The Fed Doubles Down on Mistakes Despite Rampant Speculation

Commitment to Blow Bubbles

The lead image is from Fed Holds Policy Steady as Economy Stumbles.

The Fed’s Lovey-Dovey All Around FOMC Statement shows the Fed’s commitment to blow bubbles is still intact.

Eight Key Takeaways

  1. Whatever It Takes: Undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain the federal
     funds rate in a target range of 0 to 1/4 percent.
  2. Full Range of Tools: The Federal Reserve is committed to using its full range of tools to support the
    U.S. economy in this challenging time, thereby promoting its maximum employment and price stability goals.
  3. Accommodative Financial Conditions: Overall financial
    conditions remain accommodative
    , in part reflecting policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and businesses. 
  4. Let Inflation Run Hot: With inflation running persistently below this longer-run goal, the Committee will aim to achieve inflation moderately above 2 percent for
    some time
    so that inflation averages 2 percent over time and longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored at 2 percent. 
  5. No End Date to Accommodative Stance: The Committee expects to maintain an
    accommodative stance of monetary policy until these outcomes are achieved.
  6. Pile on More QE:The Federal Reserve will continue to increase its
    holdings of Treasury securities by at least $80 billion per month and of agency mortgage-backed securities by at least $40 billion per month
    until substantial further progress has been made toward the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability goals.
  7. Roll Over QE Auction Proceeds: Roll over at auction all principal payments from the Federal Reserve’s
    holdings of Treasury securities and reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve’s holdings of agency debt and agency MBS in agency MBS.
  8. Set Low Primary Credit Rate: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
    voted unanimously to approve the establishment of the primary credit rate at the existing level of 0.25 percent.

Bubbles? 

In its statements, the Fed made no mention of the obvious bubbles it is blowing. Powell did take questions on speculation in the Q&A that followed. 

Price Stability

Fed chair Jerome Powell would not recognize price stability if it jumped out of the audience and spit grapefruit juice in his eye.

Somehow the Fed is wedded to a goal of 2% inflation with no explanation as to why the goal should be 2% in the first place.

The Fed’s commitment to 2% inflation is galling. It cannot see the rampant inflation right under its nose or it is purposely looking the other way.

Offsetting Errors

The idea that one can offset errors by further errors in the other direction is pure nonsense.

It’s as if a doctor said “For the last three months we gave you too little medicine so for the next three months we will give you too much.” 

No Economic Benefit to Inflation

My Challenge to Keynesians “Prove Rising Prices Provide an Overall Economic Benefit” has gone unanswered.

There is no economic benefit to inflation but there are winners and losers. The winners are those with first access to money, namely the banks and the already wealthy.

Asset Bubble Deflation

Consumer price Inflation may be tame, assuming you believe the CPI.

It’s asset bubble deflation that is damaging. 

Q&A on Bubbles

BIS Deflation Study

The BIS did a historical study and found routine price deflation was not any problem at all.

Deflation may actually boost output. Lower prices increase real incomes and wealth. And they may also make export goods more competitive,” stated the study.

For a discussion of the BIS study, please see Historical Perspective on CPI Deflations

Central banks’ seriously misguided attempts to defeat routine consumer price deflation is what fuels the destructive build up of unproductive debt and asset bubbles that eventually collapse.

The problem is not deflation, it’s the Fed’s misguided attempts to prevent it.

Asset bubbles in housing and speculation in stocks like GameStop are as obvious a Pinocchio’s nose. 

In the Q&A after the meeting, Powell dismissed asset bubbles saying they were based on speculation on vaccines and fiscal policy, not monetary policy.

I disagree. Interest rates are ridiculously low at 0.25%. Real interest rates are hugely negative, way more than widely believed factoring in housing prices. 

 The Fed is doubling down on mistakes.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

53 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Boot6761
Boot6761
3 years ago

Mish, for the past 4 years you have blamed Trump for many things…is he still at fault here? It’s a Big Club and we aint in it at the end of the day…When this bubble bursts there will be many many Close to Retiring boomers that will be very unhappy…and you know what…it shows that it doesn’t matter what party is in the White House…

markwood45
markwood45
3 years ago

markwood45
markwood45
3 years ago

George_Phillies
George_Phillies
3 years ago

We see this publicity about a few companies whose stocks are caught up in a short squeeze, courtesy of all this money sloshing about. Stock prices soar. At some point, the historical tendency is that the bubble will pop, people will start wanting to sell stock beyond what the short sellers want, and the price of the stock will fall, very rapidly. Of course, money is conserved so buy and selling stock simply determines in whose bank account the money resides.

However, there is a complication that has not yet had much attention. Some of these folks trying to squeeze the shorts have been buying on margin. As the price of the stock soared, their net worth soared, meaning the amount of stock they could buy might have gone up a lot. When the price of the stock crashes, the apocryphal 22 year old instead of having $2000 in the bank is apocryphally in debt to her broker for 1.2 million dollars.

