Housing Starts Plunge 14.4 Percent But From a Significant Upward Revision

Housing data from commerce department, chart by Mish

The Census Department’s New Residential Construction reports has the starts, permits, and completions data for May, 2022.

Building Permits 

  • Privately‐owned housing units authorized by building permits in May were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,695,000. This is 7.0 percent below the revised April rate of 1,823,000, but is 0.2 percent above the May 2021 rate of 1,691,000.
  • Single‐family authorizations in May were at a rate of 1,048,000; this is 5.5 percent below the revised April figure of 1,109,000. 
  • Authorizations of units in buildings with five units or more were at a rate of 592,000 in May. 

Housing Starts 

  • Privately‐owned housing starts in May were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,549,000. This is 14.4 percent below the revised April estimate of 1,810,000 and is 3.5 percent below the May 2021 rate of 1,605,000. 
  • Single‐family housing starts in May were at a rate of 1,051,000; this is 9.2 percent below the revised April figure of 1,157,000. 
  • The May rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 469,000. 

Housing Completions 

  • Privately‐owned housing completions in May were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1,465,000. This is 9.1 percent above the revised April estimate of 1,343,000 and is 9.3 percent above the May 2021 rate of 1,340,000. 
  • Single‐family housing completions in May were at a rate of 1,043,000; this is 2.8 percent above the revised April rate of 1,015,000. 
  • The May rate for units in buildings with five units or more was 417,000.  

Housing Starts Single Family vs Multi-Family 

Housing data from commerce department, chart by Mish

Housing Starts, Permits, Completions Not Adjusted 

Housing data from commerce department, chart by Mish

Seasonally-adjusted, annualized numbers have a way of making increases and declines as well as the overall numbers look much worse or better than reality to persons not familiar with how adjustments work.

To put things into perspective, there were actually 138,000 starts in May. After adjustments, starts are reported as 1,549,000 units.

Many disagree with these seasonal adjustments. However, it is the best way of looking at monthly changes. Year-over-year comparisons are best done with unadjusted numbers.

New Homes For Sale by Stage of Construction

New Homes for Sale data from Commerce Department, chart by Mish

The above data is from the April new home sales report not the above housing starts data. 

For discussion, please see New Home Sales Plunge 22.5% In April, 16.6% From Deep Negative Revisions

An even better way of looking at upcoming supply is total units under construction.

Housing Units Under Construction

Housing units under construction data from Commerce Department, chart by Mish

There is a record 1.6 million units under construction. 

How Far Behind the Curve is the BLS and Fed on Rent Inflation?

National Rent data from ApartmentList, OER and Primary Residence from the BLS, chart by Mish

Rent of primary residence and Owners’ Equivalent Rent make up over 31 percent of the CPI. Rent has been on a tear. 

On June 2, I asked How Far Behind the Curve is the BLS and Fed on Rent Inflation?

There will be upward pressure on rent in the CPI for the next three to six months. Then what?

With housing starts about to plunge are there enough units in the pipeline to cool rent prices?

I do not know the answer, but if it’s no (or will take a long time to kick in), the Fed will have one hell of a time getting inflation down without crushing the economy. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

42 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
1 year ago
This one’s gonna be a doozy. I’m afraid anyone who bought a house after a certain point is going to end up losing it if they lose their job. This recession has not only the hallmarks of the 2001 recession but also 2008.
TechLover1
TechLover1
1 year ago
40 year mortgages. Here we come!
There will be creative solutions from GSEs. The pressure is going to be very high to stem the tide of loss of home prices.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  TechLover1
I am skeptical. Keep in mind why the 30-year fixed is tied to the 10-year Treasury note. It’s because the note’s duration is 7 years, and so is the average holding period of a residential mortgage. If they came up with a 40-year fixed, I don’t see the rate differential being significant enough to matter.
TechLover1
TechLover1
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
It is not the rate differential but the reduced monthly payment that matters for most buyers. Most buyers purchase based on monthly payments that they can afford.
FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATION ADDS 40-YEAR MORTGAGE MODIFICATION WITH PARTIAL CLAIM TO HOME RETENTION OPTIONS FOR STRUGGLING BORROWERS
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  TechLover1
I am always persuaded by facts. I don’t see that there’d be a material change in the monthly payment, but I’ll admit to not running comparative amortization tables. It’s been a long time.
Gordofeo
Gordofeo
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
a 40-year or interest-only loan would only make the situation worse and drive prices even higher
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
It’d be interesting to see if rent prices — both absolute and rent inflation rates — are different in places that have adopted rent control. Rent control has come roaring back in CA, OR, and WA.
TechLover1
TechLover1
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Interesting perspective.
I don’t have the data but it would make sense that regions where there is rent control will have lower inflation in rent prices. There will also be very little building so there will be shortages as well. Rent control has been studied well for a very long time and has fairly predictable results. It just takes a very long time to surface the results so politicians keep doing it to get the short term benefits.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  TechLover1
I think higher inflation over time, as rent control causes supply to decline.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
rent control ==> minimal maintenance, slower appreciation, physical deterioration
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
And rental brokers, and “key money.”
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Cheap money is what made things too expensive to build or buy.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
Yes.
Credit worthy prudent people have been forced to pay up for things when anyone with a pulse can get credit.
The beater I drive I bought off of craigslist. Cash and Carry. Amazing the deals to be had when there is no (easy) financing.
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
It used to be that banks would not lend on any car over 10 years old. If one had cash, cars over 10 years old were priced more favorably. Not sure of lending requirements now.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
  • The monthly principal and interest (P&I) payment on the average-priced home with 20% down is nearly $600 (+44%) more than it was at the start of the year and $865 (+79%) more than before the pandemic
  • As of May 19, with 30-year mortgage rates at 5.25%, the share of median income required to make that P&I payment had climbed to 33.7%, just shy of the 34.1% high reached in July 2006.
Sustainable?
High Water Mark?
KidHorn
KidHorn
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Maybe housing can stay afloat with arms. 4% for first 5 years climbing to going rate + 1% afterwards. People can gamble about being able to refinance after interest rates drop back down.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I’m skeptical, because I think the 30-year fixed will be hitting 10% before too long.

