Senate Passes Huge Infrastructure Bill, What’s Inside and What About the House?

Today the Senate passed a Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill.  Let’s take a look at the Infrastructure Details

Infrastructure Details

  • $110 billion would go toward roads and bridges
  • $66 billion investment in rail maintenance, modernization and expansion, most of which will go to Amtrak.
  • $39 billion to modernize and make public transit more accessible to the disabled and elderly. Significant chunks of that money will go to major city transit systems, like New York City’s, based on federal funding formulas.
  • $11 billion in funding for highway and pedestrian safety program
  • $65 billion for expanded access to broadband, including by providing low-income households a $30 monthly voucher to pay for internet service.
  •  $65 billion allocated for improving the electrical grid and energy production 
  • $50 billion to bolster the country’s infrastructure generally against climate change and cyberattacks. 
  • $55 billion will go toward clean drinking water 
  • $21 billion in removing pollution from soil and groundwater, job creation in energy communities and a focus on economic and environmental justice. T
  • $73 billion to update and expand the power grid.
  • $7.5 billion will go to implementing a network of electric vehicle chargers
  • Another $7.5 billion will be used for zero-emission or low-emission buses and ferries. 
  • Ports and airports will be boosted with $42 billion in new spending.

What’s Missing in the $1 Trillion Package?

The above items total approximately $612 billion out of a bill that authorizes roughly $1 trillion (I have not seen an exact number).  

Other specifics are buried in the Text of 2702 Page Bill. Part of the confusion is new spending vs existing spending.

The bill allegedly authorizes about $550 in new spending of which $612 billion is listed above, perhaps with some overlaps.

How Will This Be Paid For?

  • $200 billion in repurposed funds originally intended for coronavirus relief but left unused
  • About $50 billion will come from delaying a Trump-era rule on Medicare rebates
  • $50 billion from certain states returning unused unemployment insurance supplemental funds. 
  • The negotiators also expect about $30 billion will be generated from applying information-reporting requirements for cryptocurrency
  • Nearly $60 billion will come from economic growth spurred by the spending
  • $87 billion from past and future sales of wireless spectrum space. 
  • A series of smaller pay-fors are expected to make up the difference.

Funding Goal

The goal appears not to get to $1 trillion but rather to $550 billion in “new” spending.

The above items total $477 billion, the rest is magic, and likely some of that is magic, especially estimates of growth which never seem to pan out.

What About Cryptos?

Details for how some of the revenue streams would work remain controversial and could change in the amendment process this week. Sen. Ron Wyden (D., Ore.), the chairman of the Finance Committee, criticized the cryptocurrency tax provision as “an attempt to apply brick and mortar rules to the internet and fails to understand how the technology works.” Cryptocurrency industry groups have criticized the provision as unclear and warned it could ensnare individuals and companies who don’t have actual customers, such as decentralized exchanges and miners, as opposed to more traditional exchanges that are the primary target of the changes.

What’s Next?

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland has said that House Democrats may want to tweak the bill to include more climate provisions. But he has also acknowledged such a move could put the bill’s chances in jeopardy in the Senate

If the House changes the bill and passes its own version, the Senate will need to vote on the House version. If they cannot pass the House version, the chambers could also go to a conference committee where they would try to bridge the gap.

Mr. Hoyer said Democratic leadership hasn’t yet decided next steps on the specific bill. However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California has said the House will only take up the infrastructure bill once the Senate has also sent over the $3.5 trillion package.

Democrats are likely to be able to lose the votes of some members as the bill is expected to garner some Republican support if it remains the same. The bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, which includes 58 members, evenly divided, is expected to endorse the legislation, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Infrastructure Bonanza

All in all this was a bonanza for lobbyists. 

On August 7, I noted Lobbyists Spent $426 million to Reap an Infrastructure Bonanza.

Nearly 2,000 companies and other groups have engaged with Washington officials about infrastructure to shape the final deal.

One group that did not get what they wanted was the crypto lobby.

Destroy American Jobs and Growth Plan

Nancy Pelosi and AOC sa the Democrats $3.5 trillion must past first.

I discussed that on July 30, in AOC Goes After Senator Krysten Sinema With a “No Climate, No Deal” Threat

Biden calls the bill “The American Jobs Plan“. I originally proposed labeling the bill the Stagflation Guarantee Act of 2021 but Destroy  American Job act is also a fitting name.

In addition to untenable clean energy costs, the bill would expand Medicare, offer universal “free” pre-kindergarten, two years of “free” college, and other massive giveaways.

Thus my comment: The Stagflation Threat is Very Real but Congress Holds the Key

Mandating 80% clean energy by 2030 as the Democrats seek is economically crazy. Costs would be enormous and there would be a huge bit to growth. 

