Many States are Cutting Taxes, Some Like New York and Illinois are Raising Them

By the end of 2023, about half of the states will have cut rates on income within three years. 

But some Progressive states are intent on driving away businesses and consumers.

The State Tax-Cut Movement

Please consider the Wall Street Journal article on The State Tax-Cut Movement

At least six states have kicked off their 2023 legislative sessions with income-tax cut proposals. Newly inaugurated Governors in Arkansas and Nebraska campaigned on rate cuts and are asking legislators to follow through. Leaders in Virginia and Montana want to cut rates modestly with bipartisan support. Large GOP majorities in West Virginia and Utah are considering significant cuts after hesitating last year.

Each of these states has at least one neighbor where tax rates have dropped recently, and competition is sustaining the trend. “We were the cool kid on the block 15 years ago when we moved to 5% flat,” said Rusty Cannon, president of the Utah Taxpayers Association, referring to his state’s flat income-tax rate this month. But in the past two years Colorado has adopted a 4.4% top rate on income, and Arizona dropped its rate to 2.5%. “We’re no longer the cool kid on the block at all,” said Mr. Cannon.

The tax-cutting trend took off in 2021 as state revenues boomed, driven by postpandemic reopening, rising stock prices and capital gains, and federal aid. By September 2022, 31 states were outperforming their prepandemic revenue trajectories, according to Pew Research. Twenty-one states have cut their income taxes in this period, according to the Tax Foundation, and they’re betting that returning revenue to taxpayers will spur faster economic growth.

Flat-rate tax reforms are also spreading. Last year Georgia, Iowa, Mississippi and Arizona joined Idaho in enacting one. That brings the nationwide total to 13, after public-employee unions finally won a referendum that nixed Massachusetts’s flat 5% income-tax rate last year. Now the top Bay State rate is 9%, an invitation to move to Nashua, N.H.

Carbon Taxes in New York

In contrast to tax cutting states, New York Keeps Piling on Taxes

New York is bleeding taxpayers and business, so how does Gov. Kathy Hochul open her first legislative year? By proposing to raise taxes some more. That’s the economic news buried in the $227 billion budget she unveiled this week that includes a higher payroll tax plus a new CO2 cap-and-trade program.

The Governor is directing state officials to develop an economy-wide carbon trading system that will force businesses to pay for their CO2 emissions. This is a stealth tax increase. The state will establish a cap on statewide emissions that will decline over time to reduce emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and 85% by 2050. The state will auction allowances to fuel distributors, utilities, manufacturers and other businesses to offset their CO2 emissions.

New York companies and workers will pay for all this. Europe’s cap-and-trade program has made its manufacturers less competitive, so the European Union is planning to implement a carbon tariff on imports to level the playing field. A New York carbon border tax would violate the Constitution’s Commerce Clause.

New York’s cap-and-trade model is California, where CO2 allowance prices have climbed by nearly two-thirds over the last three years and are driving up energy costs. While California’s cap-and-trade program has reduced oil production in the state, its CO2 reductions have been overwhelmed by wildfires.

Two Gas Tax Hikes in Illinois 

Meanwhile, in Illinois, Illinoisans are stuck with two gas tax hikes in 2023.

Illinoisans are already familiar with high gas prices, which are the highest in the Midwest, according to AAA.

Gas tax hikes disproportionally hurt lower-income residents, who give up a larger percentage of their paycheck to pay for gas.

Even without upcoming gas tax hikes, Illinoisans already pay the second-highest gas taxes in the nation thanks to Gov. J.B. Pritzker doubling the state gas tax to 38 cents per gallon from 19 cents in 2019. He also added automatic annual hikes for inflation that drove the rate to 39.2 cents but delayed the 2022 increase until after the election – leading to two hikes in 2023.

Tax-the-Rich Measures Pass in Massachusetts, Fail in California

On November 9, 2022 Bloomberg reported Tax-the-Rich Measures Pass in Massachusetts, Fail in California

Voters in Massachusetts approved a measure to raise taxes on millionaires after a hard-fought battle that pitted unions against wealthy opponents, while Californians rejected a proposition that targeted the state’s highest earners to pay for climate initiatives. 

