Productivity Decreases the Most Since 1960 but Labor Costs Surge 9.6%, What’s Going On?

Labor Productivity and Costs

The BLS report on Productivity and Costs shows labor costs are soaring while quarterly productivity is at a 60-year low. 

Labor productivity, or output per hour, is calculated by dividing an index of real output by an index of hours worked by all persons, including employees, proprietors, and unpaid family workers. In the third quarter of 2021, both output and hours worked increased for the fifth consecutive quarter following historic declines in those measures in the second quarter of 2020.  

Labor Productivity Lowlights

  •  Nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased 5.2 percent in the third quarter of 2021 as output increased 1.8 percent and hours worked increased 7.4 percent. 
  • This is the largest decline in quarterly productivity since the second quarter of 1960, when the measure decreased 6.1 percent. 
  • From the third quarter of 2020 to the third quarter of 2021, nonfarm business sector labor productivity decreased 0.6 percent. 
  • The four-quarter rate is the largest decline since the fourth quarter of 1993, when the measure also declined 0.6 percent. 

Unit Labor Costs 

  •  Unit labor costs in the nonfarm business sector increased at an annual rate of 9.6 percent in the third quarter of 2021, reflecting a 3.9-percent increase in hourly compensation and a 5.2-percent decrease in productivity. 
  • Unit labor costs increased 6.3 percent over the last four quarters. 
  • The BLS calculates unit labor costs as the ratio of hourly compensation to labor productivity. 

Manufacturing Productivity

  •  Manufacturing sector labor productivity decreased 1.8 percent in the third quarter of 2021, as output increased 5.1 percent and hours worked increased 7.0 percent. 
  • In the durable manufacturing sector, productivity increased 0.7 percent, with a 9.7-percent increase in output and an 8.9-percent increase in hours worked.
  • Nondurable manufacturing sector productivity decreased 3.6 percent, as 0.3-percent growth in output was outpaced by 4.0-percent growth in hours worked.
  • Total manufacturing sector productivity increased 2.2 percent from the same quarter a year ago.  
  • Manufacturing sector output is now 1.0 percent above its level in the fourth quarter of 2019, the last quarter not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. 
  • Hours worked in manufacturing remain 3.2 percent below the fourth-quarter 2019 level.

Manufacturing Labor Costs 

  •  Unit labor costs in the total manufacturing sector increased 4.6 percent in the third quarter of 2021, reflecting a 2.7-percent increase in hourly compensation and a 1.8-percent decrease in productivity. 
  • Manufacturing unit labor costs increased 3.7 percent from the same quarter a year ago.  

Negative Revisions 

The numbers today are revisions to preliminary numbers for the third quarter that the BLS released last month.

Econoday expected positive revisions.

What’s Going On?

  1. In the scramble to find workers, employers are accepting nearly everyone who applies and at increasing pay levels. New employees are not well-trained and are not as productive, yet they cost more.
  2. Three rounds of stimulus paid millions of workers more being unemployed than employed. They have not all returned to work and some won’t. This puts upward pressure on wages.
  3. Child tax credits come into play. Biden wants to extend them. Pay people enough not to work and some won’t. 
  4. Job jumping compounds the problem. Even skilled labor is not as productive initially in a new environment.
  5. Shortages impact output. For example, if you need a chip, you can’t finish a car. 
  6. Boomer retirements. Skilled boomers are retiring en masse. They are replaced by less skilled labor.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Like these reports? If so, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen.Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