If only one 22 year old had pulled this stunt, well, they have to convince the court that they will not in a reasonable time be able to pay off the debt, so they can go bankrupt.

However, the broker actually had to pay for all that stock, because the seller undoubtedly took the money and ran. When a scad of 22 year olds pull the same stunt, then depending on legal details it is perhaps like the 2009 financial crisis, except now instead of taking down the banks it is the brokerage houses who face difficulties.

Scooot
Scooot
3 years ago

This is partly why The Fed and other central banks are so paranoid about supporting financial markets. Their view is that we’ll all be much worse off if they allow the credit risk of the participants to play out with no aid. Although they’re digging a bigger hole. It’s an example of why holding bullion is better than gold etf’s, there’s no credit risk.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago

“The winners are those with first access to money, namely the banks and the already wealthy.”

And people who can qualify for a home mortgage. 30 year fixed rate money at 2.5%. As liabilities go, it’s a good one.

“”There is no economic benefit to inflation but there are winners and losers. The winners are those with first access to money, namely the banks and the already wealthy.”

And the homeowner and the owner of residential housing. If you have to pick being a winner or a loser I prefer being a winner. Not financial advice, Do your own DD.

Explains why housing is booming. One explanation anyway.

Tim E
Tim E
3 years ago

It’s irrelevant – the Stock Market is now UBI for working folks with 401K’s – like me. I’ve increased my contribution to 25% pre-tax because when I retire at 67 I’m going to want that income – consider the Fed’s manipulation of the markets as something similar to a public employees defined pension plan – except it’s for those of us not fortunate enough to win the public employee lottery/jackpot. Get in and enjoy the ride.

Call_Me
Call_Me
3 years ago

“The Fed Doubles Down on Mistakes Despite Rampant Speculation”

“There is no economic benefit to inflation but there are winners and losers. The winners are those with first access to money, namely the banks and the already wealthy.”

So the folks making the alleged mistakes are the ones that benefit? How sure are you that the actions should be classified as mistakes?

Johnson1
Johnson1
3 years ago

Marketcap of US homes increased over 2 trillion in 2020. Value of all homes is $36 Trillion.

Johnson1
Johnson1
3 years ago
Reply to  Johnson1

That is a lot of money. Total Mortgages equals $15.5 Trillion. So that is a pretty good assets to liability. Essentially there is $20 Trillion in equity.

bradw2k
bradw2k
3 years ago

Been listening to Fed Up. You know I think the Proud Boys attacked the wrong building in DC. Seriously populist revolts are springing up left and right, when does a ragtag group short squeeze the Fed?

njbr
njbr
3 years ago

And as for what is driving all this distortion….

From the NYT…

The monoclonal antibody treatment made by Eli Lilly is powerless against a variant of the coronavirus discovered in South Africa, according to a new study posted online on Tuesday.

In addition, one of two monoclonal antibodies in a cocktail treatment made by Regeneron also is significantly less effective against that variant, although the combination still works, researchers at Columbia University reported.

The findings underscore growing concerns that because of new mutations in its genetic material, this variant, called B.1.351, may be able to resist antibodies contained in these treatments and perhaps those created by the body following vaccination.

ColoradoAccountant
ColoradoAccountant
3 years ago

Why does the Fed hate savers? Why won’t the banks pay for savings? Why is money basically free? Because it has no value anymore?

RonJ
RonJ
3 years ago

“Fed chair Jerome Powell would not recognize price stability if it jumped out of the audience and spit grapefruit juice in his eye.

Somehow the Fed is wedded to a goal of 2% inflation with no explanation as to why the goal should be 2% in the first place.

The Fed’s commitment to 2% inflation is galling. It cannot see the rampant inflation right under its nose or it is purposely looking the other way.”

The FED has an agenda. The FED chairman doesn’t see what the FED chairman doesn’t want to see.

Bernanke was asked why the FED still kept gold. He answered, “tradition.”

Haze90
Haze90
3 years ago

Its a very speculative market when I bought GME and BBBY in July because I shop and like them apparently my shares made me a millionaire today but it was only 6000 between them originally. I literally am selling everything other than retirement too crazy.

Felix_Mish
Felix_Mish
3 years ago

Speaking of CPI inflation, as a thought experiment: Close down national borders for commerce. There are too many such noises out there for comfort. Talk about a global-cooling level disaster waiting to happen.

LawrenceBird
LawrenceBird
3 years ago

If the 10yr were at 5% where would S&P 500 be? I don’t think 3800!

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago

Betamax.

ajc1970
ajc1970
3 years ago

Blockbuster Video’s stock had its best day in over a decade.

You call it a bubble but I say that’s the market looking ahead.

VHS is coming back.

JJ Johnson
JJ Johnson
3 years ago
Reply to  ajc1970

Dummies fat fingering for BlackBerry buying blockbuster instead. So funny

JoeJohnson
JoeJohnson
3 years ago

Honestly I thought for today’s era this was pretty hawkish. No expansion of eligible debt? The train has left the station, even a ever so slight tightening will trigger meltdown in the economy.

