St. Louis Fed President Says “Fed is Not Far Behind the Curve”

Core Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) chart by St. Louis Fed.

Please consider Is the Fed behind the Curve? Two Interpretations, by James Bullard.

Key Bullard Ideas 

  • U.S. inflation is exceptionally high, comparable to that in 1974 and 1983. 
  • Standard Taylor-type monetary policy rules, even if based on a minimum interpretation of the persistent component of inflation, still recommend substantial increases in the policy rate. This provides one definition of “behind the curve,” and the Fed is far behind. 
  • However, all is not lost. Modern central banks are more credible than their 1970s counterparts and use forward guidance. 
  • Credible forward guidance means market interest rates have increased substantially in advance of tangible Fed action. This provides another definition of “behind the curve,” and the Fed is not as far behind based on this definition.  

Inflation Well Above Target

A Generous Interpretation 

  • In my definitions of “behind the curve,” I will use the most generous (lowest) interpretation of the persistent component of current inflation, which is the 3.6% Dallas Fed trimmed mean value. 
  • This will help give us a “minimal” definition of the degree to which the Fed is behind the curve in the calculations in the following slides. 
  • We should keep in mind that this minimal definition excludes some inflation that is actually occurring, and that the Fed’s inflation target is ultimately stated in terms of headline inflation.  

Credibility and Forward Guidance

  • Modern central banks have considerably more credibility than they did in the 1970s, much of it stemming from an explicit commitment to inflation targeting.
  • They also make more use of forward guidance. 
  • As a result, indications of future policy rate increases are incorporated into current financial market pricing, before policy actions are taken. 
  • This has been a key factor in current market pricing, as the 2-year Treasury yield and the 30-year mortgage rate have increased substantially.  

Where to Start?

There is so much ridiculous nonsense by Bullard, it’s  difficult to pick a starting point.

Bullard produces charts of the jobs market as evidence of a “strong economy.” The economy always looks strong at the peak of the cycle. The economy looked strong in 2007 and 2001 too. 

Bernanke denied a housing bubble and Greenspan was fearful the dotcom miracle would cause overheating. 

Forward Guidance

Is forward guidance a strength? I think not. It allows market forces to front run the Fed in both directions. And the guidance assumes the Fed is right. 

Housing 

Case-Shiller Home Price data from St. Louis Fed. Chart by Mish.

Home prices are not in the CPI, the PCE, or the most absurd construct of all, trimmed-mean PCE.

Core PCE excludes food and energy. 

Put housing in the CPI and inflation is running about 10 percent year-over year.

Case-Shiller home price data and CPI data via St. Louis Fed, chart by Mish

Percent Change From Year Ago Notes (January 2022)

  • CPI: 7.48%
  • OER: 4.09%
  • Rent: 3.76%
  • Case-Shiller 10-City: 17.52%
  • Case-Shiller National: 19.17%

CPI Understated?

Yes, by a lot.

I do not believe OER is only up 4.09%. Nor do I believe rent is only up 3.76%.

Moreover, home prices are not directly in the CPI, only OER and and Rent.

For discussion please consider 2021 Set New Annual Records for Home Prices. 2022 Continues the Trend.

Trimmed Mean Inflation

Please consider my January 4, 2022 post Trimmed Mean Inflation Is the Ultimate Absurdity in Inflation Measures

  • The Dallas Fed chopped off items with a combined weight of 24.07% from the low end.
  • This was “balanced” by chopping off items with a weight of 32.50% (100-67.5) at the top end.
  • Everything that went up by more than 9% annualized was chopped off the top culminating with gasoline up 103.5% and air transportation up 112.7%.

Ultimately, the Dallas Fed discarded 56.57% of the entire PCE, heavily weighted by discarding high inflation items to arrive at a preposterous 2.8% year-over-year measure of inflation

If you throw away 57% of consumer items and not factor in housing at all, the current measure of trimmed mean is 3.6%.

And by that measure the Fed is not behind the curve.

What a Hoot!

