Tracking the Economic Impact of the Trump Trade War
The Tax Foundation reports Trump Tariffs: Tracking the Economic Impact of the Trump Trade War
- President Trump has imposed International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) tariffs on US trading partners, including China, Canada, Mexico, and the EU. In addition, he has threatened and imposed Section 232 tariffs on autos, heavy trucks, steel, aluminum, lumber, furniture, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and copper, among others.
- The Trump tariffs amount to an average tax increase per US household of $1,100 in 2025 and $1,400 in 2026.
- Under the tariffs imposed and scheduled as of November 1, the weighted average applied tariff rate on all imports rises to 15.8 percent, and the average effective tariff rate, reflecting behavioral responses, rises to 11.2 percent—the highest average rate since 1943.
- The Trump tariffs are the largest US tax increase as a percent of GDP (0.47 percent for 2025) since 1993.
- Trump’s imposed tariffs will raise $2.1 trillion in revenue over the next decade on a conventional basis and reduce US GDP by 0.5 percent, all before foreign retaliation. Accounting for negative economic effects, the revenue raised by the tariffs falls to $1.6 trillion over the next decade. The Trump tariffs threaten to offset much of the economic benefits of the new tax cuts, while falling short of paying for them.
- The US Supreme Court will soon decide whether the president’s emergency powers under IEEPA include the power to impose tariffs.
- Historical evidence and recent studies show that tariffs are taxes that raise prices and reduce available quantities of goods and services for US businesses and consumers, resulting in lower income, reduced employment, and lower economic output.
What If Tariffs Enjoined?

The new tariffs will significantly raise the tariff rates the US applies to most imports. According to the World Bank, the weighted average applied tariff was 1.5 percent in 2022. We estimate that under the tariffs currently imposed and scheduled, it rises by 14.3 percentage points to 15.8 percent.
However, if the IEEPA tariffs are permanently enjoined, it will rise by 5.3 percentage points to 6.8 percent. The weighted average applied tariff rate measures the rate imposed on different products from different countries, and it differs from averages measured by actual tariff revenues as a share of total goods imports.
That tax analysis assumes Trump will not result to other tariff measures.
However, he is certain to do so. Trump’s likelihood of success depends on method.
Economic Impacts
On May 28, a panel of judges at the US International Court of Trade unanimously ruled that the IEEPA tariffs were illegal, a decision that was upheld by the US Court of Appeals. Our estimates below separate the effects of the IEEPA tariffs from the Section 232 tariffs, which were not affected by the rulings. See the Appendix for a detailed explanation of the modeled provisions.
We estimate that before accounting for any foreign retaliation, the Section 232 tariffs will reduce long-run US GDP by 0.2 percent. The IEEPA tariffs, including the scheduled “reciprocal” tariffs, will reduce long-run GDP by an additional 0.4 percent if they are upheld by the courts and remain in place.
As of September 1, threatened and imposed retaliatory tariffs affect $223 billion of US exports based on 2024 US import values; if fully imposed, we estimate they will reduce long-run US GDP by 0.2 percent. Combined, the US-imposed tariffs and the threatened and imposed retaliatory tariffs reduce long-run US GDP by 0.7 percent. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Revenue Collection
we estimate the tariffs will raise $2.1 trillion on a conventional basis and $1.6 trillion on a dynamic basis from 2025 through 2034.
On a conventional basis, before incorporating negative economic effects, we estimate that the Section 232 tariffs will increase US federal tax revenue by $602 billion over the next decade. The IEEPA tariffs will raise an additional $1.5 trillion in revenue over the next decade. The IEEPA tariffs raise less in 2025 than in later years because they will not be in effect for the full calendar year.
