LA Spends Up to $837K Per Unit to House a Mere 5,600 of Over 40,000 Homeless

Los Angeles Passed Proposition HHH in 2016. Cost per unit from LA City Audit.

Inquiring minds are investigating Los Angeles City Controller’s Audit Report on the Progress of Proposition HHH a 2016 measure that authorized spending $1.2 billion to tackle homelessness in LA.

Key Points

  • California had 28,464 Homeless in 2016.
  • LA then passed proposition HHH, authorizing $1.2 billion to address the problem.
  • In early 2020, pre-Covid, the city had 41,250 homeless. There are no current homeless stats and due to Covid are undoubtedly much higher.
  • The city is building units to address the problem. 1,200 units have been completed. 
  • 4,400 units are in construction. 

LA Homelessness

Homelessness chart from LA City audit pre-Covid, annotations by Mish. 

Proposition HHH Cost Per Unit

  • Average completed cost is $520,879 per unit
  • Average cost of units underway is $596,486 per unit 
  • Approximately 14% of units in construction exceed $700,000 per unit.
  • One project is currently estimated to cost $837,000 per unit.
  • It took 3.4 years for the 1,200 completed units.
  • The estimated timeline is another 4.3 years for the additional 4,400 units.

My guess is there are now 60,000 LA homeless (possibly a lowball number due to Covid). At the current average of $600,000 per unit (and rising), LA will need to spend another $36,000,000,000. 

The controller says “Projects exceeding $600,000 per unit are no longer outliers.

Interim Housing

What about interim housing? 

Good question. Although six years have come and gone since HHH passed, the city is just now addressing delays.

Ron Galperin says “The City should use remaining HHH funds—or any HHH funds that become available—to prioritize the development of facilities such as interim housing, clinics, storage, and showers to help better manage the immediate needs of Angelenos experiencing homelessness.”

How Timely!

Q: How much money is left anyway? 
A: Less than 5%, according to the audit, and that is a 2018 figure after the city suspended building HHH facilities and still struggles to complete them.

Current vs Ongoing Costs

  • Housing the current estimated homeless would cost another $36 billion taxpayer dollars at the current rate. Unfortunately, that’s not the end of it. 
  • What about food, electricity, mental health treatments, and other services? 
  • What about building maintenance? 
  • What about building security at union wages? 

Of the $1.2 billion authorized, we have the same questions, just on a smaller scale. 

In another 4.3 years, LA will have a total of 5,600 units built for $1.2 billion while needing perhaps 60,000 units. Then what?

When Does it Stop?

The report says “Even after housing being built through Proposition HHH is completed, it is likely that tens of thousands of people will remain unsheltered.”

Duh? Ya think?

I assure you that whatever the the number of homeless is, be it 45,000 or 75,500 there is an endless demand for free services. 

If the city were to give away 100,000 free units at a cost of $600,000 to $800,000 each, there would be 200,000 willing takers if not 2 million takers.

What’s to stop San Diego or Austin, Texas from offering $200 and free bus transportation to LA for willing participants?

Perhaps Austin should consider that right now.  The obvious snag is unlimited demand for a mere 5,600 “free” units. 

Some will manage to get to LA from nearby areas even without the free transportation. 

Progress? What Progress?

There will never be progress in combatting homelessness by building $600,000 units to shelter the homeless.

Inflationary Madness

Paying $600,000 per unit to shelter homeless is inflationary madness. 

So is the entirety of Build Back Better: Free college, student debt cancellation, more union jobs, free child care, combined with an attack on energy to allegedly save the world, while now promoting free gas money for dependents who don’t even drive. 

On the table if Build Back Better happened to pass was a guaranteed “living wage” proposal. 

One courageous Democrat, Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia saved the US from massive perpetual inflation of “free” stuff. 

Meanwhile, Biden Doing Everything Possible to Drive Up the Price of Oil, Some of It’s Illegal

Stop!

