Don’t Miss a Post. Subscribe now.

Minneapolis Fed President Goes Woke, Does Political Lobbying, Ignores Inflation

Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari is involved in educational activism and justifiably received a cease and desist letter from Senator Pat Toomey. 

Excerpts (Emphasis Mine)

Dear President Kashkari: I write regarding the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis’s (Minneapolis Fed) active and political lobbying efforts to change Minnesota’s constitution on K-12 education policy. These political lobbying efforts by you and other Minneapolis Fed officials, which the board of the Minneapolis Fed has shockingly endorsed, are well beyond the Federal Reserve’s mandate, violate Federal Reserve Bank policies, constitute a misuse of Minneapolis Fed resources, and ultimately undermine the Federal Reserve’s independence and credibility. 

For more than two years, you have been improperly using your position as president of the Minneapolis Fed and Minneapolis Fed resources to aggressively lobby Minnesotans to support the Page Amendment, an amendment to the Minnesota constitution that you helped develop and would create a new “fundamental right to a quality public education.”  This amendment is highly political, as it wades into an ongoing debate about whether government-run school systems are preferable to parental choice in education. It is also controversial because it could be used by liberals to challenge education spending levels in court and give activist judges grounds for overriding levels set by the state’s legislature, which is elected by and accountable to voters.  

Setting aside the merits of your proposal, these political lobbying efforts on the issue of K-12 education are well beyond the Federal Reserve’s mandate. Nowhere in the Federal Reserve’s governing statute is there a mention of education policy.  

Instead of engaging in mission creep, the Minneapolis Fed should focus on its day job of fighting the runaway 40-year-high inflation that the Federal Reserve has allowed to spiral out of control. Furthermore, it is improper for Federal Reserve officials to use their official positions and Federal Reserve resources to lobby in support of a specific public policy proposal—on any subject, let alone one that is far outside the Federal Reserve’s narrow statutory mandate—or to be engaged in political activity of any kind. Federal Reserve Bank policies explicitly prohibit political activities in order to preserve the Federal Reserve’s independence.  

Moreover, you have publicly stated that your purpose for supporting the Page Amendment is explicitly political: your aim is “to solve a political problem” by using the law to “break through the political gridlock” on education issues.  

Unfortunately, the Minneapolis Fed, under your leadership, has embraced politically-charged social causes far outside of the Federal Reserve’s statutory mandate. When I asked for records about these activities, the Minneapolis Fed engaged in unacceptable stonewalling of this legitimate Congressional oversight request by refusing to provide any records.  

The Federal Reserve was given independence to insulate monetary policy from politics. Congress, however, has a responsibility to ensure that the Federal Reserve does not become a political actor. In order to prevent further damage to the independence and credibility of the Minneapolis Fed, I urge you to cease these political lobbying efforts that are well beyond the Federal Reserve’s mandate.  

Toomey pointed out that not only is Kashkari’s activism outside of Congressional mandate, it’s also outside the bylaws of the Minneapolis Fed charter as well.

Toomey proposed Congress should examine whether the historical regional Federal Reserve Bank structure is still appropriate. According to Toomey, many of the original functions of the regional banks have been superseded by advancements in finance and commerce. Therefore, it may make sense to eliminate the Federal Reserve Banks entirely by having the Fed Board assume their responsibilities. Alternatively, Congress might consolidate them into fewer regional banks, making each a permanent voter on the Federal Open Market Committee.

Toomey copied Fed Chair Jerome Powell, numerous board members of the Federal reserve and numerous board members of the Minneapolis Fed. 

Well done Senator Toomey. 

This post originated on MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!  

