Mortgage and Interest Rate Shock, Never in History Have Rates Risen So Fast

Interest and mortgage rate percent change from St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

The Fed is hiking at an unprecedented rate. Mortgage rates have been following the 10-year rate up. 

The shorter the duration, the faster the move.

2-Year and 3-Month Interest Rate Percent Change

Interest rate percent change from St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

Percent Change From Year Ago Synopsis

  • 3-Month T-Bill: 7,725%
  • 2-Year Treasury: 1,501%
  • 5-Year Treasury: 328%
  • 10-Year Treasury: 156%
  • 30-Year Mortgage Rate: 111%

Implications

A Tweet thread on the implications by Andreas Steno Larsen inspired this post.

Equities and Housing 

Unemployment 

Discussion Points

  • I am in general agreement with Larsen’s ideas regarding ISM, equities, housing. 
  • However, I think his stock market estimate is too optimistic and housing may take longer than a year to fall 20%. Too many people will not sell. 
  • Unless prices do crash then housing will remain weak for years.  (A 20% not enough to stimulate housing at 7+ percent mortgages).
  • I see real (inflation-adjusted) interest rates vs the CPI as still deeply negative. Factoring in housing prices as opposed to OER (Owner’s Equivalent Rent), would send real rates positive as soon as housing prices decline substantially.  
  • My only substantial disagreement regards unemployment. Millions of boomer retirees coupled with millions of openings will stave off a massive rise in unemployment.

Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

Add it all up and you have the makings of a long, but shallow (from an unemployment rate perspective), period of slow growth. 

This will be payback for long periods of massive and unfounded QE. 

For discussion, please see Expect a Long Period of Weak Growth, Whether or Not It’s Labeled Recession

It’s payback time for three consecutive bubbles. Expect a long period of weak growth, no matter how it’s labeled.

This time there will not be bailouts. Nor will the Fed quickly reverse on interest rate policy out of fear of stimulating more inflation and unwanted demand.

Unless asset housing prices crash, the housing sector figures to be weak for a long time, with the Fed unable or unwilling to offer much assistance.

Housing tends to start and end recessions. But where is housing going if prices remain high along with 5+ percent mortgage rates? [Edit: Now 7+ percent] 

What About Jobs?

  • The Covid-recession was very short, two months, not even a full quarter of declining growth. The pandemic was also accompanied by the greatest job losses in history.
  • I expect the opposite of the Covid-recession: A long period of weak growth accompanied by relatively strong unemployment numbers. 

Employment Levels in Retirement Age Groups 

Chart by Mish from BLS statistics

Age 60+ Employment

  • In 2022: 22.09 Million
  • In 2008: 13.46 Million
  • In 1999: 8.22 Million
  • In 1981: 7.21 Million

As of January 1, 2022, there are over 22 million people age 60 or over who are still working. We have never seen anything like this before, so don’t expect prior recessions to be a model for this one.

Millions of these people will retire. 

Employment may drop substantially when these boomers and Gen X employees retire, but falling employment and rising unemployment are not the same thing.

Rise in Unemployment Rate 

Chart by Mish from BLS statistics

Rise in Unemployment Rate Key Points

  • In 12 previous recessions, the lowest rise in unemployment was in 1990 and 2001, 1.1 percent each.
  • The highest jump was 8.2 percent in 2020 and that was undoubtedly understated.

Given the pending levels of retirement and the incomplete jobs recovery from the 2020 recession, I expect this to be a very weak recession in terms of rising unemployment. 

Biggest QE Experiment in History Backfires

In June of 2021, I commented Fed Will Foolishly Continue QE Purchases in Search of Higher Inflation

Indeed, the Fed kept QE going all the way until March of 2022. Inflation exploded.

My June 26, 2021 Comments

The Fed either has no idea inflation is roaring if one accurately includes home prices, or it simply does not care. My take is the Fed is basically clueless.

Looking ahead, the fourth quarter and 2022 GDP and will be much weaker than most expect.

The irony in the Fed’s actions is they are indeed increasing inflation, but only in the most unproductive, yet uncounted ways. There’s plenty of inflation now, just not as they measure it.

And when bubbles burst, expect another painful round of asset deflation, likely accompanied by the price deflation they fear.

No White Hats

There will be no Fed posse to the rescue this time. For four decades the Fed had disinflationary winds of globalization at it back. It could easily step on the gas without starting an inflation spiral.

