Bloomberg Soars to 15% in Latest Quinnipiac Poll

The lead image is from CNN politics.

Quinnipiac University reports Bloomberg Rises, Runs Strong Against Trump.

In the wake of the Iowa caucuses and heading into the New Hampshire primary, there is a dramatic shift in the Democratic primary race for president as Senator Bernie Sanders claims frontrunner status for the first time, overtaking former Vice President Joe Biden, according to a Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pea-ack) University national poll released today.

Sanders gets 25 percent of the vote among Democratic voters and independent voters who lean Democratic, while Biden gets 17 percent, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg receives 15 percent, Senator Elizabeth Warren gets 14 percent, former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg receives 10 percent, and Senator Amy Klobuchar gets 4 percent. .

In a January 28th poll, prior to the Iowa caucuses, Biden had a modest lead with 26 percent of the vote while Sanders got 21 percent, Warren had 15 percent, Bloomberg received 8 percent, Klobuchar got 7 percent, and Buttigieg received 6 percent.

“Biden scrambles to bounce back in frigid New Hampshire after an icy slide to 17 percent, his lowest national number,” said Quinnipiac University Poll Analyst Tim Malloy.

Is the Bloomberg camp prepping the white horse for him to ride to the rescue? Maybe not yet, but without setting foot in Iowa or New Hampshire, he is suddenly a looming shadow over the primary field,” Malloy added.

Candidates vs Trump

  • Bloomberg tops Trump 51 – 42 percent
  • Sanders defeats Trump 51 – 43 percent
  • Biden beats Trump 50 – 43 percent
  • Klobuchar defeats Trump 49 – 43 percent
  • Warren wins narrowly over Trump 48 – 44 percent
  • Buttigieg is also slightly ahead of Trump 47 – 43 percent

Favorability Ratings

President Trump’s favorability rating is underwater, as 42 percent of registered voters have a favorable opinion of him, while 55 percent have an unfavorable view of him. However, it is his best favorability rating since a March 7th, 2017 poll, when his favorability rating was a negative 43 – 53 percent. [I calculate -13]

Like President Trump, the top four Democratic candidates in the primary are viewed more unfavorably than favorably. Warren has the worst net score (favorable minus unfavorable) among all registered voters, with Biden close behind. Biden’s favorability numbers have been declining over the last year since his positive 53 –33 percent favorability rating in a December 19th, 2018 poll.

  • Warren gets a negative 39 – 47 percent favorability rating [-8]
  • Biden gets a negative 43 – 50 percent [-7]
  • Bloomberg gets a negative 34 – 40 percent, with 25 percent who haven’t heard enough about him [-6]
  • Sanders gets a negative 44 – 49 percent [-5]
  • Buttigieg gets a positive 36 – 32 percent, and 31 percent haven’t heard enough about him [+4]
  • Klobuchar gets a positive 32 – 22 percent, with 44 percent who haven’t heard enough about her [+10]

I have maintained all along that Klobuchar would make a strong candidate. The Democrats need a moderate to have the best chance and she fits right in. She as also has the feweet enemies. Not knowing her helps.

Warren is a lightning rod and the Democratic candidate most likely to lose to Trump.

Hung Primary Odds Keep Rising

The better Bloomberg does, the more likely Democrats have no clear winner heading into the national convention.

Biden rates to get clobbered in New Hampshire but then South Carolina will be very favorable to him.

National Polls

According to Real Clear Politics, Morning Consult has Bloomberg at 14% in one national poll. Harris has Bloomberg at 13% in another.

The Quinnipiac poll is not yet posted.

By my count, Bloomberg just needs one more poll (4 total) over 10% to have eligibility for the Nevada debate. Sanders, Biden, Buttigieg, Warren, and Klobuchar have already qualified. Bloomberg would make six.

No Winner Odds 25%

On February 5, I wrote Odds of “No Winner” in the Democratic Primary Top 1 In 4

For now, I will stick with that estimate, but today’s implications are a bit higher. The problem now is most polls in key states are too stale.

