G-7 Nations Agree to Biden’s 15% Minimum Corporate Tax Proposal

The G-7 Nations Agree On New Tax Rules, but obstacles remain. 

Under the deal, G-7 members will back a global minimum tax rate on company profits and a new way of sharing the revenues from taxing the world’s largest and most profitable companies.

The G-7, which comprises Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S., agreed that businesses should pay a minimum tax rate of at least 15% in each of the countries in which they operate 

The main aim of European countries has been to increase taxes on large digital businesses such as Google’s Alphabet Inc. and Facebook Inc., most of which are based in the U.S. To do that, an overhaul of the existing rules is needed, because they were designed for an age in which businesses had to have a large physical presence in a country—such as a factory—to be able to make profits there.

Obstacles in the US and EU

Perhaps US Senate Republicans will agree in the name of bipartisan cooperation, but don’t count on it.

On May 24, Senator Mike Crapo (R., ID) , a ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, sent Janet Yellen a Letter expressing concerns about Congress ceding U.S. taxing rights over profitable U.S. companies to foreign jurisdictions.

And Senate Republicans are not in favor of any tax hikes, but perhaps this idea eventually floats.

Regardless, to have much meaning, the tax haven countries and the G-20 would have to agree.  

It will be interesting to see where this goes, if anywhere.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
Is the 15% rate to be based on profits reported to shareholders or on national tax codes often riddled with loopholes such as tax credits for locating new factories in depressed areas? If the latter, then the 15% rate will be a whole lot of nothing. 
ed_retired_actuary
ed_retired_actuary
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
It would be based upon income reported to  stakeholders, including share-holders,. There is some discretion in US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), so the potential for manipulation would generally be reduced but not eliminated.
ed_retired_actuary
ed_retired_actuary
4 years ago
To rally public opinion, the G7 leaders need to appeal to voters sense of fairness and also resentment that large multinationals are able to exploit loopholes unavailable to the large majority of individual tax payers or even many domestic corporations.   In the US congress, virtually all Republicans will heed their corporate pay-masters unless such opinion becomes overwhelmingly strong, which is unlikely.  In the unlikely event of sufficient political will in the G7, opposition from tax havens could be effectively overcome. 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
They had to show something for all the caviar and champagne, not to mention the climate changing jet fuel spent for this get together.
Now, if they come up with an idea how to dig themselves out of the hole caused by more than a decade of ZIRP/NIRP, I would be impressed.
The scary thought is, they don’t think they are in a hole, and everything is fixed.
amigator
amigator
4 years ago
They are struggling to tax the climate change so they  have regrouped. this is the goal to have a world government that taxes all.  Even if it starts out with good intentions it will be corrupted in a short time.  I doubt our founding forefathers would call an adminsitration pushing such an ideology as Americans.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  amigator
The founding fathers might not call those supporting the abolition of slavery or fighting for the right of women to vote, as Americans either.  So?  
SyTuck
SyTuck
4 years ago
Am I being foolish in seeing this as a tax cut at best or do nothing lipstick at worst?
Most countries have overall tax rates much higher than 15% but tout “net” tax rates that are lower than 15%. 
The real problem is tax haven countries that are very unlikely to agree, or even care.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  SyTuck
This is one time when I would fully and wholeheartedly support the use of our awesome military firepower.  To bring those two-bit tax haven “countries” to heel.  Just one night of relentless bombing should have them raising the white flag the next morning!
SyTuck
SyTuck
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Or just cut them off from onshore banking.

They can have their little banana republic tax shelter, but good luck with getting your money out.

Ultimately it’ll never happen as politicians everywhere love their little Caribbean shell companies

RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I read John Kerry, Democrat, parked his boat in another state in order to evade higher taxes on it. Bernie Sanders used to rail against millionaires and billionaires, until he became a millionaire. Now he just rails against billionaires.
When Hillary ran for president, the Clinton’s were supposedly worth some 130 million dollars. She proclaimed they were not “that” rich.
Who knows what the Biden’s are worth, from decades of public service? High level public service has turned into quite a gravy train.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Most Dems are no better than socially moderate right-wingers aka libertarians.   As for Sanders, when he criticized the millionaires, it was against those who could afford to attend the $5000 a plate campaign fundraising dinners.   The average working stiff in NY or CA, who just happens to have a net worth of a million-plus mainly because of the equity in their house, would never think that Sanders was ranting against them.
caradoc-again
caradoc-again
4 years ago
There will come a time when there will be some agreement on minimum everything, including health care and income relative to local cost of basics. Some way off but its the way this will head. Give it time.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
I can’t see how it’ll make any difference to European G7 members, aren’t their corporate tax rates always over 15%? The US’s is heading up as well at the moment. 
Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
4 years ago
Anyone notice how like a price-fixing cartel this seems?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
This article talks somewhat about the effect of increasing taxes on corporations and unionizing more workers. A minimum tax of 15% will only make things that much less competitive in the G20 countries and force that much more manufacturing offshore. Just like there are Liberian freighters there will be Liberian corporations.
It also discusses the core issues we’ve been talking about the past few days in other threads. Entitled workers in America, need to train workers for the jobs of tomorrow in the Carrier example at the end of the article.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.