In Unusually Candid Statements, China Admits a Rapidly Slowing Economy

China Highlights Threefold Economic Pressure

Please consider China’s economic policymakers doubling down on ‘stability’ for 2022 in the face of ‘threefold pressure’

Beijing has pledged to “front-load” policies to shore up the economy next year, as leaders remained on high alert against strong headwinds at the tone-setting annual central economic work conference that concluded on Friday.

“We are facing threefold pressure, including contraction of demand, supply shocks and weaker expectations,” the official Xinhua News Agency reported, citing an official statement from the conference. “Our policy support should be front-loaded appropriately.”

The emphasis on “stability” – the word appeared 25 times in the 4,700-word statement – comes as leaders are trying to project a positive image to the world ahead of February’s Beijing Winter Olympics, and with their sights set on the 20th National Party Congress – a key political gala that will usher in twice-a-decade leadership reshuffle for the Communist Party in the second half of next year.

“We need to concentrate on stabilising the macroeconomy, keeping the economic operation within a reasonable range and maintaining social stability,” the statement said.

“[The meeting] emphasised the downward pressure – the notion of ‘threefold pressure’ was very rare in the past,” said Zhou Hao, a senior emerging markets economist with Commerzbank.

He added that it was also uncommon for such official statements to mention the need to strengthen countercyclical regulations, and said it also warrants mentioning that the phrase “houses are for living in, not for speculation” showed up again, in reference to Beijing’s strong regulation of the sector.

China Headwinds

  • Financial risks amplified by the Evergrande debt crisis
  • A regulatory crackdown
  • Biden continues Trump tariff policies
  • US monetary tightening
  • Climate change pressures from the US and EU 

Expect climate change to take a back seat in the process.

In the statement, Beijing also stressed that the carbon-neutrality initiative cannot be “accomplished in one battle”, and noted that the nation’s energy supply is still dominated by coal.

I like this question.

China’s Coal Imports Surge 200% but Its Trade Surplus is the Third Highest in History

China has responded to the slowdown in advance by simulating exports. This will not go over well with Biden, Congress, or the EU.

For discussion, please see China’s Coal Imports Surge 200% but Its Trade Surplus is the Third Highest in History

What About Inflation?

The global economy is far weaker than Biden, the Fed, and ECB think.

If so, right as the Fed finally gets inflation religion it might have to reverse with nowhere to go.

Bubbles Burst 

Absurd asymmetric central bank policies lead to bubbles that inevitably burst.   

The moment the stock market cracks in a sustained way, demand for houses, cars, and all kinds of goods will plunge.

For now, inflation is way understated and demand is through the roof confounding supply chains.

But what room do central banks have to cut if demand plunges? 

On top of that, the Fed is in a bind because nearly everything Biden seeks is inflationary. 

For discussion, please see Biden’s Union Push is a Push For Still More Inflation

And for a discussion of bubbles by five different measures, please see Margin Interest Hit a Massive $595 Billion, What’s it Mean?

 All eyes will be on Jerome Powell on Wednesday.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