For example, the latest Texas poll is from January 19. The latest California poll is from January 27.

Given the Iowa Debacle, (See Blatantly Incorrect Iowa Caucus Math Is Now Official) and the staleness of the polls it’s even harder than normal to estimate the current situation.

Nearly any setup in which 3 candidates can maintain 15% or more of the vote until the end leads to a negotiated convention. And it does not have to be the same three in each state.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock

Subscribe to MishTalk Email Alerts.

Subscribers get an email alert of each post as they happen. Read the ones you like and you can unsubscribe at any time.

This post originated on MishTalk.Com

Thanks for Tuning In!

Mish

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
JonSellers
JonSellers
4 years ago

The totals for rightist democrats crush the totals for leftist (Sanders/Warren). And Sanders supporters won’t show up to vote for Bloomberg. Trump takes this easy.

sangell
sangell
4 years ago

Looks like the Democrats are setting up to replay 1968. Eugene McCarthy put the nomination in play when he knocked of LBJ in New Hampshire. Then Bobby Kennedy entered the race but got his head blown off in California. The establishment Dems then tried to ram Hubert Humphrey ( who avoided primaries) down a leftist leaning party’s throat and their convention dissolved into a televised riot.

A unpopular Nixon was able to win even with George Wallace running and, save for Jimmy Carter’s single term, the GOP held the White House from 1968 to 1992. Mike Bloomberg seems a perfect stand-in for Hubert Humphrey and Bernie Sanders Antifa goons the rioters at the 2020 convention.

magoomba
magoomba
4 years ago

A new supervolcano 30 times the size of Yellowstone has just been discovered under southern Utah.

Stuki
Stuki
4 years ago
Reply to  magoomba

Supervolcano for President!!!

Least of evils, and stuff…..

Bam_Man
Bam_Man
4 years ago

If the people of this country are stooopid enough to elect Bloomberg President, then they deserve what they will have coming.

But I think that is a VERY long shot.

mkestrel
mkestrel
4 years ago

You folks are delusional. The democrats have set their future with Iowa.

shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago

Clearly, Trump will lose the popular vote. He lost by 3 million last time. What if he loses by 8 million but squeaks out a victory anyway? Will the people accept that or just revolt?

SleemoG
SleemoG
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock

Count De Monet – “Sir, the peasants are revolting!”

King Louis – “You said it. They stink on ice!”

Ther is no limit to the abuse Americans will take from TrumpCo.

Latkes
Latkes
4 years ago
Reply to  SleemoG

Don’t worry. Americans will gladly take more abuse from Bloomberg and will do so with smiling faces.

Or maybe from Buttigieg: “Our intention is … to create a pathway towards a universal, national expectation of service for all 4 million high school graduates every year.” – what a great idea!

SleemoG
SleemoG
4 years ago
Reply to  Latkes

Well I was just addressing the example at hand, but you certainly have a point. Freedom in America died a long time ago.

Esclaro
Esclaro
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock

Half the population does not vote. They don’t care who wins. The apathetic do not revolt.

Ted R
Ted R
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock

Yeah well factor in election fraud and I’m not so sure he really lost the popular vote.

footwedge
footwedge
4 years ago
Reply to  shamrock

That’s been my contention for a long time. There has to be some point where over ruling the majority vote by an anachronistic turd like the Electoral College becomes unacceptable. With any luck the Interstate Compact will get around this perhaps as soon as this year but certainly by 2024 (which, of course, is 4 years too late.)

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago

Forget the election talk. The next month or so are going to be about the contagion that is nCoV and the associated impact. Things are getting worse in China from firsthand reports.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago

BEIJING/GENEVA (Reuters) – The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Monday the spread of coronavirus cases among people who have not been to China could be “the spark that becomes a bigger fire” and the human race must not let the epidemic get out of control.

Latkes
Latkes
4 years ago

Ah yes, the human race needs to start demanding more action. Perhaps a global governing body, with as much authority over us as possible.

investors seek safety in gold

Gold is full 0.61% higher than 30days ago. OMG!

