Trump’s Steel Tariffs Failed Miserably, Biden Should Scrap Them

Historic Shortages

Over 300 US manufacturers sent a Letter to Biden this month, protesting scarce metal materials and unsustainable prices.

 Manufacturers in the United States currently face historic shortages of readily available and globally priced steel and aluminum products at a time when the country is relying on our sector to help drive the economy and overcome the unprecedented challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The temporary increase of 4,800 steel industry jobs in the United States since 2018 recorded by the Bureau of Labor Statistics is not directly attributable to the Section 232 tariffs and is dwarfed by the 6.2 million American manufacturing jobs at risk in steel- and aluminum-using industries.  On some products, American businesses pay 40 percent more for similar steel compared to their European counterparts — an unsustainable situation for any U.S. employer.

Mr. President, we support a strong and thriving steel and aluminum industry, but producers today simply cannot meet demand and the tariffs create a tax that only manufacturers in the U.S. must pay.

Failed Tariffs

The WSJ comments on the letter to Biden.

High prices, low supplies, and financial records for steel makers: It sounds like a perfect time to end Mr. Trump’s tariffs. The latest jobs report said manufacturing employment fell 18,000 in April. It’s 515,000 below the pre-Covid mark of February 2020. With the stroke of an auto-pen, Mr. Biden could lift the burden of 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminum, helping the economy emerge from the pandemic. So what is he waiting for?

Make US Steel Jobs Great Again

Trump thought he could make steel jobs great again. 

He failed. Moreover, Trump had to lie to get those tariffs. 

National Security Ruse

Trump labeled steel production a national security item. He said the same thing about Volkswagen car imports.

His National Security Tariff Ruse was so bad the Pentagon would not even go along.

In an undated memo released to the media, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis wrote that “imports of foreign steel and aluminum based on unfair trading practices impair the national security.” But he added that, “As noted in both Section 232 reports, however, the U.S. military requirements for steel and aluminum each only represent about three percent of U.S. production. Therefore, DoD does not believe that the findings in the reports impact the ability of DoD programs to acquire the steel or aluminum necessary to meet national defense requirements.”

US Manufacturing Employment

Don’t blame NAFTA. Manufacturing jobs peaked 15 years before NAFTA then rose for a number of years after NAFTA.

Jobs are down because productivity is up, globally. 

Trump’s Tariff Failure

Trump repeatedly said tariffs are good and trade wars are easy to win.

He failed miserably. 

If Biden tries, to make US steel jobs great again, he will fail too.

Biden Reversal?

Biden should reverse Trump’s policy now.

Will he? 

Unfortunately, I doubt it. Biden will not want to upset his union pals even though it is crystal clear the tariffs are net damaging to US consumers and businesses.

Mish 

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eddie_T
Eddie_T
2 years ago
He’s gonna dance with them what brung him.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Mish is a Libertarian and is therefore against all tariffs by principle.
SyTuck
SyTuck
2 years ago
Reply to  Doug78
Sounds like a good plan.
Doug78
Doug78
2 years ago
Reply to  SyTuck
Yes in theory like the perfectly spherical cow.
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
It’s not only steel and aluminium the tariffs affect, EU member states implemented retaliatory measures with rebalancing tariffs on a range of US imports. Canada also implemented tariffs on other goods. As well as tariffs affecting such imports the dollar has fallen making them even more expensive. At least the Fed will be happy with such contributions towards their inflation target.
Dutoit
Dutoit
2 years ago
Reply to  Scooot
As long as EU does not impose taxes on US bourbon, I dont’ mind
Scooot
Scooot
2 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
I think they’ve scotched that idea.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
“Don’t blame NAFTA. Manufacturing jobs peaked 15 years before NAFTA then rose for a number of years after NAFTA.”

Well, that is because NAFTA was *not* the first nail in the coffin.   It was MFN for PRC (China), later renamed as PNTR.    Manufacturing jobs peaked in 1979, the year before China got MFN status.   

Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
I will do some charts on that idea
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
A lot of other things happened in this decade (70s) besides MFN for China.
As a kid in the 70s I recall lots of small manufacturers in my small home town (50K) in Canada. Most things were done locally (bottling coke/pepsi, milk, canning goods from farms, printing newspapers/flyers etc). But by 1990 all were gone and that’s not because of China. Instead we got massive improvements in transportation (refrigerated trucks/trains allowed goods to be canned/bottled far away and brought to your hometown cheaper than done locally especially as highways and rail lines constantly improved) so manufacturing starting going on in huge scale operations in major cities like Toronto/Montreal instead of small scale in every town.
The other is the rise of the microprocessor. By 1980 automation was really taking off. Anyone old enough to remember that I love Lucy skit where she works on a manufacturing line will know what I’m taking about (I also remember school trips to GM plants in Oshawa in the late 70s and seeing the huge numbers of workers on the assembly lines as everything was done by hand). Microprocessor development in the 70’s allowed automation to take off so that you needed way fewer humans on the assembly lines not just in cars but in canned goods, bottled goods (by 1990 those same assembly lines were mostly robots with just a few humans needed for some steps).
A lot of jobs were just automated away in the 80’s and that’s likely the decline from 1980-1994 on your graph (pre-NAFTA) which would represent a rise in productivity.
whirlaway
whirlaway
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
It was not just the bottling and canning jobs that went away;  it was also the manufacturing jobs that produced light and heavy machinery, steel, automobiles etc.   And the jobs didn’t just go to the nearest big town/city.  They went right out of the country.  The devastation was noticeable as early as 1984.   During the presidential campaign that year was probably the first time the term “Rust Belt” was used (at the start, it was called the “Rust Bowl”) to describe the regions that were destroyed by the early years of Reaganomics.
And of course, it was not just outsourcing and offshoring.   Towns like Lancaster, PA (home of the Anchor glass company) were hit by something much closer to home: Wall Street.  Capitalism was replaced by financial engineering – another “achievement” of Reaganomics that thoroughly ruined the country – and continues to do so to this day.

(And make no mistake, a lot of this devastation was bipartisan.   BJ Clinton made more of Reagan’s dreams come true – NAFTA, Crime Bill, gutting of social safety nets, financial deregulation, media and telecom deregulation etc.) than any Republican was able to, including Reagan himself).

TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  whirlaway
Japan, not China was the country that ate up most of the jobs that disappeared in the 80’s. Especially in Steel and Cars, the new Japanese plants built from the ground up in Japan after WWII were vastly better than the old outdated plants here from the 1920s and earlier. To compete, the plants here had to modernize too which meant more robots/automation which meant there were less workers needed even here. But the jobs weren’t really outsourced like we think of today where GM (or Apple) builds a factory in China to make cars to ship here for sale. That idea didn’t really become popular until after NAFTA was signed in 94 and companies realized the value of making things overseas (that’s when ‘made in China’ took off)
Reaganomics definitely didn’t cause the Rust Belt because the same thing happened in Canada without Reagan or Reaganomics. North America was complacent after WWII since they were the only game in town in terms of manufacturing for several decades while Europe and Japan were rebuilding after WWII.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.