Fed Anticipates Rate Hikes in 2022 and 2023 – Fade This Consensus

Laugh of the Day

The Fed’s Projection Materials that accompanied today’s FOMC Stay-the-Course Non-News provides the laugh of the day. 

The vote for no hikes this year was a unanimous 18-0 score by the FOMC participants. After that it gets interesting.

Base Rate Projections

  • 2021: 0.1 
  • 2022: 0.1-0.4 
  • 2023: 0.4-1.1
  • 2024: 0.9-2.1

In 2024, one participant thinks the Fed will have short-term rates at 2.50-2.75%. What a hoot! 

I assure you the participant who thinks the Fed Funds Rate will only be 0.5-0.75% will be closer to the mark.

Interest on National Debt

The national debt is over $28 trillion and rising fast. By 2024 it will be at least $33 trillion. 

At 2.75%, annual interest on the national debt would be $907,500,000,000. Call it $900 billion. 

Of course, the Treasury could lock in 30-year rates now, but it never does and won’t again. 

What About a Recession?

The Fed has never forecast a recession and never will. They believe they are omnipotent with unlimited power to stop recessions.

History shows the Fed actually cause recessions.

I bet we see another recession between now and 2024. Even if we don’t, the Fed will not hike if there is any weakness at all. 

Previous Dot Plots to Laugh At

That was from the April 2016 meeting. Here are some more Dot Plots with my anecdotes at the time.

Dot Plot June 14, 2017

Dot Plot September 26, 2018

Dot Plot December 2018 Fantasyland 

My Comments Then and Now

  • June 2017: “Who the hell is this dreamer?”
  • December 2018: “The expectations for 2020 and 2021 are pure fantasyland material.”
  • September 2021: “The expectations for 2023 and 2024 are pure fantasyland material.”

If you put any faith at all in these dot plots, you are simply nuts. 

They do not factor in recessions or even slowdowns. Nor do they consider interest on the national debt or deflationary boomer demographics. 

Fed Repeats Inflation Nonsense But Stays the Course For Now

Earlier today I commented Fed Repeats Inflation Nonsense But Stays the Course For Now

In practice, the Fed’s policies are so asymmetric that the Fed just starts to hike when it should be slowing.

Of course, the problem is the Fed itself. There should not be a Fed to repeatedly make these mistakes in the first place.

Real World

In the real world, bubbles eventually matter.

The problem is timing. It is very difficult to predict when things finally matter.

But when bubbles do matter, what the Fed then does or says is “Too Late To Matter.”

Huge imbalances ensure that another recession is baked in the cake. However,  virtually no one see it coming. 

Another Debt Ceiling Non Crisis Deja Vu Or Does This One Matter?

This morning, I commented Another Debt Ceiling Non Crisis Deja Vu Or Does This One Matter?

Stock market psychology is very important.

In addition to debt ceiling concerns, here are the pending items: An infrastructure package, another $3.5 trillion on top of that, tax hikes, and AOC’s demand for 80% clean energy by 2030.

This is a potentially explosive mix on top of a massive stock market overvaluation issue.

A psychology change away from risk will be very important and it’s guaranteed to happen at some point. 

If it happens now, some will blame the debt crisis, others China, but stock market greater fool exhaustion will be as good an answer as any.

Huge Credit Stress Starting in China

Meanwhile, in case you missed it, please consider Huge Credit Stress Starting in China May Easily Rock the Whole World

Once again, and right on cue, hyperinflationists are again moaning. Forget about it just as you should discount anticipated Fed rate hikes.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Normalized fed rates are always 3 years away. Just like global warming doom is always a decade away.
How can the FED taper and the dems have their infrastructure package? I guess the FED assumes people will flock to buy t-bills yielding almost nothing.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
The Bottom Line