Esclaro
Esclaro
4 years ago

Investors seek safety in gold? What a joke. The mining stocks are headed for the basement taking gold with them!

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago

The big issue by summer may be if offshoring to China is even a good idea anymore. How will the Democrats be pro-America manufacturing if Trump has been there for years ? This could shape up to be a globalist vs nationalist election again.

Stuki
Stuki
4 years ago

Judging by how Trump looks to get 43% against anyone from Washington reincarnated to ditto Osama bin Laden, It looks to be an election primarily about whether his eventual opposition is exciting enough to get sufficient numbers of voters out.

Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  Stuki

But a large percentage of Trump supporters are criminals and can’t vote!

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago
Reply to  Stuki

Maybe this is why Bloomberg polls highest against Trump in a national election. More than Sanders, Biden or anyone else against Trump. This is rather stunning given he has only been in the for less than 2 months and didn’t even show in Iowa.

klausmkl
klausmkl
4 years ago

Forget stupid polls/Vegas odds

Ted R
Ted R
4 years ago
Reply to  klausmkl

Exactly.

klausmkl
klausmkl
4 years ago

2020 Presidential Election Odds Tracker
Candidate Jan. 7 Jan. 14 Jan. 21 Jan. 29 Feb. 4/Feb. 5
Donald Trump -115 -145 -140 -135 -140 / -150
Bernie Sanders +700 +500 +500 +350 +350 / +425
Michael Bloomberg +1600 +1200 +1200 +1000 +1000 / +750
Joe Biden +400 +550 +450 +550 +600 / +850
Pete Buttigieg +1600 +2200 +2200 +2800 +2000 / +1300
Andrew Yang +2500 +2500 +2300 +2800 +2600 / +2600
Elizabeth Warren +1600 +1800 +1800 +2500 +3000 / +3000
Hillary Clinton +4000 +4000 +5000 +5000 +5000 / +5000
Amy Klobuchar +6000 +6000 +7500 +10000 +10000 / +10000
Mike Pence +8000 +8000 +12500 +12500 +12500 / +12500
Nikki Haley +10000 +10000 +15000 +15000 +15000 / +15000
Tulsi Gabbard +15000 +15000 +15000 +15000 +15000 / +1

shamrock
shamrock
4 years ago
Reply to  klausmkl

I’ll take Biden at +850.

Zardoz
Zardoz
4 years ago

It’ll be nice to see someone finally pay for their own presidency.

Stuki
Stuki
4 years ago
Reply to  Zardoz

With money The Fed stole for him, even! He would certainly be just as much a Man for Our Time, as the sitting Fed-loot beneficiary.

Casual_Observer
Casual_Observer
4 years ago

Trump can still win even by losing the popular vote. He doesn’t actually need as many votes and can focus on some specific districts in the country. The last analysis I saw had Trump at 259 electoral votes if you take away the swing states he won in 2016. He needs only 11 electoral votes based on this and has multiple paths to 270.

Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago

You mean one actual billionaire and one underwater guy up to his neck in lawsuits of all varieties?

Latkes
Latkes
4 years ago
Reply to  Jojo

Who cares. TDS is for retards.

Jojo
Jojo
4 years ago
Reply to  Latkes

Sounds like you have no rebuttal!

stillCJ
stillCJ
4 years ago

No doubt Bumberg can buy some votes, but can he buy an election?

Stuki
Stuki
4 years ago
Reply to  stillCJ

That depends entirely on how badly The Fed wants him to.

SleemoG
SleemoG
4 years ago
Reply to  stillCJ

Where’d my true and accurate comment disappear to Mr. Censor?

Latkes
Latkes
4 years ago

Bloomberg would be great. Two billionaires facing off, while the plebs argue which one is better for the people.

pvguy
pvguy
4 years ago
Reply to  Latkes

Wasn’t there a Simpsons episode like this, except the billionaires were lizards?

Edit: It wasn’t lizards, it was green aliens.

Stay Informed

Subscribe to MishTalk

You will receive all messages from this feed and they will be delivered by email.