That changed in 2020. The Fed now has inflationary winds of de-globalization and wars blowing in its face. Labor pressures also remain inflationary.

The Fed knows it made a mistake and will be very reluctant to repeat it.

Biggest Rate Hike Experiment in History

The first chart shows this is the biggest rate hike experiment by the Fed in history.

It follows the biggest QE experiment in history.

Fed policy operates with a lag. Yet, the Fed has a cushion (and an excuse) to keep hiking if my unemployment rate thesis is correct.

Even if, unemployment is modest, it will be unbalanced. 

Given housing rates to be weak for a long time (and consumer durables with it), don’t expect earnings to come roaring back. 

De-globalization and decarbonization also come into play. They are inflationary headwinds and profit headwinds too. 

We have energy shocks, wage pressures, earnings estimates that remain ridiculously high, and a Fed that is likely to overshoot.

Despite the declines, stocks are still priced for perfection.

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

82 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
mrchinup
mrchinup
1 year ago
Very interesting times coming up. Should get fun in about a year or so, will there be anything left? We think we have it bad, Europe is on the brink right now and winter hasn’t even started yet. I hope everyone is prepared.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
And despite the rapid rise in 30YFRM as well as treasury yields, the reality is that the stock market is behaving just like the labor & housing markets. The question, of course, is for how much longer? All three a fighting with all they’ve got to not go bust.
FromBrussels2
FromBrussels2
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Algorithms in unchartered territory ?
mrchinup
mrchinup
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
Won’t be long now!
RonJ
RonJ
1 year ago
“Mortgage and Interest Rate Shock, Never in History Have Rates Risen So Fast”
Record after record after record, anywhere we look. Just think, during the Covid lockdowns, someone floated the idea of shutting down the economy every two years……. because climate change. Imagine the chaos.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Mish,
Is the Fed’s modest run off in MBS putting upward pressure on mortgage rates? It’s my understanding that this runoff has two main components:
1) Passthrough principal payments which reduce the outstanding mortgage balance and amount owed in each individual MBS bond.
2) Mortgage payoffs from sales or refi’s.
In both cases, it’s my understanding that once a MBS bond reaches a certain remaining value, it’s somehow rebundled into a new MBS bond. With refi’s down over 80% and sales falling, it’s reasonable to assume that this rebundling is slowing down. But, when an MBS is rebundled, it would be subject to prevailing higher yields which lowers prices.
With the Fed out of the business of buying up MBS and inflation being so high, I would assume that 30YFRM are rising, in part, for similar reasons as to the 10, 20 & 30 Y treasury bonds. Again, the run off and lack of Fed intervention in markets in terms of purchases is causing rates to rise as inflation stays high.
I read an article the other day that said MBS runoff is pushing up 30YFRM, but it’s a little hard to understand why. Basically, I assume the private investors in MBS have pulled back on their demand for MBS, forcing rates higher. It’s kind of like bond vigilantism, I guess?
Thanks!
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago

O/N RRPs destroy the money stock (which is reported in error). This decreases the supply of loanable funds, forcing interest rates higher, increasing illiquidity/contagion.

