Fed Beige Book Shows K-Shape Upper-Income Strength, Middle Class Struggle

The economy is teetering, especially in the middle class and below.

Fed Beige Book Activity

The Fed Beige Book is a Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by each of 12 Federal Reserve Districts.

  • Slight or Sluggish Expansion: 3 – Boston, Chicago, Cleveland
  • Modest Expansion: 1 – Richmond
  • No Change: 3- Atlanta, St. Louis, Minneapolis
  • Slight Contraction: 2 – Texas, Kansas City,
  • Modest Contraction: 2 – New York, Philadelphia
  • Mixed: 1 – San Francisco

On average, the Beige Book is slightly net negative. Modest declines in New York and Philadelphia more than offset the modest gain in Richmond.

San Francisco is an interesting case with “Activity in retail trade, agriculture, and residential real estate eased slightly while activity in services and commercial real estate remained largely unchanged on balance.”

That looks like a net slight contraction to me.

National K-Shaped Fed Comments

  • Overall consumer spending declined further, while higher-end retail spending remained resilient.
  • Reports of travel and tourism activity reflected little change in recent weeks, with some contacts noting cautious discretionary spending among consumers.
  • Community organizations saw increased demand for food assistance, due in part to disruptions in SNAP benefits during the government shutdown.
  • Revenues in the nonfinancial services sector were mostly flat to down, and reports of loan demand were mixed.
  • Prices rose moderately during the reporting period. Input cost pressures were widespread in manufacturing and retail, largely reflecting tariff-induced increases. Some Districts noted rising costs for insurance, utilities, technology, and health care. The extent of passthrough of higher input costs to customers varied, and depended upon demand, competitive pressures, price sensitivity of consumers, and pushback from clients.
  • There were multiple reports of margin compression or firms facing financial strain stemming from tariffs. Prices declined for certain materials, which firms attributed to sluggish demand, deferred tariff implementation, or reduced tariff rates. Looking ahead, contacts largely anticipate upward cost pressures to persist but plans to raise prices in the near term were mixed.

Regional K-Shaped Fed Comments

  • New York: Consumer spending declined slightly, though higher-end retail spending remained resilient
  • New York: Many firms continued to report that tariffs were driving up their costs and selling prices. A consumer-facing firm dependent on imported goods filed bankruptcy while a brass machining company said it may go out of business, both a consequence of tariffs.
  • New York: A New York City area contact reported that the combination of congestion pricing, property taxes, and other regulatory expenses were a significant burden on its business. Some contacts reported sharp jumps in health insurance premiums. Looking ahead, firms expected pricing pressures to remain significant.
  • New York: While smaller retailers reported sharp declines, higher-end retail spending remained resilient.
  • New York: An upstate New York retailer near the Canadian border reported weak sales due to declining visits from Canadian shoppers.
  • Philadelphia: Price pressures continued to pop up with increasing harm to low- and now middle-income households.
  • Philadelphia: Small businesses have also been struggling to survive amid uncertainty driven by state and federal government actions.
  • Philadelphia: Firms continued to report cost pressures from tariffs, insurance, health care, and energy. In our monthly surveys, the diffusion indexes for prices paid and prices received broadened among manufacturers and were well above their nonrecession averages.
  • Philadelphia: A restaurateur observed that although family restaurants are full, competition has driven menu pricing into unprofitable territory.
  • Philadelphia: One manufacturer noted that “our larger competitors will raise prices in the first quarter of 2026. Not because it is justified, but because they can.”
  • Cleveland: Manufacturers reported tariff-related cost increases for equipment and materials, and one observed that most manufacturers had run out of lower-cost pre-tariff inventory. One large retailer’s average costs had increased around 20 percent year-overyear because of tariffs, and it was trying to determine how it would distribute these increases. By contrast, another large retailer did not anticipate further cost increases, stating that tariff impacts had stabilized.
  • Atlanta: Smaller businesses have found little ability to negotiate with suppliers alongside limited pricing power. Alternatively, larger firms have been “sharing the squeeze” on margins through the supply chain, with various suppliers absorbing portions of the tariffs. However, many firms have exhausted cost-cutting methods and plan to implement price increases in the coming months by targeting increases toward products with stronger demand to minimize broader demand erosion.
  • St. Louis: Consumer spending has declined modestly, with contacts attributing the slowdown to uncertainty and tighter budgets. Auto dealers reported that sales had fallen short of expectations as consumers were cautious with spending and some customers were also more credit challenged.
  • St. Louis: A restaurant owner reported seeing fewer customers and declines in spending per visit. Another restaurant contact noted their daily regulars were now coming in just two or three times a week and not ordering full meals like they used to.
  • Minneapolis: Prices increased moderately, a faster pace of growth than the previous report.
  • Minneapolis: Business contacts continued to report increases in employee health-care premiums for the coming year. Meanwhile, a medical provider said insurance payments were not keeping pace with increased costs for medical supplies and labor.
  • Minneapolis: A brewery reported that aluminum can prices recently increased 18 percent.
  • Dallas: Employment fell on net, and prices increased moderately. Outlooks generally worsened, with contacts citing an economic slowdown, tariff concerns, interest rates, and heightened uncertainty.
  • Dallas: A health-care contact cited hiring challenges for residency positions because of much-higher H-1B visa fees.
  • Dallas: A manufacturer noted rising raw material costs from international vendors as well as national suppliers. Another said tariffs have now begun to more deeply impact their overall margin and profitability, and that they expect this to continue for the next several months. Some contacts said customers were pushing back on price increases. One noted difficulty in collecting outstanding customer payments.
  • San Francisco: One contact in agriculture highlighted increased difficulties in hiring workers due to immigration visa revocations.
  • San Francisco: Higher local minimum wage requirements or recent labor union contract negotiations contributed to wage pressures in some areas.
  • San Francisco: Conditions for community support and services organizations worsened this reporting period. Demand increased for food assistance in particular, which a number of contacts attributed to the government shutdown and reductions in SNAP benefits. Inventories at some food banks were strained by the increase in demand.