On a dynamic basis, incorporating the negative effects of the US-imposed tariffs on the US economy, we estimate that the Section 232 tariffs will raise $447 billion over the next decade, about $155 billion less than the conventional estimate. The IEEPA tariffs will raise an additional $1.2 trillion over the next decade, about $318 billion less than the conventional estimate. Incorporating the negative effects of imposed retaliatory tariffs as of September 1, 2025, further reduces 10-year revenue by $146 billion.
Distributional Impacts
In 2026, the Section 232 tariffs will reduce after-tax incomes by 0.3 percent on average, while the IEEPA tariffs will reduce after-tax incomes by 0.9 percent on average. The top 1 percent will see a smaller reduction in after-tax income. Per US household, the tariffs altogether will amount to an average tax increase of $1,100 in 2025 and $1,400 in 2026. However, if the IEEPA tariffs are permanently enjoined, the tax increases will be smaller at $300 in 2025 and $400 in 2026. Notably, these averages do not capture additional costs to US households stemming from higher-priced alternative goods and loss of consumer choice.
If the Supreme Court rejects the tariffs the bond market is likely to react negatively due to the reduction in income.
However, the stock market should like the news.
Related Posts
On November 16, 2025, I addressed the question What Are the Odds the Supreme Court Rules Against Trump on Tariffs?
The Supreme Court decision is not random. I discuss a framework.
December 3, 2025: Costco Sues Trump Administration for Full Refund of Reciprocal Tariffs
I commend Costco for standing up to Trump’s unconstitutional order.
I expect a 6-3 ruling against Trump that in practice ought to be unanimous.
December 29, 2025: Will Tariffs Be Refunded If the Supreme Court Strikes Them Down?
Polymarket provides no guidance because that bet expired December 31.
January 1, 2026: Three More Trump Tariff TACOs on Furniture, Kitchen Cabinets, and Pasta
To fight inflation, that Trump denies exists, comes another round of TACOs.


I disagree with the Tax Foundation analysis of this, an organization which I really respect, BTW.
Many service providers hid behind tariffs as an excuse to raise their prices well beyond the impact that tariffs had on their actual costs. I don’t think this spread of additional profits gained by service providers was accurately captured in their numbers. That extra revenue was used to grow wages, which is why wage growth has been on the historical high side, of late.
It didn’t do much for the deficit, but it did serve as a distraction from the massive coverup of mountains of child rape evidence, if only for a bit.
Now we have a brand new war, so none of that’s relevant. Can’t talk about the president raping little girls… there’s a WAR on!
The overall effect of trumps tariffs was to disrupt long established trading partnerships and sow distrust for the US in the global economy.
Increase costs to American consumers and businesses.
Raise the cost of raw materials to American manufacturers that use Aluminum, copper, steel etc.
Trump’s tariffs on China have resulted in the Jan 1, 2026 ban on the export of strategic metals to US military contractors or their suppliers. This has resulted in a run on western Silver, Platinum, Rhodium supplies and an explosion in their price.
Globally, China became a “Trusted” economic partner for many of our competitors.
Farmers lost access to many Asian markets to Trump subsidized Argentina, further US agricultural sales losses provided benefits to Brazil, Russia, Australia and Canada. (Farmers lost big time and had to be subsidized). The markets they lost will not return,
Canada opened its oil, mineral and lumber exports to China and committed its LNG exports to China for the next 20 years.
American businesses were destabilized and lost their ability to execute long term plans. Huge investments were stranded and had to be written off along with the payment of a wave of random, almost incoherent tariff declarations.
Trumps tariffs were and are an unmitigated disaster in concept and execution with the Supreme Court about to declare them illegal and subject to being re-funded to the US importers that paid them.
Perhaps worst of all, Trump lied to all of us about who pays tariffs and how much revenue they could raise. Americans are being systematically desensitized to the Trump administrations lies and distractions.
The tariffs also served to distract from the Epstein/Trump pedophile relationship and the gutting of the senior legal teams at the Pentagon as well as the SEC and DOJ.