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.   

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LM2022
LM2022
2 years ago
Ok, I live in Los Angeles so I have some thoughts on the matter. First of all, the number of homeless is widely underreported. If there are fewer than 100K homeless here I’ll eat my hat. I got accosted today by a homeless guy at a Starbucks while he ordered a free cup of hot water and I paid for my beverage. None of the employees at Starbucks did anything because no one making minimum wage is going to risk their lives taking on some wild eyed maniac. Secondly the city/state idiotically announce they’re raising taxes to build housing for homeless (that magically never gets finished) and people from all over come here for the warm weather and hospitable (?) people. “Addressing the homeless issue” has become an income stream for more than a few people in this state which is why the problem never gets better, only gets worse. Why solve a problem when you can make money off of it? Welcome to the good ol’ USA in 2022. Finally, local stories regularly feature people that just arrived from Ohio/Spokane/some place in the middle of the country I’ve never heard of who came here because they heard they were going to get a house. It sucks that there are so many people with drug/alcohol/mental health/reality issues but that shouldn’t be the sole responsibility of the tax payers of LA to solve. It needs to be addressed on a national level and people need to seek shelter and economic assistance in their home states.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
“Paying $600,000 per unit to shelter homeless is inflationary madness.”
That’s not what they are doing.
They are paying $600,000 per unit to connected wastes-of-space. So that those, can live it up on stolen funds, pretending to be “developers”, or “real estate investors”, or whatever else it is that rank idiots are dumb enough to believe are some sort of legitimate jobs, in our little financialized, theft-is-all-thats-left, retardtopia.
Paying anything, to anyone, as a reward for having achieved homelessness, is plain idiotic.
The only thing even more idiotic, is restricting people from building whatever they want wherever they want. Since restrictions which are THAT completely, 100%, obviously to anyone not substantially less intelligent than a doorknob, retarded and plain retarded only; is the one and only reason why such a thing as homeless people exists in America 2022 in the first place,
JJ Johnson
JJ Johnson
2 years ago
$25k for a tiny house, $10k for hookups, cement pad & incidentals. 1-3 people
$50k for small singlewide delivered, $10k plus again. Can house a family of 4-5.
Just sayin’
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  JJ Johnson
+ $500K for some connected idiot who contributes nothing whatsoever to solving the, nor any, problem.
That $500K is the whole reason for programs like these in the first place.
Remember: The whole purpose is theft. The rest is just obfuscation to fool the reliably stupid and gullible into believing there is somehow some other purpose than pure, crass theft.
It is, after all, America in the Fed Age: Theft is what we do. It’s all we do. It’s all we anymore know how to do.
Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
2 years ago
[“There will never be progress in combatting homelessness by building $600,000 units to shelter the homeless.”] should read “There will never be progress in combatting homelessness.”
Possibly the most complex American problem, there is no solution for it in the land of the free. It cannot even be managed competently.
randocalrissian
randocalrissian
2 years ago
What a load of garbage to be spending that kind of money. Company I work for built a 40-unit seven story midrise in 2018 for $18MM, $450,000 per unit. They are market rate ($5,000+ rent per month to college undergrads) and this doesn’t even factor in the cost of the two ground floor retail units 3,300sf total $35/sf lease rate, or the 20 offices and roof deck for hospitality upstairs. The apartments were more like 325K each. What they are building sounds like a bloated, crooked PPP. i.e. it isn’t being built to help anyone who is homeless, just the contractors and paid off gubmint folk.
nic9075
nic9075
2 years ago
$5,000 rent per month to college undergrads??? Or is the parents that are milked (and required to be guarantors making 70 times the $5,000 a month rent) for this complete waste of money so these precious 18-20 year olds don’t have to live in 1960s style college dorms.
I bet this is either in Boston or NYC — both are “college towns” for the offspring of the top 1% now..
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
But, but, but… the housing units are green.
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
I haven’t watched it, but a new episode of Chris Martinson’s podcast popped up on my Youtube viewing options.
“California is Being Destroyed – Unthinkably Bad Laws Being Proposed” Episode 54
AWC
AWC
2 years ago
“ When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” F. Bastiat
RonJ
RonJ
2 years ago
“When Does it Stop?”
Bankruptcy.
Cocoa
Cocoa
2 years ago
If you are doing that, then everyone is coming for their palace. The problem never abates and essentially a hoard of bureaucrats and Pentagon-like suppliers are making tons of money! The Homeless Industrial Complex!
AWC
AWC
2 years ago

