Fed Minutes Show Inflation Risks Are Skewed to the Upside

Image courtesy of Fed Board of Governors, Text by Mish from Latest Minutes

Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee

Please consider the Minutes of the FOMC May 2-3 Meeting

Notably, the Fed is sticking with an overoptimistic economic outlook. The staff anticipates “GDP growth would rebound in the second quarter and advance at a solid pace over the remainder of the year.”

On retail sales, “participants indicated that they expected robust growth in consumption spending. They pointed to several elements supporting this outlook, including strong household balance sheets, wide availability of jobs, and the U.S. economy’s resilience in the face of new waves of the virus.”

All participants concurred that the U.S. economy was very strong, the labor market was extremely tight, and inflation was very high and well above the Committee’s 2 percent inflation objective.”

The Fed is drinking Kool-Aid. A recession is baked in the cake, and obviously so. 

But the Fed cannot admit that. Given the stated nonsense on a “strong economy” perhaps a clueless Fed does not even see a recession.

At best, the Fed masks its outlook with a discussion of risks.

Risk Discussion

  • Participants judged that the implications for the U.S. economy were highly uncertain. 
  • Some participants noted that their business contacts had reported an easing of supply constraints, participants assessed that supply constraints overall were still significant and would likely take some time to be resolved.
  • Participants observed that inflation continued to run well above the Committee’s longer-run goal and that inflation pressures were evident in a broad array of goods and services. 
  • Participants agreed that risks to inflation were skewed to the upside and cited several such risks, including those associated with ongoing supply bottlenecks and rising energy and commodity prices
  • Several participants who commented on issues related to financial stability noted that the tightening of monetary policy could interact with vulnerabilities related to the liquidity of markets for Treasury securities and to the private sector’s intermediation capacity.
  • “Participants observed that developments associated with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the COVID-related lockdowns in China posed heightened risks for both the United States and economies around the world.”
  • “In light of continuing inflation risks, members judged that it would be appropriate for the postmeeting statement to note that the Committee is highly attentive to the upside risks to inflation.”
  • “Regarding risks related to the balance sheet reduction, several participants noted the potential for unanticipated effects on financial market conditions.”
  • “With regard to funding risk, the staff highlighted structural vulnerabilities in some types of mutual funds as a continuing focus.”
  • “The staff noted that increased uncertainty and ongoing volatility had reduced risk appetite in financial markets and eased price pressures, although valuations of many assets remained elevated.”
  • “The staff continued to judge that the risks to the baseline projection for real activity were skewed to the downside and that the risks to the inflation projection were skewed to the upside.”

On Rate Hikes and Quantitative Tightening (QT)

  • “All participants reaffirmed their strong commitment and determination to take the measures necessary to restore price stability.”
  • Participants agreed that the Committee should expeditiously move the stance of monetary policy toward a neutral posture, through both increases in the target range for the federal funds rate and reductions in the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet.”
  • Most participants judged that 50 basis point increases in the target range would likely be appropriate at the next couple of meetings.”
  • “All participants supported the plans for reducing the size of the balance sheet. This reduction, starting on June 1, would work in parallel with increases in the target range for the policy rate in firming the stance of monetary policy. 
  • “A number of participants remarked that, after balance sheet runoff was well under way, it would be appropriate for the Committee to consider sales of agency MBS to enable suitable progress toward a longer-run SOMA portfolio composed primarily of Treasury securities.”

Words of the Day are Risk and Inflation

The word “risk” appeared in the minutes 31 times. The word “inflation” appeared 66 times. 

The text is a warning sign to the markets the Fed intends to hike until inflation is under control. 

Sales of agency MBS (mortgage-backed securities) is a warning to the housing markets that the Fed is willing to sell its mortgage portfolio which would drive mortgage rates higher. 

Given all the lovey-dovey projections, the Fed either does not see a recession or is warning that inflation, not recession, is its focus. 

To repeat “Risks to the baseline projection for real activity were skewed to the downside and that the risks to the inflation projection were skewed to the upside.”

Finally, please note the warning “valuations of many assets remained elevated.”

No kidding, but guess who is largely responsible for that. Meanwhile let’s look at recent data. 

New Home Sales Plunge 22.5% In April, 16.6% From Deep Negative Revisions

New home sales have peaked this cycle and the bottom is nowhere in sight.

For discussion, please see New Home Sales Plunge 22.5% In April, 16.6% From Deep Negative Revisions

Expect Negative Retail Sales Revisions

On May 13, I commented Retail Sales Easily Beat Expectations, US Treasury Yields Jump in Response

I was really scratching my head over that until the following day when I commented Target Plunges 25%, What About Yesterday’s Big Retail Sales Blowout?

The advance retail sales reports by the commerce department were stunning. Reports by Target and Walmart strongly suggest something else.

Walmart and Amazon both reported being overstaffed in the first quarter.

Expect negative revisions, pretty much everywhere.

