NASA’s Webb Telescope Finally Launches Most Complex Exploration Mission Ever

NASA Press Release

Please note NASA’s Webb Telescope Launches to See First Galaxies, Distant Worlds

NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope launched at 7:20 a.m. EST Saturday on an Ariane 5 rocket from Europe’s Spaceport in French Guiana, South America.

A joint effort with ESA (European Space Agency) and the Canadian Space Agency, the Webb observatory is NASA’s revolutionary flagship mission to seek the light from the first galaxies in the early universe and to explore our own solar system, as well as planets orbiting other stars, called exoplanets. 

“The James Webb Space Telescope represents the ambition that NASA and our partners maintain to propel us forward into the future,” said NASA Administrator Bill Nelson. “The promise of Webb is not what we know we will discover; it’s what we don’t yet understand or can’t yet fathom about our universe. I can’t wait to see what it uncovers!”

The world’s largest and most complex space science observatory will now begin six months of commissioning in space. At the end of commissioning, Webb will deliver its first images. Webb carries four state-of-the-art science instruments with highly sensitive infrared detectors of unprecedented resolution. Webb will study infrared light from celestial objects with much greater clarity than ever before. The premier mission is the scientific successor to NASA’s iconic Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes, built to complement and further the scientific discoveries of these and other missions.

“The launch of the Webb Space Telescope is a pivotal moment – this is just the beginning for the Webb mission,” said Gregory L. Robinson, Webb’s program director at NASA Headquarters. “Now we will watch Webb’s highly anticipated and critical 29 days on the edge. When the spacecraft unfurls in space, Webb will undergo the most difficult and complex deployment sequence ever attempted in space. Once commissioning is complete, we will see awe-inspiring images that will capture our imagination.”

The telescope’s revolutionary technology will explore every phase of cosmic history – from within our solar system to the most distant observable galaxies in the early universe, to everything in between. Webb will reveal new and unexpected discoveries and help humanity understand the origins of the universe and our place in it.

James Webb Space Telescope Launches Successfully After Years of Delay

The WSJ reports James Webb Space Telescope Launches Successfully After Years of Delay

Shortly after launch, the telescope successfully separated from the rocket and deployed its solar array so that it can begin generating electricity and charging its batteries, NASA said. Within the next 24 hours, plans call for mission scientists to command Webb to course-correct using on-board rockets so that it heads toward a point four times as distant as the moon called the second Lagrange point.

Then, complicated unfolding processes will begin, taking about two weeks to complete. Seventy hinges, 90 cables, 140 releases and 400 pulleys will be involved in unfolding the telescope’s tennis court-size sunshield by issuing commands to Webb from Earth. Webb will then open the two wings of its primary mirror and lock them in place.

If all goes well, Webb can start conducting its first science experiments about six months after launch and is expected to produce its first photo this summer. It takes that long to completely unfold and align its mirrors, calibrate its cameras and infrared light spectrographs, and cool the telescope to its operating temperature. The telescope was jointly developed by NASA, the European Space Agency and the Canadian Space Agency.

That is a copy free link with a fascinating video and a lot of pictures. 

Enjoy!

Here is another link with 12 Images of the Webb Telescope. That link may be protected.

Merry Christmas

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.

Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

25 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Call_Me
Call_Me
2 years ago
Surely a lot of potential and very exciting that this project has gotten off the ground, so to speak, but the most startling facet of this is in danger of being overlooked:
Canada has a space agency!
Call_Me_Al
astroboy
astroboy
2 years ago
The main purpose of the Webb is not to look back to the Bing Bang, per se. It’s to figure out what dark matter and dark energy are. 96% of the universe is dark matter or dark energy, which we can’t detect as things stand now. In other words, 96% of physical creation is something that we’re entirely clueless about.  That’s a very big deal, if you ask me.
Ten billion is a good chunk of change but the federal government runs through that in 77 minutes and the Webb has been in development for 20 years which is equal to four minutes of federal spending each year. It would have arrived sooner and cheaper but for decades NASA has been laboring under the ‘faster, cheaper, better’ slogan. You can have any two of the three, but not all three. Inconsistent funding results in projects being defunded, which have to be started all over again from ground zero, hence a lot more expense.  I worked at NASA for a decade, its the only government entity I know that really has its act together: smart people, hard workers, and some of the time, competent management. (you can include NOAA, the UGS, and NIH in that category too). If it was funded at a decent consistent level we’d have had a colony on Mars years ago, for example. 
As with all money spent on esoteric technologies it eventually pays for itself a hundred times over. Like your digital camera or phone? The CCDs that are the heart of it were developed by NASA to make better telescopes. That’s just one small example. 
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
2 years ago
Reply to  astroboy
….and all things well considered not even that many astronauts got killed in the insane process, did they ?   The insane process being, destroying our one and  only beautiful planet while looking out for too far away or mostly uninhabitable  barren rocks ….’Understanding’ the universe, is too much of a ambitious undertaking for our limited brains it seems, guessing and speculating is all, well paid and probably well meaning,  scientists can do ….Thank gowd,   I ll say for once, being an atheist… 
astroboy
astroboy
2 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
I guess you missed the part where I pointed out that basic research, such as the Webb, pays for itself 100 times over. Example: the internet would not exist except for high quality fiber optic cables. The technology to make such transparent glass was a pure science project, with only limited applications to a Hubble forerunner satellite. High speed internet was an unexpected by-product. Without that outlay of 20 million bucks for pure research we’d still be doing dial-up at 56K baud. 
I didn’t make it clear. Knowledge gained by NASA has vast applications on earth. It’s not like billions of dollar bills are shot into orbit for no return on investment. 
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
2 years ago
Reply to  astroboy
I don t know about you but I lived more happily WITHOUT  the internet ….
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels
Nah, life is much improved after the net came into existence.  Just think how much easier access to quality porn is!
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
show me yours  and I ll show you mine …that s what we did with  neighbour boys and girls (and we touched ) when I was ….well, a child let s say ….now fn adults are doing the same without touching ….Long live the Net !  What would we fn do without it ?  
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  astroboy
I enjoy the high degree certainty… 96% of the universe is dark matter… Given that we can’t detect dark stuff at present, I suspect there are things awaiting detection/discovery that are so far beyond our comprehension that in 100 years we will have entirely different theories.
thimk
thimk
2 years ago
yes the search for intelligent life continues . /s
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Just a few days before, SpaceX landed its 100th Falcon booster. SpaceX landed its first booster only five years ago and now they are up to a hundred. Some of them have been launched and landed by themselves over ten times. Our space industry is getting better and better. It’s market share of the satellite launch business is dominate now.
ohno
ohno
2 years ago
Well I hope it can avoid all of our commercial space junk.  It’s really cool, I love science and all….but I really think we could spend our time better here on our own rock and it’s immediate problems. Then again that would probably just mean screwing up my life with green initiatives or some other stupid crap so nevermind.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
I love science and I admire the work required to put together this latest piece of amazing technology.  But I have to wonder if this is just a fool’s chase leading nowhere?  “The Big Bang” doesn’t lead anywhere, any more than instant creation of the universe by a god does.
Imagine a huge primordial explosion of unmeasurable force (“The Big Bang”) that actually BUILDS all the laws of the universe we live in, defines the atomic, subatomic and quantum particles and their acceptable interactions that together construct our reality, builds gravity, puts into place a maximum physical speed (speed of light) which then allow real physical constructs like stars, planets, galaxies, black holes and so much more to come into existence.
More commonly, explosions destroy things, tear them apart, not become the foundation or beginning of a universe.
An analogy to the “The Big Bang” would be for a huge explosion to create a brand new city with working infrastructure, buildings with clean windows, paved streets, working traffic lights and much more in some short period of time!
Our universe is either the result of a god thing (but where did the god thing come from and why did  it choose to build a universe?) or more likely a bubble, possibly through a black hole, in a multiverse (but where did that come from?) of an infinite number of similar universes.
astroboy
astroboy
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Big Bang is sort of a misnomer. As far as we can tell, and the Webb will help with this, it was the creation of something out of nothing. The rapid expansion of the universe (space-time, really) since then has made it into an explosion in the popular mind.  
During the first few nanoseconds (to the extent that we can say time existed at that point) the laws of physics, such as electric charge, gravity, time, etc., as we know them, came into being. Before that it doesn’t seem possible that they existed. There are theories, none of them likely  correct, that explain how this happened but the bottom line is that we just don’t know. Nor do we know, are these the only laws of physics that are possible? The Webb will help with this a vast amount. 