“Progress” towards a system of totalitarian central government control, Ala The Neo Soviet Union.

KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Are the homes given away? if so, what would stop a homeless person from selling their unit, pocketing the proceeds, and then asking for another free home?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
I suspect they are being allowed to live there rent free. That means no skin in the game so expect the places to be trashed within a year or two.
Jackula
Jackula
2 years ago
Lotta graft in that total, good ole big city Democrats.
AWC
AWC
2 years ago
Reply to  Jackula
By way of egalitarian “Non Profit Organizations.” The socially acceptable way to untold riches.
shamrock
shamrock
2 years ago
Whats wrong with trailers? $50k each.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
Hhmm, sounds like another plan … brokering FEMA Katrina trailers …
hhabana
hhabana
2 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
What about an insulated Tuff Shed. If they can do some work they can buy an A/C and heating unit. Those that are crazy need to be locked up in a controlled environment with medication, food and monitoring.
Everything else is chaos.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
“What’s to stop San Diego or Austin, Texas from offering $200 and free bus transportation to LA for willing participants?”
Shhh … I’m still working up my business plan …
Wizard1966
Wizard1966
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
When Atlantic City was growing they build a huge homeless shelter. Homeless, criminals from all over the country arrived. LA will have many new citizens.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
That’s pretty much what the whole country does… which is why part of LA is zombie land.
hhabana
hhabana
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Sacramento is no better. I don’t even like to go there if I need to visit a government agency. Homeless everywhere.
This America now. All the big cities are falling apart due to acceptance of degenerate behavior, poor institutional drug therapy, lack of psyche facilities for those that are seriously mentally ill, and Federal Government spending money on MIC and overseas i.e. Ukraine for example.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  hhabana
The reason people are homeless, is no different from why people would also be sockless, if various Juntas placed as many restrictions on building new tennis socks, as they do on building new houses. It has nothinhg to do with anything more fundamental than that. Not “those people are, like…” nor any other nonsense.
Just, 100%, simple lack of housing supply. Solely because of completely arbitrary restrictions. Which are in place solely in order to ensure prices are artificially high. Since artificially and arbitrarily propping up prices of otherwise cheap stuff, is how government redistributes wealth from productive and useful people, to the idle but connected leeches who are stupid enough dumb enough to believe “making money from my house going up” is in any, literally any, way different from “making money from the government holding up my neighbor and handing me a cut.”
nic9075
nic9075
2 years ago
Reply to  hhabana
Really where is this happening?? certainly not in Boston or NYC which are glorified playgrounds for the top 1% basically for two things —
“fine dining”, and “upscale shopping”. Please tell me the allure or either especially when traveling by either subway or driving is a complete PITA now with crowds of people and roads that are narrowed for bike lanes, much easier to get virtually any item now online…..
I see the complete opposite of what the media like NY POST and FOX says about big cities. Sure there are homeless but nothing even approaching the 1980s or 1990s’
I am lucky that I can still pay under $1,000 for a rent regulated 2 bedroom apartment outside Manhattan which family had before they passed away.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  nic9075
Glad to hear you managed to hang on to a government sponsored teat, albeit a small one. They are getting harder and harder to come by for middle class Americans. That’s why I self-identify as a black lesbian transvestite muslim immigrant to improve my opportunities.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.