Ukraine Unexpectedly Strikes Back, Sinks at Least One Large Russian Supply Ship

Image clip from Wall Street Journal Video

Ukraine Unexpectedly Strikes Back

The Wall Street Journal reports Ukraine Strikes Russian Navy as War Enters Second Month

That link is not paywalled so you can click to watch the video. Here are a few snips.

Ukraine said it struck the Russian-occupied port facilities in the Azov Sea city of Berdyansk Thursday, setting off a large fire and hitting a Russian warship as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization pledged additional help for Kyiv.

Seized by Russia in the first week of the war that began a month ago, Berdyansk has become a major logistics hub for Russian forces. Footage from the area showed smoke billowing from the berthing area and secondary explosions from the detonating ammunition.

The attack in Berdyansk, nearly 100 miles from the main front line in southern Ukraine apart from the besieged Ukrainian port in Mariupol, is a sign Kyiv has retained significant military capabilities as it pursues a large-scale conventional war against Russian forces.

Footage from Berdyansk also showed two smaller Russian ships fleeing the port after the explosions, one of them on fire.

Before Thursday’s strike, Ukraine managed to inflict severe damage on the Russian navy personnel in the Azov area. Moscow has acknowledged that Ukrainian troops killed the deputy commander of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, Navy Capt. Andrey Paliy, and the commander of the fleet’s 810th Marine Infantry Brigade, Col. Aleksey Sharov, both of whom were recently operating in the Mariupol area.

Western analysts expected Ukraine to fall within a couple of weeks, possibly even a few days. 

It’s now been over a month and the Russian advance on the capital city Kyiv has been stalled for weeks. 

Another military surprise occurred today with the missile attack hitting at least one large ship. Ukraine has not disclosed how it hit the ship or with what weapons. 

Reports first said Ukraine hit the ship Orsk. Now the reports named the targeted ship as Saratov. Other smaller ships were hit as well. 

Looking Ahead

There is no logical end to this war. Putin cannot easily back down and as long as the West supplies weapons to Ukraine, the fight will go on. 

Ukraine and Russia provide close to a third of global wheat exports and planting season is about to start.

Anyone who thinks rate hikes will cure these inflation shocks isn’t thinking clearly.

Hard Landing or Very Hard Landing

What Can the Fed Do About the Price of Food, Medicine, Gasoline, or Rent?

The answer is nothing or next to nothing. Rates hikes will not impact inelastic items.

For discussion, please see What Can the Fed Do About the Price of Food, Medicine, Gasoline, or Rent?

This post originated at MishTalk.Com.

Thanks for Tuning In!

Please Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

If you have subscribed and do not get email alerts, please check your spam folder.

