Speculators keep betting on an oil industry bailout or a revival in demand. Neither is in sight.
Crude is down again after hours following a 25% plunge on Monday.
The large speculators are long 587,180 contracts and have been increasing their bet since April as the arrow show.
They appear to be betting on one of two things.
- A Bailout
- A Return in Demand
Bailout: OK, suppose Trump and Congress work out a deal to hold reserves in the ground. There is still excess supply with no where to put the oil. At best, this maneuver stabilizes the price at some price below the price to produce the oil.
Demand: As people go back to work demand will pick up. But demand return will be slow, not instantaneous.
On the corporate side, expect more work-at-home, more teleconferencing, and fewer flights.
On the personal side, consumers need to rebuild savings. Many will be scarred for life.
Gains or Losses
The large speculators increased their bet from 435,108 contracts on April 1 to 587,180 contracts as of last Tuesday, April 21.
There will be a time for a long energy play, but this does not seem like the time.
Oil is another example of leveraged trades. Even more so than gold, speculators will not take delivery.
For discussion of delivery issues related to gold, please see Gold "What If?" Silliness
It's time for personal responsibility, not bailouts of favored industries.
That's the only plan we need.
Fed Bailout Not Possible
Some readers suggested the Fed would bail out the sector. It cannot. There is no place to store the oil if the Fed bought futures and I do not believe the Fed would even if it could.
Those expecting hyperinflation out of forced debt writeoffs and plunging prices understand neither hyperinflation nor inflation.
Moreover, hyperinflationists and strong inflation proponents do not even understand what is most important in general: credit and the balance sheets of lenders.
For discussion, please see Hyperinflationists Come Out of the Woodwork Again.