Sechel
Sechel
3 years ago

The Fed is very clear, in their view the risk of economic slowdown exceeds the risk of a bubble. I don’t agree but their language and actions leave no doubt.

Mish
Mish
3 years ago

We Are All Transitory

Mandelabra
Mandelabra
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish

Whoah, deep.

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago

We are imitating China in just about every way now with dirt-cheap credit leading to financial and asset bubbles but also generating a booming economy, at least that’s the plan (or hope) now.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

Laissez le bon temps rouler.

Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

Let them leave you up in the air.

Let them brush you rock ‘n roll hair.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple

Hair is transitory.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

There is a tide in the affairs of men.
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
On such a full sea are we now afloat,
And we must take the current when it serves,
Or lose our ventures.

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

‘Tis well said again;
And ’tis a kind of good deed to say well:
And yet words are no deeds.

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

Let it roll!

FromBrussels
FromBrussels
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

Hey grenouille, what’s up ?…Long time no read !….Japan started the madness decades before China, have a look at the Nikkei chart….wouldn t be surprised if western and chinese stockmarkets go the same way rather sooner than later…with the housing bubble imploding big time… Let’s hope not of course but something is definitely rotten in the state of Danmark(Hamlet)..

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  FromBrussels

Hey Russian. I thought of putting Japan also but they inflated under a
world-deflationary environment. I don’t think we will get that this time around. Our situation looks more like China.

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

Also I am not frog. I just live here.

FromBrussels
FromBrussels
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

yes, know that by now…just kidding, ok ?

Doug78
Doug78
3 years ago

The FED is riding a tiger; we all are and we don’t know how it will end. The alternative would be mass unemployment in the developed wold leading to who-knows-what. Very few people believe in MMT and even fewer wanted it to be policy but with COVID there was no choice. In 2008 you could make a case of bailing out one sector and then depend on the trickle-down effect to bring back prosperity. Something like that now is out of the question. It’s going to be an interesting next ten years. Is that why Mish moved to Utah?

FromBrussels
FromBrussels
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug78

Utah …beach….Far from where you live ? Belle région !

Mish
Mish
3 years ago

The Q&A with Powell just ended. I put a link in the post.

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago

Low rate mortgage loans amortize a lot faster than high rate loans…..that’s another way to stack wealth using this cheap mortgage money…if I could get one more house right now…with say a 3.5% loan…that would probably make up for the higher current price I’d have to pay for the house…..in the long run. It would be an interesting math problem to look at that.

Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago

I don’t think he has a choice. Interest rates are effectively slightly negative. Pushing em lower will blow up US (world) capital markets. Only other way I see to keep this reflation game going is UBI. Otherwise asset prices crater as debtors go insolvent.

Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Jackula

real interest rates are enormously negative,

I have charts I am working on that show that

Jackula
Jackula
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish

Awesome! Can’t wait to see em!

Ol' Stevie
Ol’ Stevie
3 years ago
Reply to  Jackula

They’re more than “slightly” negative. Banks will soon charge for deposits paying no interest.

FromBrussels
FromBrussels
3 years ago
Reply to  Ol’ Stevie

Switzerland does …and european banks pay the ECB for euro deposits…only a matter of time for them to pass on the costs to the clients….

Ol' Stevie
Ol’ Stevie
3 years ago
Reply to  Jackula

They’re more than slightly negative; soon banks will charge for deposits on which no interest will be paid. Admittedly, they’re nearly there now.

Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
3 years ago

We’ve hit a permanently low plateau (flood plain???) on interest rates. Seriously, can anyone see the Fed raising rates ever again?

Tengen
Tengen
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple

Took them seven years to raise above zero last time, I’d expect it will take them even longer this time, if it ever happens!

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple

Only if inflation does run very hot…..and frankly I don’t see the drivers for that happening…but when you beg for it like they’re doing…..maybe…..

Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

Inflation is rampant but it’s not the CPI inflation the Fed is focused on

Eddie_T
Eddie_T
3 years ago
Reply to  Mish

Sorry. I do understand….I meant the Fed will be forced to raise rates if the CPI shows hot inflation for very long…..but I don’t think that’s really likely.

What would be the driver…..rapidly rising wages? Somehow I doubt that’s gonna happen. Not sure if raising the minimum wage would have much of an effect on CPI. I doubt it.

Mish
Mish
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

I agree – CPI inflation is not coming

Mr. Purple
Mr. Purple
3 years ago
Reply to  Eddie_T

Automation
AI
$15 minimum wage
Continuous outsourcing

Deflation in CPI as far as the eye can see.

Inflation in asset prices … but for how long now that the floor is in in interest rates?

Johnson1
Johnson1
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr. Purple

It will be hard to raise interest rates because it would take a bite out of the Federal Budget.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.