Mish

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

73 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
wmjack50
wmjack50
2 years ago
We have learned that Cheap drones and shoulder fired weapons can defeat multi million dollar systems!!!What will our military Industrial complex in the USA sell congress now? ? We have learned that terrorists can defeat our multi million dollar systems with cheap systems as well. We have learned that the Russian army is inept and under trained and not the supper power the DC elites sell the American people to fear. So cut the military budget
JRM
JRM
2 years ago
I’m call this BS, yes they hit a ship but who’s..
After all many of the HEROIC Ukrainian DEAD are showing up alive!!!
Siliconguy
Siliconguy
2 years ago
Reply to  JRM
It’s supposedly one of these.
4,000 tons, not that big.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  Siliconguy
A lot bigger than a single tank!
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  JRM
No idea exactly what happened in this specific case, but as the Houthis in Yemen are demonstrating, it is becoming very hard to prevent even seriously bombed out (even starving) people, from reaching out pretty far, with drones and the like.
Ukrainian soldiers/militants will pretty much certainly have an easier time procuring the kit required to do so, than the Houthis are.
While at the same time, Russians will find it awfully hard to hammer what will inevitably be mostly civilian Ukrainians, nearly as hard as what the Saudi/International-Community-blah-blah coalition is doing to Yemenis.
With any luck, tech such at that, will allow all people, in all societies, to be more effectively armed. Since, after all, armed societies are polite ones. While, conversely: Unarmed ones; despite what self promoting clowns who insist it is OK that they themselves have arms which others don’t inevitably insist on; aren’t.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
Everyone needs personal armed drones! That seems like a solution.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Nt A solution. THE solution.
Not everyone needs to have them, first thing as they wakeup in the morning, period. But everyone needs to have fundamentally EQUAL ACCESS to them. Such that they end up dispersed among what amounts to a representative sample of the people. Instead of only among systemically skewed samples as non representative as Putin, MBS, Trump and others of that ilk.
In the dying language of Literatese, as practiced by the US Founders, it’s referred to as ensuring government exists to serve the people. Rather than just some tiny clique of leeching garbage, whose only defining trait is that they exist at the very bleeding edge of self righteous scumminess and illiteracy.
FrankieCarbone
FrankieCarbone
2 years ago
This is gonna dump a ton of egg on the faces of the “Russia Evil, America Good” crowd. How the heck are they going to be able to back-walk their litany of “pulled-out-of-their-backside” ignorant nonsense without someone like me, licking my chops, to savage them? And trust me, I will..
JJ Johnson
JJ Johnson
2 years ago
At these prices I may just take the family farm out of CRP, pay the penalty & put some crops in the ground.
Carl_R
Carl_R
2 years ago
This is not the first Russian warship the Ukrainians have sunk. The first one was the vessel involved in the Snake Island incident, where there the Ukranians told them to “Go ____ yourself”. The Ukranians lured it close to shore with a smaller vessel, where a hidden missile batter unloaded on it:
JRM
JRM
2 years ago
Reply to  Carl_R
NATO/US has not confirmed this PROPAGANDA!!
Since the US have assets in the Black Sea this should have been easily confirmed.
So I’m calling BS on this story too!!!
FrankieCarbone
FrankieCarbone
2 years ago
Reply to  JRM
Like the “Ghost of Ukraine” who shot down dozens of Russians, but never existed? Or the 12 “brave” men on Snake Island who told a Russian Frigrate to F themselves when told to surrender and were promptly martyred? Except that it turned out to be 85, and all were alive as they surrendered and were seen on Russian TV?
People are so damn credulous.
caradoc-again
caradoc-again
2 years ago
The fact Lavrov used the idea of a disintegrating Russia as not something the West would want to see tells everyone that is precisely what the Russian elite see as a very real possibility.
Putin has buggered Russia for years to come. At any moment the Chinese can do whatever they want and know Russia is in no state to stop them. Meanwhile Finland and Sweden can join NATO and give up neutrality due to Putins dumb action. He couldn’t have made a much worse move whilst Russin demographics limit his pool to call upon.
A great shame and anyone following Putin will end regretting it.
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
2 years ago
Reply to  caradoc-again
Russia bad….America good !
ZZR600
ZZR600
2 years ago
In completely fail to understand Russia’s strategy. They could have turned off the oil and gas to Europe before Christmas and likely achieved their desired outcome without all the death and destruction that has ensued. As it stands their economic hit is far worse, not even mentioning the destruction of Ukraine and of their army
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  ZZR600
They need the incoming revenue! Whew.
ZZR600
ZZR600
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
My point is that incoming revenue is now being severely curtailed as a result of the war. End result is the same, no Russian energy supplies to Western Europe, but via sanctions rather than by stopping supply.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  ZZR600
Ukraine and Russia is so close, that there is bound to be an enormous amount of intelligence leaks both ways. Chances are, it appeared (at least to notoriously paranoid Russians) that the Ukrainian government were getting close enough, likely by pressured from the US, to crossing a line; say surprise NATO application; which would make things much harder for Russia going forward. The Russians may have a harder time than expected now, but just imagine if Ukraine was already in line for NATO membership….
