Delusional Fed President Hopes to Steepen the Yield Curve Via QT and Rate Hikes

Yield Curve as of 2022-02-14, data from the New York Fed, chart by Mish

The yield curve is rapidly approaching a flat state in response to anticipated Fed hikes.

Both the 7-year note and the 10-year note yield 1.98%. The 5-year note lags by a mere 8 basis points (.08 percentage points). 

The curve is inverted (downward sloping), between 20 and 30 year durations. 

Yield Curve Spreads

Yield Curve Spreads via New York Fed and Mish Calculations

The yield curve has been flattening since March 2021 in response to anticipated rate hikes. 

The 2-10 spread has fallen from 1.59 percentage points to 0.40 percentage points.

Economists watch this spread because when it inverts (a shorter duration bond yields more than a longer term bond) it’s a recession signal. If the Fed hikes 50 basis points (a half point hike), the curve might easily invert. 

Note the 20-year to 30-year spread is already inverted by 6 basis points. This corresponds to the downward slope in the lead chart.

Flattening Concerns 

This flattening is a sign the economy is weakening even as inflation has been ramping up.

It’s a difficult environment for banks and borrowers alike and because inversions morph into recessions.

Fed Credibility on the Line 

On February 14, St. Louis Fed president James Bullard gave an interview with CNBC in which he discussed rate hikes and the Fed’s inflation credibility.

I commented on that in James Bullard Says Fed Credibility Is On the Line, Repeats Faster Rate Hike Message

Bullard Statements

  • We have the hot CPI report. Not so much that report alone, but the last four reports taken in tandem have indicated inflation is broadening and possibly accelerating.
  • I am just one person but I would like to see 100 basis points on the policy rate by July 1.
  • “I do think we need to front-load more of our planned removal of accommodation than we would have previously. We’ve been surprised to the upside on inflation.
  • This is a lot of inflation in the US economy. 7.5% on the headline CPI. These are numbers Alan Greenspan never saw and haven’t occurred in 40 years.
  • Our credibility is on the line and we do have to react to data.
  • I think the inflation we are seeing is very bad for low and moderate-income households. Real wages are declining. People are unhappy. Consumer confidence is declining. This is not a good situation.

Balance Sheet  Runoff

The DailyFX reported this comment by Bullard: “From balance sheet run-off, I’d want to see the yield curve steepen.”

Kansas City Fed President Esther George commented on the balance sheet in her speech on January 31, 2022, The Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy

  • All in all, it could be appropriate to move earlier on the balance sheet relative to the last tightening cycle.
  • While it might be tempting to err on the side of caution, the potential costs associated with an excessively large balance sheet should not be ignored.
  • A large Fed presence in markets can displace private activity, even in a market as large and liquid as that for U.S. Treasuries and certainly where the central bank holds roughly 1/4 of the MBS market. This presence can distort price signals, currently most evident in the pricing of duration. By holding long duration assets, the Fed’s balance sheet is depressing the price of duration, by lowering longer-term yields by as much as 1.5 percentage points according to some rules-of-thumb, incentivizing reach-for-yield behavior and increasing fragility within the financial system.
  • Second, and related, maintaining a large balance sheet reduces available policy space in the inevitable next downturn.
  • Finally, a large balance sheet has the potential to intertwine fiscal and monetary policy in the public’s eyes and could unintentionally pose risks to the Fed’s independence and authority. In a rising rate environment, this risk could become more apparent as interest paid on the large stock of reserve liabilities grows.

Free Money to Banks

Pay particular attention to that last bullet point by Esther George. She is discussing free money the Fed hands out to banks at taxpayer expense. 

Sweet Deal for Banks

The Fed currently pays banks 0.15% interest on reserves.

With QE at $8.9 trillion dollars, banks annually collect $13,350,000,000 interest annually on free money (QE) the Fed crammed down their throats.

This has been going since former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke lobbied Congress for the right to pay banks money on excess reserves. The Fed then reduced the reserve requirement to zero, making all reserves excess reserves, now simply called reserves.

I suspect interest the Fed pays on reserves will rise in March, possibly to 0.40% or higher when it hikes in March. On a double hike by 50 basis points, the Fed might pas as much as 0.60% interest on reserves.

