In a 4-3 Wisconsin Supreme Court ruling, Wisconsin Now Without COVID-19 Restrictions.

Conservative justices on the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ monthslong stay-at-home order in a ruling released Wednesday.

The 4-3 decision marked the first time a state’s highest court has overturned a stay-at-home order amid the coronavirus pandemic and sided with Republican leaders who argued the governor’s administration had overstepped its legal authority.

The court rejected the legislature’s request for a six-day stay to allow the GOP lawmakers and the governor to work out new rules.

Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley Questions Deputy Attorney General Colin Roth

“Where in the constitution did the people of Wisconsin confer authority on a single, unelected Cabinet secretary to compel almost 6 million people to stay at home and close their businesses and face imprisonment if they don’t comply, with no input from the legislature, without the consent of the people?” Bradley asked. “Isn’t it the very definition of tyranny for one person to order people for being imprisoned for going to work, among other ordinarily lawful activities?”

Free to Roam

The Independent reports Wisconsin Supreme Court Throws Out Stay-at-Home Order.

Wisconsin's Supreme Court has struck down Governor Tony Evers' stay-at-home order, the first statewide measure in the US to be dismissed by the courts, throwing out his quarantine effort amid a coronavirus outbreak that has infected more than 10,000 people in the state.

But local polls show that Wisconsin residents largely support the shutdown, reflecting national polls that show a majority of Americans believe quarantine efforts should've been in place much earlier.

A poll from Marquette University Law School showed 69 per cent of Wisconsin voters support Governor Evers's order, though responses fell mostly along partisan lines. Less than half of Republican respondents support the measure.

The court's ruling awards Republicans a temporary injunction to block the governor's extension of the order that was set to expire on 20 May.

Tavern League Chimes In

RECOMMENDED ARTICLES

The Seattle Times has still more information on the ruling.

The Tavern League of Wisconsin swiftly posted the news on its website, telling members, “You can OPEN IMMEDIATELY!”

The decision let stand language that had closed schools, however, and local governments can still impose their own health restrictions. In Dane County, home to the capital of Madison, officials quickly imposed a mandate incorporating most of the statewide order. City health officials in Milwaukee, meanwhile, said a stay-at-home order they enacted in late March remains in effect.

Chief Justice Patience Roggensack wrote for the majority that health secretary Andrea Palm’s order amounted to an emergency rule that she doesn’t have the power to create on her own, and also imposes criminal penalties beyond her powers.

No Appeal

Evers said there’s no avenue to appeal the decision. His administration plans to put together an emergency rule addressing the virus, he said, but the process is so complex that it could be at least two weeks before state health officials can start drafting it. And once it’s finished the administration will have to submit it to legislators, who could block it.“


In the meantime, we’re going to have 72 counties doing their own thing,” Evers said. “I can’t believe there’s a state in the nation with this type of chaos.”

Many Questions

  1. What if the Governor or legislature issued the order and not the Health Secretary?
  2. Curiously the decision let local authorities decide on lockdowns. Why should they be allowed to?
  3. What will the patchwork of local laws look like?
  4. OK, the bars are open. How many people will show up?
  5. How many people will die as a result of the ruling?

Lots of question, time will provide the answers.

Mish

Hit to Unions Following Supreme Court Ruling Begins

Following a Supreme Court ruling, states are ordered to stop collecting millions of dollars in fees from public worker.

Major Gerrymandering Decision Heads to Supreme Court: Illinois and Wisconsin in the Spotlight

In case that could shape future US elections, the Supreme Court will consider the legality of electoral maps purposely doctored to favor one political party.

Supreme Court Delivers Huge Blow to Unions!

In Janus vs. AFSCME, the Supreme Court correctly dealt a huge blow to forced membership in unions.

Supreme Court Poised to Deal Huge Blow to Unions

The Supreme Court will hear a case today that may end unions' ability to collect “agency fees” from reluctant workers.