ZZR600
ZZR600
2 years ago
Reply to  StukiMoi
I understand that, but Russia could have cranked up the pressure a lot more without resorting to war. They could have restricted exports of energy and commodities, demanded payment in Roubles or gold, basically a lot of the stuff they’ve been forced to do now as a result of sanctions. This economic pressure may have yielded results. As it stands, they seem to have gone into this war totally unprepared militarily, psychologically and economically.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  ZZR600
From the Russian POV, Nord Stream 2 was hatched, to a large extent, as a way of cranking up that pressure.
With the pipelines through Ukraine operating smoothly, the required capacity for transporting gas to Europe, was already in place. NS2 was largely about cutting out dependence on the Ukrainians.
Pre invasion, Neither Russia nor Germany were entirely comfortable being at the mercy of what both viewed as Ukrainian “gangsters” and “nazis.” Now Germany have obviously reevaluated who they feel represents the bigger threat…. At least temporarily.
The ones most concerned about Ukraine suddenly having to pay heed to Russia, in order to get gas, were the clique of Ukranians able to leverage their position on the energy delivery map for influence ad profit, and cliques in Washington. As well as, longer term, Netanyahu and his gallery of East Med Pipeline backers. Not Western Europeans, who were/are rather cold to any Eastern Europeans.
Chances are; I’m just speculating; Russia was becoming aware that some combination of US and Israeli interests were getting closer to rope their suddenly favorite comedian in.
As far as Europe is concerned, NS2 would have been vastly preferable to this mess. Ditto most Ukranians. It’s not as if their rank and file were getting any of the spoils flowing from sitting on a chokepoint of energy delivery.
It’s mainly the combination of Cold-War-Carreerists and weapons-and-influece-peddlers in Washington; who benefits, above all, from propagating the memes that “Russia is in decline” and “Russian arms and alliances aren’t as good as ours.” While a pipeline of East Med gas to Greece, dependent on Israel for security, would serve to tie Europeans’ hands wrt Israel criticism.
thimk
thimk
2 years ago
RUSSIA stops tank production because of supply chain shortages . crazy stuff – take that russia /s
elon musks starlink guides drones
JRM
JRM
2 years ago
Reply to  thimk
You mean the US MSM that’s been lying for years about EVERYTHING RUSSIA RELATED!!!!
RUSSIAN COLLUSION!!!!
Call_Me
Call_Me
2 years ago
Why would any of this be unexpected? This isn’t a war from history, there isn’t total annihilation with ‘scorched earth’ policy as invaders roll across the countryside obliterating everything and everyone in their path. One side has larger targets and has to operate in the open, the other is dispersed and largely in urban areas that may or may not have a significant civilian presence — not unlike many recent U.S. operations (most here know how those have gone).
Now that there has largely been a pivot from Syria and Afghanistan, Ukraine looks like it will be the new dumping ground for smaller arms that will ‘unexpectedly’ show up in the hands of unfriendlies in the future.
Those invaders at the fronts are probably as enthusiastic as Americans were in Iraq – dejectedly trying to figure out why they are there and wondering what condition they will be in when the are cleared to go home.
Call_Me_Al
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
like nixon hired don rumsfeld and dick cheney to run the “price control board”, to tame inflation under his guns and butter policies, sleepy joe could do the same. obviously sarcasm. you are correct mish. haven’t read this entirely but looks perfect. anyone who thinks Ds or Rs are different i really want to keep investing and betting on politics. like playing in a poker game with suckers. link to theatlantic.com
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Is Putin running out of military leaders? Best to cut and run and live to see another day.
———
Putin loses 15th top commander in Ukraine invasion as Russia suffers worst deaths among top brass since World War Two
Mar 22 2022
Irondoor
Irondoor
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
All these “top commanders” are part of the klepto class of senior officers. The military is actually looked down on in Russia, with the security services getting higher status, salaries, etc. because of Putin’s need to have tight security and police to control the population. In one list of dead from a city, the most common name was Mohammed. Only one ethnic Russian on the list. Troops are preyed upon, morale is rock bottom.
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  Irondoor
Then put this in your pipe and smoke it.
——-
The heads begin to roll in Russia
The Hill
03/22/22
European media report that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the house arrest of two senior Federal Security Service (FSB) officers. Colonel-General Sergei Beseda, Chief of the FSB’s “Fifth Service,” reportedly was detained along with his deputy, Anatoly Bolyuk, charged with providing flawed intelligence about Ukraine and their improper use of operational funds. Separately, Oleksiy Danilov, Ukraine’s national security council chief, claimed that several Russian generals have been fired. The implications portend more suffering yet to come, but likewise opportunities to increase pressure on the Russian leader from within.
