Rainy Day Funds? Who Needs Em? States Unprepared for Next Downturn

Despite a recovery going on ten years, States are Unprepared for Next Downturn.

Measured as a share of spending, 21 states had smaller rainy day funds in 2017 than they did in 2008, according to data from the National Association of State Budget Officers compiled by the Tax Policy Center. Rainy day funds help states preserve spending levels when their revenues plunge. Those reserves are especially important because, unlike the federal government, states don’t run budget deficits in downturns.

“There are levers that all the states could think about in terms of preparing for the next economic downturn,” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston President Eric Rosengren said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. “It doesn’t seem like there is that much movement in that direction right now in many states.”

North Dakota had only 1.5% of its expenditures in a rainy-day fund in the 2017 fiscal year, down from 16.6% in 2008. Oklahoma’s rainy day fund had 1.6%, down from 9.3%. New Jersey emptied its rainy day fund in 2009 and has yet to begin refilling it.

Last week, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli warned that the state badly needed to replenish its reserves. New York will face budget shortfalls, reduced borrowing capacity and possible cuts to federal aid, he said in a report. “Yet, there are no plans to add to our reserves, leaving the state with little cushion in the event of an economic downturn,” he said.

There are some important exceptions. California’s rainy day fund was empty in 2008 but in 2017 held 8.5% of the state’s expenditures. Voters there passed a measure in 2014 requiring the state government to set aside money every year into the fund. That effort helped to drive overall state rain day funds to 6.8% of spending in 2017, up from 4.8% in 2008, according to NASBO.

California Here We Come

Well, not quite.

Anyone who thinks California is prepared for the next downturn is fooling themselves.

Taxpayer flight is massive and about to pick up.

Polls show an amazing [50% of Bay Area Residents Want Out](50 percent of Californians say they want to move out soon, poll finds).

I take such polls with a huge dose of salt. 50% are not going to leave. Yet, the sentiment is important.

The state is seemingly in better shape because its property bubble is fully re-blown and the tech bubble is in full swing.

The next downturn will easily wipe out both.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RonJ
RonJ
5 years ago

Newsom wants to double down if he becomes Governor of California. Spend, spend, spend.

Prop 30 was supposed to be a temporary tax. When it reached expiration, there was a ballot measure to extend it. Proponents said it wouldn’t raise taxes, which was a lie. Extending a tax beyond it’s expiration date is a tax increase, as they were not supposed to be paying the tax after that date.

Deter_Naturalist
Deter_Naturalist
5 years ago

It is clear now that intangibles do not respond to supply-demand pricing, and abstractions (like total debt, and public pensions are a debt) are irrelevant to the cognitive pathways people use to decide on their actions.

This results in a paradox: Knowing the truth is irrelevant to forecasting.

Just imagine if simply the last 9 years of stock market gains were eliminated….just 9 years! It would be an 80% collapse. This speaks to the power of mass human cognition, aka Mass Psychology. People do what they do because their impulsive, herding mind tells them to do it, and they use their rational mind to simply provide a convenient rationalization (or more often, adopt a rationalization given to them by the Boob Tube’s “experts.”)

Up. Down. Sideways (which is just marking time to the next Up or Down.) There are no rational explanations for it beyond “the herd stampeded.” Twenty-three years of tilting at this windmill has taught me only that survival means getting out of the way when the herd is stampeding.

blacklisted
blacklisted
5 years ago

You may want to consider the data-based forecast from Armstrong –

blacklisted
blacklisted
5 years ago

Where are the “rainy day” funds disclosed? Are these reporters looking at CAFR’s?

blacklisted
blacklisted
5 years ago

Most everyone, including Mish, seem to forget the USA is not the only country on the planet. Stocks will continue to rise because the dollar is the only game in town for now and the US is the strongest horse in the glue factory. Global investment is over $80 Trillion, dwarfing trade, stock buybacks, and everything else the pundits and so-called analyst choose to use to justify their positions.

