Fed Chair Jerome Powell is Concerned Over the Rapid Rise in Retirements

The lead chart is from the Role of Retirement by the Dallas Fed.

Role of Retirement

Since February 2020, the economy-wide employment-to-population ratio has declined by 3.2 percentage points, or by about 8.5 million workers. About 1.6 percentage points (4.1 million people) of the decline consists of unemployed workers who will likely eventually return to employment. 

The remaining roughly 1.7 percentage points (4.4 million) represents a higher share of individuals not in the labor force—meaning that they are not currently actively looking for work.

Chart 4 [lead chart above] shows how a hot labor market in 2018 and 2019 likely prompted many older workers to delay retirement, causing the share of the population in retirement to increase more slowly than the rate of aging would have implied. We see that during 2020 and 2021, the rate of retirement returned to its 2017 trend. How this trend unfolds—along with the degree to which caregiving, unemployment benefits and other special factors influence employment—will impact the ultimate size of the available workforce

Teenage Employment Fully Recovered

One group that is increasing its participation is teenagers. According to the latest employment report, the employment-to-population ratio for individuals age 16–19 increased to 32.8 percent in April, exceeding its prepandemic level of 32.1 percent in February 2020.

This increase in teenage employment accounted for approximately 78 percent of the increase in employment in the April 2021 jobs report. While this may signal increased opportunity for younger workers, it could also have negative implications for educational attainment and future productivity.

In particular, a wide range of school superintendents in the Eleventh District are expressing concern about dropout rates for their junior and senior classes and the long-term impact on the workforce if these young adults don’t return to achieve their high school certificate.

Employment in Age Group 16-19 is Fully Recovered, Who Else is Winning?

I too noted the rise in teenage employment. For details, please see Hooray! Employment in Age Group 16-19 is Fully Recovered, Who Else is Winning?

Recent Retirements Throw Wrench Into Fed’s Economic Recovery Plans

The Wall Street Journal reports Recent Retirements Throw Wrench Into Fed’s Economic Recovery Plans

“This is an extraordinarily unusual time, and we really don’t have a template of any experiences of a situation like this,” said Fed Chairman Jerome Powell in a press conference Wednesday following the central bank’s June meeting. “We have to be humble about our ability to understand the data.”

The rapid rise in retirements translates to fewer people available to work—meaning the labor market could hit the full employment threshold at lower levels of employment and a lower labor-force participation rate than before the pandemic.

“It is a different economy,” Mr. Powell said. “We don’t actually know exactly what labor-force participation will be as we go forward.”

People Are Quitting Their Jobs at a Record Rate

I discussed retirements on June 13 in People Are Quitting Their Jobs at a Record Rate: What’s Going On?

A reader noticed I had a data point incorrect for age group 60-64. I added a correction note referring back to this post. 

Population-adjusted, the age group showing retirements is 65 and older. First, here is the raw data.

Employment Change Pre-Pandemic to May 2021

Overall employment is down 6.9 million but accounting for a rise in working-age population, employment is down 8.4 million as the following table shows.

Population and Population Adjusted Employment 

Since February 2020, the overall population is up by 1.6 million but the population of those 65+ alone is up by 2.0 million. Age groups 60-64 and 65+ are the only age groups gaining population.

The second chart shows that employment in age group 65+ is down by only 915,000. However, population-adjusted employment in age group 65+ is down by 2.9 million.

On a percentage basis, age group 65+ accounts for over 34% of the population adjusted decline in employment since February 2020. 

These numbers are bound to get much worse. 

For example, the population of age group 60-64 is 21 million. Within 5 years they will all be 65-69 with a current employment population ratio of 33.1 down from 57.3. 

Those currently 65-69 (18.2 million) will be five years older too, also with declining employment population ratios. 

Although Powell is correct that we do not know were these ratios will go, he should not at all be confused by the direction.

I will discuss this further in a future post that  incorporates population projections.