Perhaps emulating Joseph Stalin, this could be the onset of a purge and Putin’s desperate ploy to provide his domestic audience with a fall guy for self-inflicted wounds. His call to rid Russia of “scum and traitors” as “a necessary self-purification of society” might be Putin’s theatrical unveiling of not merely a further crackdown against the Russian people, but also his version of a “cultural revolution” to bring further to heel those around him on whom he has counted to take and maintain power. If I were one of the oligarchs or “siloviki,” those from Russia’s intelligence services who profiteered on Putin’s kleptocracy, I’d be more than just a little worried.
….
randocalrissian
randocalrissian
2 years ago
Thank heavens our poor beleaguered MIC is minting fresh profits from all these death vessels we’re vending.
ILHawk
ILHawk
2 years ago
How could you begin to make this stuff up.
Sitting US President who as VP positioned himself against Russian financially leading to a war in Donbas.
Russian President who didn’t know he had no clothes for the operation.
Nicest people in the world with an incredibly corrupt Govt (Ukraine)
8 years ago a military so weak they had to rely on Militia of the Nazi perspective
Govt so fragile they needed 25,000 people of Sovoda and Right Sector persuasion to form a pro Ukraine Coalition
A President (Pro Russian) that was force out by militia which in part was driven by Russian efforts to keep pro Russian leaders in power
A hero President that dances in high heels and played a… well that story is old.
A rag tag Army fighting for years against Boris and Natasha (Rocky and Bullwinkel) and sometimes Russian troops transformed
US 101st Airborne soldiers pictured training AZOV which were wearing Swastikas
An airliner shot down due to Royal Dutch Shell/Burisma/Biden
Incredible heroism soldiers and civilians
15 percent of a population fleeing the country and many more displaced.
Russian generals getting popped right and left by who knows which side.
Either side endanger of collapse.
US right wingers in part siding with Vlad
Left wingers pumping arms into the battlefield
Threat of WW3 with Nukes
Everyday people in the US, Ukraine, and around the world with a giant huh?
Irondoor
Irondoor
2 years ago
Reply to  ILHawk
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. As long as they are killing Russians by the boat-load, give them more guns and ammo.
Irondoor
Irondoor
2 years ago
In reading commentary about the Russian army, it appears that a majority of the troops are from the poorer ethnic areas of Russia and are bearing the cost of Putin’s escapade. These young men are bribed with a bit of money and have to sign contracts. They get very little training and were lied to about this war. Someone posted a long list of soldiers who had been killed. The most common name was Mohammed. Ukraine is now offering rewards for Russian soldiers to defect. $10,000 per soldier. Up to $1,000,000 if you bring an airplane or helicopter. $500,000 for a tank. Some are shooting themselves in the leg or foot so as to get sent back home. The feared Chechens are a non-factor. Remember, when an Army goes to war, it is usually about a 10 to 1 ratio of support troops to actual front-line fighters. All the Ukranians are on the line.
As unbelievable as it may sound, it is possible for the Ukranians to not only fight Russia to a standstill, but to win in a long war. Russia has shown that its so-called “2nd best military in the world” is a paper tiger. They are exposed for poor quality of equipment, communications, training, and most of all, troop morale. And, it seems that the west has cracked the Russian communication network or have moles inside Russian security.
The key to Ukrainian success is for the west to provide them with everything they need. They still have MiG’s, but these will be degraded due to losses and inability to obtain parts and maintenance. They need more modern surface-to-air missile systems and radar. As it is, the Russians have to attack at night and at low level due to the fact they still don’t have air superiority after a month.
Biden and the Europeans need to start talking about a Ukraine victory. Don’t encourange Ukraine to surrender and compromise since that will always be in Russia’s favor. Get as many civilians out as possible and let the Army and volunteers fight to the end. How much worse can it get for Ukraine?
By point of reference, I am a Vietnam veteran of two tours flying combat missions in both the south and north. Based on my experience, Russia cannot win this war by bombing and firing long-range artillery and missiles.
Business Man
Business Man
2 years ago
Reply to  Irondoor
This was a great reply. Thank you for sharing. My dad was a Vietnam vet — paratrooper with a purple heart. He’s no longer here, so I always appreciate the stories and perspectives of veterans of that war (or, Conflict, if we’re going to use official terms).
The most informative part of your reply is the potential to bribe Russians to defect — with equipment. This is ingenious. $1MM to a rural, poor farmer is a heck of a lot of money — and you get out of oppressive Russia. In the scheme of the costs of war, this is a pittance, and you get a piece of equipment to boot.
StukiMoi
StukiMoi
2 years ago
Reply to  Irondoor
“Get as many civilians out as possible and let the Army and volunteers fight to the end.”
Without civilians serving as de facto shields, the Russians could level “the Army and volunteers” in short order. They’re not lacking for firepower to do so. What they are lacking, is the ability to do so without racking up intolerable civilian casualties in the process. It’s why it’s so easy to take uninhabited, open areas. But near impossible to even contemplate entering and taking cities, unless your “overmatch” is more akin to what Israel enjoys in Palestine, or the LAPD in Compton, than what Russia enjoys in Ukraine.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Irondoor