At a level of government debt that is more than 266% of its gross domestic product (GDP), Japan is the second-most indebted nation in the world. With bond yields in negative territory, the government is now getting paid to borrow. By charging private banks interest on reserves held at the BOJ, Japan’s central bank is effectively transferring wealth, and thereby the ability to control the economy’s resources, from the private sector to the public sector. It amounts to a “helicopter drop” of new money that is channeled into the economy either through tax cuts or direct government spending. Sounds a lot like debt monetization.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
So….the Fed’s member banks get paid interest for their deposits with the Fed, right? But….that money is from your deposit balance. Meaning it starts out as a liability for the member bank.  
So then….they loan your money to the Fed…..it’s fractional reserve lending. Your money is being leveraged. The loan becomes an asset for the member bank but it’s a liability for the Fed. It’s also collateralized with your money.
You have a claim on the money and you can withdraw it on demand. The member bank has a claim on it and they can WD it from the Fed.
The Fed then leverages it again by buying Treasuries and MBS’s. The money spent for those goes into the US Treasury.
So here, as opposed to the BOJ, the Fed is just putting more leverage on your deposit to create money. It isn’t printing, straight up, but it is increasing leverage on the system every time they do it. 
The interesting question is “Are there limits to how much you can leverage the original deposit?” 
This is pure Bernanke Theory magic, begun only in 2008. My understanding is that over 60% of American bank deposits have already been leveraged this way.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
Evergrande debt crisis ensnares retail investors, builders and homebuyers
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
The Fed can predict recessions about as well as they can predict pandemics. Now this message: 

Wuhan Lab Wanted to Genetically Enhance Bat Viruses to Study Human Risks, Documents Show

Less than two years before the COVID-19 pandemic began, scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology planned to genetically alter viruses to make them more infectious for humans and release them into bat caves.

The research proposal was part of a trove of documents released this week by a group of scientists and activists who are trying to determine the origins of the pandemic, which has killed 4.7 million people around the world, according to Johns Hopkins University.

The Wuhan scientists were listed as partners on a funding proposal the environmental health nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance made to the U.S. government’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)

DARPA rejected the proposal and it is not clear what happened to the research project, which the documents described as having “a good running start”

The growing suspicion of China’s official version has been driven in large measure by the Decentralized Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigating COVID-19 or DRASTIC, which released the documents this week. The documents could not be verified by Newsweek.

Throughout the pandemic, about two dozen DRASTIC researchers and correspondents, many anonymous, working independently from many different countries, have uncovered obscure documents, pieced together the information, and explained it all in long threads on link to newsweek.comlink to newsweek.com.

Richard Ebright, board of governors professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University and laboratory and director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology, tweeted out the findings of the latest DRASTIC document dump and said the world should be furious at the news.

The documents showed researchers aspired to genetically alter coronaviruses and monitor their release and transmission in bat caves to determine the risks those viruses posed to humans.

In a Monday post on DRASTIC Research’s website, the group said documents shared by an unnamed whistleblower showed the EcoHealth Alliance “collaborated” with the Wuhan Institute of Virology to “carry out advanced and dangerous human pathogenicity Bat Coronavirus research” through a grant proposal EcoHealth Alliance filed with DARPA.

DARPA is a research agency within the U.S. Department of Defense which aims to “preserve military readiness by protecting against the infectious disease threat” through its PREEMPT program.

In its funding request, EcoHealth Alliance “proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanised and ‘batified’ mice,” DRASTIC Research said.

A copy of EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal shared by DRASTIC Research said the proposed project aimed to “defuse the potential for spillover of novel bat-origin high-zoonotic risk SARS-related coronaviruses in Asia.” The proposal’s executive summary said researchers would “intensively sample bats” in field locations where scientists “identified high spillover risk” for coronaviruses.

EcoHealth Alliance wrote in the document shared by DRASTIC Research that it planned to work with researchers at the Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore, the University of North Carolina, the Palo Alto Research Center in California, U.S. Geological Survey’s National Wildlife Health Center and the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. It requested $14 million from DARPA to conduct its research, which was estimated to take three and a half years.

The proposal was dated March 2018, less than two years before SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes COVID-19, began spreading around the world. The virus is believed to have begun spreading among humans in Wuhan, where the first wave of infections was reported.

Thanks to DRASTIC, the world now knows that the Wuhan Institute of Virology had an extensive collection of coronaviruses gathered over many years of foraging in the bat caves, and that many of them—including the closest known relative to the pandemic virus, SARS-CoV-2—came from a mineshaft where three men died from a suspected SARS-like disease in 2012. It knows that the Institute was actively working with these viruses, using inadequate safety protocols, in ways that could have triggered the pandemic, and that the lab and Chinese authorities have gone to great lengths to conceal these activities. It is also clear the first cases appeared weeks before the outbreak at the Huanan wet market that was once thought to be ground zero. None of that is conclusive proof that a lab leak caused the virus.