25 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jackula
Jackula
4 years ago
It’s hard to tell but I think China’s day in the sun is almost over, everybody thought Japan was gonna do it in the late 80’s but they were too racist along with many other issues, massive financial bubbles being a big one. China has many more issues than the US to solve and not sure Xi and the current chinese leadership are up to the task. The US has a way of re-inventing itself every couple of decades. Robotics, AI, and almost fully automated manufacturing alone will make large cheap workforces obselete. We hopefully are gonna go about re-inventing ourselves over the next decade. A telling indicator is we would not be allowed to have this kinda discussion in china.
GodfreeRoberts
GodfreeRoberts
4 years ago
A Chinese slowdown?? Noooooooooooo! Not again!!!!!!!!
1990. China’s economy has come to a halt. The Economist
1996. China’s economy will face a hard landing. The Economist
1998. China’s economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist
1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada
2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune
2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas
2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 
2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times
2004. The great fall of China? The Economist
2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini
2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy
2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME
2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes
2009. China’s hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune
2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini
2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider
2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 
2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 
2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC
2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 
2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist
2017. Is China’s Economy Going To Crash? National Interest
2018. China’s Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning.
2019 China’s Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC2020. Coronavirus Could End China’s Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times
2021  Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg
cmc
cmc
4 years ago
Reply to  GodfreeRoberts
Cherry picking.  There are just as many articles about China becoming dominant, how it will be a “Chinese Century”, etc., various people predicting the future.  Reality is that no one knows what the future holds.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  GodfreeRoberts
You are in for a rude surprise.
JeffD
JeffD
4 years ago
Demand won’t plunge. People are frantically trying to dump their worthless currency to buy real goods. The supply situation makes that clear.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  JeffD
There are limits to how much an increasingly homeless indentured servant fellating welfare queens, ambulance chasers and totalitarian-connected racketeers; is in any sort of position to demand, no matter how he feels about some currency of which he has none.
For a a country as big as China to grow its sales in aggregate, it requires broad realistic-ability-to-demand, aka wealth, growth among those it intends to sell to as well.
Hence their Belt and Road initiatives, aimed at facilitating potential customers grow their ability to demand Chinese goods and, critically, to pay for them in something worth something (in the immediate term, raw materials, but over time moving up the value stack into areas no longer viable in China). But the sheer size of China (8% of their output is more than the entirety of most countries’) requires a seriously broad and successful Belt and Road, for it to make up for traditional export markets’ now seemingly terminal decay.
Doesn’t help that a bunch disgruntled has-beens, like Russia and America, is desperately trying to cling on to once-were relevance by indiscriminately throwing around what still remains large stockpiles of military might, in order to force others to still pay some attention to them and their silly tantrums. Nor that China itself isn’t exactly headed up by the most feelgood-inspiring gang of rulers. The latter no doubt making it easier for wannabe tinpots to avail themselves of weapons provided by the formers, in order to breed and maintain poverty, effective instability and resulting inefficiency; via the militarization which America ad Russia by now are dependent on in order to sell anything.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
4 years ago
Is the slowing growth adjusted for ballooning fiscal debt, and ZIRP adjusted excess growth, i.e. is it the sustainable growth?
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
What does an economy mean to a country like China that just monetizes everything anyway ?   For that matter, the notion of an economy these days is just pretending to have one. Most money now is just money that filters down from governments across the globe into what we call the economy. There is now a Jupiter-sized divide between the actual economy on the ground anywhere in the world and those that govern it from central banks and governments around the world. Let us not pretend anymore.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Changing from one growth model, one that had worked well but not longer, to another untested one is not easy.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
“In the statement, Beijing also stressed that the carbon-neutrality
initiative cannot be “accomplished in one battle”, and noted that the
nation’s energy supply is still dominated by coal.”
Zero Hedge sub headline today:  ” ‘Net Zero’ is just plain virtue-signaling…”
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Mish has replaced Roubini as Doctor Doom and Gloom–that said, I think this is seriously accurate and timely analysis. The Covid boost to demand and inventory replacement will end with the new year, IMHO. That drop-off in demand will be enough. Worse, the Fed is fast approaching eunuch status–can’t go more than a few points in either direction.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Agree growth in either direction is capped. We may jawbone around 0% growth for some time yet. CFNAI-MA3 suggests there is no significant slowdown or uptick.  The Fed may be powerless under this scenario.  But I predict the man behind the curtain will taper with one hand and start buying assets with the other hand. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
China is in a similar spot as Japan in the early 90s. Export driven economy with a huge property bubble. Japan had decades of slow growth because people spent their money paying off loans instead of spending on goods. I’m not sure how China can avoid a similar fate. Exports are a losing proposition because trading goods for USD and Euro debt is a terrible deal. They need a way to increase domestic consumption but with so many having to pay off property loans, it will be very difficult.
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Spot on!
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Slow growth arises from excessive debt being incurred. Not from it being paid down. The real slowdown in Japan, happened because people spent their time decorating offices and overpaying for nonsense at art auctions, rather than at doing something productive. That happened in the late 80s.
No longer being able to cover it up with ever more new debt, just made the slowdown more generally visible, even for those less-than-clearsighted. That’s what happened in the early 90s.
Then, unwillingness to sort the mess out quickly via rapid, comprehensive, indisputable and final let-the-chips-fall-where-they-may  bankruptcy; all in an effort to protect connected Tokyo society under guise of “stability”; means people are still stuck working to pay for dumb dilettantes’ pretense of being cultured “business men” by overpaying for old wine bottles and effectively-commodity buildings. Instead of using that income in order to be able to afford raising children.
Since 1992 or so, though, despite what the less-than-literate have been repeatedly told to mindlessly regurgitate: Japan has, real-economy (at least per declining capita), grown plenty faster than places which still haven’t come to terms with their own debt bubbles. And with those ever-expanding debt bubbles’ ability to cover up, for the myopic and not so bright at least, the plainly obvious real-economy decay, which inevitably result from handing control of ever rising shares of capital stock to dilettante morons with no other qualification than closeness to the debt issuing credit nexus.
Economically destructive resource misallocation always occurs as a result of incurring debt. Never as a result of clearing it out; whether that is done by paying it off, or by getting rid of it in proper bankruptcy.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Leveraged investment always runs out of other peoples money ; but also uses up other peoples money for mal-investment.
numike
numike
4 years ago
China’s efforts to keep the new coronavirus strain out of its borders
have failed, with the country reporting its first case of the Omicron
variant in the coastal city of Tianjin on Monday (Dec. 13). https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4375269
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago

“The moment the stock market cracks in a sustained way, demand for houses, cars, and all kinds of goods will plunge.

For now, inflation is way understated and demand is through the roof confounding supply chains.”

Class … DISMISSED.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett

“The moment the stock market cracks in a sustained way, demand for houses, cars, and all kinds of goods will plunge.

For now, inflation is way understated and demand is through the roof confounding supply chains.”

I don’t understand; is consumer inflation higher than stated, or is wholesale inflation higher than stated, or is cost of production higher than stated, or all of the above. I understand the first part about stock market cracks affecting demand. Just asking. Could you explain the severity of the two combined statements. Thanks
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
I don’t answer for Tony Bennett, but my take:
Inflation is both a symptom and result of the underlying disease, not the cause.
Debt created out of saved income is, in a sense, real. At one time, people did not consume 100% of the harvest, but put some aside for the future, or for investment in new plows and mules. That is they received a ‘real return’ to compensate for going without.  Moving to the 1920s, debt created out of thin air (by banks) largely caused the Great Depression. Because it cost nothing to ‘make’ it, it was worthless, in a real sense.
Moving to the 2020s, debt created by the Fed (and other central banks) by ‘adding zeroes to the balance sheet’ is as faux as the underlying currency. IMHO, if it gets out of control, there will be the Mother of All Depressions–a global implosion.
I suspect the less real real/the more faux the ‘asset’, the greater the loss. Derivatives! Bitcoin…
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Thanks
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  Christoball
All of the above.  Inflation (in part) due to ultra loose monetary policy of central banks.  Central banks do NOT create money (QE is a swap of assets).  In a fiat world commercial banks create money thru lending (fractional reserve).  If / when central banks tighten (taper / raise rates) it will affect availability of credit.  Equities will be supported until there is a problem (something blows up) in the credit world.  THEN banks will tighten fearing losses.  That is when we’ll see a “sustained” draw down in stocks.  It will be a vicious cycle of falling stocks + credit tightening driving each other.  A LOT of “money” will go to money heaven.  Deflationary Bust of assets will bleed over into cpi as demand falls.
I know many here think Federal Reserve omnipotent, but their bark worse than bite.  Yes, they can influence at the margins, but when TSHTF they won’t be able to do much until major losses taken.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Leveraged investment reminds me of Socialism, eventually leveraged investors run out of other peoples money. Thanks for your reply.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“Isn’t the big question whether the slowdown has acquired enough momentum even a major effort by Beijing won’t be able to stop it?”
Bigger question … Does Xi even want to stop it?
Most articles on China are dismissive of a substantial slowdown.  Obligatory quote from a Western “expert”:  “blah blah blah I’m not worried blah blah blah Beijing will step in any minute blah blah blah.”
Imo, Xi NOT planning on business as usual.
And Mish, thanks for the China post.  Keep them coming.  2022 China will be front burner.
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
Common prosperity and attacking corruption help prove your point.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.