Four Key Takeaways

  1. The poor and middle classes are having a harder time than the wealthy.
  2. Small businesses are struggling more with tariffs than large companies.
  3. Consumers turn cautions on discretionary spending.
  4. Tariffs still apply upward cost pressures

Point of No Return

The anecdotes suggest we have finally reached the point of no return. Businesses have exhausted their lower-cost tariff front run inventories.

Businesses will now have to eat the costs or pass them on. Many small businesses that cannot raise prices will be forced out of business.

What’s the Fed Doing?

Spending at the upper end is still strong. So are reported price pressures.

One has to wonder if the Fed pivot from no rate cut in December to an 87 percent chance now was to bolster the stock market to keep high end spending up.

There was no news to explain the round trip in rate cut odds from 80 percent to 30 percent back up to 80 percent.

The longer the Fed tries to stave off recession, the worse it will be when the dam finally breaks.

Meanwhile, affordability talk by Congress and Trump is ridiculous.

Related Posts

September 6, 2025: Trump’s Aluminum Tariffs Seriously Backfire Already

Tariffs did not and will not bring production back to the US.

November 26, 2025: The Senate Debates Car Affordability. I Have a Good Suggestion

Republicans debate safety features. OK, but let’s get basic.

November 27, 2025: Trump Says It ‘May Be Necessary’ to Extend Obamacare Subsidies

Trump says the “unaffordable care act has been a disaster ” so that it “may be necessary” to extend it.

Thanks! I made a note to add that to my book of twisted government logic if and when I get to writing it.

November 28, 2025: Trump Doubles Down on Idiotic Idea of Using Tariffs to Replace Income Tax

Once again, Trump says tariffs can replace the income tax.

Affordability is the buzzword of the day. But you are crazy if you think Trump or Congress will do anything other than make it worse.

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

41 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Counter
Counter
4 months ago

I live on the border, it is a ghost town. The malls used to be packed. Canadians will not pay tariffs.

Apr 08, 2025

Car travel to the US is down. Compared to 2024, 35,619 fewer cars went across the Peace Bridge in Buffalo this February and March, and another 29,537 fewer cars crossed the Rainbow Bridge in Niagara Falls over the same time period.

“The county’s initial sales tax receipts have slipped 7 percent through mid-February, a $4.9 million reduction in revenue. Poloncarz blames the decline at least partly on a drop in Canadian visitors.”

In Niagara County, January and February sales tax revenue is also down an estimated 1 percent.

Jun 27, 2025 — Tourist traffic has fallen at Niagara Falls State Park in New York, with a 4.7% decline in international spending.

Aug 8, 2025 — Niagara County is getting hit at various businesses and venues. Fashion Outlets of Niagara Falls experienced a 30 percent drop in foot traffic.