45 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
oee
oee
4 years ago
There are two simple explanations. 1) quaterly figures are erratic 2) Robots are not…replacing us.   We will continue to have automation but that is function of the…Industrial Revolution. 
Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Doesn’t look like anyone posted this story.  The CEO claimed that many of his employees (who I assume are working remotely) put in only 2 hours of work to collect 8 hours of pay.  That is certainly a productivity reducer.  [lol]
————–
CEO fires 900 employees via Zoom call
12/06/21
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
4 years ago
Productivity is partly going down because there are people working multiple jobs but getting paid a full salary on each job. Corporations are desperate for any productivity at any cost these days and will take what they can get. I know people that made about 7-8 years worth of income in one year in the tech sector without stock options and just doing hourly work and billing every employer for a 40 hour week. 
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago
Step 1 to resolve this problem – Stop watering the crops with Brawndo.
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
Depression from the dragged on covid hoax and also lower oxygen from constant mask wearing are detrimental to productivity.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Just as a thought experiment:
You have a world with two classes of goods. One for which there is a market. With the ensuing continued innovation, competition and price reductions this entails. Such that people can afford more and more of it every year.
And the other, one where all innovation and cost reduction is not only banned, but is indeed officially reversed year over year, in order for those in that “industry” to capture ever more of spending in exchange for simply sitting there “owning” and “managing” it.
Now, assume both goods are very important. Critical, even.
Then, remember the universal law of diminishing returns…..
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
If all bachelors marry their housekeepers would that then increase the productivity rate? This is a question for Hardcore Economist. 
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
4 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Since “productivity” is output per hour, and output is measured in units of completely arbitrary nonsense pulled out of some clueless anointed’s rear: The answer to that; as is always the case wrt purported “measures” where the unit of “measure” is just arbitrarily debased for the fun of it; in reality depends on nothing more than the entirely arbitrary value assigned to the “measure” itself. With the rest being nothing more than a diversion designed to fool those who are easily fooled.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Since housekeepers often work for several bachelors often just for a few hours a week if we legalize Polyandry that would not change the productivity rate. If we legalize Polygamy however then the productivity rate would increase. If we make marriage illegal then the productivity rate would lower. Since many couples live together without being married compared to a couple of decades ago we could attribute the weak productivity growth to since then to couples living without being married.
whirlaway
whirlaway
4 years ago
So the “lazy, uppity” working class folks aren’t working for what they worked for 2 years ago??!!   Well, cry me a river!!  LOL
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
4 years ago
I think points 1, 4, 5, and 6 contribute the most to productivity declines in the tech workplace. That’s what I’ve observed and experienced in my career.
Captain Ahab
Captain Ahab
4 years ago
I believe there are far more profound factors at work, having to do with structural changes in the society and culture. Also, productivity is less about working harder, and more about working smarter.
Between1932 and 1978, IQ in the US increased by about 14 points. (the Flynn effect, American psychologist, James Flynn)
However, another ‘effect was already underway, as IQ began to decrease during the 1970s–significantly. I suspect women’s liberation as the underlying cause–mothers leaving the home to work, and women who would have been teachers, moved on to professions, law, medicine, etc, leaving a ‘vacuum’ in early education. Add TV for morons and social media….
Carl_R
Carl_R
4 years ago
Reply to  Captain Ahab
Idiocracy?
randocalrissian
randocalrissian
4 years ago
People working at home without boss supervising? What could possibly go wrong? Surely that won’t decrease production. /s
Yooper
Yooper
4 years ago
Maybe an academic question, but at what point is productivity a valid measure? I mean if the measure “compares the amount of goods and services produced (output) with the number of hours worked to produce those goods and services”, and the charts are measured on YoY growth, isn’t there a mathematical limit to this? Could we be approaching a point where growth being exponential, needs either an adjustement, flat-lines, or collapses?
Webej
Webej
4 years ago
A huge swing not completely explained by the 6 factors indicated, which are not all so specific to this month.
There’s got to be a more satisfying hypothesis and evidence.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Productivity is dropping because workers are able to capture through increases in salaries a larger part of the productivity being created. Productivity figures go down not because less is produced but because what would have been considered productivity has been sidetracked into higher wages. It is in my opinion a good sign.
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
I saw somewhere(can’t remember) that extending Biden’s child tax credits would reduce the number of people in the workforce by 1.5 million.  Another 1% drop in the labor participation rate. 
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
2022 will prove interesting … how will consumer demand – with waning (ended) stimulus – hold up??
Christoball
Christoball
4 years ago
This is the results of reverting away from the much touted useless service sector economy to something productive. People do not know how to do anything anymore.
Greenmountain
Greenmountain
4 years ago
I dont know the answer – but how much is the labor shortage caused by drop in immigration.  Until 3 years ago, at least in the northeast immigrants were a big part of the entry job/minimum wage jobs.  Obviously numbers down….