The Fair Share Amendment in Massachusetts, known colloquially as the millionaires’ tax, would amend the state constitution to allow for a 4% surtax on annual income over $1 million, lifting the rate from the current flat 5%. About 52% of voters approved the measure, according to the Associated Press. 

Proponents, dominated by teachers’ unions, raised more than $28 million for the measure, roughly double what opponents raised. 

Not to worry, I am sure California will pas more tax hikes this year. The returns speak for themselves.

Outbound Exodus States 

Moneywise reports on the Top 10 States People are Leaving 

  1. New Jersey, Outbound Moves 70.5%: The Garden State holds the dubious distinction of holding the highest percentage of outbound moves — for the fourth year in a row. New Jersey has some of the highest property taxes in the nation.
  2. Illinois, Outbound Moves 67.2%: The state lacks job opportunities and reached an all-time high for resignations in August last year during the Great Resignation. To make matters worse, Kiplinger named it the least tax-friendly state for middle-class families in 2021.
  3. New York, Outbound Moves 63.1%: The top reason for movers exiting New York last year was to be closer to one’s family (29.4%), closely followed by retirement (29%).
  4. Connecticut, Outbound Moves 60.1%: The Nutmeg State is burdened by high taxes and expensive housing, and its residents simply cannot afford to stay.
  5. California, Outbound Moves 59.3%: California’s home to Disneyland, Hollywood and Silicon Valley — what’s not to love? — but the Golden State can lack luster for those who can’t afford it.
  6. Michigan, Outbound Moves 57.7%: Although the desire to be closer to family was the primary motivation for almost half the inbound movers, a third of outbound movers said they exited the Great Lake State for jobs.
  7. Massachusetts, Outbound Moves 57.6%: The Bay State might be renowned for its top educational institutions and charming coastal towns, but it’s also one of the least affordable states to live in the U.S.
  8. Louisiana, Outbound Moves 56.5%: An overwhelming majority of movers pointed to work as their primary reason for getting out of Louisiana — more than 30 percentage points higher than the second biggest motivator (family). And nearly half of movers were under the age of 45.
  9. Ohio, Outbound Moves 56.3%: A new job or job transfer is the number one reason for Ohio’s outbound moves, but 28% of Buckeye movers say it was retirement that prompted them to relocate elsewhere. 
  10. Nebraska, Outbound Moves 55.7%: College-educated adults are moving out of Nebraska for better jobs and pay, and looking at larger cities with more to offer, according to David Drozd, research coordinator at UNO’s Center for Public Affairs. Nearly 42% of movers pointed to work opportunities as their primary reason for departing the state.

Affordability, taxes and jobs are the reasons people leave. Higher taxes are a big part of it. 

It Takes 3 Weeks to Escape Illinois

On July 10, 2020 I reported It Takes 3 Weeks to Escape Illinois

Why 3 weeks? That’s how long it takes to reserve a one-way U-Haul outbound.

We escaped and love our new location in Utah. 