Edgar
Edgar
4 months ago

One has to recognize that in the K the two stems are no longer connected, that the upper stem now starts 80% up vertical stem, and that the spending in the upper stem is far greater than the lower stem. As noted in many places the top 20% of American’s now earn more than half of American incomes.

I’ve seen a graph where income distribution in American mirrors income distribution indian, a by enlarge agricultural nation.

RonJ
RonJ
4 months ago

People were lined up for Black Friday deals at the Citadel outlet stores, southeast of L.A. Young people being interviewed by KTLA were rather excited. One case, buy two pair of jeans, get two free. No Black Friday buying for me. Doesn’t interest me anymore.

MelvinRich
MelvinRich
4 months ago

America eagerly gobbled up the free money during the covid era (more wings, larger tv etc.) Now, they want the same political sharks, who created the inflation, to fix their life. Why can’t they connect the dots?

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago

Whatever the beige book is suggesting is overwhelmed by what gold is shouting as it resumes its upward spiral and prepares to test its all time record of $4,398.

There was a large off-take of physical gold at the COMEX when the December contract expired and though settlement was orderly, price suppression failed and appreciation has resumed.

Debt is spiraling upward by $1 trillion every 150 days and Trump is beating the war drum against Venezuela to cover his abject failures in tariff policy and regulatory over-reach.

Do not be surprised when Russian & Chinese supplied drones are used by Venezuelan forces to retaliate against US aggression via our oil interests in the Gulf of Mexico. Trumps arrogant ignorance has consequences and destabilizing oil prices will unlock Pandora’s box of inflationary forces.

Got some bits of gold and gold mining shares? For Q4 2025, top tier miners have seen their margins expand by over 200% from 2024. Enough to make NVDA blush.

Stu
Stu
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

– gold is shouting as it resumes its upward spiral and prepares to test its all time record of $4,398.
> Gold is rising as expected, and May/June is fast approaching. Less than a Year away…

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  Stu

Are you referring to the June futures/options expiry or something the far right is going to do to bring America to its knees?

RonJ
RonJ
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

Far left is pro “you’ll own nothing and be happy.”

whirlaway
whirlaway
4 months ago
Reply to  RonJ

Well, that is the mantra of the Silicon Valley oligarchs. Let me repeat – OLIGARCHS. If there is one thing the far Left despises, it is the oligarchs.

randocalrissian
randocalrissian
4 months ago
Reply to  RonJ

mischaracterizing those who are not your actual enemy. Nice choice, RonJ

Bill
Bill
4 months ago

I notice the area where the largest suckerfish operate is the one expanding the most on the map. Government doing just fine up thar near Richmond. Imagine thinking a) you’re the most important group; b) deserving of the lion’s share and c) having a tiny group in the Politburo trying futily to control the economy with interest rates and fiat money mismanagement.

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  Bill

“Suckerfish” Good name for them…

Jeff Kassel
Jeff Kassel
4 months ago

What is different now compared to 40 years ago is horrendous federal debt. When we went off the gold standard in 1971, federal debt was about $300 billion…a big number back then. Now it’s $38.2 trillion, over 100 times worse, with no hope of ever paying it off. With a recession in the offing, in 7 years we’ll have $50 trillion in federal debt. What standard of living we have for average Americans is mostly supported by a mountain of debt and interest costs. Interest on the federal debt is the 2nd most expensive item in the federal budget. More than Medicare, more than Defense. Within 10 years, I expect interest on the federal debt to be the biggest item in the federal budget.

Jeff Kassel
Jeff Kassel
4 months ago

America has been slipping for decades….just think about the price of rent or a house 30 years ago. Think about the cost of health insurance and what it used to cost to get a tooth filled at the dentist in 1990. A new small car in 1968 was $1800. What did cigarettes or a gallon of gas cost in 1970. We’ve had a tone of inflation and 40% of the country is living in an inflationary depression. How can people afford a 4-year university degree these days? After ai is fully deployed, how many accountants, lawyers and software developers will be out of a job?

A D
A D
4 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Kassel

Back in 1993 you could get a 1 bedrm, 1 bath apartment in Panama City Beach for $300, and hourly wage for fast food was around $5. Now the same rents for $1400 and hourly wage is $15. Income has not kept up with living expenses since the early 1990s for the working class.

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  Jeff Kassel

in 1960s, a village idiot who dropped out of hs, could end up owning their own little house by their early 20s. the usa had the same percentage of world’s population back then as today. the world was flattened from two world wars. the rest of world built up and saved a little. of course this was by design. the ruling class of usa did NOT want a third world war. so they allowed and encouraged japan and germany and italy………to build back and manufacture everything except aeorspace. as that was the future of warfare. the imports from europe and japan came streaming in during the 70s………..probably a good thing than a third world war.