Observation: 2022-10-21: 2,265.809
The rise in RRPs coincided with the top in many equities (not averages) in early 2021. I.e., RRPs destroy both money and reserves (reported in error). RRPs are part and parcel with limited QT (which affect some asset prices). I.e., the technical definitions have superseded the actual flows.
cklaus76
cklaus76
1 year ago
Reply to  Salmo Trutta
Hi Mr. T, can I have some acronym explanation
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  cklaus76
Overnight reverse repo’s
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
A longer view of Fed interest rate changes is revealing:
Desperate times call for desperate measures? Can the US afford $31 trillion (and growing daily) at 5%, 6%, 7%… interest rate, let alone pay down principal?
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Very good question, and the simple answer is NO. Our national debt and the resulting total interest expense are now the financial noose around the Fed’s / Treasury’s neck. They can’t let treasury rates get out of hand or stay above 4-5% for month than 18-24 months. This isn’t circa 1981.
IMO, I don’t see the FFR rising above 5%, meaning the 1Y bill will peak at about 6%. Inflation is slowing. The problem is the deceleration, for now, is slower most everyone predicated. But, outside of some sort of black swan event, everyone knows inflation has peaked and is slowly working its way downward.
We may get to 4% in 10 days, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the Fed delivers a 50-basis point rise. December is most likely a pass, and then the Fed will know for sure where inflation is headed & how fast by January 1. Trying to predict out past the end of this year really is pointless.
mrchinup
mrchinup
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Nope, that’s why the dopes in the fed should have started with 5%, then 10% two months later and crashed the housing and stock market quickly then taken it away after the crash. Slowly raising rates will be a slow death. If they really wanted to try to fix this mess they should have said to Booben, no rate hikes pump every ounce of black gold you can find and get those pipelines working. High energy prices kills everything.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
love your r/e analysis. my short hand analysis on r/e investing is it’s roughly 10 years up followed by 5 years down. been trading r/e as a landlord and investor for decades and always rather be going to cash when the fed starts raising rates. this time powell really was very clear on what was at stake for them. i trade fx and equities and debt, too. i’m just shocked at how so many people believe in hopium. the fed reserve of NY where all the real action takes place, is owned by the bankers. to make believe they give a hoot about me, or you, or they are “stupid”, is really naive. been since the late 60s since the fed has been on such a mission to jack up rates to crush inflation. i do think it is gonna work, as this situation is more akin to post ww2 inflation after pent up demand and printing and borrowing extremes. demographics suggest jobs will be bountiful for many years to come. the us for good or bad, now has a domestic industrial policy with huge money behind it, to rival any other nations out there. we have not had that since the 1930s. this blog is great. the commenters, smart. i’ve learned.
xbizo
xbizo
1 year ago
Off topic a bit. I have to deal with long term inflation expectations in my work and have used 10-year treasury plus a 1% margin for a while (I figured the true rate would be 3% higher than the Fed-manipulated market and a 2% profit to the investor had to be backed out). I also trust historical inflation rates from 2014-2018 were reasonable which was inflation of 2.7% for select metro areas. What do you think about using the 10-year TIPS?
10-Year Breakeven Inflation Rate (T10YIE) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org) – fred.stlouisfed.org/series/T10YIE
The TIPS index has risen from 1.8% to 2.5% and may still be rising. My current system is going to hit 5% and that seems too high. But I think TIPS has been too low in the past. How would you estimate inflation over ten years?
Thoughts?
Thetenyear
Thetenyear
1 year ago

Relative to interest rates this is the most over valued stock market ever.