Stay tuned.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

31 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Too much BS
Too much BS
2 years ago
Why go to work when  you get punished for working and putting in the bank?   Inlaw  72 retired broke never worked ,lives in a new retirement building, food delivered to her suite, has home cleaned  by building maintenance. Hard working relative 89 live at old paid off home, hard time paying utility and tax bills, shops for bargains and strugles to to maintain house.   2021moral  RETIRE BROKE FOR A BETTER WORRY FREE LIFE
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
I suspect a good percentage of the retirements are based on people using their primary (and in most cases, their only) home as an ATM.  
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
2 years ago
When you have to work hard for a couple thousand dollars per month and you see the orgy of trillions being printed by the government, one has to eventually ask themselves, what is the point?
Morr314
Morr314
2 years ago
Let’s say your 55 years old and in good health.
In my opinion you’re not old but you’re not young either.
The question you have to ask yourself is how many quality years do you have left and when will you pass away? You can’t answer them because nobody knows when it will happen.
If you can retire at 55 I would do it because you never know what will happen to your health tomorrow.
Life is to short and I have not read an obituary yet where a person said they wished they would have worked more.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
I am eager to see your follow-up post for the whole picture.  
CJones
CJones
2 years ago
Isn’t it because they still have worries about the virus and, different to other recessions, juiced up asset prices makes it an easier financial decision? Very different to, say, the post GFC recovery when assets took years to hit new all time highs..
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“Fed Chair Jerome Powell is Concerned Over the Rapid Rise in Retirements”
Maybe governments shouldn’t have shut their economies down. Maybe the FDA shouldn’t have blocked HCQ and Ivermectin, for a vaccine agenda. It certainly has created a lot of distortions.
Northeaster
Northeaster
2 years ago
“These numbers are bound to get much worse as I will discuss in a future post that  incorporates population projections.” – 
Government will open the borders/loosen immigration restrictions. Massachusetts did this due to flight from the state. For the first time in decades we didn’t lose a seat in congress. Of course we also ended up with the highest increase in welfare in the nation. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Haven’t people been retiring starting at around age 60 for decades? Why is this a bigger problem now than in the past? Could it be that retirees stop paying into the system and start collecting from the system and our economy is only staying afloat with massive constant stimulus from the FED? It can’t handle any more strain.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
It’s fine if you retire at 60 if you plan to die by 65-70.
The system was never designed for people to live decades in retirement which is what is happening now. My own parents have been retired for 25 years now and are in their early 80’s and fairly healthy so could easily live another 10 years. If they do, they will have lived roughly as long in retirement as they did in their working life.
Anon1970
Anon1970
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I have been retired for over 15 years. I was pushed into early retirement by my last employer and I decided that I had enough savings and that I did not have to go back to work. Although it is illegal for employers to discriminate against older workers (over 40) based on age, it is not difficult for them to get around these rules. In my case, my job was moved to another city and I took the buyout without creating a fuss. Employers have an incentive to get rid of older workers because of the high cost of medical insurance for such employees.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
My parents are 97 years old. At 65 my father retired, played intensive golf for two years and then started his own company from scratch and worked there every workday till he was 91. He was definitely not a drag on the economy. There are many who retire and end up still working for years afterward because they like it or like the extra income and so forth. It’s a growing segment of the population I hear. How do they count in the statistics I do not know.
Roadrunner12
Roadrunner12
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
“Haven’t people been retiring starting at around age 60 for decades? Why is this a bigger problem now than in the past?”
-This is a bigger problem than in the past because retirees are slowly becoming a larger % of the population and this is expected to continue until 2060 when 25% of the US population will 65+.
-12,000 Baby boomer Americans retiring every single day, 1000 Canadians retiring every single day.
-Social Security insolvency likely in 8-14 years. Those receiving social security to expect possibly 30%+ reduction in benefits, increased taxes, etc.
-Changes are coming to Social security one way or another.
-In Canada, Canadians have been paying increasing premiums and Canadian social security is projected solvent for 75 years as compared to 8 years or so for Americans.
“It is well past the time for Congress to address Social Security’s financing problem, which it last did nearly 40 years ago with a link to fas.org of tax increases and benefit reductions”
WTFUSA
WTFUSA
2 years ago