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

29 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
david halte
david halte
4 years ago
Kudos Senator Toomey. Unfortunately, progressive lobbying is integral to the Fed’s mandate, and part of the Minneapolis Fed resources.
The Fed assigns the Minneapolis regional division as “dovish” regardless who is president. Kashkari is no woke progressive liberal. His interest is purely mercenary.
In 2017, Kashkari established the Fed’s “Opportunity & Inclusive Growth Institute”. The objective is “to promote research that will increase economic opportunity and inclusive growth for all Americans and help the Federal Reserve achieve its maximum employment mandate.” – (The objective defines the Fed’s scheme to keep rates at historic lows, by narrowing the definition of maximum employment to minority communities. The two remaining progressive nominees to the Fed board come from the OIGI.)
On May 22, 2017, Lael Brainard spoke at the OIGI Conference: “Why Opportunity and Inclusion Matter to America’s Economic Strength” – (In her speech, Brainard defines maximum employment).
“In fulfilling its dual mandate, FOMC has set a target of 2 percent for inflation but does not have a similarly fixed numerical goal for maximum employment. That is because the level of maximum employment depends on ‘nonmonetary factors that affect the structure and dynamics of the labor market’.
Inclusion is an enduring goal of public policy that is embodied in our maximum-employment mandate. The Employment Act of 1946 charges the federal government with creating ‘conditions under which there will be afforded useful employment for those able, willing, and seeking to work, and to promote maximum employment, production, and purchasing power’. Maximum employment is inherently an inclusive goal.
We can also see persistent disparities by gender, such as the well-known wage premium earned by men relative to women with similar experience and expertise. With its focus on inclusive growth, this Institute could give us important insights on how far the overall economy is from full employment, as well as the barriers that could be limiting the economy’s potential, by studying labor market outcomes of men and women of different racial and ethnic backgrounds in more depth.”
ohno
ohno
4 years ago
Keep in mind this is the same jackass that said what we need was ‘another’ good ‘hard’ lockdown for 6 weeks. These people have to go.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
It’s woke to want better educational standards? I agree it isn’t the fed’s business, but aren’t there already to many Ignorami running around?
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Several years ago, there was a California ballot proposition which raised taxes on wealthier people, to fund public schooling, after the Great Recession. After it passed, i heard a teachers union ad on radio, thanking the public. The ad crowed about how they were going to promote social justice.
Leo Terrel mentioned on his local radio show the other day, that 40% of kids have not returned to the classroom after Covid lockdowns ended, in the L.A. School District. If i remember correctly, he said 57% for black students. The L.A. Teachers Union fought tooth and nail, not to go back into the classroom.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
This has nothing to do with better education. It has to do with protecting public school teacher jobs. The more kids who attend private school, the fewer public school employees needed.
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Forget woke or not woke, or whether you agree with the policy he supports or oppose it. The problem is that “Federal Reserve Bank policies explicitly prohibit political activities
in order to preserve the Federal Reserve’s independence.” Clearly this is a political activity.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“Therefore, it may make sense to eliminate the Federal Reserve Banks entirely by having the Fed Board assume their responsibilities.”
The only tiny shred of evidence supporting current structure: Federal Reserve Bank Presidents are nominated by their bank’s board of directors (needing approval from Federal Reserve Governors) … and NOT by the folks in DC. I recall about 10 years or so ago a Bernanke (FOMC) policy decision had 2 dissents from presidents. This ticked off Barney Frank who suggested federal reserve bank presidents needed to be picked in DC.
denker
denker
4 years ago
Kahkari always stood out even among the doves that dominate the Fed. Not surprised he has more important SJW projects to work on than worrying about 11%+ PPI. A good example of why i have no faith in the future of the USA and dollar. Got out almost 40 yrs ago.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  denker
He was Hank Paulson’s right hand man re TARP. We know EXACTLY where his allegiance lies (Wall Street and not The People).
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
Reply to  denker
What do you expect a Fed regional bank to do about inflation? In the old days, regional banks probably played a major role in moving checks around the country. But the entire check cashing process is now done by computer in a day or less.
Did you get out of the dollar or the US or both? What can you say about a country that can’t keep its cameras in subway stations in good repair but has enough money to intervene in the governments of foreign countries (e.g. Ukraine). I feel that I am too old to move but if I were 50 years younger and a recent college graduate with good job skills I might feel different about moving.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
Hell, if I were 50 years old or less I’d probably leave.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
