It’s not only steel and aluminium the tariffs affect, EU member states implemented retaliatory measures with rebalancing tariffs on a range of US imports. Canada also implemented tariffs on other goods. As well as tariffs affecting such imports the dollar has fallen making them even more expensive. At least the Fed will be happy with such contributions towards their inflation target.
“Don’t blame NAFTA. Manufacturing jobs peaked 15 years before NAFTA then rose for a number of years after NAFTA.”
Well, that is because NAFTA was *not* the first nail in the coffin. It was MFN for PRC (China), later renamed as PNTR. Manufacturing jobs peaked in 1979, the year before China got MFN status.
A lot of other things happened in this decade (70s) besides MFN for China.
As a kid in the 70s I recall lots of small manufacturers in my small home town (50K) in Canada. Most things were done locally (bottling coke/pepsi, milk, canning goods from farms, printing newspapers/flyers etc). But by 1990 all were gone and that’s not because of China. Instead we got massive improvements in transportation (refrigerated trucks/trains allowed goods to be canned/bottled far away and brought to your hometown cheaper than done locally especially as highways and rail lines constantly improved) so manufacturing starting going on in huge scale operations in major cities like Toronto/Montreal instead of small scale in every town.
The other is the rise of the microprocessor. By 1980 automation was really taking off. Anyone old enough to remember that I love Lucy skit where she works on a manufacturing line will know what I’m taking about (I also remember school trips to GM plants in Oshawa in the late 70s and seeing the huge numbers of workers on the assembly lines as everything was done by hand). Microprocessor development in the 70’s allowed automation to take off so that you needed way fewer humans on the assembly lines not just in cars but in canned goods, bottled goods (by 1990 those same assembly lines were mostly robots with just a few humans needed for some steps).
A lot of jobs were just automated away in the 80’s and that’s likely the decline from 1980-1994 on your graph (pre-NAFTA) which would represent a rise in productivity.
It was not just the bottling and canning jobs that went away; it was also the manufacturing jobs that produced light and heavy machinery, steel, automobiles etc. And the jobs didn’t just go to the nearest big town/city. They went right out of the country. The devastation was noticeable as early as 1984. During the presidential campaign that year was probably the first time the term “Rust Belt” was used (at the start, it was called the “Rust Bowl”) to describe the regions that were destroyed by the early years of Reaganomics.
And of course, it was not just outsourcing and offshoring. Towns like Lancaster, PA (home of the Anchor glass company) were hit by something much closer to home: Wall Street. Capitalism was replaced by financial engineering – another “achievement” of Reaganomics that thoroughly ruined the country – and continues to do so to this day.
(And make no mistake, a lot of this devastation was bipartisan. BJ Clinton made more of Reagan’s dreams come true – NAFTA, Crime Bill, gutting of social safety nets, financial deregulation, media and telecom deregulation etc.) than any Republican was able to, including Reagan himself).
Japan, not China was the country that ate up most of the jobs that disappeared in the 80’s. Especially in Steel and Cars, the new Japanese plants built from the ground up in Japan after WWII were vastly better than the old outdated plants here from the 1920s and earlier. To compete, the plants here had to modernize too which meant more robots/automation which meant there were less workers needed even here. But the jobs weren’t really outsourced like we think of today where GM (or Apple) builds a factory in China to make cars to ship here for sale. That idea didn’t really become popular until after NAFTA was signed in 94 and companies realized the value of making things overseas (that’s when ‘made in China’ took off)
Reaganomics definitely didn’t cause the Rust Belt because the same thing happened in Canada without Reagan or Reaganomics. North America was complacent after WWII since they were the only game in town in terms of manufacturing for several decades while Europe and Japan were rebuilding after WWII.
Stay Informed
Subscribe to MishTalk
You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.
Well, that is because NAFTA was *not* the first nail in the coffin. It was MFN for PRC (China), later renamed as PNTR. Manufacturing jobs peaked in 1979, the year before China got MFN status.
(And make no mistake, a lot of this devastation was bipartisan. BJ Clinton made more of Reagan’s dreams come true – NAFTA, Crime Bill, gutting of social safety nets, financial deregulation, media and telecom deregulation etc.) than any Republican was able to, including Reagan himself).