San Francisco Airport Lunacy Causing Huge Traffic Congestion

This Tweet caught my eye today.

Let that sink in.

Departure drop offs happen at the arrivals.

Arrival pickups happen at the departure gate.

The poster blames technology for the snafu, but the problem is idiotic airport regulations.

Check out the bureaucratic solution: Two-Tier Pricing for Curbside Drop-Offs.

No one is going to walk around with luggage to save the $3.80 curbside fee.

I saw a Tweet earlier but cannot find it now that said the arrival gate is now low traffic because few want to pay absurd taxi rates. If accurate, arrivals and departures now both happen at departure.

Wonderful.

The taxi business is a walking zombie. The best solution is to let it die.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KidHorn
KidHorn
7 years ago

Business travelers will take whatever is most convenient. They just expense the cost. I personally don’t mind lugging luggage around. Good exercise. Particularly after being crammed into a seat for many hours.

MissionAccomplished
MissionAccomplished
7 years ago

Rent seekers
Spreading chaos as always
In Quebec for decades it was illegal to sell yellow margarine. Had to be white. The dairy lobby was “looking out” for the consumer yuk yuk.

xilduq
xilduq
7 years ago

“goal was not for him [you] to make money”
I wonder what happens if/when more people come to that realization

bradw2k
bradw2k
7 years ago

Used Uber in Paris last month, very nice, and they do pick up at the regular arrival doors of CDG — but taxi drivers were clearly annoyed, had one lie to me and say that Uber is not allowed in the airport at all.

whirlaway
whirlaway
7 years ago

Both the driver and the passenger end up losing. The driver makes very little money and has accelerated wear and tear of the vehicle by the increased miles. The passenger gets a cheaper ride but has no protections in case of crime by the driver or injuries in accidents etc. It is the middle man that wins.

And then there’s this: http://bgr.com/2017/04/07/uber-class-action-suit-driver-cheating-software/

Stuki
Stuki
7 years ago

Must make sure the Uber driver loses on the deal with the passenger. Otherwise the passenger would be the loser. And must simultaneously make sure the passenger loses, otherwise the driver would lose. That’s economics, as understood by the President of the sole remaining superpower, and his supporters.

SMF
SMF
7 years ago

As if any government is meant to solve problems instead of causing them.

JonSellers
JonSellers
7 years ago

Took my first uberish ride last week to the airport in Madrid. Company was Cabify which is popular in Spain and Latin America. The driver was a nice enough guy and his car was top notch and immaculate. He even had free water bottles in the back. He regaled me with tales of how great it was that the Socialist Party is taking over Spain and maybe he could finally start making money. I politely let him know that the goal was not for him to make money, regardless of who is in power. The ride was fairly long but I only paid 6 euros. I don’t know if Cabify fares are subsidized by shareholders like Ubers, but I was happy with the service at that price.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.