The Russian counter to that of course is to prevent civilians from leaving (so far both sides have allowed them to leave in designated corridors) and cut off food supplies and create a humanitarian crisis until Ukraine surrenders. All they have to do is destroy all food supplies everywhere. It’s not nice and will lead to howls of protest in the west but it will be 100% effective because the Ukrainian president would be under huge pressure to not let millions starve to death. A nuclear accident at one of the many nuclear plants could be thrown in for good measure…
As far as the bribes go, how could any soldier be confident they’d get their 500K or more AND be able to keep it along with their life? I’d imagine exactly none of them would get to keep that 500+K and enjoy a wonderful retirement someplace.
JRM
JRM
2 years ago
Reply to  Irondoor
So I’m assuming the names are being released by Ukraine??
Which of course has not reason to “LIE”!!
Ukraine hast a great PROPAGANDA machine that is playing the West Press like a fiddle!!!!
Like posting videos from games to claim victory against Russia..
Releasing videos of ZELENSKY before the Russian invasion to claim ZELENSKY is doing this and doing that while under attack by Russia!!
FromBrussels
FromBrussels
2 years ago
Reply to  Irondoor
Yeah sure…. 10K $….and their nuts cut off …
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
A couple of good articles.
——–
I’m the Prime Minister of Estonia. Putin Can’t Think He’s Won This War.
March 24, 2022, 1:00 a.m. ET
By Kaja Kallas – Ms. Kallas is the prime minister of Estonia.
AND
Why Is Europe Still Buying Oil From Putin?
March 24, 2022, 1:00 a.m. ET
By Oleg Ustenko – Mr. Ustenko is an economic adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
The war’s not over so it’s impossible to state who has won and who as lost. Even when there is a cease fire it may take years to figure out who really won the war in the long term and it’s possible no one ‘wins’ and that everyone on the whole is a loser.
caradoc-again
caradoc-again
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
The fact Lavrov used the idea of a disintegrating Russia as not something the West would want to see tells everyone that is precisely what the Russian elite see as a very real possibility.
Putin has buggered Russia for years to come. At any moment the Chinese can do whatever they want and know Russia is in no state to stop them. Meanwhile Finland and Sweden can join NATO and hive up neutrality due to Putins dumb action.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
you are a wise person.
Dr. Odyssey
Dr. Odyssey
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
It’s complicated.
France’s TotalEnergies ‘unable to end’ Russian gas purchases…
Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
The Russian economy is decimated. More and more Western companies are withdrawing from Russia. People who depended on Western “status” items cannot be happy with Putin’s folly.
———
No Longer in Russia
More than 400 companies have withdrawn, at least temporarily, from Russia since it invaded Ukraine. Some have been there since the fall of communism — symbols of the enduring power of Western culture and commerce.
Six000mileyear
Six000mileyear
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
Private companies ceasing to do business in/ with Russia is so much better than elected officials initiating boycotts and embargoes.
hmk
hmk
2 years ago
Mish, do you think the feds should not hike? I understand that hiking rates will not affect some prices, but overall it will reduce demand. They can’t keep suppressing rates, especailly now, without more inflationary pressures mounting. I have heard ancedotally that two builders in my area are not building new homes as the price pressures have made them unaffordable and their margins are sinking fast.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  hmk
I do not believe there should be a Fed.
If there was no Fed rates would not have gotten as low as they did as long as they did blowing bubbles.
There should not have been QE.
But there is $9T of it.
OK from where we are what should the Fed do?
That’s harder to say: Possibly shrink its balance sheet to $0 in 6 months, hike rates 50 BPs. Then let the recession stew for a while, announcing no more asset bubbles.
Apologize to the nation for being a bunch of group think clowns who don’t understand inflation.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
as long as the West supplies weapons to Ukraine
So, is their any evidence that weapons are being supplied to forward based units?
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
What kind of evidence are you expecting to find? You think someone is going to analyze spent shell casings from a machine gun and say it came from NATO?
Most of the supplies will be small arms (guns, bullets) because Ukraine would have run out of those long ago.
Dutoit
Dutoit
2 years ago
I think that the only goal of Russia is to get the east of Ukraine (Russian speaking zone). Once this is achieved, it will be very difficult for the rest of Ukraine to do anything.
Johnson1
Johnson1
2 years ago
Spot on regarding the FED and home buying.
Inventory is so low in my metro. I looked yesterday. 1754 Single family homes for sale in a metro of 2.2 million. 594 are new construction homes and they all start at $500k and up. I would say the average is around $575k for new construction. The medium family income in the area is about $68k so no way can most families afford a new construction home.
Last month there were 2500 homes for sale. So inventory dropped a lot.
If I add condos and townhouses there are 1950 for sale.
If I look at affordable housing units under $400k that include SFH, condos, multi-family, there are only 600 homes for a metro of 2.2 million. This is in flyover country.
FYI – Normal inventory is 8k to 10k.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  Johnson1
thanks for that info.
dbannist
dbannist
2 years ago
Of all of the problems in the news lately I personally believe the biggest story is the shortage of fertilizer (primarily caused by oil costs).

