience store hold-up.
I often think about what would happen in my neighborhood if it was invaded by BLM protesters like the ones who gathered on that white-shoe lawyer’s lawn in Louisville. I suspect the outcome might be a little different.
The new Woke DA here has indicted the off-duty sergeant who offed the BLM Boogie Boi downtown who brandished an AK in his face……but you know, I haven’t heard of anymore of that kind of activity since that happened. We’re back to Saturday night gang shootings. I predict the sergeant gets off, too. This is not Louisville, or Minneapolis.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I expect that people will be paying much more attention to local elections in the future. The radicals slipped in because few people were interested in looking into the nuts and bolts of those elections and expected things to keep on as they had before. This last year and a half has been a rude awakening. They found out that many of those in office are way further left than the population and put in policies that mirrored these extremely stupid ideas. 
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
So when will WalMart start closing stores in California due to shoplifting?
Business Man
Business Man
4 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
WalMart is not a convenience store.  Different business model, and different security protocols.
human909
human909
4 years ago

Let’s think about this critically rather than jumping on ideologically based click bait.

Wolf Richter has us covered here:

Why Walgreens is in Trouble in San Francisco and is Closing Some Stores: It’s Not Shoplifting, that’s an Artful Distraction from the Real Reason

It isn’t shop lifting it is too many stores and not enough customers.

whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  human909
Very relevant.   The moment I saw the post, I knew there was more to the story than just shoplifting.   But to conservatives, poor people and minorities are all the problem, and the way to solve the problems is to throw some of them into prison and cut the wages of the others.   And rich people are the good guys, and the way to encourage them to create more wealth (for themselves, but it will trickle down to everyone else – as we all know 😉 ) is to applaud them and to cut their taxes.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  human909
Amazon is eating them.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  human909
Thanks for that. It does make sense. But as a tourist,I can say that I’ve visited a number of those same stores, and they’re full of street people 24/7, and I can believe that there was also above average shoplifting in the area….. in and near the financial district. Part of the problem is that urban SF is a bit of a food desert….although it is a small area in terms of square miles, there are significant travel barriers to visiting the larger food stores, which tend to also be expensive. The Walgreens tried to fill that void, obviously with bad results.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
Reply to  human909
I live here and so does Wolf, he is a little bit blind to what is around him, though he does swim in the bay…..
The city is a liberal cess pool of the worst kind……
Blurtman
Blurtman
4 years ago
Five finger reparations.
SAKMAN1
SAKMAN1
4 years ago
All efforts and all monies must be spent to help those undet the age of 15. Anyone over than must help themselves as best they can.
However, teaching anything but the best tools to compete in our modern economy must be banned.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
The California voters voted for it and since I do not live in California or do business there it doesn’t affect me at all. Personally I think it is stupid but it’s not my problem. On the bright side if I get the urge to shoplift I can fly to California and shoplift to my heart’s content.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
In general, petty crime in SF is out of control. It’s very common to have your car windows broken by smash and grab artists, and the cops do nothing. It happened to me, and I was out a lot more than $950. It definitely affects my behavior when I’m there, and that is far less often than it used to be, for that reason.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I was there eight years ago for a few days. One of my daughters spent four years in LA going to grad school so we went there often and know the whole state. Back then I had no problem. In LA where she was in school she lived in Venice Beach and it was nice. Now it’s a hell hole. Fortunately she moved to Brooklyn and was glad to leave. 
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I live 20 miles south.  I haven’t been up to the City in years.  Used to go semi-regularly.  Now it’s just a sorry, unsafe cesspool of a city.  Sad!
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
I do love your part of the world, Jojo. I used to visit there regularly during Spring Break when my kids were still at home and we needed a place to get away from SXSW. Really pretty country between Santa Cruz and where you live. Some great trips to Coastanoa Lodge and the state parks.
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Here in the next county south of SF, the Sheriff’s Dept has the contract to act as the primary police force for a number of county towns.  It seems the vast majority of people “contacted” by the police get cited and released to commit more crimes and to NOT show up for their arraignments.  I’ve seen reports of people with 5 warrants out for them get cited and released!  It’s really difficult to get arrested here.  Sheese.  
This is what I see reading the police reports in the local paper and looking at the online dB just now.  Releasing virtually everybody has become standard procedure ever since the beginning of Covid due to lack of isolation space at the jail and general fear of Covid.  It also matches the desires of the Libs who don’t want to send anyone to jail for any reason.
Here’s a short list I captured:
On October 16, 2021 at approximately 1914 hours, a subject was contacted at grocery store and was found to be in possession of a controlled substance. The subject cited and released on his promise to appear.
On October 16, 2021 at approximately 2114 hours, a male subject was contacted at grocery store and found to be in possession of a switchblade knife and drug paraphernalia. The subject cited and released on his promise to appear.
On 10/14/2021, at approximately 0158 hours, Deputies contacted a subject who was found to have an outstanding warrant out of Belmont Police Department. The suspect was cited and released on her promise to appear.
On 10/15/2021, at approximately 1002 hours, a subject was contacted and was found to have an outstanding misdemeanor warrant out of the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office. The subject was later found in possession of narcotics and cited and released on his promise to appear.
On 10/12/2021, deputies contacted a subject who was found to have an outstanding misdemeanor warrant out of Pacifica Police Department. During a search he was found in possession of a controlled substance and drug  paraphernalia. He was cited and released on his promise to appear.
On 10/07/2021, a male subject was found to be in possession of controlled substances and drug paraphernalia. He was subsequently cited and released from the scene with no further incident.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.