In the Covid-19 Baby Bust Crisis, US Birth Rate Plunged the Most Since the Late 1970s
•
•
23 comments on In the Covid-19 Baby Bust Crisis, US Birth Rate Plunged the Most Since the Late 1970s
•
Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.
Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.
This post originated on MishTalk.Com
Thanks for Tuning In!
Mish
Subscribe
23 Comments
Newest
2 years ago
Covid-19 has completely destroyed our economy and healthcare system throughout the world. To cope this stress during lockdown, i would suggest to play games and use different apps that promote learning process. You can download games from link to apkstreams.com
2 years ago
Who in their right mind would have a kid in today’s world?
2 years ago
During the Great Depression, there was also lots of unemployment, more time for sex and no birth control pills. But there was also a baby bust. It took a world war to get much of the world back to full employment and to experience economic growth. The last thing the country needs is a baby boom in the country’s ghettos. In the meantime, Congress has been chipping away at the value of Social Security benefits by imposing Medicare premium surcharges (since about 2007) on higher income beneficiaries and deducting the surcharges from from monthly Social Security benefits. But income tax continues to be levied on 85% of the gross benefits.
2 years ago
This overall trend has been predicted for a long time. Africa is the only region of the world that’s expected to grow substantially between now and the end of the century, with its population expected to nearly double by 2100. All other regions are expected to lose or gain between -25% to + 25% of their population over the next 70 years. Unfortunately, given Africa’s lack of infrastructure, it is also the region least capable to handle the robust growth that’s expected there by the end of the century.
2 years ago
Why should that be a problem ? Maybe the Sapiens Ape, consciously or unconsciously, is finally realising we are far too many already….If we(US, EU) are worried about the continuation of the indispensable, all important, planet destructive eternal growth and sick consumerism economy, it is only a matter of opening up our southern gates….At least in the US they come with the same superstitious, or religious if you want, convictions….
2 years ago
I have been preaching this for some time. Testosterone levels and sperm counts are down something like 60 percent over the last 38 years – something an evolutionist would expect over millions of years, if that, I expect. We are 16 percent under what reproducibility will sustain our society in America, and the sperm counts are just at the precipice of what can support reliable conception at all. I am told that chemicals that make plastics soft, like shower curtains, and fabric stain treatments are thought to be major culprits. The reproductive organs of humans are now becoming so small as to be marginally functional (as well as a wide array of other species), and sexual disfunction at large has taken off. My fellow Christians are primarily worried about an asteroid coming back in 2025, or the Illuminati, and many secularists are concerned about more serious real threats like global temperature rise, pollution and clean water access, but I am more convinced that THIS will be the real threat to humanity in the short term (like a generation or two).
2 years ago
Yes all that poison…and now the C19 jab on top of that….
2 years ago
Well, a cynic might note that it’s long been the fashion for the cleverest people to let someone else’s kids support them in their old age. And, win-win (!), feel smug about saving the planet while doing so.
2 years ago
“Meanwhile, we do have a self-made problem of fewer and fewer workers supporting undeserving and ungrateful baby boomers and public unions freeloaders.”
Worse, I see societies slowly disintegrating. Boomers own much wealth and have been promised/are used to a certain model, but they didn’t directly implement what we have going now, it is beyond them to understand how leverage has been introduced, and over or against who and for what. They might be selfish, ignorant or ungrateful, but really they are just caught up in a model they were sold, and are getting ripped off and suckered like anyone else, in the bigger picture. I should think many remember the values they used to stand for, in a world where they have lost respect.
The actual population size is neither here nor there, except for those that speculate on it. I thought people might be a bit more active, and I guess some were, but then many nowadays also choose to “plan” family matters. I suppose even the idea of being caught up in the care services during this time would be off-putting. I don’t even think there will be a great rebound…you imagine all the relationships interrupted, “force majeur” insinuating to people their own inability and reminding them of the weight of responsibility.
Anyone imagining their country going back to some previous way or ideal or other is probably out of touch. There are new and untested times ahead, and they are very worthy of hesitation so as to be considered – not that treadmills change course much.
2 years ago
I’ve decided I like the new layout Mish. And I can edit.
2 years ago
Colorado’s PERA was 105 percent funded in 2000. Then the economists told the Governor that the stock market was going to go up 20 percent a year. So they suspended the employer’s contribution share and lowered taxes in time for the 2002 election. Colorado is now in the top 10 for underfunded. Economists are not licensed like the woman who cuts my hair. These economists are like weathermen/women. They can’t be sued for being wrong.
2 years ago
I don’t see this as good or bad, but merely inevitable. Before Covid, fertility rates were already falling pretty much everywhere in the world outside the Sahel.
We’ve been in a state of suspended animation since 2008 when we made the fateful decision to print to the moon. People can sense that something is really wrong and as Mish hinted, having more babies does nothing to fix our fundamental problems of too much debt, too much easy money, and rocketing asset prices. Economists want infinite growth in a finite world but they can’t have it.
2 years ago
It may never reach that level again with the vaccine effects on male and female reproductive organs.
2 years ago
Stop spreading misinformation. You have a link?
2 years ago
That’s common disinformation. I’m sure he will have no difficulty producing a link. The question is, will you believe it?
2 years ago
“Economists predicted a baby boom with everyone staying home.”
Economists are not like other people. They check their tax returns and then decide to have a child or not based on whether they can use another deduction. In the real world, with the bars closed, alcohol fueled promiscuity takes a real hit, and that has unforeseen consequences. Many young men are probably in danger of never having children at all…..what with no booze, no frat parties, and no drive-ins…..they can’t even go to church to meet the girl of their dreams.
On a more serious note, there is a small but significant number of people who do seriously advocate against having children in order to combat climate change and/or limit habitat destruction for non-human species…..which is nuts imho, but they’re out there, believe me. I’d be surprised if nobody makes a comment in support of that.
Put me down as a GRATEFUL boomer. But the younger generations are all socialists anyway, so they’re going to be happy to be taxed into penury, because its all for the common good, and the government is sure to figure out a way to apportion benefits in the best possible way, since our elected officials all have our best interests at heart.
2 years ago
Immigrants can solve this problem.
Easily.
Allow 300K Syrian refugees under the age of 20 into the country.
2 years ago
and put Americans at increased risk of Terrorism. There was a pew survey from about 10 years ago that showed about 15% of Syrian refugees supported ISIS.
2 years ago
The scariest part of those quotes is:
“they deserve all their entitlements, and they’re gonna live out another 30 years”
If people really are going to start averaging 30 years of retirement along with roughly 20 years of upbringing it means 50 years of a lifetime will be spent producing nothing but consuming plenty. There is no way that an average of 30-40 years of work can pay for that (much less for those who never work).
Either retirement age is going to have to go up by a lot or people are going to die a lot younger in ways they never anticipated (disease, war, famine).
2 years ago
Agree. Retirement at age 65 (or even earlier) makes no sense when life expectancy is up to late 80’s.
2 years ago
If you retire at less than about 68, your benefits are reduced significantly, and if you live 30 more years, retiring earlier than 70 is crazy.
2 years ago
we were warned in 2017 link to time.com
2 years ago
I am sure there are a few who are just giddy over this news. Gates would be one.