More than double the level that broke the market in late 2007, 78% higher than 2020 and 67% higher than the prior all time high in 2000.
In each case(2002,2009,2020) it took an all time monthly low in the ten year before the market bottomed. The ten year is at a 15 year high.
Early BottomTimers are going to get their faces ripped off.
xbizo
xbizo
1 year ago
Reply to  Thetenyear
I think it depends on what you are looking at. If it is early-stage tech stocks, the multiples have already crashed. The question is whether cash flow growth is going to meet lowered expectations of those multiples. I think there is a good chance these multiples hold or improve.
For the rest of the market of mature companies, I think that multiples are not compressed enough, and cash flow declines are coming. Going to get hit with multiple contraction on lower cash flows. Going to be tough for Wall Street over the next 18 months.
killben
killben
1 year ago
The Fed simply does not learn. The moment market takes a beating, they start whispering tunes that the market likes to hear – Pause, Pivot, QE etc. What does it show – it shows that markets cannot stand on its own feet and is still attached to central bankers tits which were money spigots.
It is beyond me why we call these markets when these are easy money suckers sucking money from the central bankers’ tits. Since the central bankers could print at will the tits were well stuffed but now the sucking is likely to leave the central bankers’ tits bruised.
The turmoil that can happen can be easily gauged by the turmoil in Yen and the UK. Can anyone imagine what happens if it all comes unglued at different places at the same time.
To add salt to thew wound, the central banker who destroyed pricing of capital with his QE gets the Nobel.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  killben
“The Fed simply does not learn. The moment market takes a beating, they start whispering tunes that the market likes to hear…”
Two years ago I’d agree to this point, but it’s been 8 months of regular hikes with the market dropping the whole time.
No debate with the other points.
.
killben
killben
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
“Two years ago I’d agree to this point, but it’s been 8 months of regular hikes with the market dropping the whole time.”
Agreed. Thanks to inflation biting their heels constantly.
But the message was sternly delivered only at the short Jackson Hole speech after the June Pivot. Why pussyfoot?
My questions are simply:
1. Why whisper? Let market learn to stand on its feet without constant morsels from the Fed. Let market make out what it wants – why thrown in your 2 pence? why not keep your mouth shut? everyday someone or the other will blather something depending on the direction of the market? In fact gag orders for central bankers during their tenure is not a bad idea
2. Why do you think you have to play god?
3. Let market price and reprice stocks. Why keep talking? Why forward guidance?
4. When will the Fed understand its job is let market stand on its own feet? If you keep coddling it it will keep sucking up – is this dfficult to understand? if it is so difficult to understand let them talk to mothers trying to wean their child.
5. When will the Fed understand its job is to be a lender of last resort and stand by it?
Like BOE did – helped pension funds from going bust and then saying that it is not going to go on forever (at least as reported by the media).
It is time for the central banks not to play god and allow genuine pricing of capital. Now that they can see the monster they have created with their deranged policies (rightly called out by Hussman) what can happen if it all unglues is what scares them now.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
“but it’s been 8 months of regular hikes with the market dropping the whole time.”
“dropping” as of a fractional percent of what has been artificially pumped up over the past decades….
There is no meaningful “drop” until major beneficiaries of the current regime drop. Meaning, significant actors are carted out.
Channelling Planck: Goldman Sachs’ wasting/destroying capital with/under The Fed’s blessing and protection from loss, doesn’t magically end because the leeches at Goldman suddenly decide to change their ways. But rather because their ability to continue wasting/destroying, is curtailed by them now being penniless and dangling from lamp posts.
That’s the whole essence of creative destruction: Unless you first destroy of what doesn’t work, there can’t be any resources available for anyone attempting to try something which just may.
Lehman/Goldman/Citi…… along with labor, farmers, stocks, real estate and the rest of the systemic nothing-but-rottenness which has bee built up by Fed printing and totalitarian government over the past 5 decades…..: Until all that is liquidated, there can be no meaningful change. No resources will be available for anything better to be built, since every resource will continue to be aggressively redistributed from everyone else, in order to keep the beneficiaries of the destructive rottenness safe and secure in their positions of unearned privilege. So, instead, all we’ll get is mindless, hyped “hope and change.” From Dustmop Boris to dimwit Truss to dimmerwit dustmop Trump to even dimer Kardashian and back to Boris…. With nothing significant occurring which could even theoretically hope to stem the persistent, unbroken decline.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Seems to me the stock market has plateaued more than ‘dropping the whole time’. Dow at 30-32K for 6 months. Ditto S&P at avg 4k, and NAS at 12K.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
First .25% cut was in March with the market already down 15%, there has been a total of 3% over that time as the market continued down another 10%. – I’m referring to stocks, not commodities.
I can’t recall any time since ’08 they’ve done that, if even before that in my lifetime (won’t argue any mention of examples).
If there was any merit to the “transitory” theme, or if they’re not factoring the supply part of inflation while stunting demand, we’re screwed in the next year with the reverse problem.
It’ll be interesting, the Fed’s slowing the economy intentionally, I hope they’re watching early indicators and know to account for policy lag… I assume they are.
.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
A recession is like flushing the toilet. A little push on the button just stirs up the crap. If the ‘button’ push isn’t strong enough get rid of the crap, you have to keep flushing.
And yes, since 2008, the Fed has filled the bowl with faux bucks, its negative real rates directly transferring wealth, distorting the risk-return tradeoff, and driving mom and pop into risky investments. Had the Fed taken Wall Street and the Federal Govt off the teat, we would not have today’s problem.
There was a lesson in the 70s–see the chart here: link to i2.wp.com The oil crisis did not help; however, it was not until the Fed’s aggressive action in the early 80s that the economy stabilized.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
“Had the Fed taken Wall Street and the Federal Govt off the teat, we would not have today’s problem.”
Five charts of note from 1980 to present, Household debt to income, government debt to GDP, real hourly wages, executive salaries vs median and Fed rates.
Ceo pay went from 50X in 1980, to 330X now, I don’t begrudge them, but coupled with “trickle down” tax ideology…
All of those charts but real wages have steadily moved from 1980, the Fed has continually had to make debt cheaper for households and government in order to accommodate “trickle down” wealth accumulation and tax cuts for the wealthy.
We can split hairs over thousands of theoretical notions, like, say, the Laffer curve, but those charts say it all.
The Fed cannot continue accommodating debt for consumption & economic growth, the average worker doesn’t make enough to afford a mortgage at current rates and Bezos paid 1.1% last year in taxes under the “trickle down” guise while Amazon replaces countless mom n’ pops.
(Only using Bezos as an example)
.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
Mainstream financial media is reporting the cost of borrowing has jumped 50% since January 2022. Adding in a few % of price increase and tax increases, houses are now clearly out of reach for many who were looking. Very few people saw their pay increase by 50% in 9 months. Prices are going to have to drop by more than 30% to get buyers back in the market.