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
let’s talk reality. the amerikans have been moving east and south for centuries now. and from the west movement of spanish empire was from west and southwest towards the south east. the number of people moving in past few decades is a tiny percentage number and is really statistically silly. all these people that recently move always think they are trend setters and mock where they came. it’s silly human nature. the state tax rates are basically meaningless after you account for transfer payments from the FEDs to those states medicaide and educational and much more. the amount of free money the farmers and ranchers get in places like utah and ca and az and fl etc…….makes all the little tax rate talk a joke. it’s a nation of federal welfare queens. all of us. top to bottom. ca to utah to ny to ma…………
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
In Europe some countries have tax abatement (e.g., gasoline) as you approach the (state) border, proportional to the distance.
This is to disincentivize everyone from crossing the border for [gas,wine,cigarettes,liquor…] for big savings.
Do they do that in the States as well/
MBA SOFA
MBA SOFA
2 years ago
In the Middle Ages, parliamentarism began about money. The king needed the aproval of his subjects to levy taxes.
It is democratic some people approve take the money from their neighbours? If the goverment wants some segment of population’s revenues, it must be with their consent.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  MBA SOFA
Yeah, with my consent.
Like when someone with a piece of paper, a badge and a gun shows up and throws me out of my home if I don’t pay.
The king didn’t need the approval of his subjects to levy taxes, he needed the acquiescence of his barons.
Acquiescence from anyone is more readily obtained with sharpened implements.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Since local municipalities can’t print like the FED can, eventually they’ll do whatever they have to to keep the gov’t afloat. The easiest target will be property owners. Property taxes will get so high, you’ll have trouble selling the property. You’ll be stuck. In effect everyone will be renting their property from their local government.
The problem is everyone has a vote. And people will always vote for what’s best for them. There will always be a lot more poor than rich, so anything that targets the rich and helps the poor wins a lot of votes. What happens in reality is the rich avoid paying the full brunt of the taxes because they contribute to the politicians and can afford lawyers and accountants. So, it’s the middle class that ends up paying for it. The poor never have money so there’s no money to pay taxes.
It used to be in order to have a vote, you had to serve in the military. You had to sacrifice in some way to earn the right to vote. I think this is still true in many countries. In the US there’s no sacrifice required. I would be in favor of only allowing those who pay more in taxes than they receive from the government to vote. People who live off welfare shouldn’t be allowed to vote. They don’t support the system in any way, so they should have no say in how the system is run. Maybe make an exception for retirees who paid more than a certain amount over their working career. Clearly, the republicans would be in favor of this and the democrats would scream racism.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
“And people will always vote for what’s best for them.” In a game theory world, yes. In the real world they vote for whoever makes them feel special.
sflon666
sflon666
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
This is why the founders attempted to limit voting to property owners and net tax payors. If one does not contribute to the public purse, one should have no say in the matter of how the purse is spent. Otherwise, it is like 2 wolves and a sheep arguing over what to have for dinner.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
If you add having completed military service as well then we will be able to take on any arachnoid aliens in the galaxy to boot.
To be serious, you have reinvented the oligarchical form of government which is instable because those with property vote for their interests only and eventually those who can’t vote because the laws made by the oligarchs make it really hard to obtain property revolt. Ancient Greece was a laboratory of the oligarch vs democrat forms of government. Both had grave instabilities and the Founding Fathers studied them and came up with the idea of separation of powers and overlapping oversights. It causes a lot of infighting and often makes it hard to get things done but it does avoid the errors of the oligarchic and democratic forms of government. The ancient Greeks also had Tyrants and we have many of those today and they strangely enough they all follow the pattern of that in ancient Greece. Notably as they age they become paranoid and attempt military conquest to keep in power. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
They don’t care about a change – “après moi le déluge.”
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
TX might pay higher RE taxes, but houses and rent are 1/3 of CA. Prop 13 skew up CA taxes. TX gas is half. CA teachers are the highest paid in the nation, teaching sex ed, climate change and woke for free. CA police and sheriffs do nothing for the highest price. CA DAs are Soros DAs. They protect their own entitlements and pension.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Everyone has to believe in something, and I believe I’ll have some more free stuff.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Also, which state has the most regressive tax policy? It is NOT Texas. It is blue Washington state! Texas is in second place. How is that? It is because WA has no income-tax and a hefty sales tax on almost everything you buy.

https://itep.org/whopays-map/

The bottom 20% pay a state tax rate of 17.8% while the top 1% pays 3.0% (no typos here).

This is what a national flat tax would do to the entire country.

