The CPI Measures Inflation and Other Widely Believed Economic Nonsense

Chart Discussion

In the chart above I plot the Case-Shiller national home price index, the Case-Shiller 10-city index, the CPI, Owners’ Equivalent Rent (OER), and the BLS Rent Index. 

I have produced this chart previously, but this month I added the BLS Rent Index. 

OER is the mythical price one would pay if one rented their own house from themselves, unfurnished and without utilities. 

Prior to the year 2000, housing, rent, OER, and the CPI all moved in sync. In 2000, home prices disconnected from the CPI, OER, and rent. 

In 2012 another disconnect developed in which both rent and OER also disconnected from the CPI.

If we plotted actual medical prices (not the BLS measures of them), we would see that the cost of healthcare disconnected from the CPI as well.  That happened because the CPI does not include prices paid on behalf of consumers (i.e. Medicaid, Medicare, or your group plan where you work). 

The two enormous bubbles (you do see them don’t you?) are the direct result of the Fed sponsoring bubbles. 

Debate Over the CPI

I made the statement that the real CPI is understated. Actually, that’s not phrasing things properly.

More accurately, the CPI is a piss poor measure of inflation.  Which led to the comment “Housing prices lead rent, no?” 

No! 

Slaves to the CPI

The Fed and economists in general are slaves to CPI despite the facts

  • The CPI does not measure inflation
  • Consumer prices do not properly measure price inflation
  • The entire notion we need 2% inflation while ignoring asset bubbles that allegedly do not represent inflation is downright idiotic. 

Measured Price Inflation MPI

A better measure of inflation can be calculated by substituting actual home prices for OER in the CPI. 

To satisfy the purists who say that home prices are a capital expense, let’s not call the result “consumer” inflation but rather MPI measured Price Inflation.

I called it Case-Shiller CPI but will change the name next month to better reflect what it really is and to stop futile discussion of the word “consumer”.   

Those who want the CPI can have it. As an inflation measure, especially as used by the Fed, it’s proven useless anyway. 

The nice thing about Case Shiller is the index measure actual resales of the same house over time. We can debate the weights but OER is at least a reasonable place to start. 

Weights in the CPI 

Notice that OER is the largest component at 24.6% of the CPI and rent of primary residence is another 7.86%.

CS National, Top 10 Metro, CPI, OER, Rent Percent Change 

In the last year, home prices are up 14.59%, the CPI is up 5.39%, but OER only 2.34% and Rent only 1.92%. 

OER and rent have held down the CPI considerably.

Issues Understated

These inflation stats are understated because the latest CPI data is from June but the latest housing data is from April. 

I created the above charts using an assumption that home prices were flat in May and again in June although we know prices went up. 

CPI, CS-CPI Percent Change 

The above chart shows the impact of substituting home prices for OER in the CPI. 

Real Interest Rates 

Real rates are formed by subtracting various interest rates from the Fed Funds Rate, a miniscule 0.08%.

Real interest rates, factoring in housing, are about -7.5%. But that does not include home price increases in May or June. 

Real interest rates are more deeply negative than right before the housing crash. 

The Fed is purposely allowing inflation to run hot, and that does not count home prices at all, just rent.

Monetary Inflation vs Price Inflation

Some say that the increase in money supply is inflation and prices follow. But money measures themselves are very distorted and people bicker over how to measure them too. 

I will discuss monetary inflation next week, so stay tuned.

Historical Perspective On CPI Deflations

In its March report, the BIS took a look at the Costs of Deflations: A Historical Perspective. Here are the key findings.

Concerns about deflation – falling prices of goods and services – are rooted in the view that it is very costly. We test the historical link between output growth and deflation in a sample covering 140 years for up to 38 economies. The evidence suggests that this link is weak and derives largely from the Great Depression. But we find a stronger link between output growth and asset price deflations, particularly during postwar property price deflations. We fail to uncover evidence that high debt has so far raised the cost of goods and services price deflations, in so-called debt deflations. The most damaging interaction appears to be between property price deflations and private debt.

Deflation may actually boost output. Lower prices increase real incomes and wealth. And they may also make export goods more competitive.

Once we control for persistent asset price deflations and country-specific average changes in growth rates over the sample periods, persistent goods and services (CPI ) deflations do not appear to be linked in a statistically significant way with slower growth even in the interwar period
. They are uniformly statistically insignificant except for the first post-peak year during the postwar era – where, however, deflation appears to usher in stronger output growth. By contrast, the link of both property and equity price deflations with output growth is always the expected one, and is consistently statistically significant.

CPI Spotlight Is Wrong!

The BIS clearly draws the line on asset bubbles and property bubbles and so do I. 