Hell yeah, the Fed is concerned with numbers of people retiring. They thought their methodology would prevent anyone not in the top 10% from being able to retire at any time without living in poverty and squalor for the rest of their lives. E.g. spin the hamster wheel until death at the beck and call of their masters.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Been noticing that the recruiter contacts I get for tech director positions are offering some rather eye-watering salaries in the very first email.  Up until this year, salary info was really hard to get. Unfortunately, thus far they’ve been office-only in urban areas, so I haven’t pursued, but it does make me feel loved.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
I’ve seen the same.
I’ve also seen some offering work from home even if you live in another state.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
i just moved 50% of my 401k from cash to s&p500.  if it triples, i’ll feel comfortable calling it a day.  when do you guys think the s&p500 hits 12000?
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Today marks the 4th day of the DXY making a near flat-line sideways move…..but examined closely, it is making higher highs and higher lows . Metals have made a tepid bounce this morning, but nothing to get very excited about. 
I closed my SLV trade at a 3,7% loss. I simply have no wish to be exposed until the dollar decides which way it wants to go.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
I’m still down about 4% on OUNZ, and I think I’ll hang on as a hedge against the deflation of my cash.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Gold is a better hedge for deflation than inflation. And deflation has to get pretty bad before it really shines.
I try not to let my trades morph into “investments” because they’re losing….my trade has not worked out, and the forces I was counting on to make it work out……did not pan out. Metals might go up, but I’m not confident they will, over the next week or two.
The  juice seems to be back in equites since the Fed announcement and associated jawboning. I’m not interested in equities, and nothing else looks great to me…..except the RE I already own. Prices for single family homes here are still going exponential for the moment. My net worth continues to go up a few hundred thousand bucks a month. Crazy, and who knows when it will turn? Does it feel like a top to me? Damn right it does,
I’ve had several things that have put a hickey in my cash flow this year. Two hail damaged roofs that the insurance company failed to pay enough to fix….and now a tree down last week that has to be removed. It damaged two neighboring fences and a garden shed in a neighboring yard….could have been worse, but still not cheap. I have a minor fence repair on another house…..minor repairs always start around $1500 these days, it seems like.
If I were smart I’d retire and sell my house and most of my investments. It’s just a tough decision, and irreversible once the decision is made.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Feels like the house market is turning… at least compared to a couple months ago.  If I had investment houses, I’d probably be looking at selling now.
…and if I could retire now, I would. Sort of. I’d still be doing the same kind of work, just on projects of my own.  I watched my dad work to 62 and die at 69.  You never know if you’re gonna get gypped that way.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
It would be a mistake to sell now.  Things are going much higher.  Private equity doesn’t buy houses for a quick flip.  They are in it for the long haul.  They know that at least for now house prices are headed only one way — up.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  anoop
They know they can’t get yield anywhere else, but I don’t think they know anything about what prices will do.  Besides, if they lose the money they have, the government will give them more, so why not?
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
My guess is that Powell will think about this, buy some more  assets to drive up asset prices even more, and then……retire himself, and leave the mess to the next Fed Chairman.
Hey, it worked for Bernanke and Yellen.
Ziggy
Ziggy
2 years ago
Powell is concerned about the rapid rise in retirements but he isn’t concerned about financial repression(interest earnings below even his massaged PCE inflation measurement) and stoking inflation.  These policies absolutely butcher the senior population.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
Reply to  Ziggy
not at all.  most people retiring are celebrating the meteoric rise in their stock portfolios which they attribute to their smart choice of taking a risk and betting on capitalism.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  anoop
Wasn’t capitalism that got them their stock winnings… it was corporate socialism.  Without those government trillions splashing around, a lot fewer of them would be retiring.
Dr. Manhattan23
Dr. Manhattan23
2 years ago
Then this is deflationary. This lends me to believe that some portion of the inflationary price increases will stick, but rest will come back to earth. As to when, No clue. Maybe 12 months? Maybe Fed is trying to get ahead of deflation by ramping up inflation? I don’t think a little deflation is bad, but as with most things, too much of a good thing is no good lol 
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
if stocks keep going up, then we have a perpetual motion machine of sorts because those retiring are doing so because they feel comfortable with their portfolios and will continue to spend as long as the markets keep going up.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Maybe… maybe not.  Looks like it will drive up wages, meaning more proletarian dollars chasing the stuff proles buy.
Probably good news if you’re in the market for a penthouse or megayacht though.
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
The last time a major baby boon retired was back in the mid to late 1970’s. I don’t recall that it caused deflation.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.