Dave Smith
Dave Smith
4 months ago

The fed is impotent at this point and going forward with respect being able to influence employment or hold prices stable. Government has lost control; they cannot stimulate the economy. The fix in fy2024 was $1.8 trillion stimulus for growth of $1.4 trillion. We do not have GDP data for fy 2025 due to government shutdown.

Gold, silver, and those mining it are doing very well suggesting confidence in the whole fiat system is collapsing. Crypto is not doing well probably because it is a creation to beat the system, but soon to be controlled by the government. It will potentially be taxed worthless unless government can turn it into a positive for itself.

In my opinion, time is short before the chaos begins.

Tony Frank
Tony Frank
4 months ago

trumpnomics is working out as “originally” planned.

dtj
dtj
4 months ago

As a multi-billionaire whose net worth quadrupled in the last 5 years, all I have to say to those struggling is “upgrade your skillset”.

Meanwhile I’ll be upgrading my fortifications for when the pitchforks come out. Hopefully Musk can fly me and all the other billionaires off to Mars before SHTF.

Blurtman
Blurtman
4 months ago

Move on up.

bill wilson
bill wilson
4 months ago

the retail shopping where I live has been saying this for a couple of years.

Eric
Eric
4 months ago
Reply to  bill wilson

Saying what? Thanks Bill.

JeffD
JeffD
4 months ago

“What’s the Fed Doing?”

Widening the inequality gap further by increasing the rate of flow on their firehose of liquidity.

Last edited 4 months ago by JeffD
I’m back robbyrob
I’m back robbyrob
4 months ago

The wealthy always do better than low and middle class cohorts
Thats how most of not all societies work
regarding spending: As of June 30, the top 20% of earners accounted for more than 63% of all spending, and the top 10% accounted for more than 49%

U.S. economy is being driven by the wealthy, could face recession if prospects change | Fortune

Rogerroger
Rogerroger
4 months ago

The wealthy dont get poor they just get less rich. The poor get desperate. Desperate people do dumb things.
The middle class is getting stretched with the lower end getting pulled down.
Imo the less of a middle class you have the more unstable the country will be.
I wonder how much of this upper income spending is retired boomers blowing their 401 ks and the assets they inherited from their folks. Hosing their adult children’s future.

SocalJim
SocalJim
4 months ago

The wealthy always do better than low and middle class cohorts. That is how America works. But, don’t let that get in the way of you trying to convince people the economy is tanking.

El Trumpedo
El Trumpedo
4 months ago
Reply to  SocalJim

It’s only the wealthy that matter, after all.

I say, do you have any Grey Poupon, old chap?

bmcc
bmcc
4 months ago
Reply to  El Trumpedo

my next door neighbor, in charleston SC, and funny pal had a gorgeous rolls royce. he kept a bottle of grey poupon in glove compartment. he was a heart surgeon with a father who had a hedge fund up north. LOL. great and funny dude.

Brutus Admirer
Brutus Admirer
4 months ago
Reply to  SocalJim

“The wealthy always do better than low and middle class cohorts. That is how America works.”

Would you care to mention a society where it works differently? I readily admit that if the US were more free market and less fascistic/socialist, there would be somewhat less inequality. But I challenge you to point to a country where the smartest, richest, & most powerful (in terms of political connections especially) don’t benefit disproportionately from events generally.

BenW
BenW
4 months ago
Reply to  SocalJim

I would love for someone to research & show where (i.e., who’s pockets) all the interest the Fed has been paying on banking reserves has gone since 2008. And that’s just one example of dozens of obfuscated sources to the growing wealth gap that supports your point.

This is kind of like the CRM crisis that’s been building for a while now. There’s only so far down the road that lenders can kick the can. The same thing goes for the bottom 50% earners who’ve been in a recession for at least two years now. They don’t have the safety net that Fed runs cover for the wealthy.

I generally agree with most of your posts, because they tend to offer a solid reality check to a lot of the FUD that spreads around here. However, I do think you’re oversimplifying things, in this case. America doesn’t have S&L type crisis anymore that would have the potential to really hammer the wealth gap back towards the mean.