The data shows the Fed has made the same mistake again, insisting on 2% CPI inflation while ignoring asset bubbles on grounds they are not inflation.

The Fed has a spotlight on the ant, missing the elephant in the room that it created. 

I will update the charts again when the next Case-Shiller reports come out.

Subscribe!

Like these reports? I hope so, and if you do, please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
frozeninthenorth
frozeninthenorth
2 years ago
Take a different tack, what is the Fed looking for?  In 1978 my parents bought their principal residence, an apartment in the centre of the city, they paid $50,000…I know!  They still own that apartment, sure the condo fees have gone up, from maybe 400 per month to nearly 2,000 per month (its a very nice place). but their overall cost of housing has not increased appreciably.  Now if they bought the same apartment today it would cost, conservatively, $2 million.  If they had to carry a mortgage on that it would be expensive, but they don’t.  The reality is that for the vast majority of the US population, the cost of buying a house today is irrelevant.  Its a bit like the tail wagging the dog.  
It has been know for many decades, it was when I studied economics in the late 1980s) that the CPI was a poor indicator of inflation, which I agree is a lot higher today than that measure would seem to indicate.  Nevertheless, the big question is what is the FEDs game, what are they trying to do, and more importantly are the levers they control allow them to do anything about inflation?
The tools for managing inflation have changed over the years, and don’t even start about how we measure the expansion of the money supply…its an unholly mess and I suspect that the Feds have no idea what to do.  Afterall the US economy is doing rather well, there “seems to be some inflation out there” but the Feds keep rates low.  Its like the story below about selling commercial real estate (3rd tier) with negative cap rate, what are the buyers expecting?
Powderhound
Powderhound
2 years ago
Mish, great stab at a more realistic inflation measure, certainly the Fed dfn does not work in today’s world.  I’m in the real estate investment business and have been for decades.  Never have I witnessed real “ cap rates” this low.  We just sold a large apartment project in a tertiary market for the equivalent, depending on your inflation measure, of between -2% and -7%, “cap rate”.  Buyers must be expecting serious rent inflation or significant appreciation (which is a symptom of rental rate growth) or both.   God bless the buyers.  We’re definitely at the party and just hope no one shows up with a pin to poop the balloons.
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
I have a different theory as to why the Fed doesn’t care about these asset bubbles — they are good for pension funds and 401ks at a time when a fair chunk of the population is entering retirement. The Fed doesn’t need more problems with pension funds and 401ks so I predict they will continue to keep asset values on the high side over the next 10-15 years. You heard that right. But don’t expect that to keep up with inflation. It will simply be treading water for that period and this will convince more people who have the money and are eligible for retirement to take the plunge. The labor market will improve for younger college graduates because of this. 
Casual_Observer2020
Casual_Observer2020
2 years ago
Looks like ending UI really isn’t doing much. Only about 13 % of those unemployed because jobless benefits pay more.   Overall the US is a crappy place to work for multiple reasons and this is why people quitting with no job lined up is increasing. 
The Republican labor-shortage fix looks like a bust
·Senior Columnist
Fri, July 16, 2021, 8:32 AM·4 min read
There are probably some people who are sitting out the job market because they make more in jobless aid than they would from working. But research has consistently found this to be a much smaller slice of the unemployed than Republicans typically acknowledge. A link to morningconsult.com found that only 13% of unemployed Americans are jobless because benefits pay more. Other big reasons people aren’t working: child-care obligations, ongoing fears about Covid in the workplace, health limitations and lousy work options.