Blurtman
Blurtman
4 years ago
So if your cost of living has gone up 10% because of inflation, you’ll need maybe a 15% raise just to stay even, depending on your taxes. Is your employer offering a 15% COLA?  If not, then jumping to a new job that pays 15% more is the only way.  And that is just to stay even.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  Blurtman
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
good point  – labor shortage gives unions an incentive to strike
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  thimk
Yes and to chase inflation creating a vicious circle.
Scooot
Scooot
4 years ago
Reply to  Blurtman
Say income is $100, tax $30, net $70 and you spend all of the $70.
After a 10% rise income is $110, tax $33 net $77
After 10% inflation, cost of living has risen from $70  to $77, so you only needed a 10% rise to break even, unless it took you into a new tax bracket. 
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
 “Skilled boomers are retiring en masse.”
Sure, turbo charge 401Ks … and folks will retire (early).
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
What’s a 401(K) ?  LOL.
People who like their jobs don’t necessarily want to retire when they know inflation is going to eat them alive as soon as they get on a fixed income. And for me?   Every year I can knock back a normal income is one less year I have to live off the investments.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Are you denying a factor for some?
If you are top 10%er you likely have seen your nest egg grow substantially past few years … and if you listen to cnbc the gravy train won’t stop anytime soon.
Reality will prove quite different, but I can see where some chose this route in 2021.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
No I’m not denying it’s a factor for MANY. More so for those who have the LEAST in any kind of structured retirement or pension.
I think some people…many perhaps….. have decided (with the pandemic to influence them) that what’s left of their time on earthy is worth far  than struggling for a few more years to save or invest.
For some of us though, it is partly about being in the game. I’m not ready to hang it up yet. My market exposure is quite manageable. The new portfolio is about 2.5% of my net worth.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
When I retired it opened up a whole lot of time for me to do the things I had wanted to but didn’t have the time to do. You are lucky to be in a profession where you can work part-time if you so choose. I worked in a profession where you either work full-on or not at all so it made sense for me to retire when I did. 
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
4 years ago
“The BLS report on https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/prod2.pdf shows labor costs are soaring while quarterly productivity is at a 60-year low.” 
Hhmm, sounds wonderful for business profits.  Luckily, fundamentals no longer matter for equity.
Too bad small business.  You get the short end of the stick.  Again.
Tanner 0
Tanner 0
4 years ago
1. New more expensive workers and 2. Job jumping are directly related.  Once you hire someone on at a higher rate and refuse to raise your experienced employees pay the experienced employee will change companies in order to get that raise.  reddit/antiwork has hundreds of these stories playing out in real time. 
KidHorn
KidHorn
4 years ago
‘What’s going on’ is spot on IMO. Good deduction Mish.
thimk
thimk
4 years ago
perhaps this is why the feds abandoned the “inflation is transitory” meme. ?
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
4 years ago
“Skilled boomers are retiring en masse.”
I think that at age 73, I have earned that “right”.
I actually cut way back at age 70-½ and have no intention of working more than 15 minutes a week going forward.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  davebarnes2
Hell yeah!
shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
Reply to  davebarnes2
Maybe everyone else has a right not to work also.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
He who does not work, neither shall he eat.
davebarnes2
davebarnes2
4 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I don’t “work”. I let my money work for me.
Our retirement funds were up $45K today. LOL. Eating will be good.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
4 years ago
Reply to  davebarnes2
You worked to earn your retirement funds. Now you can enjoy the fruits of your labor.
My quote was directly toward Shamrock who was imagining everyone else (ie the young) could not work and still expect to eat.
Doug78
Doug78
4 years ago
Reply to  davebarnes2
My father retired at 67, spent two years playing intensive golf and then started a company and happily worked full time there till he was 91 years old. He grew up during the Depression where being lazy meant you starved so work was good. I on the other hand………….
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
No way you can be productive with a small team if people keep quitting, and if you have lots of absenteeism, some of which is COVID related and  requires quarantining and a negative test before returning to work. I’m surprised we’re doing as well as we are.
One positive employee, fortunately self-tested over the weekend due to a family member infection. I just tested the other six this morning with no further positives. I was afraid we might be about to take a long Xmas holiday, but once again we dodged the bullet. But even the one out for the week hurts. Imagine doing this over and over for months….which is what’s going on.
Yooper
Yooper
4 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Question… is the quarantine protocol a state requirement where you’re at? We went through a whole-house COVID shutdown last month (along with 2/3rds of her office), and now my wife’s employer (UPMC) says because she’s recovered, she’s no longer required to quarantine or test if exposed again.
Sucks, ‘cuz she’d rather work from home 🙂
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
4 years ago
Reply to  Yooper
The original COVID rules here were a 10 day quarantine and return to work then if symptoms and fever were gone (no test)….or alternately two negative tests within 24 hrs.
I’m not sure what that has morphed into, what with the Gov. trying to pretend COVID doesn’t exist. 
I personally require 10 days and a negative test to come back….we are a healthcare office and I want to take every precaution.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.