Chicago Poised to Create One of the Largest ‘Guaranteed Basic Income’ Programs

Please consider Chicago poised to create one of the nation’s largest ‘guaranteed basic income’ programs.

The Chicago City Council is poised to vote this week on what would be one of the nation’s largest basic income programs, giving 5,000 low-income households $500 per month each using federal funding from the pandemic stimulus package.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) has proposed the more than $31 million program as part of her 2022 budget, which the city council is scheduled to consider on Wednesday. The one-year pilot, funded by the nearly $2 billion Chicago received from the Biden administration’s American Rescue Plan, is supported by most of city’s 50 aldermen. But it has received pushback from the 20-member Black Caucus, which has urged Lightfoot to redirect the money to violence prevention programs.

The inequalities in Chicago are particularly stark. A 2019 report by an economic inequality task force created by the mayor’s office found that 500,000 Chicagoans — about 18 percent of the population — are living below or at the poverty level. Nearly half the city’s households do not have a basic safety net to help in emergencies or to prepare for future needs, such as homeownership or higher education. A quarter of households have more debt than income.

Study Says Guaranteed Income Pays Off

The Washington Post reports Stockton gave people $500 a month, no strings attached, to fight poverty and it paid off.

Starting in February 2019, the Stockton program has provided monthly payments for two years to 125 people living in neighborhoods with a median income below $46,034. Participants can use the money as they see fit, without work requirements or other restrictions.

Dozens of mayors have joined an initiative to advocate for guaranteed income, and several pilots in cities including St. Paul, Minn., and Compton, Calif., have already begun.

“The study shows what mayors know: People are working, but the economy isn’t,” St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter said.

Idiotic Plans and Idiotic Assumptions

500,000 Chicagoans live below the poverty line. Chicago will give 5,000 lucky lottery winners $500 a month. 

What about the other 495,000?

And what about the allegation that “Nearly half the city’s households do not have a basic safety net to help in emergencies or to prepare for future needs.”

The 2015-2019 number of households was 1,066,829 with an average of 2.48 persons per household.

The Math

Chicago’s total city budget for 2021  is $12.8 billion. Property taxes in Illinois are already outrageous. Sales taxes in Chicago are a whopping 10.25%.

The 10.25% sales tax rate in Chicago consists of 6.25% Illinois state sales tax, 1.75% Cook County sales tax, 1.25% Chicago tax and a 1% Special tax.

Where in the hell is Chicago going to come up with taxes to hand out billions in “free” money”.

Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s 2022 Budget

As city council gets First Look At Proposed Budget, some balk at property tax hikes.

Some alderpeople want to avoid a property tax increase in next year’s city budget, saying too many Chicagoans can’t afford any more strain on their finances in the ongoing pandemic.

The City Council launched its 11-day, marathon budget hearings Friday to dissect Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s budget proposal for 2022. The mayor’s $16.7 billion spending plan is aimed at powering the city’s economic recovery from the coronavirus crisis.

In 2021, City Council approved a $94 million property tax increase that included a provision annually raising taxes at a rate tied to the Consumer Price Index. This year’s hike would be 1.4 percent, determined by the increase from December 2019 to December 2020.

The plan to spend liberally on social programs received little push back Friday, but aldermen were concerned that once the city opens up the spigot of the spending, it would be hard to rein in and the city wouldn’t have the federal money to fall back on.

“What are we going to do in 18 months, in 24 months when those federal dollars aren’t there? How do we make sure…that they will be able to sustain themselves down the road,” O’Shea said. 

$100,000 ‘slush fund’ is ‘ripe for abuse’

City officials had no firm answers for how aldermen should spend the $100,000 Lightfoot wants to give each alderperson to provide “microgrants” in their wards.

“It’s ripe for abuse,” Vasquez said. “If we’re getting that kind of fund in each ward, I could see people interpreting that as some sort of slush fund, which could lead to potential problems.”

Pays Off?

The idea these programs are winners is sheer lunacy. They appear to work because the trial sizes are exceptionally tiny.

In the case of Stockton, California the trial size was a mere 125 people.

I do not doubt for one second that these people chosen at random had improved lifestyles.

But until someone can say how they are going to pay for these programs it’s clear they don’t work.

Imagine the backlash and result if Chicago (which has home rule on sales taxes) doubled the sales tax to 20.5%. And I suspect that would not even cover the shortfall.

Chicago property taxes have grown 90% since 2010. Every bit of that went to teachers’, police, and fire unions. 