Note my post above. 96% of the universe, which includes our planet, is made of dark energy and dark matter which we can’t detect right now and might not obey the laws of physics, which apply to only 4% of space-time, as we understand them. That’s a big big deal.
The notion of an infinite number of multiverses comes from comic books and from quantum mechanics. When you really get into it, it seems inevitable that an infinite number of universes are continuously created. I find this hard to swallow but that’s the most reasonable explanation for what we do see, at this point. The Webb will provide major insights into this.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  astroboy
“During the first few nanoseconds (to the extent that we can say time existed at that point) the laws of physics, such as electric charge, gravity, time, etc., as we know them, came into being. Before that it doesn’t seem possible that they existed. There are theories, none of them likely  correct, that explain how this happened but the bottom line is that we just don’t know. Nor do we know, are these the only laws of physics that are possible? The Webb will help with this a vast amount.”
How will Webb tell us anything about how the laws of physics were created?
“Note my post above. 96% of the universe, which includes our planet, is made of dark energy and dark matter which we can’t detect right now and might not obey the laws of physics, which apply to only 4% of space-time, as we understand them. That’s a big big deal.”
IMO, dark matter/energy do not exist and are just fudge factors for incorrect models and lack of true understanding of our universe.
You sound a bit like a NASA apologist for whom the new telescope will answer all questions until someone proposes the next extragent instrument.  It won’t.  No matter how much you look at the myriad pieces of an explosion, you aren’t going to be able to bring back and visualize what it was that exploded.
astroboy
astroboy
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
I’m not a NASA apologist. I’m a NASA scientist. One of my discoveries, on  a NASA project in infrared astronomy (what the Webb will be doing)  allows a semi-rare birth defect to be diagnosed before it kills the infants. You never know what is going to be useful.
Also, dark energy and dark matter really do exist, unless you doubt the existence of gravity, in which case they might just be fudge factors. For a long time I thought they were nonsense but eventually the evidence became bulletproof. 
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  astroboy
I’m not contending that there are throw-off benefits from technology advancement.  As I wrote in my OP, you can look back to 1 second before the big bang but still won’t be able to explain what created the laws of physics or what caused the explosion.
One of the other grandiose benefits being attributed to the Webb telescope will be the possibility of discovering more earth like habitable planets.  This sounds interesting, though not, IMO, $10 billion interesting.  Regardless, we can’t even get to the Moon w/o years of preparation before a flight, so even were wee to discover habitable planets at other stars, we still have no feasible way to get there.  Perhaps we should be spending that money on propulsion systems or warping space-time so we can travel to other planets and stars in reasonable time periods.
Also, dark energy and dark matter really do exist, unless you doubt the existence of gravity, in which case they might just be fudge factors. For a long time I thought they were nonsense but eventually the evidence became bulletproof. 
BS Mr. NASA scientist!  Here from a quick Google search, #1 hit.
Maybe ‘dark matter’ doesn’t exist after all, new research suggests
Observations of distant galaxies have seen signs of a modified theory of gravity that could dispense with the invisible, intangible and all-pervasive dark matter.
Jan. 6, 2021, 7:24 AM PST
By Tom Metcalfe
For decades, astronomers, physicists and cosmologists have theorized that the universe is filled with an exotic material called “dark matter” that explains the stranger gravitational behavior of galaxies and galaxy clusters.
Dark matter, according to mathematical models, makes up three-quarters of all the matter in the universe. But it’s never been seen or fully explained. And while dark matter has become the prevailing theory to explain one of the bigger mysteries of the universe, some scientists have looked for alternative explanations for why galaxies act the way they do.
Now, an international team of scientists says it has found new evidence that perhaps dark matter doesn’t really exist after all.
In research link to iopscience.iop.org, the scientists report tiny discrepancies in the orbital speeds of distant stars that they think reveals a faint gravitational effect – and one that could put an end to the prevailing ideas of dark matter.
The study suggests an incomplete scientific understanding of gravity is behind what appears to be the gravitational strength of galaxies and galaxy clusters, rather than vast clouds of dark matter.
That might mean pure mathematics, and not invisible matter, could explain why galaxies behave as they do, said study co-author Stacy McGaugh, who heads the astronomy department at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland.
….
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
What made god?
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
How, exactly, do we know that the maximum physical speed is that of light, other than it is part of a theory created using our limited  human intelligence?
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Imagine if the aliens vaporize the thing, leaving everyone scratching their heads as to what happened to their $10 billion investment?  Now that would be pretty funny!
ohno
ohno
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Or smile directly into it
Greggg
Greggg
2 years ago
100 times more powerful than Hubble.   Infrared images as far back as the first hundred million years.  How many theories will be tossed out, and how many new hypotheses will emerge?   This is going to be amazing no matter what.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
“Webb to course-correct using on-board rockets so that it heads toward a point four times as distant as the moon called the second Lagrange point.”
I guess, global warming would fool its infra-red sensors closer to Earth.
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Lagrange points are where you can put stuff and have it stay there.Glad to hear it made the journey… it is an incredibly complicated operation.  An achievement of intelligence in a stupid world.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
The Webb scope will be at L-2 and its’ position will wobble every 25 days or so. The telescope will then use thrusters to keep in place. It has fuel to do that for at least five years. After that they will probably have the means to refuel it.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz
Stay put depends on the frame of reference. Lagrange point L2 seems to be on the Sun-Earth axis, making solar panels less effective, and refueling more costly.
Hope, there are no Hubble-like  problems in that spot.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.