I just don’t see the housing market bouncing back anytime soon. My neighbor is a real estate agent. Things are so slow that she took time to get a facelift. It takes a good week for the inflammation to go away.

Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Mish, do you really want to be showing ads like this? I didn’t know what this was but it looked sort of off-color. Thought it might be some porn site but when I clicked through (there someone made a penny!) I found it was from a video game. Still don’t think it is right for your audience.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
Ads are often targeted at each individual user based on their browsing history. So I’m pretty sure we all get different ads. I get a lot of ads for banks, investment companies, and travel. I’m not sure what the ad you mentioned is about and I’m sure not going to click on it to find out.
Jojo
Jojo
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
The link I posted was only to acapture of the ad. It won’t hurt you [lol]
It was about video games but sort of looked pornish. I have no interest in games and haven’t played a video game in many years. i block ads but this one somehow made it through my blocks.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  Jojo
First time I’ve seen it. The ads I get are for vacations in Tahiti.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Two things stuck out for me in this post:
1. We have energy shocks
2. stocks are still priced for perfection
Not all stocks are priced for perfection. Energy stocks are priced at “historically low” levels. Many are trading at levels of 2x-4x cash flow instead of a more traditional 6x-8x cash flow.
Assuming Mish is correct in his call for a long, mild recession with minimal job losses, then energy demand will continue to rise, as it always does in a mild recession. Yet energy supply is tight. SPR releases of 1 Mbpd are about to end. OPEC cuts quotas by 2 Mbpd in November, though in reality, the actual cut will be around 0.8 Mbpd. And Russian oil production is beginning to drop more quickly now. Which coincides with Eurozone sanction on Russian oil beginning in December.
We definitely will have more energy shocks coming in 2023. There will be upward pressure on oil and gas prices next year, and the possibility of occasional price spikes.
Yet most oil and gas stocks continue to trade as if oil was $50-$60, instead of $80-$100.
If folks here are interested, check out Shubham Garg of White Tundra Investments on twitter or youtube. He recently did a 4 hour summary of 57 Canadian oil and gas stocks (3-4 minutes each). Lots of great info for those interested in investing in this undervalued sector.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
PapaD, just wondering if you’ve got an exit strategy from some or all of your fossil fuel investments?
In other words, do you have a certain loss percent that you’re willing to sell out at, expecting that a bear market may lie ahead in fossil fuels once you cross that threshold.
With a big enough recession, oil stocks will take a big hit.
Or are you in this to win it for the next 10-15 years, possibly longer?
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
An exit plan. Of course. When the outlook changes, my investments change. But the outlook has not yet changed.
For example, I was heavily invested in tech stocks until I found this blog in 2020. Then I began reading comments here about the opportunity in oil and gas stocks. I did some research, found the scenario to be solid, sold most of my tech stocks and began loading up on oil and gas stocks.
I have a core position and a trading position in oil and gas stocks. My core position has more than tripled over the 2.5 years since I set up the portfolio. Not counting all the dividends I received.
My trading position has done so well, I’m not even going to tell you what it is, because you wouldn’t believe me anyway.
I see no reason to get out of my core position anytime soon. Oil prices have settled into a range of $80-$100 and it is difficult to see how they could drop significantly from this range. OPEC is willing to cut production when oil drops below $90 in order to support prices, as they just showed us. And the US has set a price of $68-$72 for refilling the SPR in the future which sets a floor price for oil until such time as the US fills the reserve again. Which could take years. I do not agree with you that a bear market in oil prices will appear anytime soon.
At a floor price of $70, the average oil stock has free cash flow (FCF) of 15% (after expenses, capex, and dividends). Add 5% FCF for each $10 in price. So 20% FCF at $80, 25% FCF at $90, 30% FCF at $100. Etc
The companies are using that FCF to pay down their debt. As the debt goes down, that creates even more FCF. And some companies are already debt free.
Once companies reach their desired low/no debt targets, they are then also buying back their shares. The standard buyback program in the industry is 10% of shares per year. Though some companies could easily do 20% as their FCF is that high already.
And many are now increasing dividends and/or paying special dividends in addition to the share buybacks. Because they have so much FCF.
FRU has increased their dividend 6 times in the last two years.
TOU has raised their base quarterly dividend twice in the last year. And they declared 4 special dividends that have been increasing every quarter as well.
I see no reason to sell companies that are just beginning to reward their shareholders with all that excess FCF.
Given the current tight supply I expect oil to average closer to $100 next year, which means 30% FCF being directed at shareholders. I do not yet see a scenario where oil enters a bear market.
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Got it. That was way more than I was looking for. Sounds like you’ve got a very sound strategy, FCF and all : )
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  worleyeoe
I don’t always have time but I am watching baseball and enjoying a beer on a Friday night. So I have some free time. You’re welcome!
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“…recently did a 4 hour summary of 57 Canadian oil and gas stock…”
Let me know when the Cliff’s notes is out.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
You don’t have to watch the entire presentation. You can scroll through and listen to just the stocks you are interested in. The stock names appears as you scroll through.
I guess no one wants to do research anymore. Lol!
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
Well, yes, but not for four hours for one sector of Canadian companies!
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Understood! Didn’t think many would jump at that. But I’m just trying to help out. I watched it about 5 companies at a time. First time through I merely made a list of the stocks I want to go back to a second time. Going through it a second time now and taking notes on about 30 companies that suit my portfolio.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  PapaDave
“… But I’m just trying to help out….”
Duly noted, my reply was somewhat tongue in cheek.
Dean_70
Dean_70
1 year ago
Let the title of the post sink in. “Never in history..” How do you engineer a soft landing out of the fastest interest spike in history when decades of stimulus as been based on low rates? We are in uncharted waters but the outcome is easy to see with the unknown variable being how deep the crash occurs.
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Economists don’t know a debit from a credit:
Interest On Reserves, Part I – Alt-M
Interest On Reserves, Part II – Alt-M
I.e., no discussion of disintermediation imposed on solely the nonbanks.
Economists don’t know:

the difference between the supply of money & the supply
of loan funds,

the difference between means-of-payment money & liquid
assets,

the difference between financial intermediaries & money
creating institutions,

doesn’t know that interest rates are the price of loan-funds,
not the price of money,

that the price of money is represented by the various price
(indices) level,

honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
1 year ago
PNF charts printed 72 Target on TNX both weekly and daily, double top breakout yesterday on daily
amalagoli
amalagoli
1 year ago

The ignorance and incompetence displayed by the Fed is astounding. It is like they read Macroeconomics for Dummies and still proceeded without a clue. This is what happens when important jobs are allocated based on politics and special interests.

Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  amalagoli
FYI, it is called Keynesian Economics.
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
I used to think that the fed was clueless along with Brandon. His policies are so idiotic, like draining the SPI while provoking Russian into a nuclear war and provoking China into invading Taiwan. Also his ridiculous fiscal largess flaming inflation. I actually think they are trying for a complete demolition of the US with a “reset” of the political and economic system. I mean can anyone be that f ing stupid?
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
With any luck, the repubs win the midterms and their first priority will be to dismantle social programs like social security. Let’s see how it goes..
hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
One hit wonder. Is that all you can say over and over again. You know its a f in lie.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
I am confused…are you saying you are for these socialist programs? I thought you didn’t like Brandon? Brandon wants to expand social security and medicare. These programs drain most of the taxpayer money, surely you can’t be for this? Please clarify the record.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
hilarious, Dementia boy has done nothing for 50 years, 8 sponsored bills and a lot of corruption, Cons are not going to dismantle SS, you would have to be a sheep to believe that, they like staying above ground
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
so they are lying? they are not i fear. remember the old speaker ryan. he was a true believer. that dumb, too.
whirlaway
whirlaway
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
LOL. Biden is continuing with the privatization of Medicare. Look up Direct Contracting Entities.