As the DRASTIC revelations swayed a once skeptical Western media and scientific community, President link to newsweek.com ordered a U.S. intelligence investigation to determine the origins of the pandemic. The intelligence agencies issued an inconclusive report last month.

In one document shared by DRASTIC Research, a DARPA official wrote he was not recommending funding for the project. DARPA’s assessment of the project said it “aims to identify and model spillover risk of novel, pandemic-potential SARS-related coronaviruses (SARSr-CoVs) in Asia, focusing specifically on known hotspot bat caves in China.”
While DARPA said the project had “a good running start” since field locations had already been identified, it noted “several weaknesses” within the proposal, including DARPA’s “concern that vaccine approaches may lack sufficient epitope coverage to effectively protect against the diverse and evolving quasi species of the many coronaviruses found in the bat caves.”

When contacted for comment about the documents released by DRASTIC Research, DARPA told Newsweek that it could not share identifying information about individuals or organizations that submit grant proposals. Even so, DARPA said it “has never funded directly, nor indirectly as a subcontractor, any activity or researcher associated with the EcoHealth Alliance or Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Newsweek reached out to EcoHealth Alliance for comment but did not receive a response in time for publication.

Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
We are all extending and pretending. But there’s nothing to worry about. The Fed and Treasury have already started monetizing the debt via this invention called electrons. The rate the Fed sets for Treasury is negative. The Fed has the ability to keep monetizing treasury debt and even the federal budget for decades with zero consequences. Japan has been doing this with minimal consequences. /sarc off.
Tengen
Tengen
2 years ago
It took seven years to raise above zero last time (Dec 2008 to Dec 2015) and we’re only a year and a half into this round of ZIRP. Even if the Fed has the gumption to start raising rates again, it will be a negligible amount. I can’t imagine seeing rates above 2% ever again.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
what will inflation be by then?
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
2 years ago
The 60 year interest rate cycle has been spot-on since records were kept starting in the 1790’s. This cycle is so strong that its duration has not been changed despite Civil War, 2 world wars, a Depression, the invention of the car/airplane/telephone/radio/TV/computer/internet/robotic surgery, landing a man on the moon, Dot com bubble bursting, and housing market bursting. Given this cycle is 40 years old, interest rates have been near their theoretical limit of 0%, and the financial system is the most leveraged it has ever been; interest rates are going higher regardless of what the Federal Reserve says or does.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
Interest rates have never been zero, or negative if you factor in inflation.
We are (thanks to central banking) in an apres-moi-le-deluge mode.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
If the FED supplies an unlimited amount of money at close to 0%, interest rates will not go higher. USD may crash.
amalagoli
amalagoli
2 years ago
This is becoming hilarious … how many times has the Fed anticipated rate hikes in the next two years?
In fact, it is more of a farce. The Fed needs to pretend it is still actively managing monetary policy to control inflation and unemployment, when it is quite apparent that the Fed is cornered in a liquidity trap of epic proportion.
Hence the need to keep pretending that next year will be different.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“The Fed has never forecast a recession and never will.”
They fear they would panic the public. They carefully word and give heads up to the market, well in advance, if they are planning to raise rates, for fear of spooking the market toward the exit.
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Persistent high inflation or worse, stagflation, might force the hand and raise rates significantly higher than any of these dot plots.  I swear there are intermittent shortages of just about everything, higher prices are inevitable.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
The FED will not raise rates outside of a token quarter point every now and then. Which would be reversed later. There’s way too much debt that would go unserviceable.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
The central banking bible says that you can only RAISE by 0.1%, but CUTTING by 1-2%, part of the essential toolbox.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
“Someday”
Well, I’m here to tell you now, each and every mother’s son,
That you better learn it fast, you better learn it young,
‘Cause someday….. never comes.
           —- John Fogherty, CCR
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
“I assure you the participant who thinks the Fed Funds Rate will only be 0.5-0.75% will be closer to the mark.”
Absolutely.
For eons I’ve predicted interest rates going negative in the US (either from NIRP considered least bad option … or inflow flood of global liquidity) … as Bubbles collapse everywhere simultaneously.  Only AFTER collapse will rates rise.
Got Bonds?
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Pretty soon banks will start charging checking accounts. Either via negative rates or fess that are higher than interest paid. I was shocked the other day when my bank started charging a $3 convenience fee for using their ATM to get my money.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.