Since the Fed has no intention of winding down its balance sheet, the 0.40% interest rate would allow banks to collect $35,600,000,000 a year in “free” money.

It’s not really free, of course. You and I (taxpayers) foot this bill.

Fed’s Balance Sheet 

Fed’s Balance Sheet data from St. Louis Fed, as of February 9, chart by Mish.

That balance sheet amazingly enough is still expanding. In the last week, the Fed added another $5 billion. 

The Fed’s total balance sheet is nearly $8.9 trillion. 

Emergency “Sunshine” Meeting

The  Fed had an Emergency Sunshine Meeting on Monday, the following matters: “Review and determination by the Board of Governors of the advance and discount rates to be charged by the Federal Reserve Banks.”

They are concerned about QE, reversing QE, and interest rates on excess reserves. 

Some expected the Fed to hike intra-meeting but the Fed only does emergency cuts, not hikes.

There was zero sunshine at the meeting or following it.

Too Late For Honesty

All of a sudden we are getting a little bit of honesty from Bullard on how Fed-sponsored inflation has been “very bad for low and moderate-income households.”

We also see Esther George discussing three issues regarding the Fed’s balance sheet.

We should have had dissents for at least the past 6 months on rate hikes. The Fed should have stopped balance sheet expansion (QE) as soon as it as clear the economy was recovering. Better yet, there was no good excuse for QE in the first place.

Now What?

  • The economy is slowing 
  • The Fed is about to initiate a rate hike cycle
  • The yield curve is flattening before the rate hike cycle has even started
  • Inversions and a recession are on the horizon

Delusional Bullard

Bullard is hoping that Quantitative Tightening (QT), the opposite of QE coupled with rate hikes will steepen the curve. 

If he really believes that’s likely, he is delusional. The normal response to tightening is a flattening of the curve. Yet Bullard is a proponent of more aggressive hikes. 

It’s far more likely, we will see the Fed panic after two or three hikes and never start QT at all.

Ironically, the Fed doing nothing and letting inflation run hotter would steepen the curve. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

30 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
The Fed has distorted the Treasury market for well over a decade now. If the Fed were to sell off all its long term Treasuries and none of the short duration Treasuries, the Fed could *easily* steepen the yield curve.
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
2 years ago
Why do we let economist manage monetary policy instead of finance majors?
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
to help wall street bet around and over the sheep
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
We don’t.
when economists manage monetary policy, there is no monetary policy.
And precious few wants to be finance majors. 
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
If you are calling FOMC members economists, you are way off base. Several are lawyers, and one has a journalism degree. PS Finance majors would screw things up even worse.
Greff
Greff
2 years ago
MCConnell finds the Fed nominees controversial…Recommendation: Biden should propose MISH for Fed post and if nominated MISH would do the obvious of DISBANDING THE FED!!  No more Greenspan, Bernanke, Yellen or Powell put!
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
I’m not sure why you say the interest the Fed pays to banks is a taxpayer expense.  It’s the Fed balance sheet, not the U.S. Treasury.  Taxpayers pay nothing.  A case could be made that this results in lower payments from the Fed to the Treasury but that’s not the same as an expenditure.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
It reduces the FEDs profits which means the FED remits less back to the treasury at years end.
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Yes, and I said as much in my original post.  But it’s kind of like saying that if Microsoft spends money in such a way that lowers their tax burden then the U.S. taxpayers are the ones footing the bill for that spending.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
it’s a govt program, of course its still running….help the banker, eat the children
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“Better yet, there was no good excuse for QE in the first place.”
That’s true. Covid-19 was largely treatable by April 2020.  Dr. Zelenko had an 84% reduction in mortality with his Covid therapy. The economy and peoples lives were turned upside down for no good reason.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
The only way to defeat covid is if everyone is fully vaccinated. There’s no other possible way. Even if everyone had naturally immunity, everyone would still need to be vaccinated. Even though vaccinated people still easily get and spread covid, it’s the only way to stop it. You must be one of those science deniers.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
You both are wrong.
WarpartySerf
WarpartySerf
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
“You must be one of the science deniers” …….    No-   I can read a dictionary , and understand the meanings of words.