The DONORcrat Party *says* that it supports SS and Medicare. But I watch what they DO, not what they say.

hmk
hmk
1 year ago
Reply to  whirlaway
These alternate medicare programs like the advantage programs save money by not paying providers as they are mandated to. Providers have little recourse in disputing the payments or rejections of claims. They also data harvest to try and increase their govt reimbursements. Some of them have been caught and sanctioned, but they all do it. Crony capitalism at its finest.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
I see the FED and US government in a policy battle. The FED wants control over monetary policy, but government fiscal policy is undermining monetary policy. If the USD is destroyed by fiscal policy, then the FED will be out of business / lose its power.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  Six000mileyear
“but government fiscal policy is undermining monetary policy”
This has been the case since 1980, forcing the Fed to cut rates to keep debt service affordable for both households and government.
“Trickle down” was a farce.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
1 year ago
Reply to  hmk
Wait until Kamala takes over in January
MIFE
MIFE
1 year ago
Great article as usual.
One quibble – I don’t think it is appropriate to express the increase in rates as a percentage of the base. Isn’t it the total impact of the increase that matters? i.e. my payment went from $1200/mth to $1500/mth. It does not matter that a 1% rate going to 4% is a 300% increase – it matters in the dollar impact on the monthly.
How would you do this with the other countries that had zero or negative rates?
Rate are still below inflation as well (I acknowledge that future inflation may well be a lot lower and the whole issue of how it is measured as being valid). US housing seems like it will hold up much better relatively speaking than in other market like Canada, my home, and maybe others like Australia, Sweden etc. Many Canucks are in for a whole world of hurt kinda like 1989 all over again here.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Rates did need to increase over 2020’s insane low, but aside home prices, inflation has largely been a supply problem.
Rate hikes target demand.
Nat gas is spiraling, and this month the U.S. has one more liquefaction plant coming online (Freeport) to add another 15% to supply, oil may be another story.
Food is also a supply issue.
That said, if homes sales continue to plummet at current rates, I can easily see the Fed back pedaling, or at least pausing.
For the Fed, deflation is a far bigger problem to fight than inflation, and Fed policy lags inflation, real estate being the exception.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Inflation heightens uncertainly for businesses and consumers. Uncertainly is one of the worst fears for businesses.
The Fed will not back pedal as long as inflation continues to rage.
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
As a business owner, I agree on both counts.
If you have a pipeline and contracts are already priced, it’s pretty damned scary.
What I’m saying is if inflation, aside real estate, is a supply problem – If/when those supply issues resolve with rates up so much so fast, look out below.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
what about the labor issue?
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
Good question, with 10 mil excess jobs, I suspect homebuilder layoffs this month will play a big role.
I’m just hoping the Fed knows to factor the residual effects and balance rates preemptively.
We’re already into a housing recession, which oddly might be exactly what the Fed wanted
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
Today is Friday, somewhere across America, about 40,000 baby boomers retired and many won’t return to work. At the end of October, that will be about 200,000. Rinse and repeat every month until 2030.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
the freeport disruption is reason for short attack on NG, soon another super setup for next run to double digits….NG has a demand problem, everyone wants it….in fact any push down here pretty much takes wkly to 28 RSI and time to load up
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
I won’t buy gas here, no way, even if the MACD crosses over the 45 day MA and does a back flip through Bollinger bands..
Our LNG exports are only recent, over the last five years, and we already produce almost as much as the EU consumes.
The EU has other suppliers as well.
There has always been a lot of disinformation on energy, now more than ever, too many pumps pushing energy prices to trust.
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
I just got 50% bump on my large royalty gas company, it will pay out for years….your not good at this it seems….
cycles don’t break down in months, its energy sector bull cycle for quite a while coming….
I used to ride on oil pumps and hang out at my grandpas refinery. I think I have an idea on how this plays out….
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
I said “gas” not gas companies.
Just look at a ten year chart of gas, periodic but short lived price spikes.
Currently it has fallen from $9 to just under $5, it trades like the VIX, briefly spiking, then back down to a range +/- $3, that will likely be higher now with our exports to the EU, but the U.S. has an abundance, and as companies jump into the profit train and supply increases, price goes down.
Great example was the frack boom in North Dakota, companies were paying over $100K for laborers there, then when increased supply dropped price, it went bust.
JRM
JRM
1 year ago
Reply to  MarkraD
It is clear you have no idea where “FOOD” comes from!!!