If I have read the letter right he used an official study done by the Minneapolis Fed economists on education to justify writing op-eds on the official Minneapolis Fed web page to push a amendment to the Minnesota constitution to change K-12 education policy. I would put this as borderline since he was using an official Fed study from the area. In that he was not acting as a private citizen but as an official and overstepped somewhat. He should cut it back a bit.
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
Washington DC is roughly 40% white, yet their public school system only has about 7% white enrollment. Our elected officials and federal employees deeply support our public school system.
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
Even the Obamas sent their daughters to a private school, Sidwell Friends.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
Reply to  Anon1970
Hence the motivation to make public schools better.
RonJ
RonJ
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
The teachers union wants to make schools more political.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
You can’t make public schools better unless you get rid of the unions. There has to be a way to get rid of bad/poor teachers and with a union that’s impossible.
Anon1970
Anon1970
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
DC spends far more per student than my local school district in California with far worse outcomes. There is something to be said for growing up in a two parent household where the parents value education and encourage their children to excel.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
“…you have been improperly using your position…”
The impropriety there, is “position.” Period.
Get rid of, and/or sufficiently neuter, all and every such “position,” and you can once again go back to being a country which respects freedom of speech. As all legitimate countries do.
Of course, that would mean Toomey’s “position” as well. Along with anyone else’s.
Government, at least any Government enjoying even the faintest claim to legitimacy, is people’s servants. Absolutely no need to restrict free speech for the guy who shines your shoes, based on him somehow using his “position” improperly.
The entirety of the problem, is on account of the de facto powers, and influence over the lives of others, that some those supposed “servants” have now been handed; being in any way greater than those of the shoe shiner. Take those, always IMPROPER, privileges away; and we may perhaps have a legitimate shot at pretending to be civilized and legitimate again.
JeffD
JeffD
4 years ago
Best thing I’ve read all year.
Reptilicus
Reptilicus
4 years ago
He’s previously been a pretty consistent mainstream small-l libertarian Republican. His support of this vaguely worded proposed amendment strikes me as out of character and bizarre. The word, “quality” means so many different things to different people, it’s hard to imagine such an amendment actually having the effect he presumably would want for it to have, or really any effect at all other than to, as you say, justify the courts overriding elected officials and even school board budget votes.
One might conclude Kashkari is suffering from delusions of grandeur.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
Kashkari is a GS great recession disciple…
it reeks of the whole system
Nuddernoitall
Nuddernoitall
4 years ago
My take on Toomey’s letter is that it’s an attempt to limit future Fed “activism” efforts, both for regional Fed banks officials and more importantly the “esteemed” central Fed bank seat holders. Perhaps Toomey is thinking of Lisa Cook and wondering who or what will keep her on the proper guard rails, when she is finally approved for her Governor position. Her resume of activism far exceeds Kashkari’s. Maybe Toomey will also address Cook’s activism in the final Senate vote, which this letter to Kashkari may make easier.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
He’s a private citizen too that has a stake in the public school system. Pretty sure Toomey is only singling this out because he disagrees with it. The Minneapolis Fed doesn’t have to endorse it. Should we not allow Fed members to vote either ? Where does it end.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
4 years ago
were you mad George jumped in the river to rescue the angel?
Kashkari is a GS Pigman….
JeffD
JeffD
4 years ago
Sure! And while we are at it, let’s allow the military to decide where to deploy troops and which countries to make backdoor treaties with. Why shouldn’t they be able to try and wrest control away from Congress!? See how that works?
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
The issue is he’s using his position to advance a political agenda which is completely outside his official duties.
Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago
They should be kept in a box under the stairs while not doing fed things. Unless the outrage factory runs low on supply.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
As a private citizen he is free to endorse and support it. But if he mentions the Fed directly or hints that the Fed supports it then he has over stepped his bounds and should be subject to dismissal. It sounds like he was using the Fed directly/indirectly to support this bill.
My own company has policies on this that are very clear in that if you make any donation or volunteer your time for any cause and even hint at or mention the company name you are subject to dismissal.

Decorate Your Walls with Mish Fine Art Images

Click each image to view details or purchase in the store.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.