Siliconguy
Siliconguy
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Washington also has a new carbon tax that will naturally fall hardest on the rural poor who can’t afford an EV and also have nowhere to charge it.
The governor wants an income tax, but he has NOT offered to cancel the sales tax in return. If he wanted to adopt Oregon’s system (income tax but no sales tax) fine, that’s a honest proposal, draw it up and put it to a vote. He wants his 8% sales tax and an income tax too. Rest assured he will spend every penny.
By the way the sales tax is 8.4%, not 17.8%, and have the receipt to prove it. The sales tax does not apply to food, but we have a very high gas tax which just went higher as an intentional action against the rural population. And then he wonders why we don’t vote for him.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
I didn’t say the *sales* tax burden for the lowest quintile in WA is 17.8% That number is the total of ALL state taxes. Sales + Excise taxes is 13.3%, and the property tax burden for them is 4.5%, resulting in a TOTAL state tax rate of 17.8%
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
I need for the State to put a charging station on my north forty, for my electric tractor.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I was paying almost 2k a month in state taxes in California… more than I spend in total on taxable items. California also has a solid sales tax.
sflon666
sflon666
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
My monthly amortized CA property taxes exceed my monthly mortgage payments. Even better, the state takes my property taxes and gives the minimum back for our local schools on a per capita basis. They call that equity.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Most Texans pay more in taxes than most Californians do.
Yes, Texas does not have a state income tax, but read that headline again!
What these so-called low tax states generally have, is a highly regressive overall tax system. So, unless you are in the top 3-5 percent of income earners, it is a bad deal to live in any of these “low tax” states. Even within that range, the top 0.5 percent or so are so damn rich that they can afford to pay more to live in style in Woodside, California or Maui, Hawaii than languish in Bumblebutt, Texas for instance.
Also, while those in the 0.5 percent to 3-5 percent could benefit by moving to Texas (or other red states), many are put off by their extreme policies on social issues like abortion.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
AND they’re freezing in the dark, just like last year. Turns out Jesus won’t fix a power grid.
Dr Funkenstein
Dr Funkenstein
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
U S abortion policies are more liberal than most European countries. Many of the people you cite are stupid enough to believe what CNN and the New York Times say is true.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
Very true. Abortions there are limited to a much earlier time than in the US.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
“The first big problem with this argument is that it is false. Although many European countries have gestational limits that on paper resemble those in the Mississippi statute, and some have mandatory counseling and waiting periods, the exceptions that come into effect after that initial limit mean that …..

To say that after Dobbs, American abortion laws will simply resemble those in Europe, is to drape a veil of normalcy over plans for a post-Roe world that will drastically circumscribe basic freedoms of speech, movement, and association. But whatever that future looks like, it will not look like Europe does today. It will be much worse.”

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/roe-overturned-europe-abortion-laws/670539/

vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
total rubbish. you know nothing. i have EU passport and USA. vote in both places. italia is the motherland of my bloodlines. amerika is backwards, like italy and ireland was in the 1960s. the amerikan middlebrow is brainwashed. by their betters. they don’t think or travel and talk to folks from other lands. too insulated.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Americans are provincial – and parochial.
PapaDave
PapaDave
2 years ago
You cannot control what governments do. But if you don’t like the government you have, you can control where you live. Whether its moving from state to state, or country to country. Same goes for companies. Look for where the best opportunities are.
Based on many of the people who complain here, I expect most of you to leave the US eventually.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Or you could join the partisans and work to free the country.
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
Cut taxes, cut entitlement to attract businesses. // Raise taxes, cut entitlements to pay debt, to get rid of shingle mums, to send them to red states.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Raise entitlements, raise taxes to pay for them. Attract homeless, addicts and free-loaders. // Productive people with families flee to Red states.
8dots
8dots
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Not under the Irish gang, following Xristalina Georgieva and David Malpass way.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  8dots
Do you mean the Gangs of New York or Boston or Delaware?
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