Fertilizer, diesel and transportation prices are added to food.. Grains to feed the cattle are added to the price!!!
So now your saying the FED is “LYING” when they say they want inflation down to 2%????
MarkraD
MarkraD
1 year ago
Reply to  JRM
..And all this time I thought the Food Fairy brought it at night while we sleep.
Deflationary spirals happen fast, as I said above, if the supply issues abate with rates this much higher “look out below”…namely, your hero Putin could realize he’s cornered and drop his conquest delusions, or he drops dead from a heart attack after falling out a window, accidentally, of course.
Those things happen in Moscow, I hear.
.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
It has been a slow crawl but people are finally starting to come to the realization that demographics are in the driver seat and the bridge is out ahead but we’re all still moving at 60 mph toward it knowing the bridge is out.
Never in the history have….
1. interest rates and mortgage rates moved this much this fast
2. masses of people aged this much this fast
3. masses of people left the workforce this much this fast
4. masses of people enrolled in social services to feed and care for them
5. masses of people demanded more goods and services this much this fast
6. so many houses been built so much so fast
8. so many apartments been built so much so fast
9. so many jobs been open and few to fill them
10. so many profit opportunities arisen from the changes coming
I could go on with dysfunctional government, horrible educational opportunities, healthcare, environment, climate and more but the list would be endless. Boomers should be glad they’ll be checking out sooner than later because they’d be the first the pitchforks and torches would come for once everyone wakes up.
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
Checking out sooner than later is correct, Being glad about it not so much. . Already 30% of Boomers have perished, which is quite remarkable since the oldest Boomers are only 76.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
ONLY 76 ?
Christoball
Christoball
1 year ago
Reply to  vanderlyn
For 30% to be gone before the 76 year life expectancy of American Males is telling. Things will escalate quickly now that this statistical milestone has been reached by the oldest Baby Boomer men. We are approaching in on the Life expectancy crosshairs of the oldest Baby Boom women in 4 short years.
PapaDave
PapaDave
1 year ago
Reply to  Christoball
When the boomers were first born, the average life expectancy of an American was 63 years. Today it is 79 years. So that is quite an improvement.
Worldwide average life expectancy is 73. The top life expectancy countries are Hong Kong and Japan at 85. Bottom is the Central African Republic at 54. The US ranks 46th out of 193 countries.
Life expectancy around the world has increased steadily for nearly 200 years.
During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, an increase in life expectancy was driven mainly by improvements in sanitation, housing, and education, causing a steady decline in early and mid-life mortality, which was chiefly due to infections.
This trend continued with the development of vaccines and then antibiotics.
By the latter half of the twentieth century, there was little room for further reduction in early and mid-life mortality. The continuing increase is due almost entirely to a new phenomenon: the decline in late-life mortality.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
You seem to blame boomers for a lot of things.
I do not believe pitchforks would ever be coming out for them because it would literally mean pitchforks for your parents or grandparents. There is no historical precedent to suggest something like that is possible.
Also while Boomers definitely have the most wealth (because they’ve lived and worked the longest), they are going to spend most of it down in health care related issues so there won’t be much left anyway.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I meant that metaphorically of course but the last generation is responsible for our current conditions just like Gen X and Millenials will be responsible for those that follow. Aren’t the judicial, executive and legislative branches all largely run by boomers?
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
The turds in power are not classified by such terms. They are not representative of any generation, other than they are the worst of each generation. So, AOC would get the same treatment as Mitch Oconnel. Though I do hope the people get inspired to do better than pitchforks. Look to events like Nero turning Christians into torches. Well, one can dream.
MPO45
MPO45
1 year ago
Reply to  HippyDippy
HippyDippy
HippyDippy
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
Literacy is more than just voicing the written word.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
the boomers parents were the ones who reproduced after the war. is it not their fault. i’m joshing of course. we will have a big decision in coming decade or so. world wide empire building or taking care of our own house. might be lots of geezers voting immigration to fill many positions……….
Salmo Trutta
Salmo Trutta
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
re: “so many houses been built so much so fast” — That’s wrong.
New Privately-Owned Housing Units Started: Total Units (HOUST) | FRED | St. Louis Fed (stlouisfed.org)
see: Housing Is Getting Less Affordable. Governments Are Making It Worse. | Mises Wire
worleyeoe
worleyeoe
1 year ago
Reply to  MPO45
#6 is not true. The early to mid 2000s saw a faster rate of home construction
And why no mention of the millions of illegal immigrants?
pimaCanyon
pimaCanyon
1 year ago
great post. thank you. have a good weekend!

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.