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Comments to this post are now closed.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
I just noticed the 2-10 yield spread is back to +21 basis points. No recession? I also noticed Freddie Mac mortgage rate is 4.67%, not the 5% that was reported here earlier. No housing collapse?
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
fwiw, Hussman:
a) Economic activity tends to weaken after 2/10 inverts
b) Curve tends to un-invert before recession – ISM, credit spreads, equities, job growth confirm
Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago
Reply to  Tony Bennett
The long ends been taking a bit of a hammering this week. I’d guess partly due to the unwinding of some flattening trades, but also worries about QT and inflation. Given the speed of the recent steepening I can’t help thinking someone knows something they shouldn’t. Maybe I’m being too cynical.
Don’t know how far they’ll fall before some (permanent) natural support comes in, but it could be some time away because the market will want to see some evidence of inflation falling and or the economy stalling. Particularly as the stock market is being resilient and still in denial about the Fed’s actions. Whilst that’s going on I think the Fed will ratchet up their hawkish speak. A 3% handle is not too far off now?
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
3 years ago
At least Bullard undeniably admitted that the Federal Reserve is behind the curve.
JeffD
JeffD
3 years ago
Meats and eggs are up over 30% in Southern California vs 2020. That’s about 15%/yr. Most of the other stuff I buy is at least 10% higher. Gas is up 30%. The Fed is outright lying about CPI.
Sunriver
Sunriver
3 years ago
Mish,
It would be much appreciated if you could put a link on your web-site which shows the dynamic value changes to your ‘CSAI National % Change’, which includes housing prices in the CPI, on your web-site for easy access.
Thank You
Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Sunriver
Sure – the link is already there
For discussion please consider 2021 Set New Annual Records for Home Prices. 2022 Continues the Trend.
ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
3 years ago
The Fed monetize the fiscal stimulus. That put them so far behind they couldn’t even see the curve.
Business Man
Business Man
3 years ago
I believe that they are “inching” along because they don’t believe that this inflation has been caused by monetary policy. I think they still believe that it’s temporary, but because they are waiting for the supply chain and labor issues to somehow resolve themselves.
They figure if they can throw just a little water on the economy, that will be enough to kill some demand to get the supply chain and labor situation back at equilibrium. They are afraid of doing too much to the negative side.
Then–perhaps they believe–inflation will suddenly drastically come down, as we are no longer dealing with scarce production due to labor and shipping.
Remember, they did nothing for a full year for this reason. I think they are afraid that if they start acting with their hair on fire now, they are afraid it’s unnecessary.
There may be some truth to this, but I don’t think the labor and the shipping is going to resolve in the next few quarters. I’m still seeing all the indications of wage inflation, labor scarcity and difficulty getting materials that I was seeing a year ago. It’s not any better, and no one has indicated it will get any better.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
Everything is temporary. We are overdue for a recession. They have been in the business of preventing one for so long that when this one happens, it will the mother of all recessions because of the sheer amount of money creation that has gone on.
thimk
thimk
3 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
Yes , i agree also . notice also the 25bps march rate increase, right now they are in the “jawboning ” stage. Maybe they can take some froth out but it won’t be much.
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
3 years ago
Reply to  Business Man
“They are afraid of doing too much to the negative side.”
Given they overshot so badly on the positive side I’m willing to give them a bit of leeway, but the whole 0.25% interest rate bump was way too little.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
3 years ago
“Modern central banks are more credible than their 1970s counterparts”
But only so, because the only variable required to explain ALL supposed “credibility” of something so trivially completely useless as central banks, is the degree to which their captives are indoctrinated into rank economic illiteracy. So yes: The dumber people get, the more credibility dumb stuff has.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
“Modern central banks are more credible than their 1970s counterparts”
Dr. Goebbels said: “If you repeat the lie often enough the folk will believe it.”
Or something like that.
Bam_Man
Bam_Man
3 years ago
The Fed is not “far behind the curve” — compared to Venezuela.
Venezuela inflation rate = 1,638% (2021)
Venezuela Overnight Benchmark Interest rate = 57.99%
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
3 years ago
The time to start hiking was summer of ’21. They now need to a 250 bps hike to start getting it under control.
RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago
2 + 2 = 5. By new definition.
Lisa_Hooker
Lisa_Hooker
3 years ago
Reply to  RonJ
Actually, 2 + 2 = 11.
You figure it out.
Naphtali
Naphtali
3 years ago
Long pitchforks, tar and feathers.
shamrock
shamrock
3 years ago
How do they come up with their rent estimates? Why so wildly different then other sources that says rents up up 15% or more?
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
3 years ago
Reply to  shamrock
15 – graft – stupidity = 4.
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
3 years ago
“Fed is Not Far Behind the Curve”
Thanks. You saved me from looking for today’s market levitation.
Good old, Bullard. Hasn’t lost his touch. Who can forget the (infamous) Bullard Rally of 2014?

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.