Vaccination : ” A substance that creates antibodies in an individual that provides IMMUNITY from a disease or diseases.”

Medicine : “A substance that lowers the symptoms of a disease, but does not prevent the acquisition or spread of the disease.”

KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  WarpartySerf
So, according to your definition, the covid vaccine isn’t a vaccine since it clearly doesn’t provide immunity.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
yes, you cannot change the game no time left, that is what they did by changing the definition….and some folks ate it up…
it was always a flu shot nothing more, no animal reservoir virus has ever had a vaccine, in history of mankind
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
We can no more defeat Covid than we can defeat the common cold.  The purpose of the vax is to lessen the affects of Covid so that you don’t have to go to the hospital and use up precious medical resources. That’s the same reason the regular flu shot has been given out for decades.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
The regular flu vaccine has historically provided immunity from the strains of flu it was created for. It doesn’t always work because people become infected with strains that it doesn’t protect against. I don’t recall it ever being touted as something that will reduce hospitalizations if you contract the flu.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Initially it was touted as immunity in the same way the polio vaccine prevents polio.
Obviously after a couple of months time when vaxxed people kept getting and spreading Covid they realized that it was not providing lifetime immunity nor even 100% immunity for a few months. That’s when the narrative changed and it became about getting vaxxed so that the ICU units would not fill up. That’s the entire reason for the 3rd (booster) shot when Omicron ramped up.
JeffD
JeffD
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
You are hysterical.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
umm, the reset restricted you more, tightened the noose of control over freedom….
the crazy part, they are going to have to keep pumping money into this canard….
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
“Some expected the Fed to hike intra-meeting but the Fed only does emergency cuts, not hikes.”
Quotable quote there. I like it.
I don’t see them having much way to shrink their balance sheet. That’s the trap. They lever up, buy the national debt (UST’s and MBS’s) and the government spends the money…..and it’s GONE. Poof.
There is no real buyer for the all the debt instruments the Fed owns, absent a run to safety in a world-wide credit lock-up. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Foreign capital would rather own MSFT and AAPL than US Treasuries.
urtau
urtau
2 years ago
Mish,  I’m curious.  You don’t think the Fed has the firepower to achieve YCC (yield curve control)?  An Operation Untwist?  
If history is any guide, they won’t even have to do much.  If they say they’ll do whatever it takes to raise the long-end / steepen the curve, the market will front-run and do it for them. 
And this seems like something they would do.  Everything is about optics.  We all know that inversion signals recession, and they can’t allow that signal to happen, because even if all the economic data is screaming recession they can’t allow investor psychology to go there too.  So it seems likely they’ll manipulate the curve for purely investor sentiment reasons.  Plus it gives them cover:  “We never saw this recession coming, the yield curve never indicated any worries”
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  urtau
I expect they will try. Even said so. 
They have a massive balance sheet and can manipulate it at will even if they allow some to drain off naturally.
But trying to control that while hiking is more than a bit problematic.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
 Bullard: “I do think we need to front-load more of our planned removal of
accommodation than we would have previously. We’ve been surprised to the
upside on inflation.”
Well, that doesn’t do much for FED credibility.
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
I notice that Crude Oil has wild swings that are the inverse to stocks. This does not seem like a stable market and does not appear to be driven by demand or supply. Prices at the pump are holding steady and higher priced stations are trying to match lower priced stations. The consumer only has so much money, and other items are taking up budget space. At this point it seems like oil is just an emotional response of having somewhere to park money. I see gold and silver reacting in the same way.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
they say the new bond vigilantes are the oll futures folks and of course other foreign companies…..
forcing feds hand with high oil seems the play
Christoball
Christoball
2 years ago
Wow, never thought of it that way. Good Point
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
The yield curve isn’t flattening because of recession fears. It’s flattening because most sane investors expect the fed to raise rates for a year or two and then start cutting again.
The FED is going to reduce the balance sheet. Not by selling assets. Rather they’ll let their holdings reach maturity and not reinvest the principle. It will be a slow process and I expect it will only last a year or two before they start buying debt again.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.