That fertilizer shortage isn’t a massive news story yet, but it will be.

Jojo
Jojo
2 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
Fertilizer isn’t difficult to make. With the competition hamstrung, opening up new manufacturingplants makes sense. For example:
=========
‘People are begging us to sell.’ Africa’s richest man opens huge fertilizer plant as food crisis looms
By Stephanie Busari, CNN
Thu March 24, 2022
dbannist
dbannist
2 years ago
Reply to  Jojo
It’s not difficult to make. It’s difficult to afford. Big difference.
Johnson1
Johnson1
2 years ago
I just came across this gem posted by the Banque of France about a year ago. They are basically saying the there is really no limits to the size of the central banks balance sheet. BOJ is at 130% of GDP, the ECB is at 61%, and the FED is at 35%.
So in theory, the FED could increase the balance sheet to $26 trillion (Japans GDP%) and be okay. This is starting to gather some steam where the Central banks just print money and give it to citizens. (MMT)
————————————————————
What are the limits?

In theory and in accounting terms, there are no direct limits to the size of a central bank’s balance sheet. The fact that the Bank of Japan’s balance sheet now stands at 130% of GDP illustrates this point. Unlike other economic agents, central banks are able to adjust the level of their assets without any immediate limit, by issuing reserves to finance their securities purchases or the provision of refinancing (Barthelemy and penalver (2020)).

However, the growth in central banks’ balance sheets is not an objective in itself. It reflects the implementation of policies for the purpose of reaching an objective: in the Eurosystem, it is the return to inflation close to 2%. Asset purchases and the parameters of liquidity-providing operations are calibrated according to this price stability objective.

Johnson1
Johnson1
2 years ago
Reply to  Johnson1
Here is their link explaining Central Banks 101.
Although central banks have a special role, they are still banks. They issue financial liabilities and hold financial assets. They are generally owned by their governments and their net profits are regularly transferred to the Treasury through dividends. The consolidated balance sheet of the central banks of the euro zone is published every week by the European Central Bank (ECB).
Central banks issue two important types of liabilities

Central banks issue two important types of liabilities, which comprise the monetary base: bank notes in circulation and deposit and current accounts.