Question of the Day

Is the Fed pretending the economy is strong or are they as clueless as they sound? The latter will lead to a policy error in the opposite direction. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago
Obviously Fed policy is actually skewed to promote inflation. Powell is no Volcker…the FED became too politicized long ago…
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
“All participants reaffirmed their strong commitment and determination to take the measures necessary to restore price stability.”
At the expense of the FED mandate of full employment. Not to mention, 2% is fake price stability.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
2% self-appointed price stability. FIFY
JeffD
JeffD
3 years ago
“In light of continuing inflation risks, members judged that it would be appropriate for the postmeeting statement to note that the Committee is highly attentive to the upside risks to inflation.”
Wink, wink. Putting it in the statement to manipulate the public and actually caring about tinflation are two different things. Events over the last week show they clearly don’t give a damn.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Looks like layoffs have increased due to..wait for it…increased labor costs.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
The truth is actual economy was weakening before covid because of the trade war Trump started. Biden seems intent on not just continuing this trade war but expanding it. This all feels like a repeat of the 70s with Nixon followed by Ford/Carter. Higher rates are going to tip the economy into an L shaped recession the likes of which haven’t been seen since the 70s. It will take a few years of muddling through inflation but unless there are hikes in hundred basis point chunks it won’t matter.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Heard a book review today stating that the best way to stop illegal money and laundering is to ban the $100 bill. Exchange those 100s in the mattress for 20s.
MPO45
MPO45
3 years ago
My favorite real estate blogger had a youtube video that showed recessions typically start a year or two after housing peak and if that pattern holds we won’t see deep recession until late 2023. Worth a watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_LLEwvwNTE
Nicholas focuses on hard data and analysis and little hyperbole.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
Typically.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  MPO45
I often focus on a little hyperbole myself.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
“Fed Minutes Show Inflation Risks Are Skewed to the Upside”
I agree with the Fed. Inflation is more entrenched, and much harder to bring down due to high commodity prices, which they have very little control over.
Inventories of oil, gasoline, and distillates continue their two year plunge, as demand continues to exceed supply, in spite of SPR releases. What happens when SPR releases stop? Every day brings new stories of governments considering or imposing export controls on energy, ag products, water, and other commodities. Shortages of many products, combined with continuing supply chain disruptions continue to drive up prices. Shortages of skilled labor keep forcing up wages of those skilled workers. And so on.
Now; how to reduce the impact of these high prices, or even benefit from them? Clever folks will find a way to take advantage of this problem.
radar
radar
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
So glad Realist turned us on oil stocks, they have been performing very well!
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  radar
Agree. And of course, thanks to Mish for the blog, along with all the commenters here, who provide additional valuable information for the rest of us. Lots of good ideas here. Thanks Mish.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
remember, in gerald ford day it was rummy and cheney that ran the price control board. i suspect we will all be wearing bell bottoms and Whip Inflation Now buttons in a few years. this stagflation will be years in the system. not a doubt about that. imho.
PapaDave
PapaDave
3 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Agree. Yet, there are always opportunities for those who can recognize them.
TechLover1
TechLover1
3 years ago
All the signs of a rare policy error in the opposite direction.
By the time they realize they have jacked up too high, we will be in the midst of a terrible recession.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
“Is the Fed pretending the economy is strong or are they as clueless as
they sound.(?) The latter will lead to a policy error in the opposite
direction.”
I vote for a) pretending the economy is strong, and b) clueless.
Despite have the major responsibility for getting the US into this position (slowing growth, low interest rates, overpriced assets, miss-allocation of capital, surging inflation. etc.), the Fed is NOT about to admit responsibility. Far better to pretend to be clueless–after all, there might be a world war they can blame it on.
Putting the Fed in charge of the ‘economy’ is like putting F***-up Fauci in charge of Covid, and Joe Dementia in charge of the Presidency.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Your kidding yourself if you think the era of pretending started in 2020. Once the Fed intervened in 2008 there was really no turning back. The smart move now would be to remove all QE since 2012 and let the economy settle back to a new equilibrium. Then continue raising rates if necessary.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
3 years ago
we can have a recession and inflation. called stagflation. i don’t think the fed cares about the recession side of stagflation. they are committed to stomp on inflation, which has gotten more out of control in many peoples lives than since the nixon years to reagan years. they will jack up for a long time and snuff out inflaiton. might take 5 or more years. fits and starts like the late 60s to early 80s. is my guess. nobody knows. of course.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
It has somehow gotten to the point where everything the Fed actually does winds up being a “policy error”.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
I am anticipating a big shift when Amazon announces free delivery limit hike, followed by others.
The transportation pressures must be there, but Amazon also uses contractors, so those will be thrown overboard first.
Sunriver
Sunriver
3 years ago
There is war in Europe. The U.S. economy must ‘look’ strong even if it isn’t?
I have no other reason as to why the FED brings up this ‘fairy tale’ growth story, unless the FED is wanting to justify their asset bubble blowing policies for say the last two decades and is hinting at helicopter drops of QE.
Certainly there is no support for the GDP growth the FED believes in for the remainder of 2022.
The funny papers may be a better place to read the FED minutes going forward.
Curious-Cat
Curious-Cat
3 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
“I have no other reason as to why the FED brings up this ‘fairy tale’ growth story, unless the FED is wanting to justify their asset bubble blowing policies for say the last two decades and is hinting at helicopter drops of QE.”
I think your comment presupposes the Fed is acting rationally and with a purpose in mind. My reading of the minutes summary and Mish’s summary slows no evidence of such intent.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
3 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
The summary reads like a group-think session. To misquote General Patton,
“If everyone is thinking alike… everyone is working for the Fed.” Powell (2022)
danaceve
danaceve
3 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
I believe it’s what Mish stated..”the Fed cannot admit that” (recession is baked in).
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
3 years ago
Economists are bad enough when it comes to economics. What do you expect from a bunch of lawyers and bureaucrats?
Curious-Cat
Curious-Cat
3 years ago
Reply to  Karlmarx
Most of these people have all spent most of their professional lives at the Fed. One is an academic.
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
3 years ago
Reply to  Curious-Cat
Exactly. And the boss is alawyer

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.