By the way, it’s amusing to see the talking heads on CNBC and Bloomberg talking about a “possible recession” next year. Sheesh, not exactly with-it, are they?

Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I no longer watch CNBC.
But back in December Jim Cramer called the economy a “juggernaut … best in a 100 years” … what is that Clown saying now?
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
I lived in Seattle during the Panic of ’08. I have a vivid memory of Cramer saying Seattle’s housing market was in fine shape, as prices were declining by 30%. Anyone who follows that clown deserves to lose money.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
How does he keep his job? Working for free, and collecting commission for market cheerleading?
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
He’s an entertainer and a self-styled “journalist.” It’s NBC. Need I say more?
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
i only watch cnbc when markets panic. if anyone doesn’t LOL at cramer for his clown show they don’t get it. pure entertainment. not serious. he’s a great act. like marx. brothers that is, not karl. though he does look eerily like vladimir lenin. which makes me LOL even harder. i met him on streets of brooklyn last summer. nice fella actually. he walked about 100 feet to shake my hand after i yelled boooooooyaaaaaaah…….at his bald head from across the street.
TechLover1
TechLover1
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I hear you about over 10% but I am very skeptical. There is bipartisan support for homeowners. There is no appetite for another run of 2008.
There will be cries to do something if and when housing starts to sour. Mortgage forbearance, calls for Fed to start buying MBS etc.
I won’t be surprised if the Fed starts buying MBS again but keeps increasing overnight rates. Policy wise, I don’t see an issue in doing QE on the long end and increasing overnight rates.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  TechLover1
Squeeze the short end but support the long end? Hmm. I’d love to see some analysis of that from people who know more than I do.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
1 year ago
Mortgage rates in the US are heading for 6 % , right ? If that were to happen within the EU circus not even a single brick would be sold, let alone a fn house ….
Mish
Mish
1 year ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Not headed for 6 over 6 right now
And that was after a 0.25 decline yesterday
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Mish
How high do you think they’ll go? I say 10%, but I know nothing.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
I remember 12.5%+ 30 year
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
That’s the past. I am wondering about the future.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
1 year ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
You just keep your existing housing stock maintained and heated. You’ve got it too good for too long, hence the hidden Darwinian hand selected the least able to the top. Until that’s corrected, life will get tougher.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
1 year ago
Helas, don t have no housing stock Max, my grandfather used to say , ‘huizen zijn luizen'(houses are louses), but that was at a time when one got a 8 or 10 % on a saving account, so why would he ve bothered, he didn t know of course that the fn Euro currency and globalisation in general would eventually mess up our fn lives, ….unless one bought property since the BFC, I didn t ….helas …
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
1 year ago
The first domino
Starts —> appliances —> landscaping —> furniture
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Behind gas & food, housing is the #1 reason for runaway inflation, especially when you consider all those 90% refi’s from May 2020 up until about 3 months ago. That’s at least a trillion dollars. Bring on the implosion followed by a recession. This is the ONLY way inflation is tamed. The only question is did Congress & the Fed learn their lesson? Or will we see the repeat of the Fed / Congress put (aka QE & rent / mortgage forbearance)?
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Housing price increases are not the reason for inflation. It’s the result of inflation, as it works its way through the structure of the U.S. economy. The reason for inflation is that the Fed created too much money, plus the Democrats amped up velocity in ’21 with that infrastructure and covid bills.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
In 2008-9 the Fed created money and gave it to the banks.
The banks sat on it.
That buoyed up the stock market, but didn’t hurt the common folks too much.
2020-1 the Congress gave money to the common folks.
Lots of money.
Everyone is spending the money and bidding up prices.
Now we are here.
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  JackWebb
Not in love with either party, but the republicans flooded the country with more money than we needed in a blatant attempt to retain power and get Trump re elected. They both have betrayed us.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
Then the democrats flooded the country with even more money when we didn’t exactly know how much was needed in an attempt to stockpile voters. They both have betrayed us.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
I will never understand the “your party is worse than my party” dialogue. It’s nothing but a big waste of time; not to mention a distraction from focusing on what is actually important to each individual’s best interest.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Please note: “They both have betrayed us.”
That was the point.
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  Lisa_Hooker
That is what I meant to say. Don’t like either party at this point. Conservative economic and social principles have been abandoned by the most Republicans in order to try and stay in power. Doing the right thing is not in anyones playbook anymore. The last fiscal and social conservative president, believe it or not was Clinton. If he ran on those principles now he would be “cancelled” and labeled as a racist.
JackWebb
JackWebb
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
Velocity is an error term, and to my knowledge cannot be measured directly. My gut feel is that the 2020 appropriations were risky, but that the real damage (velocity-wise) was done in ’21. But I doubt we’ll ever know. The ’20 flood was big, but the ’21 flood was bigger.
jiminy
jiminy
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
Agree

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.