Failure at every level…
MAGA Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene Says President Trump
Told Her Not To Identify Jeffrey Epstein’s Client List – Because His “Friends”
Would Be Upset – “My Friends Will Get Hurt,” The President Told Greene.
TDS Is Really ‘Trump Delusion Syndrome’ – Suffered By Those Trump
Supporters Who Still Buy Into His Bullshit.!
This is a perfect situation for a RICO Act prosecution with organized collusion at every level of government to protect pedophiles.
HA HA HA. just like W and obama war crimes were prosecuted. too fucking funny. how about the commander in chiefs for korea and nam and countless banana republics. chile to panama…………..RICO. i love you frosty.. i truly do. but let’s not be so naive like they said in the godfather
Margie became teh debil overinight for them. The stupid can’t be stopped.
Interesting that a paltry net tax increase of .47% of GDP is the biggest increase in 32 years. No wonder we have a 40 trillion dollar debt. The biggest effect of Trump’s tariffs has been chaos and uncertainty. Relative certainty and general rule of law (with exceptions) have been vital facets of the American economic landscape, so chaos has to be messing things up and leading to a variety of misalignments.
Say “hello” to Ward Cleaver for me.
…Nicolás Maduro has been charged with narco-terrorism conspiracy, cocaine importation conspiracy, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the United States….
The former president of Honduras knows the proper narco defense…a quick transfer of funds.
By the way, when is it a crime for a foreign head of state to possess “machine guns and destructive devices”—maybe a new law against resisting kidnapping?
No fan of Maduro, but the power remains with the existing government structures.
President Maduro asserted that the genocide against the Palestinian people “touches us Christians in our hearts,” and called on the Muslims, the Arab peoples and the peoples of the world “in the name of Christ” to raise their voices against the – Zionist Nazi genocide on the Palestinian people.!!
(Real Reason They Want Maduro Removed)
Is it worth speculating that Trumps pardon of the Honduran drug cartel leader will supply the Trump organization with an established distribution network for narcotics?
If capturing Maduro was indeed to stop his sale of drugs, it is just as likely that Trump is taking over his cartel?
We have 1,000 FBI agents employed to redact all references to Trump in the Epstein criminal cover-up. Congress is complicit and enabling the obstruction of justice.
Trump is a convicted Felon, he is a criminal and admitted pedophile. Trump is a compulsive liar. Why wouldn’t he use his office to establish leadership of the largest and most consolidated drug cartel on the globe?
Who does Trump work for?
<><><>
U.S. law makes it a crime for foreign leaders to possess guns when the U.S. tries to overthrow them. This law is intended to protect the safety of armed U.S. military commandos involved in the overthrow operation. /s
On a serious note, I’m surprised Maduro wasn’t charged with “theft of U.S. oil” since according to Trump, Venezuela’s oil belongs to the U.S.
I still think the ongoing pressure on conservative judges on the Supreme Court by fellow conservatives is gigantic, and it will include massive bribes. I think the Supreme Court will vote to uphold Trump’s tariffs.
Clarence needs a new motor home!
OUCH!
great guess. SCOTUS has been a joke for a long time. they codified torture recently. they are amerikans. nihilist cunts. just reality.
See how it works?
No one’s talking economy, tariffs or Epstein this morning
Wag the dog baby!
amerikans don’t give a fuck whether it was flipping over mossedegh in persia in 53 or saddam in 2002. we are an empire of nihilist cunts. just reality of the empire. most amerikans cannot handle this simple truth. hat tip to plato and socrates and the republic. nothing has changed in human existence in democracies. zip. zero. nada.
Why Haven’t Trump’s Tariffs Had a Bigger Impact?
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/03/business/economy/trump-tariffs-prices-impact.html?unlocked_article_code=1.BlA.6K0l.ymD6cvhHh0Jy&smid=url-share
So I guess the question becomes, how can one react to a lengthy explanation, on the topic matter, with these words used the following times?
