Manufacturing Employment: Who are the Winners and Losers at the State Level?

Manufacturing Headed Southwest?

Here is a detailed analysis of manufacturing employment at the state level, investigating the Wall Street Journal claim The Southwest Is America’s New Factory Hub. ‘Cranes Everywhere.’

Companies producing everything from steel to electric cars are planning and building new plants in Southwest states, far from historical hubs of American industry in the Midwest and Southeast. The lure is open land, local tax breaks and a growing supply of tech-savvy workers.

The Southwest, comprising Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and Oklahoma, increased its manufacturing output more than any other region in the U.S. in the four years through 2020, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal of data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Those states plus Nevada added more than 100,000 manufacturing jobs from January 2017 to January 2020, representing 30% of U.S. job growth in that sector and at roughly triple the national growth rate, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The WSJ article had no charts so I downloaded lots of BLS data and made some. The state level data starts in 1990. 

Manufacturing Employment in Thousands 12 states 

I included the top 12 manufacturing states in the above chart. The pattern looks the same but it is a tangled mess of lines. 

Since the WSJ measured from 2017 let’s hone in there. 

Manufacturing Employment in Thousands 12 States Detail 

The pattern still is not clear and the selection of 2017 as a starting date is arbitrary. Nonetheless let’s have look at changes. 

Manufacturing Employment Change in Thousands 2017 Look

Texas is a big winner from 2017 until 2020 but that timeframe is more than a bit arbitrary.

The St Louis Fed data repository does not have monthly data for New Mexico (manufacturing is extremely tiny), but the annual data suggests a miniscule employment gain of 400. 

Let’s expand the date ranges a bit.  

Manufacturing Employment Change in Thousands Select Dates

That chart provides a still better look at what’s going on. 

1990-08-01 is a pre-recession peak as is 2008-01-01. 2009-07-01 is the end of the great recession.  

Clearly some states are far more stable than others. Let’s hone in on that idea with a detailed look at pre-recession peaks and post-recession recoveries.

Manufacturing Employment Change in Thousands start and end of recessions 

The above chart is the best visual representation of what’s happened over time.

Texas, Arizona, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Indiana have been relatively stable. Nevada is the one true winner, albeit from a very low starting point. 

Stability is no doubt due in part to the type of manufacturing. Weapons production is certain to be more stable than car or furniture production. 

North Carolina is the leading state in furniture and apparel manufacturing. Oops.

The high tax states (California, Illinois, and New York), plus the big auto states lead the decline. 

There is undoubtedly a big exodus underway but the recent winners are not Southwest in general but rather Texas, Arizona, and Nevada specifically. 

Overall, since 1990, the winners are those who lost the least. Looking ahead, Texas, Arizona, and Nevada may indeed be the winners, but the picture as detailed above is far more complex.

Not NAFTA

This post is sure to bring howls against NAFTA but the claim is false.

Productivity is rising everywhere and there is a bit of Nixon history in play too.

For discussion, please see Disputing Trump’s NAFTA “Catastrophe” with Pictures: What’s the True Source of Trade Imbalances?

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Northeaster
Northeaster
2 years ago
Well I know where manufacturing is not…

link to fred.stlouisfed.org

njbr
njbr
2 years ago
Texas the winner with low wages and high illegal population.
Race to the bottom.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Another measure is the real manufacturing GDP annual compounded growth rate which would give an idea where the value-added manufacturing is taking  place. It’s not employment in the sector though complementary to it.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Bookmarked those. I was wondering if it gets tracked by cities at all. That would be interesting to look at.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Look at this site: link to nam.org and then look up Texas link to nam.org
It has a graph that gives employment growth by type of manufacturing (graph number 3) then look up the companies in Texas who are in the high-growth industries and see near which city they manufacture. There are probably better ways but I am sure you have probably already found them Eddie. Good luck!
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
“This post is sure to bring howls against NAFTA but the claim is false.”

What was the main consequence (intent?) of NAFTA?   To ship jobs to places where the workers can be paid less, have little or no rights or bargaining power and the (lack of) regulations favor the employers.    The same thing happens between the states too.   It is a race to the bottom, and is happening across different geographies within the US and over the world.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I think that might have had something to do with why NAFTA got done in the beginning, but now NAFTA is not a bad deal for the US, especially if the world de-globalizes over time. Mexico and Canada are great markets for us. 
Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
It also favors higher profits and lower priced goods though I think most of the latter got eaten by the former.  We may not like it but it’s the truth. 
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Nice piece. Reassuring to me, given the current boomtown atmosphere around here. Hopefully the manufacturing base will add to the stability of the local economy for several more years.
I just ran across this:
I thought I was one lucky guy when I managed to buy a rare live water creekfront property in the Burnet County hill country  in 2009….after negotiating with the prior owner for nearly five years. Now it looks like I’ll get lucky again when I sell it.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Victory belongs to those that got there first.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.