Take This Office and Shove It “You Want Me Back? I Quit”
Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.
Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.
This post originated on MishTalk.Com
Thanks for Tuning In!
Mish
Subscribe
22 Comments
Newest
2 years ago
Commuting totally limits the pool of workers available to your company…and in Bay Area the commute is/was horrible. It took me an hour on a %^$% Motorcycle. The state of CA doesn’t put enough into good roads and public transit options. One crash will stall the commute for hours. %$%^ That! Public transit is flat out pathetic. Your overall productivity may fall, but in many cases the work day starts early anyway.
2 years ago
Any day I didn’t see those sour faces in the office was a good day. Now, I’m retired and loving it!
2 years ago
This is why I bought shares in a certain video communications company in April 2020. I notice ‘Team Bonding Events’ are at the bottom of the list. Not surprised! Just guessing – but one of the major attractions of working from home is escaping from the Team.
2 years ago
With CRT we now have “Team Destroying Events”.
2 years ago
together we stand – divided we fall
2 years ago
“There is so much demand for labor that people can switch jobs to resist a demand to return to the office”
But then if most companies demand return to office switching jobs cannot be the answer
2 years ago
@Mish that commute time list is informative!
Notice how, if you want a short commute, move to Alaska, Wyoming, or the Dakotas. Long commute? DC, NJ, IL, CA, etc.
Wide open spaces where the next town is a 2 hour drive == short commute. Interesting.
2 years ago
Thats not how it worked when I was out there. 45min to an hour and a half to get out to the mines. Alaska you have a flight up to the slope to make the big money.
2 years ago
Considering the the political concerns about a “sustainable environment,” how long until governments begin to mandate that jobs which can be performed at home, must be performed at home, at least on a partial basis, to cut down on traffic, etc?
2 years ago
I suspect many younger employees would like to return to an office for the social interaction.
2 years ago
What we have now is a special environment and one that will not last. Employees are happy that they are in so much demand that they can bargain for better conditions and higher wages but some act as if this exceptional demand for their services is the new normal. It is not. Labor like materials can suffer bottlenecks that cause price inflation. Once that happens supply increases. The exceptions are those that have rare qualities or skills that usually are a result of very hard work above what most people are capable of but they are generally rare. Most people can be and are replaced when they no longer make economic sense for the employer. Many employees now seem to have the belief that they somehow have joined the ranks of those exceptional people with rare skills and that their employers have suddenly recognized their exceptionalism. I am afraid that they are going to have a rude awakening when they discover that even though their employer needs them desperately now, in the future when things settle out they might find out that they are indeed replaceable. I have seen it happen over and over in my industry and the results on the person can be devastating to them. Hubris kills.
2 years ago
I treat every job like a construction job… it could end at any instant.
2 years ago
Very true.
2 years ago
Employers have had the upper hand for so long that it comes as a shock to them when employees push back. It remains to be seen whether workers are successful in gaining some bargaining power. I personally don’t believe the “huge demand for labor” story apart from the hospitality sector which laid off millions of workers and suddenly wants them back.
Let’s see how much of a pay increase workers get this year. Cost of living has increased over 5% the last year. Let’s see those 5%+ raises.
2 years ago
When I was interviewed by my present employer early this spring, I was asked a series of questions about working from home. I replied there are times when a person for this position will have to be on site, and times when full concentration is needed. I showed flexibility and understanding. Once I started, I spent all my time on-site to get to know the people and operations. Now that my project is in the subject matter design phase; I’ve been able to work from home and still feel connected during online meetings. So I am one of the lucky ones because I can take some work home with me.
2 years ago
By the way the work from home thing is not tenable in some jobs in tech. Primarily those jobs in hardware engineering or system engineering where you needs hands on equipment. Intel wants to hire a lot of people but they want many of them in the lab. The shortage in chips is slowing everything so companies in this space arent as desperate to hire remote workers and they don’t have a huge turnover problem because of it.
2 years ago
At some point it will be interpreted as not wanting to work. I think most people at a baseline don’t want to be productive given the FIRE economy pays more. No one has much data but I suspect that and not unemployment benefits is the reason behind why people dont want to go back to the office.
2 years ago
It all depends much more on the job than some set of conditions/benefits.
If you can’t be missed, it always puts you in a good place, and generally you will find satisfaction in keeping the place afloat.
If there is a constructive atmosphere and good interactions and people each take responsibility, you will miss being there.
On the other hand, for many workers their jobs are barely a step up from slavery, and work is a demeaning, boring, stress, and humiliating.
It’s not just about employees, it’s also about employers and the actual work.
2 years ago
Told my company exactly that on the survey they sent. They’re waffling about it, and I’m interviewing at 3 other companies.
2 years ago
The “unlimited vacation” thing is BS. What it turns out to be in reality is – no vacation. If you have X days vacation, you know you are entitled to take it. If you don’t take all of it, it is banked in your name and can be cashed out when you leave. With “unlimited” vacation, employees are pitted against one another, and the one that takes the least vacation is the “champ”. And when you leave a few years later (after taking little or none of that “unlimited” vacation time), you get nothing. No wonder bosses love it.
2 years ago
Yup. I take more vacation and dont look back. The people that dont take vacation are the chumps. Many of them dont realize the tortoise not the hare wins the race.
2 years ago
I told in a team meeting that “Unlimited vacation” = “Zero vacation”. Many of my colleagues diligently avoided taking vacations for about 2 years after this new “perk” was introduced. And then, the entire division of 5000+ people was closed and everyone was laid off. End of story!