link to finance.yahoo.com

Markab
Markab
2 years ago
Funny how very astute people here actually think the CDC eviction moratorium will actually be allowed to expire on 31 July. It has already been extended several times. Despite no fewer than 5 federal courts striking it down as Unconstitutional, those judges either refused to act or issued a stay on the decision. So the Biden administration ordered the CDC to extend another month in June. The Supreme Court even went with a 5-4 decision not to act on the moratorium (likely because they thought as well that it would be ending soon) but a statement issued by Justice Roberts suggested that if the matter were to come to the Court via an Appealate decision, it is likely to be found to be overreach of the CDC’s authority and struck down. But we know how long these formal legal challenges can take, and so many people are benefitting from not paying their obligations and getting stimulus, especially people with kids who have become a modern day gold mine for the stimulus policies.
So–guess what? The moratorium will be extended yet again. I’d bet my entire 401(k) on it. This is no time for rules & laws…we need to keep pumping the stock and housing markets. Do it for the kids! And with COVID cases on the rise yet again, there’s the perfect excuse for the CDC to continue its streak of egregious federal law violations.
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
2 years ago
Reply to  Markab
In California is already extended to the end of September.
By that time the delta variant will be severe enough to generate enough panic for another full year extension.
You are not entirely wrong.
Blurtman
Blurtman
2 years ago
Now hold on, Mish.  Biden says his economic plan is working.
 “Planning a cookout this year? Ketchup on the news,” the White House tweeted. “According to the Farm Bureau, the cost of a 4th of July BBQ is down from last year. It’s a fact you must-hear(d). Hot dog, the Biden economic plan is working. And that’s something we can all relish.”
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Blurtman
Almost as embarrassing as a trump tweet.  Is this really the best we can do?
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
“The entire notion we need 2% inflation while ignoring asset bubbles that allegedly do not represent inflation is downright idiotic.”
———
But what forces will force a change to anything more reasonable?  The government computes inflation the way it does because it is beneficial for them to do it this way.  Why would they ever change?
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
So…longer term, rents have to go up to follow housing price increases, or nobody will rent houses anymore.. I accept that it could take years to catch up. In fact, my experience is that it does usually take years, but since this time a lot of landlord costs are starting to get really out of hand, I expect rents to rise  faster, although I don’t expect them to go as high (proportionally) as home sales have this last year.
I don’t intend to raise rents 20%. I think that’s more than the market will bear here.
I will discuss monetary inflation next week, so stay tuned.
I know the rise in reverse repos is not money creation per se, but I have heard it argued that they’re a symptom of stress, and that the NEXT step might be a LOT of money creation, all of a sudden, when credit locks up. The chart looks scary. I know you’ve looked at it.
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
Reverse repos are soaking up liquidity that is sloshing in the banking system, the opposite of money creation.
The clowns are still doing QE to the tune of 120B/month, but the money cannot be lent out productively by the institutions. The puny interest on reverse repos provide some returns, but has to be repeated daily as these transactions unwind.
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
Reverse repos are still Fed borrowing. It’s a liability on the Fed’s balance sheet, and they get cash for that from the member banks.
What if, instead of the prevailing wisdom that the Fed is “soaking up excess money” the real story is that the Fed is using that cash to continue to float the ongoing financing of the national debt, i.e. using it to buy more Treasuries.
It looks to me like an institutional version of using a new credit card to make minimum payments on the old credit card.
In the past few months, the Fed has put up more than a trillion dollars of its most valuable assets as collateral. If they can’t pay, then what happens?
That’s when printing money actually starts for real on a grand scale. 
Maximus_Minimus
Maximus_Minimus
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
“What if, instead of the prevailing wisdom that the Fed is “soaking up excess money” the real story is that the Fed is using that cash to continue to float the ongoing financing of the national debt, i.e. using it to buy more Treasuries.”
Yes. The FED is digitally printing money and buying treasuries and MBS, that’s the ongoing QE. The FED doesn’t need cash, it can print as much as it decides, unfortunately.
I am not sure what you mean by most valuable assets? Those assets are mostly treasuries.
Previously, during the financial panic, it bought a lot of garbage from banks, but then it re-inflated all assets, and could offload the garbage.
By removing debt ceilings, the treasuries have ironically become safer, until some black swan event. Let’s imagine, when the inflation cannot be hidden anymore…
Zardoz
Zardoz
2 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T
People can’t borrow rent money like they can mortgage money.  Going to be interesting to see what happens when all this unemployment cash dries up.
Intelligentyetidiot
Intelligentyetidiot
2 years ago
People couldnt increase rents because of the moratorium.
Rents will jump 15 to 20% as soon as the moratorium is lifted, there is very little rental available out there and tremendous demand.
Just give it 3 to 6 months and rental increases will be the story everywhere, … and those greedy landlords of course.
TechLover1
TechLover1
2 years ago
I am watching rents closely.
In one of my buildings, I have a one-bedroom unit and a three-bed unit. I was literally mobbed when I listed the smaller unit last month. Over 200 requests for showing in a week! The three-bed demand is almost non-existent. These two units are literally in the same building.
My theory is that singles and young population is out in force to move out of parent’s home and become independent. Families are still in wait and watch mode so demand is not present yet for larger units.
It is true that once moratorium on evictions is lifted, there will be a lot of demand but there will be a lot of supply too. I guess there will be a market for renting to evicted folks at higher rents although I am not sure if I want to play in that market.
I am watching this closely to see where this all settles in the next six months.
BTW, evictions will take six months or so as courts are completely backed up and will handle these cases very slowly. They will force both parties to go through mediation. Tenants will stay of course until it is all resolved so tenants will have a lot of leverage in these situations.
anoop
anoop
2 years ago
can’t argue with you on this one. 🙂

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.