Moderna Phase One Covid Test Deemed a Success

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
inonothing
inonothing
3 years ago

From yesterday’s NYTimes, “Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and the Oxford-AstraZeneca group have received a total of $2.2 billion in federal funding to support their vaccine programs.”

JCPatriot
JCPatriot
3 years ago

Vaccines sound great but in reality they aren’t going to be anywhere near 100% effective. And since most on here probably don’t realize that the rationale of using widespread vaccination depends a good deal on herd immunity, which they also don’t believe in, we may be relying on hydroxychoroquine more. Oops, they don’t believe in that either, despite the recent studies.

MATHGAME
MATHGAME
3 years ago
Reply to  JCPatriot

The concept of “herd immunity” can be achieved naturally if surviving individuals acquire relatively long-lasting immunity OR by means of a vaccine that confers relatively long-lasting immunity … or a combination of the two.

But yes, the mechanism by which a vaccine confers immunity might or might not depend upon triggering an individual’s natural immune response the same way being infected by the actual virus would. If it does, and natural immunity is not long-lasting, then the immunity response produced by the vaccine won’t be long-lasting either. But some of the reports I’ve read suggest that a vaccine might work differently that that … we can only wait and see.

And BTW, I’ve been convinced for quite a while of the efficacy of HCQ+Zinc administered as early as possible after infection … and been very suspicious of the many studies seemingly “designed to fail” by administering late or omitting use of Zinc, etc. I think there has been a definite Pharma Profit Push that is responsible for that. Especially after the way Remdesivir was fast-tracked despite studies showing very little benefit at all.

SynergyOne
SynergyOne
3 years ago

If you knew your company had a good vaccine would you be selling shares in your company? link to secform4.com

MATHGAME
MATHGAME
3 years ago
Reply to  SynergyOne

LOL! NET SALES ~$273 MILLION … that’s a confident bunch!

ToInfinityandBeyond
ToInfinityandBeyond
3 years ago
Reply to  SynergyOne

Confident and rich. It certainly pays to hype phase 1 results that have yet to be approved.

tokidoki
tokidoki
3 years ago
Reply to  SynergyOne

Naaah, it’s called hedging your bets 😉

tokidoki
tokidoki
3 years ago

Increased antibodies might be harmful:

Montana33
Montana33
3 years ago

I have many friends who say they are afraid of taking a vaccine that was rushed to market and they would wait to see how it goes. I say, isn’t getting Covid worse? They say…. I may not get covid but if I get a shot then I know I will suffer the side effects that could be very bad. These are not anti vaxers. They all believe in vaccines in general. It’s bizarre but they think too many corners will be cut and any vaccine could be more dangerous than we know. I will be first in line for a vaccine but I wonder if I am the exception?

CautiousObserver
CautiousObserver
3 years ago
Reply to  Montana33

Historically, some vaccines have had problems when they first went into mass production. The polio vaccine is one famous example. Some of the early vaccine infected people with polio, apparently due to a manufacturing error. People remember that.

I have not seen anything stating the SARS-COV-2 vaccine will be a “live vaccine” like polio was, but they are deploying new technology. As I recall, at least one of the vaccines infects the person with a different engineered virus that triggers the body to produce SARS-COV-2 antibodies without causing illness. It’s new tech.

I can tell you that I am not going to be first in line for the vaccine. I am going to wait awhile; perhaps a long while. I would like to see how it goes for others.

EDIT: Speak of the devil… Bloomberg has a story out today about a vaccine that is considered the front-runner. University of Oxford candidate run by Sarah Gilbert. It is in Phase III trials. It uses live genetically engineered chimpanzee adenovirus as the delivery system for SARS-COV-2 spike proteins. Far out.

EDIT 2: I have added a link to a Youtube interview of Sarah Gilbert on June 17th. The interview is elucidating and inspires a great deal of confidence in Gilbert. She makes it sound like they are painting by the numbers and it is not a matter of if they will succeed, but only a matter of when they will be ready to deploy it on a large scale. In case the Youtube link does not post here, one can search on Youtube for “MKNavonhXyk”

Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago

Thanks for posting…excellent excellent video. Answers a lot of questions I have.

IA Hawkeye in SoCal
IA Hawkeye in SoCal
3 years ago

You wont see any vaccine going into my body.

GeorgeWP
GeorgeWP
3 years ago

Indeed, the needles are not see through

Stuki
Stuki
3 years ago

It all depends on the alternative.

If you grow up watching kids left and right suffer and die from contracting polio, you’re unlikely to refuse having your own kids vaccinated.

So far, the risks from not being vaccinated against covid, doesn’t seem quite as high. But that could change if it becomes endemic.

Avery
Avery
3 years ago

If Powell and Mnunchin tipped the unemployed the night before every virus stock rumor was floated they could make more money in their Robinhood accounts then they would on unemployment or working. A perpetual motion wealth creation machine, as it seems to work every time. Pretty good for the Pharma C-Suiters, too!

Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago

Lots of questions…recent data seemingly shows second infections occurring in 3 months and worse than the first. Some sort of enhancement going on with the body’s viral defenses? Recent data also shows antibodies fading quickly, in a few months at best. Having survived a moderate case of covid with mild after affects in no hurry to take the vaccine until proven out for a couple years on a few hundred million people.

RayLopez
RayLopez
3 years ago
Reply to  Jackula

Well, since SARS-CoV-2 is a coronavirus like the common flu (and let’s not mention it’s probably a chimeric virus), naturally a ‘flu shot’ vaccine is likely to ‘work’ in the same way ordinary flu shots work: they cut down on transmission of the disease in a significant percentage of the population (not all, but a good number) until such time the virus mutates and you need another vaccine. If enough people take this flu vaccine, then R0 drops below 1.0 and at least for a season or two, the disease “goes away” (until it reappears). So this is ‘good news’ no matter how you characterize it.

QTPie
QTPie
3 years ago
Reply to  RayLopez

The common influenza virus is not a coronavirus. However, the main gist of your post regrading reducing transmission is correct.

anoop
anoop
3 years ago

hope!

TimeToTest
TimeToTest
3 years ago
Reply to  anoop

I believe it’s called ho-pium now. They tried it in the 00’s and all the kids got addicted to it.

CaliforniaStan
CaliforniaStan
3 years ago

“In the highest-dose group, three patients had severe reactions such as fever, chills, headache or nausea. One of these had a fever of 103.28 Fahrenheit (39.6 C).” A vaccine with a high rate of reactions like this will not be well accepted.

TimeToTest
TimeToTest
3 years ago
Reply to  CaliforniaStan

All of the test subjects were health and younger. A high reactivity rate is not going to go well in a too large percentage of people.

TimeToTest
TimeToTest
3 years ago
Reply to  CaliforniaStan

I ask my wife a simple question today.

Would she rather take a brand new vaccine or take her chance with covid?

Covid it is.

I don’t buy the first model year of a car. Why would I buy the first model year of a vaccine?

RayLopez
RayLopez
3 years ago
Reply to  TimeToTest

Jail time? Or financial incentives to take it? Two that come to mind. I would take the vaccine if it’s relatively safe (keep in mind no vaccine is 100% safe). Same for my kids.

TimeToTest
TimeToTest
3 years ago
Reply to  RayLopez

@RayLopez

I don’t know how they could force people to take it, at least under the Trump administration.

As for safety, safe today and safe 2 or 10:years from now are two different things. We don’t even understand how these vaccines interact with the body. We have the ingredients and a receipt but we don’t understand what is actually happening.

Vaccines are one of the great technological advances of the 20th century but there was quite a bit of teething to get them safe and effective. I don’t expect this to be different.

QTPie
QTPie
3 years ago
Reply to  CaliforniaStan

They were testing minimum effective doses. I believe the smaller dose was found to be sufficiently effective and that is what the next phase of testing will use.

GeorgeWP
GeorgeWP
3 years ago
Reply to  CaliforniaStan

From the gumpf the company posted it seems there were 25 in the trial. 3 became unwell and one of those got a brain cooking fever. Compared to a .5% chance of dying for the disease not a great selling point so far.

Rbm
Rbm
3 years ago

Two things to watch.
Remember the money is in the treatment not a cure.
I feel between the ebola vac and this one. May lead to the industry to pushing congress to cut safety trials( ie cost) on future medicines. .

RayLopez
RayLopez
3 years ago
Reply to  Rbm

@Rbm – that would be a “Good Thing” since it’s well known FDA approval usually is worthless (Thalidomide being their only real success, but luck) and retards the advance of science. Millions die due to FDA foot dragging.

CautiousObserver
CautiousObserver
3 years ago

Does anyone else view this as a case of “counting chickens before they are hatched?” This is Phase I trials. They established a dosage and got an immune response. Does that immune response prevent people from becoming sick and prevent them from becoming carriers that spread virus and will Moderna’s vaccine candidate make it to a final product? Nobody knows.

Phase II: “Phase II trials further assess safety as well as if a drug works…”

Phase III: “Phase III trials compare a new drug to the standard-of-care drug. These trials assess the side effects of each drug and which drug works better…”

Lots of COVID-19 vaccines in the pipeline. None have been proven to prevent disease yet. Moderna up 35% in two days as though it is all a done deal that will be signed and delivered in the next 30 days. Crazy.

TimeToTest
TimeToTest
3 years ago

Phase III is really phase I.

It’s like just arriving at work. You got ready and didn’t die on the ride but you haven’t gotten anything done. Phase III is starting work.

numike
numike
3 years ago

Moderna’s latest vaccine results are promising—but it’s still too early link to technologyreview.com

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.