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Northeaster
Northeaster
2 years ago
Crypto folks mad at Sen. Shelby lol – Missed it by one vote on the tax. He don’t care, he’s retiring. 
honestcreditguy
honestcreditguy
2 years ago
can there be a wheat republic since we grow no bananas? Peak USA is now so far back in the rearview mirror it looks like a mirage
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
“Nearly $60 billion will come from economic growth spurred by the spending.”
I thought the multiplier effect of government on infrastructure is incalculable, otherwise pretty poor return.
Another point of interest are the numbers: 110, 66, 39, 11… 21, 73, 7.5 billion.
Are they throwing darts to come up with these?
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
My, my.Look at Uncle Buck. Within a quarter of taking out the April high. Couldn’t have anything to do with gold getting absolutely gobsmacked on  a random Sunday night, I guess?
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“gold getting absolutely gobsmacked on  a random Sunday night”
I’ve seen that sort of thing happen before. A large seller in a thin market. They weren’t trying to get the best price for themselves, otherwise they’d have waited until there was more depth. It looks to me as if they were trying to take out all the bids, maybe to trigger stop losses. It should be investigated in my view. 
debracarter
debracarter
2 years ago
Been looking a pictures for years of massive electrical lines on totem poles. Figuring ways to rid the sky of the..It’s a mess,. They should have been under ground years ago.  
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago

They’d better start quickly before the costs go up again? 

debracarter
debracarter
2 years ago
Breathalyzer’s.  I also heard that.   Stupid! The rich can afford the cars, they also, can afford taxi or limo ride home, if they’ve been drinking!  So what good will it do?  Hit the middle income! Yup.  That’s the sneaky attempt to bust them. 
tbergerson
tbergerson
2 years ago
$65 billion allocated for improving the electrical grid and energy production
Does this mean hardening it against EMP?  Because if it doesnt, the GOP traitors who voted for this monstrosity just missed the only chance to protect the 150 million americans who are going to die sometime in the near to intermediate future when either a sun born or sovereign born EMP takes out our electrical transformers
Also this article doesnt mention the requirement which mandates all new cars have a bult in breathalyzer.  So prove you havent been drinking (some new federal sobriety standard?  right now the states have different standards for what is impaired).  Eventually this functionality will be used to simply turn off the cars of Trump supporters or their descendants (populist America Firsters) when they are on their way to protest.  And I am only half joking
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  tbergerson
I suspect it means burying a lot of electric cables under ground (something going on here in Florida for a while) or on concrete poles. The rest is probably to replace/upgrade aging power plants.
It’s essentially impossible to harden the grid against an EMP. Who knows what it would cost and more importantly, who knows if it would ever be needed. Hard to justify countless billions on something like that.
tbergerson
tbergerson
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Hard to justify countless billions on something like that.
No disrespect TexasTim, but we are talking the certain death of like half of our country.  In the next 50 years.  Preventing that is the benefit.  I would argue a very large one.
The COST, at perhaps $100 Billion lets call it, PALES in comparison to the TRILLION being thrown away in this bill.  I do not think cost is a tenable argument when they are throwing trillions around
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  tbergerson
Certain death for 50% of the population? Within 50 years?
In that case there is no reason to do anything about CO2 emissions or the housing crisis or social security or pretty much anything else since in <50 years the population will be cut in half 🙂
And yes, I know what happened in 1859. Imagine they hardened the telegraphs against a repeat. That would have been wasted money since it never happened again and the telegraph disappeared decades ago.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
These items are actual infrastructure so it’s easy to see how it managed to pass.
Like Eddie says, it’s strange we need 65 billion for Broadband given that the free market (cable and phone providers) has already built out a solution to 90% of the country and Musk’s satellites appear poised to cover the last 10%. It must be entirely a give away to the providers (via lobbyists) under the guise of giving the poor access to broadband.
I’d also like to know what the other 388 billion is for for (1 trillion – 612). The cynic in me says ‘10% for the big guy’ so 100 billion must be earmarked for Biden’s family.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Putin gets half, from what I’m told.
Greenmountain
Greenmountain
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I think rural America would disagree with you about broadband.  Capitalist have no interest. Payback times when houses are 1/2 mile apart is simply too long.  So rural America gets crumbs.  In the year of Zoom we paid a price for not being able to connect or getting dropped as the meeting progressed.  Capitalism only works when you can make money.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  Greenmountain
Exactly.  That is also why it is the USPS that provides delivery services to FedEx and UPS for the proverbial “last mile”.   The idiots who think that getting rid of USPS would be great, have no idea how high the capitalists would charge to deliver to remote rural areas, if they deliver at all.   

You can see this happen all over the world.  In Asia, Africa and elsewhere, the private sector runs buses only on the most lucrative routes.  When it comes to taking that final leg of 30 to 40 miles to your village of 600 people, it is only a government bus that can take you there.

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Greenmountain
How rural do you have to be not to get Broadband of some kind these days?  My parents live ~10 miles outside a city of 50K people in Canada on a dead end country road (6 homes) and they’ve had broadband via cable TV for at least 10 years.
Direct TV has offered satellite internet for at least a decade plus if you are rural and want better speeds than dial up. My company uses it to access remote sites all over North America. Not blazing fast by broadband speeds but it works.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Growth won’t pay for anything, because there won’t be much of any growth forthcoming.
Free broadband for the poor? How about free fentanyl too?  (Oops did I say that out loud?)
Jobs? Who needs a job when you can get free money?
Why did I never think about lobbying as a career? What was I thinking?

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.