Bank notes – the euro bills in your wallet – are printed by central banks. They are sold to retail banks on demand in exchange for interest-bearing claims so that your bank can give them to you when you make a cash withdrawal.

Bank notes do not earn interest. Since bank notes cost very little to print but are exchanged at face value, central banks make seignorage revenue on the issuance of bank notes because the financial claim yields a return that in general exceeds the zero return on money. There are currently about 1.2 trillion EUR worth of euro bank notes circulating in the world. The value of a bank note comes from its role as legal tender and the public’s faith that its purchasing power will not be eroded by inflation.

Central bank accounts are provided to domestic banks, international financial institutions and governments to facilitate payment flows between them. When you pay for a laptop using a credit card, then the transfer from your bank account to the seller’s bank account ultimately involves a transfer from your bank to their bank across their respective accounts at the central bank. Major central banks pay interest on these deposit accounts or current accounts and it is via these rates that central banks steer other interest rates in the economy and thereby implement monetary policy. The deposit facility rate of the ECB is currently negative, -0.5%, implying that banks are paying to hold their reserves at the central bank.

Backed by a range of assets

On the asset side, central banks hold gold and foreign exchange reserves, collateralized loans to banks and outright purchases of euro area government and corporate bonds (and a few other things). Historically, the ECB and the national central banks – the “Euro-system” – used collateralized loans to banks (known as repos) to regulate the amount of reserves in the system and influence the interest rate on borrowing between banks. Since 2015, the Euro-system has purchased around 2.8 trillion EUR of bonds under its Asset Purchase Programme (APP) as an additional tool of monetary policy (see Figure 1). On 12 March 2020, this was extended by a further 120 billion EUR and under the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP) announced on 18 March 2020 the Euro-system will purchase an additional 750 billion EUR of assets by the end of 2020.

Public finances and the limits of central bank money creation

The assets purchased by the Euro-system include government bonds, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and covered bonds. The purchases are split between the national central banks and the ECB and government bonds are bought more or less in proportion to the fraction of the capital of the ECB held by each member. So French government bonds comprise about 20% of government bonds purchases under the APP and these are mostly purchased by the Banque de France (BdF). The split of purchases across countries is more flexible under the PEPP.

When the BdF buys a French government bond from a French bank, it credits the deposit account of that bank at the BdF. The BdF now earns interest income from this bond and pays interest on the deposit created – both interest rates can be negative. As long as the yield to maturity rate of return on the bond is above the deposit rate, the BdF earns a profit, which it eventually transfers to the French Treasury.

Since the central bank owns government debt and the government owns the central bank, cannot government debt held by the central bank be cancelled leaving the combined balance sheet unchanged? No, not only is annulling sovereign debt illegal in the euro area but the central bank also still owes interest on the deposits created. This is not a problem now since the deposit rate is negative but may become a problem when the deposit rate becomes positive. The central bank will owe money without income to pay for it. The central bank will also record a significant capital loss.

There are mainly two possibilities to resolve this income deficit: either the transfers between the central bank and the government serve to absorb the loss, or the central bank repays by issuing new reserves. In the first case, the government has to accept a lower monetary dividend. In the second, whilst it is true that central banks can always create additional deposits to pay for this shortfall, this risks becoming a pyramid scheme, as the central bank has to issue increasing volumes of deposits to pay interest on its existing reserves. Banks will have more and more central deposits for which there is little prospect of obtaining real value. Inflation is the inevitable consequence when households and firms begin to doubt about the value of this money and begin to spend their money before its purchasing value disappears. This may start an inflationary spiral.