Carl_R
Carl_R
5 years ago

There are so many ways that states can play games with their budgets that looking at a single slice, such as rainy day funds, tells you little. Other slices include unfunded pension funds, amount of bonds issued, and amount of expenses deferred into future years. Adding those together, you might get a look at the overall picture, which will surely show that states like Illinois and New Jersey are train wrecks. Alternately, you could look at the other side, the overall taxes that a state assesses. Add property, sales, income, and excise taxes together, and compute the total taxes per capita, and you will get another picture of how bad a situation a state is in.

Schaap60
Schaap60
5 years ago

There are two major exceptions to this general rule. First, properties are reassessed every time they are sold. In addition, the tax rate is the lower of FMV and the prop 13 value that increases by 2% each year. Therefore, after the last crash many properties saw their assessments decline well below their trending prop 13 value. As property values have recovered, they are not subject to the 2% cap until they have reached their prop 13 value as adjusted by 2% every year since the decline in values. Accordingly, the recovery in values has helped tax revenues more than most people think.

shamrock
shamrock
5 years ago

California’s tax revenue isn’t helped much increasing property values because the tax assessment can only go up a maximum of 2% per year and the rate is capped at 1%.

regular-taxpayer
regular-taxpayer
5 years ago

This does not fit as a comment for this post, but I thought you might find it interesting.
link to tomshardware.com
AMD has just made a deal that effectively transfers its x86 chip IP to China – that should weaken a bit Trump’s trade war arsenal.

themonosynaptic
themonosynaptic
5 years ago

“The state is seemingly in better shape because its property bubble is fully re-blown and the tech bubble is in full swing.”

California property is on the same growth path as the global GDP plus inflation that it has been for over two decades. There was a large bubble from 2001 thru 2008 but the property levels wrt to wealth in the state, the U.S. and the World are at the same level they have been at historically. Sure there are extreme hotspots like SF, but SF also has FB employees who want to live there (Silicon Valley is a cultural desert of steakhouses and BMW dealerships) whose median salary is $240K+.

As usual, the most frothy parts of the economy are likely to be hit when the next recession comes, but the last recession saw little nominal impact to SF property prices, and the surrounding property is like layers of an onion in 10% decrements from SF until you get to 25+ miles from the city, where you see far more whiplash.

The tech bubble is in full swing, and one of the common phrases is that “data is the new oil” – this phrase has a double meaning – the first is that data is now the energy source for the new economy (let’s see what happens in the next downturn to see how resilient this is). The other meaning is that data companies have replaced oil companies as the largest, by market cap, in the World.

If we really are moving to a digital World, and I suspect we are, then the network effect dictates that there is a winner-take-almost-all aspect to the successful companies.

China is trying to keep U.S. digital companies out of its 1B person market to allow local companies to build a local network effect, and it is working. However this rhymes with the practices of the centrally directed economy of Japan in the 1980s and we have to see how China reacts once it faces its first real recession. Will its local digital powerhouses be able to withstand a flailing and desperate Beijing that is trying to control its people when they burst the “Chinese Dream”?

themonosynaptic
themonosynaptic
5 years ago

How many of the 50% who want to leave California also want to take their California level wages with them. It is nice to speculate about how much further your dollar will go if you moved to Bumfeck, Nowhere, but if you only get to take 60 cents on the dollar, or worse, nothing because there are no jobs, then CA suddenly looks a lot better. And the weather is nice.

Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
5 years ago

It’s highly doubtful the bubble is going to last beyond this year. The ~8 year cycle is in the hard down phase, and the ~4 year cycle just topped. Both cycles were pointing down when the housing bubble burst. There is also an ~18 year cycle topping. That one will dominate the investment theme for the next 6-8 years.

killben
killben
5 years ago

Mish,

Would you be able to throw some light on how the bubble seems to be ONLY getting bubblier by the day despite the Fed rate hikes and QT. The bubble appears unstoppable as of now. True of bubbles but this also means it could well go on for another couple of years…

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.