… and end up shivering in the dark someplace in Texas

Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Are you a (gasp) Californian?
BDR45
BDR45
2 years ago
Seven years after leaving California for Florida, the Franchise Tax Board (CA taxing agency) every year dutifully sends me an estimated “tax bill” for $8000 plus, even though I have no income from sources in CA, nor assets in CA, and always paid my full share of taxes when I lived there. (My CPA, tax attorney made sure the returns were correct, and ALWAYS, a year later, I would receive a “corrected” return from the FTB saying I owed more tax…LOL) It’s true, you can check out of hotel California, but the state refuses to acknowledge that you left. If you are considering moving the the sunshine state, and you are middle or upper class, be forewarned. If you are dirt poor, it is a great place to live. Free food, and medical care.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Reply to  BDR45
Are you still a CA resident?
sflon666
sflon666
2 years ago
Reply to  BDR45
CA FSB is ridiculous. CA one party state government has gone full totalitarian as they fleece the middle and upper middle class to pay for their vote purchasing freebies extended to any third world illegal who can migrate.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  BDR45
I got a Tax bill from California in 2010 and I have never lived there. They sent it to my parents place in Florida. Can’t say I am impressed with California bureaucrats.
david halte
david halte
2 years ago
States may cut taxes for headlines – but they raise or create fees for public services previously covered by taxes, using ESG as the basis.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  david halte
and beg the FED to print more and transfer more for their education and medicaide and farmers and ranchers welfare schemes. it’s such a dumb argument.
Karlmarx
Karlmarx
2 years ago
Leaving NY was the best thing I ever did. Should have gone 20 years ago but it took the covid nonsense to get my wife to finally agree. Don’t miss a thing and I’m happy to be somewhere my conservative vote counts. Don’t think the libs will like it here much. Also deep blue voters enjoy living in their socialist utopias
Avery
Avery
2 years ago

You had me at ‘Illinois’.

The ‘long game’ here, in particular for Chicago, is the equivalent of Perkins’ ‘Confessions of an Economic Hit Man’.

Drive out the middle, and Pritzker & Pals buy up the whole place later for pennies on the dollar. Include the public areas of the lakefront and forest preserves. Disaster Capitalism.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
2 years ago
In CA, Newsom (i.e., the guy who wants to replace Biden in ’24) wants to tax the high-income earners who move out of state.
We don’t care that you don’t live in the Golden Bear state anymore, you still owe us money in perpetuity. And, we’re also going to tax you on unrealized gains of stocks, real estate, etc.
Where do these idiots dream this stuff up?
In 10-15 years, the only people who are going to live in CA are illegals and people who can’t afford to rent a UHaul to get out of dodge.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Having Maxed Out Taxes On California Residents, Newsom Proposes New Tax On Florida Residents
sflon666
sflon666
2 years ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
The totalitarian one party state government of CA fleeces the middle and upper middle classes to buy votes from people who have come here illegally and require subsidies from the state to survive. Unreal.
Dr Funkenstein
Dr Funkenstein
2 years ago
Of course the economic policies of the Covid years have made the super rich even richer and since they live in places like New York, Illinois and California they can afford to pay more. They are not going to move to Utah, sell roadside souvenirs, live on a snake farm, eat tomatoes without any taste and for their sole entertainment have some Mormons over for dinner. And the people leaving these states will enact the same policies they are familiar with in their new home,
MikeC711
MikeC711
2 years ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
That is the scary part. Many deep blue voters are leaving blue States but they will continue to be deep blue voters and push for the exact things that destroyed their old places in their new places. Florida and Texas need to be careful because they’re getting a lot of new deep blue voters
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeC711
That was the worry in Florida but judging from the last elections the Blue-staters were already conservative voters or converted to conservatives because of the new environment.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  MikeC711
news flash. folks have been moving out west since columbus landed. get a history book. i’ve lived in all regions of usa for quite some time and loved em all. northeast, deep south. far southwest and norcal and back to northeast………..the whole blue v red thing is such idiocy. like junior hs pom pom girls.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
2 years ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
Hmmm. Pom-pom girls sound like fun!
Mary
Mary
2 years ago
Reply to  Dr Funkenstein
Your dismissive attitude of those who live in other states speaks volumes. You claim they will bring new ideas to their new locale, that is fine because, judging from your remarks, their fresh ideas are not welcome in your blue state. Same old tired arguments.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.