Threaten 4, Estimate 7, Assume 1, Certain 1, Likelihood 1, and Depends 1.
Too much undecided information… Once the potential threats are gone, Estimates are known, Assumptions resolved, Certainty becomes Certain, Likelihood is known, and we no longer depend on information, but actually have it. Then I guess we can then speak more on the topic, having all the suspect information clarified to factual information…
I think that before you do something you have to look at the likely outcomes. Even after something is done you need to look at the impact and likely impacts to decide to abort or keep going. I think it is pretty clear at this point that the tariffs as enacted are not having the positive impact that Trump envisioned and that there are major negative impacts that he ignored. But, If you wait until all the facts are available in order to make a decision to abort you may have a bigger mess to clean up.
Also we know how Trump deals with facts. Especially if they are somebody else’s facts.
– you have to look at the likely outcomes. > One of the reasons they are so vague, is that we don’t yet know what to even look for. The likely outcomes are just as likely as the unlikely outcomes. This is all brand new territory, and as a result, there are no real likelihoods. In fact, Trump could decide tomorrow to do away with the idea, or push even harder, as with Trump, one does not often know.
– Even after something is done you need to look at the impact and likely impacts to decide to abort or keep going. > Agreed, but that’s not until after you have enough data and time to come up with that conclusion. We have nothing to bounce it off of, so we are going in blind of factual data to support any movement one way or another. Guesswork at best this early on.
– I think it is pretty clear at this point that the tariffs as enacted are not having the positive impact that Trump envisioned. > Not so sure because of skewed data, and changing goal post in regards to that data. Positive data wasn’t expected right away, so nothing envisioned this quickly. Heck, they are still moving pieces, and changing % figures. We are way too far away to claim success and / or failure.
>> One potential bright spot however, is Companies moving their Manufacturing here, and building plants here Etc. Don’t know yet for sure, what will be, but there are some big investment dollars being thrown at it.
– But, If you wait until all the facts are available in order to make a decision to abort you may have a bigger mess to clean up. > Do you truly ever have all the facts? You need enough to make a decision based upon experience. Things change far more constantly than ever before.
– Also we know how Trump deals with facts. Especially if they are somebody else’s facts. > Can’t say that I do. I know he is right far more often than he is wrong, otherwise he wouldn’t be in the Whitehouse.
THE PEDERAST IS SO MUCH LIKE OBAMA
DONALD HUSSEIN OTRUMPA
“And next, the Venezuelans had an election and voted in the Nobel peace winner as first female president by a 80% margin with a 95% turnout.
She gave all the mineral oil and gas rights to American companies, poverty was eradicated and Venezuelans became as rich as Qataris in twenty years. And everyone lived happily ever after.” The End.
Fairy stories are always so believable on the page…
Or is could sink into a bloodbath of hate, retribution and anarchy with US and other embassy staff and citizenry forced to flee for their lives. Local citizenry of course will suffer the most, summary execution for those of doubtful loyalty etc etc………..
Fairy stories are for those under 5 and MAGA.
Isn’t this how it ALWAYS ends??
All conducted from a country where elderly people can be found sleeping in cars or working in Walmart in their 80’s. A countries first duty is to its OWN citizens.
+100
Exactly. America First!!!!!
So lets bomb those damn cars!
CORRECT BUT THAT IS NOT THE AMERKAN PEOPLE’S WAY. DEMOCRACY WORKS. TWATS ELECT TWATS AND DO TWAT THINGS.
anything can happen. in VZ or here in pax dumbfuckistan. many examples in history. in the ussr or in rome or the endless line of crumbling evil empires. and the lands they rape pillage and burn for a few little shekels. we need genocide joe more than ever. /sarc. amerikans are cunts. so we elect cunts. democracy always works. hat tip the republic penned by plato
I wonder if any of those people got any kind of warning.
Not sure what people you are referring too. But, defense stocks went on a tear Friday. So, some people got a warning…