A D
A D
4 months ago
Reply to  BenW

Where the Fed’s Interest Payments Go
Since October 2008, the Federal Reserve has paid interest on reserves (IOR) — both required and excess reserves — held by banks at the Fed. Here’s who receives those payments:
• Large U.S. Banks:
• Institutions like JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citibank hold massive reserves at the Fed.
• They earn billions in interest annually, especially when rates are high.
• Foreign Banks Operating in the U.S.:
• Subsidiaries of foreign banks (e.g., Deutsche Bank, Barclays, BNP Paribas) also hold reserves at the Fed.
• They too receive interest payments, meaning some of the money flows overseas.
• Other Depository Institutions:
• Smaller regional banks and credit unions with reserve balances also earn interest, though on a much smaller scale.

📊 Scale of Payments
• From 2008–2015 (near-zero rates), payments were modest.
• After the Fed raised rates (2016–2019), annual payments climbed into the tens of billions.
• In 2022–2023, with rates above 5%, the Fed paid over $100 billion per year in interest on reserves and reverse repos.
• These payments are funded by the Fed’s earnings on its bond portfolio, but when interest paid exceeds income, the Fed records a deferred asset (essentially future losses taxpayers indirectly absorb).

🔎 Why It Matters
• Shift in Policy: Before 2008, banks earned nothing on reserves. Paying interest was a new tool to control short-term rates.
• Distributional Effect: Instead of flowing to the U.S. Treasury (reducing taxpayer burden), large sums now flow into the pockets of big banks and foreign institutions.
• Public Debate: Critics argue this is a subsidy to banks, especially foreign ones, while defenders say it’s necessary for monetary policy implementation.

🧩 Big Picture
• Since 2008, hundreds of billions of dollars in Fed interest payments have gone directly to banks holding reserves, both U.S. and foreign.
• This represents a quiet transfer of income from the Fed (and indirectly taxpayers) to the banking sector.
• It’s one of the reasons why Fed policy has been controversial — stabilizing markets, but enriching banks in the process.

BenW
BenW
4 months ago
Reply to  A D

AD, thanks for the information. That’s all dandy & pretty well-known which banks are getting the money & how much.

I’m talking about how much of it has filtered down into actual employee’s / investor’s pockets. That’s the part that becomes untraceable unfortunately.

Six000MileYear
Six000MileYear
4 months ago

K-shaped is what has always been called a divergence. Eventually one path will converge with the other. Usually the first to make a move is on the long term path.

Last edited 4 months ago by Six000MileYear
BenW
BenW
4 months ago
Reply to  Six000MileYear

I doubt seriously that the lower income arm is going to converge with the upper & vice versa.

spencer
spencer
4 months ago

There is a large peak in money flows in November. It strikes me as being similar to July 2008.

Frosty
Frosty
4 months ago
Reply to  spencer

There was s sudden drawdown in liquidity in 2008 that spiked the RE failure. Then credit was tightened dramatically. Our situation in RE is not remotely like 2008.

spencer
spencer
4 months ago
Reply to  Frosty

The FED covered its “Elephant Tracks” (like “Black Monday”)
We knew the precise “Minskey Moment” of the GFC:
POSTED: Dec 13 2007 06:55 PM |
The Commerce Department said retail sales in Oct 2007 increased by 1.2% over Oct 2006, & up a huge 6.3% from Nov 2006.
10/1/2007,,,,,,,-0.47 * temporary bottom
11/1/2007,,,,,,, 0.14
12/1/2007,,,,,,, 0.44
01/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.59
02/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.45
03/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.06
04/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.04
05/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.09
06/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.20
07/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.32
08/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.15
09/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.00
10/1/2008,,,,,, -0.20 * possible recession
11/1/2008,,,,,, -0.10 * possible recession
12/1/2008,,,,,,, 0.10 * possible recession
RoC trajectory as predicted.
Nothing has changed in 100 + years.

spencer
spencer
4 months ago
Reply to  spencer

2.7 july 2024

7.4

9.7

11.3

11.9

20.5

20.4

16.0

25.0

26.7

27.1

29.6

31.2

33.5

34.5

34.5 november 2025

29.8

32.2

33.7

28.0

22.2

Last edited 4 months ago by spencer
Dave Smith
Dave Smith
4 months ago
Reply to  spencer

An articulate video covering the last 3 generations that explains exactly what you present:

WARNING: The Yield Curve Just Did Something NOT Seen Since 1929…

spencer
spencer
4 months ago
Reply to  Dave Smith

Interesting. But the FED is not “pushing on a string”. Banks will buy more Treasuries when the remuneration rate is reduced. There is a sweet spot.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.