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
“Chicago will give 5,000 lucky lottery winners $500 a month. “
Hey, wouldn’t be America if it wasn’t Arbitrary. Useless dilettantes arbitrarily “doing studies” with other people’s earnings.
Citizen Salaries are great. Or, if not great, at least better than any and all possible alternative means fo government to arbitrarily hand out money. But they have to cover everyone equally. And be sustainable; meaning a percent of money already collected.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
KTLA: Los Angeles residents can begin applying Friday for a 12-monthlink to ktla.com that will provide $1,000 monthly payments to more than 3,000 residents, “no strings attached,” officials said.
db_
db_
2 years ago
In 2021, City Council approved a $94 million property tax increase that
included a provision annually raising taxes at a rate tied to the
Consumer Price Index. This year’s hike would be 1.4 percent, determined
by the increase from December 2019 to December 2020.
Sweating details with respect to reported numbers is increasingly difficult to find. The quote above (from the cited article) is a perfect example of the kinds of numbers routinely cited across media. It’s unclear for instance whether 1.4 percent ‘hike’ is a hike in the ‘mill rate’ or targeted gross tax amount. It’s an important distinction since property taxes are tied to property appraisals and the gross collection is a function of BOTH the mill rate and the property valuation (in addition to a plethora of half-baked rules designed to game the aforementioned to ensure ‘fairness’ because for some reason transparency and simplicity are routinely deemed ‘unfair’).
Chicago property taxes have grown 90% since 2010. Every bit of that went to teachers’, police, and fire unions. 
The same sort of issue arises in the above quote. Did the 90% growth result mainly from increasing property valuations or was the mill rate being increased annually to net that growth? It’s an important distinction because both mill rates and increasing property valuations result in a taxation by stealth and lead to long term moral hazard issues. Most councils in large cities will get an appraisal report annually then tweak the mill rate to raise a targeted amount via property taxes. It’s a haphazard process, prone to errors and make civic budgets overly complicated and unpredictable to manage at the best of times. The ultimate destination for the money is an entirely different can of worms.
Thanks MIsh for your continued work pointing out the inherent risk associated with both municipal taxation and pension deficits. It is the level of government that receives the least scrutiny despite having the biggest impact on day-to-day lives of residents. Before, during and after the 2007-2012 financial crisis your work highlighting MBSs, Securitization and other financial WMD’s (borrowed from Buffet) was especially excellent and well received; especially when you highlighted how inexperienced local officials were buying and selling products whose risk they clearly did not understand. Has anything really changed since then?
Stan888
Stan888
2 years ago
Most Chicago residents are already getting UBI  in the form of food stamps, section 8 housing, child tax credits, welfare, SSDI,  medicaid etc.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
The grand plan of the Left is to pay people to:
a) not ‘work’, or produce anything of value
b) sit on the couch and do social media,
c) watch porn and make low IQ babies (like themselves), and
d) vote democrap.
They will fund their grand plan by stealing the wealth of successful innovators and entrepreneurs.
When you get more of something when you subsidize it, and less of something when you tax it, what could possibly go wrong?
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
That’s quite a conspiracy theory you got going there.  Is this from Q?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Do you understand hyperbole? If not, you can read about it on Wikipedia.
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Wow, the self owning.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
What would help the people Chicago more?
a) paying UBI to a select few people, or
b) using the funds to actively reduce crime on the streets and stop the weekly slaughter of innocents
Has my statement blown up in my face? If so, I’d appreciate if you could identify what in particular. That said, your comment reeks: ‘conspiracy theory’ and ‘Q.’ Those tend to be the fall-backs of mediocre liberal minds
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
2 years ago
One might wonder what the difference is between these basic-income trials and lotteries. Which has the most winners?
thimk
thimk
2 years ago
Chicago will be under water , literally .  infrastructure needed ?.
Jcbl
Jcbl
2 years ago
What part of “There is no free lunch” do these people not understand?
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  Jcbl
And the phrase, “The world doesn’t owe you a living.”
Parents of teenagers are spinning in their graves now. 🙂
Of course, facts are what they are. You can’t tell a typical kid that there is no free lunch without damaging your credibility. They’ve known no other world than one that provides a free lunch.
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
You could pay for basic income by eliminating the hundreds of other government assistance programs.
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
True. But, the question is, what about people who cannot manage a “basic income”? That is, the truly needy.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
They’ll get a lot of the money back from lottery tickets and liquor taxes.
dbannist
dbannist
2 years ago
I’d love to see a post on the unfunded liabilities on pensions in Illinois.

Where is the pension funded invested and how much would that have to fall to wipe out the fund?  At what point does it go bust?  I know its in serious trouble but it’s been a while since I’ve seen an update on that, either here or on Zerohedge.

How much time does that ticking time bomb have if the stock market goes sideways for 10 years?

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Sure, why not?  Sounds like a swell idea … its not like its pensions are (severely) underfunded or anything ……… oh, wait …….
Over the past ten years, the unfunded liabilities of the four pension funds combined have grown by $15.3 billion, or 91.6%. This was an increase from $16.7 billion in FY2011. The total unfunded liabilities of the four funds increased to $32.0 billion in FY2020 from $31.0 billion in FY2019, or by 3.17%. 
davidyjack
davidyjack
2 years ago
Your math is wrong “500,000 * $500 * 12 = $3,000,000,000” because 500,000 is people.   The program gives  per household. Figure about 2 people per household.
So math is probably more like 250,000 * 500 * 12 =  1,500,000,000!  
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  davidyjack
Fair enough 
I revised the section

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.