A similar problem would occur with monetary finance – paying for public expenditures through central bank money creation. A central bank can simply credit funds into the account of the government. But when this money is spent, the deposits will transfer from the government’s account to a bank’s account (similar to the laptop example). The central bank will owe interest on this deposit but without any additional asset to pay for it. A similar inflationary spiral can begin.

vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  Johnson1
keep on educating us
Tony Bennett
Tony Bennett
2 years ago
“Anyone who thinks rate hikes will cure these inflation shocks isn’t thinking clearly.”
We’ll see.
Everything (including commodities) massively levered. Financial conditions tightening. Nothing broken. Yet. Something will. Forcing lenders to pull back even more —> recession. This isn’t the 1970s when stagflation could survive as debt not nearly as burdensome and Boomers hitting their stride. Hard recession (will be global) will take care of inflation concerns. In not too distant future, deflation will be the worry.
SyTuck
SyTuck
2 years ago
Much larger army yes. Better equipped? That is growing more and more in doubt. You would think Russia’s tanks were ‘Made in China’. I’m as surprised as any.

But there is a wake up call for ANY military power thinking of adventurism. When the defenders are armed with anything more than 30 year old weapons, things get messy in a hurry.

I hope China, as well as the US, are taking notes.

P.S.: lets just hope Putin doesn’t get crazy desperate and start pulling out the big bombs.

Dutoit
Dutoit
2 years ago
Reply to  SyTuck
I think that the big bombs (the one US used in Irak) will come in the east, in Donbass, once Ukraine’s armies are surrounded.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  SyTuck
Russia spends less than 1/10 of the US so expecting the Russian military + equipment to be as good as the US is crazy.
1) The United States ($778 billion)
2) China ($252 billion [estimated])
3) India ($72.9 billion)
4) Russia ($61.7 billion)
So its going to be much harder (time, lives lost, equipment destroyed) for Russia to subdue a country than it would be for the US.
Most of the US budget has always been to ‘contain the Russian menace’. But now the world is realizing that other than Nukes, there isn’t much of a menace so you can imagine people will be questioning the 800 billion spent on the military and why we need to do that.
Dutoit
Dutoit
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
I think that on should compare the cost of american F35 and that of Russian S400-S500, given that Russian missile can shoot F35.
Jackula
Jackula
2 years ago
Reply to  TexasTim65
Much of the US military budget is the ensure safe shipping lanes in the world’s oceans.
KidHorn
KidHorn
2 years ago
Hopefully this will lead things closer to peace.
Mish
Mish
2 years ago
Reply to  KidHorn
It seems to be leading to prolonged war especially with the West supplying more and more weapons to Ukraine
dbannist
dbannist
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Agreed. This has rapidly become a proxy war.The west is fighting Russia every bit as much as if their troops were on the ground. The only difference is in who pulls the trigger.

Frankly, I’m surprised Russia hasn’t stopped energy shipments. They must really really need that income. I’d have thought China and India would be willing to buy it all….but transporting it requires infrastructure that may not exist in sufficient volumes.

Webej
Webej
2 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
It was a proxy war from the beginning, starting with Washington’s “redevelopment plans” for Sebastopol (yes, they leaked out).
Russia is in an existential fight with the US, and it is the furtive integration in NATO and presence of NATO compatible troops, American personnel, and continuous stream of weapons and military infrastructure in Ukraine that has caused this operation to kick NATO/America & their partnering Nazi’s off of Russia’s balcony.
TexasTim65
TexasTim65
2 years ago
Reply to  dbannist
I suspect Russia expects business to return to normal once the shooting stops. History says once peace happens business returns to normal so it makes sense that they don’t want to annoy their best customers by shutting down the energy pipelines.
Dutoit
Dutoit
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
Many western weapons have already been grasped, and transferred to the Donetsk and Lugansk troops (according to some Russian-side sites). I think also that many US (and other occidental) bases, in particular in the middle-east, will see that their enemies have got new weapons.
William Janes
William Janes
2 years ago
Reply to  Dutoit
Please keep us updated on Russian propaganda.
Webej
Webej
2 years ago
Reply to  William Janes
There’s video of trucks full of American javelins in their possession
quantumatoms
quantumatoms
2 years ago
Reply to  Webej
Link?
Dutoit
Dutoit
2 years ago
Reply to  William Janes
I think one should read both propagandas.
vanderlyn
vanderlyn
2 years ago
Reply to  Mish
could end up like indochina or korean wars. last 10 or 20 years. the amerikan public won’t care. they love our wars. if they did NOT, they’d vote peaceful candidates like ron paul…………….ralph nader……..and other crazy lunatics advocating peace.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.